Comparison of Biomechanical Performance of Five Different Treatment Approaches for Fixing Posterior Pelvic Ring Injury

Table 6

Relative percentage difference between different fixation methods under different cases of pelvic ring fractures.

	TA1 (%)	TA2 (%)	TA3 (%)	TA4 (%)	TA5 (%)
(R1 − R2)/R2	−3.1	−5.3	−5.9	−4.2	−6.3
(R3 − R4)/R4	−3.0	−4.8	−5.6	−2.1	−5.9
(R1 − R3)/R3	−50.8	−10.0	−5.6	−52.1	−6.3
(R2 − R4)/R4	−50.7	−9.5	−5.5	−51.0	−5.9

“TA1” represents treatment approach 1 for posterior pelvic ring injury and so on; “R1” represents the case of Tile B anterior pelvic ring fixation, as shown in Table 5, and so on.