Research Article
COVID-19 Diagnosis Using an Enhanced Inception-ResNetV2 Deep Learning Model in CXR Images
Table 9
The results obtained compared to state-of-the-art methods.
| Reference | Utilized models | Highest achievement |
| Wang et al. [12] | COVID-Net | Accuracy: 92.4% for 2 classes | 83.5% for 4 classes | Hemdan et al. [19] | COVIDX-Net | F1-score: 0.89 for normal | 0.91 for COVID-19 | Sethy and Behera [20] | ResNet50 and SVM classifier | Accuracy: 95.38% | Ozturk et al. [29] | Dark COVID-Net | Accuracy: 87.02% for 3 classes | Apostolopoulos and Mpesiana [30] | VGG-19 | Accuracy: 93.48% for 3 classes | Khan et al. [18] | CoroNet | Accuracy: 89.6% for 4 classes | 95% for 3 classes | Xu et al. [16] | ResNet | Accuracy: 86.7% | Li et al. [31] | COVNet | Specificity: 96% | Sensitivity: 90% | AUC: 96% | Song et al. [15] | DeepPneumonia | Accuracy: 92.4% for 2 classes | Ghoshal and Tucker [32] | Bayesian CNN | Accuracy: 92.90% | Zhang et al. [2] | Deep CNN based on backbone network | Specificity: 70.7% | Sensitivity: 96.0% | AUC: 95.2% | Ouchicha et al. [21] | CVDNet | Accuracy: 97.20% for 2 classes | 96.69 for 3 classes (COVID-19 vs. normal vs. viral pneumonia) | Our proposed | Enhanced Inception-ResNetV2 | Accuracy: 98.80% (average accuracy) and 99.20 for 3 classes (COVID-19 vs. normal vs. viral pneumonia) | F1-score: 98.86% | Precision: 98.61% | Recall: 99.11 | AUC: 97.2% |
|
|