Research Article
Comparison of Biomechanical Performance of Five Different Treatment Approaches for Fixing Posterior Pelvic Ring Injury
Table 3
Material properties, element types, and cross-sectional area of ligaments in the FE model.
| Ligaments | Strain (%) | Stiffness (N/mm) | Strain (%) | Stiffness (N/mm) | Area (mm2) | Reference |
| Anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) | 0 < ε < 12.2 | 347 | ε ≥ 12.2 | 787 | 32.4 | Moramarco et al. [34] Rohlmann et al. [38] Naserkhaki et al. [37] | Posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) | 0 < ε < 11.2 | 295 | ε ≥ 11.2 | 617 | 5.2 | Sacrotuberous ligament (STL) | 0 < ε < 18.2 | 467 | ε ≥ 18.2 | 988 | 42.85 | Sacrospinous ligament (SSL) | 0 < ε < 13.9 | 387 | ε ≥ 13.9 | 897 | 35.6 | Anterior sacroiliac ligament (ASL) | 0 < ε < 22.1 | 454 | ε ≥ 22.1 | 887 | 112 | Posterior sacroiliac ligament (PSL) | 0 < ε < 21.8 | 398 | ε ≥ 21.8 | 876 | 96 | Sacroiliac interosseous ligament (SIL) | 0 < ε < 17.2 | 412 | ε ≥ 17.2 | 932 | 39 | Iliolumbar ligament (ILL) | 0 < ε < 18.5 | 432 | ε ≥ 18.5 | 957 | 21 |
|
|