Research Article
Applying the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Method to Evaluate Key Indicators of Health Promotion Policies for the Elderly in Taiwan
Table 8
The integration weights of evaluation aspects and evaluation indicators.
| Evaluation aspect | Weight (A) | Evaluation indicator | Weight (B) | Integration weight (C) = (A)∗(B) |
| Healthy living (C1) | 0.313 (1) | Promotion of personal health awareness and behavior (C11) | 0.282 (1) | 0.0883 (1) | Well-planned health promotion plans for the elderly (C12) | 0.236 (3) | 0.0739 (5) | Promotion of home medical services (C13) | 0.251 (2) | 0.0785 (2) | Seamless integration of medical services and social care (C14) | 0.231 (4) | 0.0723 (7) |
| Happy family (C2) | 0.291 (2) | Training long-term care service personnel and providing professional medical care (C21) | 0.254 (3) | 0.0739 (5) | Planning a family caregiver support service system (C22) | 0.258 (2) | 0.0751 (4) | Promoting connection and mutual assistance between families and the community (C23) | 0.223 (4) | 0.0649 (8) | Guaranteeing the economic security of the elderly (C24) | 0.265 (1) | 0.0771 (3) |
| Vibrant society (C3) | 0.194 (4) | Promotion of participation by older adults in work (C31) | 0.231 (3) | 0.0448 (14) | Encouragement of the elderly to participate in voluntary service (C32) | 0.270 (2) | 0.0524 (12) | Promotion of an education and learning system for older adults (C33) | 0.273 (1) | 0.0530 (11) | Encouragement of creative thinking concerning services for older adults (C34) | 0.226 (4) | 0.0438 (15) |
| Friendly environment (C4) | 0.202 (3) | Establishment of a network of continuous service resources (C41) | 0.245 (3) | 0.0495 (13) | Establishment of community service resource centers (C42) | 0.276 (2) | 0.0557 (10) | Creation of friendly living facilities and spaces (C43) | 0.281 (1) | 0.0568 (9) | Review of laws, regulations, and public education (C44) | 0.198 (4) | 0.040 (16) |
|
|
Note. The parentheses after the weight number mean the ranking.
|