Research Article
Interpatient ECG Heartbeat Classification with an Adversarial Convolutional Neural Network
Table 4
Performance comparison between the previous works with ours on DS2.
| Work | Year | Method | | | |
| [3] | 2017 | Features: temporal vector cardiogram + complex network | 57.1% | 70.7% | 63.9% | Classifier: SVM |
| [17] | 2018 | Features: features by sparse decomposition | 60.8% | 83.8% | 72.3% | Classifier: least-square twin SVM |
| [23] | 2019 | Multiscale CNN + RR features + beat-to-beat correlation | 50.7% | 92.6% | 71.7% | [4] | 2019 | Features: wavelets + local binary patterns + higher-order statistics | 60.7% | 94.3% | 77.5% | +amplitude values | Classifier: SVMs |
| [24] | 2020 | Multiperspective CNN + symbol representations + RR features | 76.5% | 89.7% | 83.1% | [35] | 2021 | Features: signal morphology + higher-order statistics | 52.2% | 90.8% | 71.5% | +RR features | Classifier: linear discriminant |
| Proposed | | Adversarial CNN + RR features | 84.4% | 93.4% | 88.9% |
|
|
score is the average value of and for pathological classes S and V, defined as equation ( 4). |