The Efficiency of AuNPs in Cancer Cell Targeting Compared to Other Nanomedicine Technologies Using Fuzzy PROMETHEE

Table 3

Linguistic variables and their corresponding priority weight of criteria and fuzzy numbers.

Priority weight of criteria	Fuzzy number	Rating of criteria
Very high (VH)	(0.75, 1.00, 1.00)	Size, shape, surface charge, biocompatibility, accumulation ratio, toxicity, efficacy, adverse effect, safety
High (H)	(0.50, 0.75, 1.00)	pH, temperature, noncovalent ligand, specificity, stability
Moderate (M)	(0.25, 0.50, 0.75)	Cost
Low (L)	(0, 0.25, 0.50)
Very low (VL)	(0, 0, 0.25)