Comparison of Presurgical Dental Models Manufactured with Two Different Three-Dimensional Printing Techniques

<table class="table-group" id="tab1"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left" rowspan="2">Printer technique</td><td class="align_center">Trueness</td><td class="align_center">Time (minutes)</td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_center">Mean ± SD</td><td class="align_center">Mean ± SD</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">FDM (0.09 mm)</td><td class="align_center">0.17 ± 0.024</td><td class="align_center">517.6 ± 62.58</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">DLP (0.05 mm)</td><td class="align_center">0.08 ± 0.009</td><td class="align_center">285.3 ± 18.38</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="3"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>Average and standard deviation of the trueness measurements and printing time.</div>

Journal of Healthcare Engineering

tab1

Table 1

Table 1: Comparison of Presurgical Dental Models Manufactured with Two Different Three-Dimensional Printing Techniques 