Strategies for Medical Device Development: User and Stakeholder Perceptions

<table class="table-group" id="tab3"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left"> </td><td class="align_center">Coder 1</td><td class="align_center">Coder 2</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Coder 3</td><td class="align_center">0.828</td><td class="align_center">0.839</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Coder 2</td><td class="align_center">0.867</td><td class="align_center">—</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left" colspan="2">Average mutual agreement: <b>0.844</b></td><td class="align_center">Reliability: <b>0.942</b></td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="3"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr><tr class="table-fn"><td><div>0.844 indicates high agreement between coders for content analysis. 0.942 is greater than 0.8 indicating high reliability of content analysis.<br/></div></td></tr></table>

<div>Reliability and mutual agreement between coders.</div>

Journal of Healthcare Engineering

tab3

Table 3

Table 3: Strategies for Medical Device Development: User and Stakeholder Perceptions 