Research Article
EERP-DPM: Energy Efficient Routing Protocol Using Dual Prediction Model for Healthcare Using IoT
Table 4
Qualitative comparison between EERP-DPM and other existing routing protocols.
| Protocols | Performance of EERP-DPM against benchmark protocols | Simulator | Emergency support | Network lifetime | Residual energy | Throughput | Path-loss | End-to-end delay |
| E-HARP [12] | MATLAB | No | 35,71% ↑ | 45.5% ↑ | 57.62% ↑ | 55.1% ↓ | 37.14% ↓ | PCRP [13] | MATLAB | Yes | 21,43% ↑ | 51.52% ↑ | 27.11% ↑ | 55.3% ↓ | 47.61% ↓ | ELR-W [14] | NS-2 | No | 28.57% ↑ | 18% ↑ | 47.16% ↑ | 19.7% ↓ | 59.25% ↓ | EH-RCB [15] | NS-2 | No | 21,43% ↑ | 46.54% ↑ | 49.15% ↑ | 39.44%↓ | 43.01% ↓ | EB-MADM [16] | MATLAB | No | 35,71% ↑ | 67,16% ↑ | 46.05% ↑ | 45.22%↓ | 37,71% ↓ | PriNergy [17] | NS-2 | Yes | 21,43% ↑ | 24.86% ↑ | 25.42% ↑ | 11% ↓ | 56.25% ↓ | EHCRP [18] | NS-2 | No | 25,71% ↑ | 12.83% ↑ | 61.01% ↓ | 6.3% ↓ | 13.39% ↓ | OPOT [19] | MATLAB | No | 28.57% ↑ | 27.86% ↑ | 18.98% ↑ | 21.3% ↓ | 29.23% ↓ | EERP-DPM (Simulated) | MATLAB | Yes | 10.37% ↑ | 7.68% ↑ | 12.31% ↑ | 8.78% ↓ | 14.36% ↓ | EERP-DPM (Experimnted) | Mysignals HW V2 platform | Yes | 8.77% ↑ | 6.36% ↑ | 10.98% ↑ | 7.3% ↓ | 12.43% ↓ |
|
|