Research Article

Comparative Analysis of Cutting Forces, Torques, and Vibration in Drilling of Bovine, Porcine, and Artificial Femur Bone with Considerations for Robot Effector Stiffness

Table 6

Comparison of the present experimental results with prior experimental data for surgical drilling into human and animal bone.

Research typeType specimenType result force (N)

PresentBovine femur12.34 to 20.07
PresentPorcine femur8.14 to 11.25
PresentArtificial femur3.86 to 5.62
Tsai et al. [33].Human femoral trochanter (cancellous)1 to 1.5
Tsai et al. [33].Human femoral trochanter (cortical)0 to 50
Powers [12]Porcine vertebra0.6 to 29.6
Alams et al. [13]Bovine femoral shaft25 to 85
Hillery et al. [34]Bovine tibial shaft24 to 48
Lee et al. [35]Bovine tibial shaft0 to 20
Troy.MacAvelia et al. [17]Human femoral shaft140.2 to 186.3
Troy.MacAvelia et al. [17]Artificial femoral shaft67.2 to 53.3

Torque (N·mm)
PresentBovine femur24.2 to 41.2
PresentPorcine femur21.6 to 37.0
PresentArtificial femur6.7 to 13.6
Tsai et al. [33]Human femoral trochanter (cancellous)2 to 120
Tsai et al. [33]Human femoral trochanter (cortical)0 to 10
Troy.MacAvelia et al. [17]Human femoral shaft16.9 to 16.
Troy.MacAvelia et al. [17]Artificial femoral shaft42.9 to 8.4
Alams et al. [13]Bovine femoral shaft10–23
Allotta et al. [36]Porcine femoral shaft55
Hillery et al. [34]Bovine tibial shaft10 to 14.5
Lee et al. [35]Bovine tibial shaft0 to 38