Journal of Immunology Research

Journal of Immunology Research / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Host Defense against Common Early Life-Threatening Infections

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 608456 |

Andreas F.-P. Sonnen, Philipp Henneke, "Role of Pore-Forming Toxins in Neonatal Sepsis", Journal of Immunology Research, vol. 2013, Article ID 608456, 13 pages, 2013.

Role of Pore-Forming Toxins in Neonatal Sepsis

Academic Editor: Robert Bortolussi
Received04 Feb 2013
Accepted27 Mar 2013
Published23 Apr 2013


Protein toxins are important virulence factors contributing to neonatal sepsis. The major pathogens of neonatal sepsis, group B Streptococci, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus, secrete toxins of different molecular nature, which are key for defining the disease. Amongst these toxins are pore-forming exotoxins that are expressed as soluble monomers prior to engagement of the target cell membrane with subsequent formation of an aqueous membrane pore. Membrane pore formation is not only a means for immediate lysis of the targeted cell but also a general mechanism that contributes to penetration of epithelial barriers and evasion of the immune system, thus creating survival niches for the pathogens. Pore-forming toxins, however, can also contribute to the induction of inflammation and hence to the manifestation of sepsis. Clearly, pore-forming toxins are not the sole factors that drive sepsis progression, but they often act in concert with other bacterial effectors, especially in the initial stages of neonatal sepsis manifestation.

1. Introduction

The birth canal, that is, the area between the fully dilated uterus and the outside of the vagina, harbours a polymicrobial community that may fulfil the definition of a biofilm [1]. Next to apathogenic species, such as Lactobacillus spp., potentially pathogenic bacteria including group B streptococci (GBS), Escherichia coli (E. coli), Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes), and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) are found in the vagina of up to 20% of women. During birth, the fetus needs to pass from the sterile uterus through these bacteria. Accordingly, aspiration of bacteria during birth is regarded as a major cause of neonatal sepsis in the first three to seven days of life (early-onset sepsis). In line with this model, early-onset sepsis is predominantly caused by GBS, E. coli, L. monocytogenes, and S. aureus. Yet most infants successfully control the bacteria at the mucocutaneous surfaces.

Subsequent to aspiration, bacteria like GBS can proliferate to striking densities in the neonatal lung, as shown in newborn primates with neonatal GBS pneumonia (109–1011 colony-forming units (CFUs)/g lung tissue, [2]). The antimicrobial quality of the local pulmonary environment, for example, the concentration of surfactant, may be important for the metabolic activity in the bacterial community and therefore for the expression of bacterial virulence factors such as bacterial toxins [3].

Sepsis imposes a major threat to newborn infants. It is estimated that sepsis causes over half a million neonatal deaths annually, thereby accounting for about 15% of all neonatal deaths worldwide [4]. Whereas sepsis causes approximately 2.5% of infant deaths in developed countries, it is responsible for up to 50% of neonatal deaths in developing countries [5, 6]. Moreover, neonatal sepsis often occurs as meningoencephalitis, which leaves almost 50% of affected patients with lifelong disabilities [7]. On the other hand, GBS, E. coli, and S. aureus are normal components of the mucocutaneous microbiome, and it is impossible to predict the risk to an individual baby.

2. Bacterial Membrane-Damaging Toxins

The first membrane-damaging bacterial toxin was described by Paul Ehrlich in 1898 [8], who found that Clostridium tetani extracts lyse erythrocytes. Today, three different mechanisms of membrane damage by proteinaceous agents can be delineated. First, toxins can solubilise target membranes acting essentially as amphiphilic surfactants. δ-Toxins from various staphylococcal species [9, 10] and the cyclolipopeptides from Bacillus subtilis are prominent examples [11] (see Figure 1). Second, toxins can act as phospholipases and damage membranes by enzymatic hydrolysis of phospholipid ester bonds. β-Hemolysin from S. aureus, for instance, is a sphingomyelin-specific phospholipase, which cleaves sphingomyelin to ceramide and phosphorylcholine. However, the large majority of membrane damaging proteins belong to the class of pore-forming proteins/toxins (PFTs). PFTs, which make up approximately 30% of all protein toxins in pathogenic bacteria [12], have evolved in all domains of life. They are secreted as water-soluble proteins and subsequently integrate into foreign membranes.

3. Mechanism of Membrane Pore Formation by Pore-Forming Toxins

Common structural themes of protein/membrane association are insertion of transmembrane α-helices or β-sheet barrel arrangements, anchoring by prosthetic glycolipids, or direct linkage to hydrophobic lipid tails, such as myristic or palmitic acid. Most pores or channels allowing for communication across biological membranes are formed by integral membrane proteins spanning the lipid bilayer. However, PFTs form pores by acting initially extraneously of the lipid bilayer. They start out as soluble molecules and then turn themselves into integral membrane proteins, with a membrane-spanning region that defines the pore. Pore formation is a dynamic process with structurally and functionally distinct states (see Figure 2). Initial binding to the membrane, for example, to a membrane lipid or protein receptor, is followed by homotypic oligomerisation to a prepore state on the membrane surface (Figure 2, arrows 1 and 2). In this state, the protomer configuration resembles that of the soluble monomer, and the whole oligomer still stands prone to the membrane with an intact lipid bilayer beneath the assembled ring. In Figure 3(a1), this is depicted for pneumolysin from Streptococcus pneumoniae, a close homologue of listeriolysin from L. monocytogenes and, interestingly, also of perforin secreted by cytotoxic T cells [13], and of the complement membrane attack complex [14, 15], which indicates that bacterial attack and immune defence employ the same mechanisms. This prepore state then undergoes drastic conformational rearrangements to be inserted as a stable pore into the membrane (see Figure 2, arrow 3). This rearrangement can even involve the refolding of α-helices in the soluble state to β-sheets in the membrane-inserted form [16]. While this general mechanism of pore formation can be proposed for nearly all PFTs, the structural changes, which the individual proteins undergo, remain largely elusive. Detailed mechanistic models on how hydrophilic proteins can suddenly change their solubility and integrate into biological membranes are available only for a few PFTs involved in neonatal sepsis (see Figure 3). Not surprising when considering that one not only needs to be able to study the solution state in sufficient structural detail, for example, via X-ray crystallography, but the structure of the membrane state also needs to be resolved. PFTs are classically divided into two main groups based on the structural motifs that form the pore [1719]. Pores can be formed by α-helices, α-PFTs or by β-sheets, β-PFTs. For certain pore-forming proteins, it was recently proposed that lipids might play a direct role in pore formation, but our understanding of how this can be achieved is limited by the available structural data to date [2022]. The structures, where known, of the soluble and membrane states of the PFTs discussed in this review are displayed in Figure 3. However, not all membrane pores are equal. The pore diameter, for instance, of the α-hemolysin membrane heptamer is considerably smaller than that of listeriolysin with up to 50 protomers (cf. Figures 3(a) and 3(c)). Clearly, the size of the membrane pore has important consequences for the targeted cell, as a large pore diameter is not selective for what it can conduct across a membrane, potentially mediating diffusion of larger molecules, such as ATP or even small proteins.

Interestingly, clearing of toxin pores from host membranes, a mechanism that is of marked importance when considering the amounts of toxin that are produced during sepsis, seems also to be size dependent. Cholesterol-dependent cytolysins, such as listeriolysin, can induce Ca2+-dependent resealing of membrane pores by induction of endocytosis [2325] but α-hemolysin from S. aureus cannot [26]. This is counterintuitive, as van der Goot and coworkers nicely state [27] that small pores are harder to repair than larger ones.

4. Bacterial Pore-Forming Toxins in Pathogens Causing Neonatal Sepsis

In the major pathogens isolated from newborn infants with sepsis, PFTs are key virulence factors. They initiate a multitude of events ranging from direct necrotic cell deaths to the induction of signalling cascades, for instance, Ca2+-mediated signalling [27]. Prominent PFTs in the context of neonatal sepsis are listeriolysin O from L. monocytogenes, β-hemolysin/cytolysin from GBS (Streptococcus agalactiae), α-hemolysin and cytolysin A from E. coli, and α-hemolysin, γ-hemolysin, and the leukocidins from S. aureus. It has long been appreciated that PFTs are especially important during initiation of bacterial infections through induction of necrosis and apoptosis of host epithelial and endothelial cells, which promotes microbial invasion and subverts defence mechanisms. However, PFTs may also contribute to sepsis by receptor mediated or membrane damaging mechanisms in immune cells, which respond with the formation of inflammatory mediators, as was shown for β-hemolysin/cytolysin from GBS [28] and listeriolysin O [29, 30] and α-hemolysin and Panton-Valentine leukocidins from S. aureus [31, 32].

5. β-Hemolysin/Cytolysin from Group B Streptococci

Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococci, GBS) are the major cause of sepsis and meningitis in newborn infants without underlying disease in the western world. In addition, they are a significant cause of invasive infections in pregnant woman and immuneocompromised patients [33, 34]. The pore-forming toxin β-hemolysin/cytolysin is one of the main virulence factors of GBS. It has been implicated in the pathogenesis of early- [35] and late-onset neonatal sepsis, although its role in both cases remains controversial. Rabbits infected with wild-type GBS had significantly higher bacterial blood counts than those infected with GBS mutants lacking the β-hemolysin/cytolysin [35]; mortality also increased dramatically. Similarly, in a neonatal rat model of meningitis wild-type GBS induced more neuronal damage in the cortex and the hippocampus than cytolysin-deficient mutants [36]. The clinical outcome score, assessed in this study by weighted changes and motor activity, decreased profoundly upon presence of the cytolysin. The β-hemolysin/cytolysin lytic protein agent is thought to be encoded by the cylE gene of the cyl operon [37], since expression of cylE induces β-hemolytic activity in nonhemolytic E. coli. However, the exact molecular nature of the protein component responsible for hemolysis and pore formation remains obscure, as it has evaded purification to homogeneity as of yet. Interestingly, β-hemolysin/cytolysin is also necessary for the synthesis of an orange carotenoid pigment [38], with which it also associates [39]. Hemolytic activity of partially purified β-hemolytic activity containing the carotenoid pigment could be inhibited by addition of the lipid dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), the major component of surfactant in the lung. Accordingly, surfactant deficiency may explain in part the particular susceptibility of preterm infants to GBS sepsis and meningitis [40, 41]. As outlined above, breaching of epithelial barriers by GBS is the first step in sepsis pathogenesis. Accordingly, it appears to be important that β-hemolysin/cytolysin mediates not only injury of lung epithelial [40] and of lung microvascular endothelial cells [42] and invasion of brain endothelial cells [43] but also injury of professional phagocytes [39] and neurons [36]. Moreover, GBS mutants lacking clyE were more readily cleared from mouse and human blood [39]. Interestingly, Rubens and colleagues initially proposed that β-hemolysin/cytolysin was no longer needed for systemic disease manifestation once the epithelial barriers have been breached [44]. However, pro- and anti-inflammatory activity of β-hemolysin/cytolysin in macrophages was demonstrated, indicating more profound immunomodulatory functions of the cytolysin [45, 46]. One direct or indirect molecular β-hemolysin/cytolysin target with important implications for mononuclear phagocyte activation is the NLPRP3 inflammasome. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome requires GBS expressing β-hemolysin/cytolysin. This pathway is essential in a mouse model of GBS sepsis, where deficiency in NLRP3 or its signalling partners apoptosis-associated speck-like protein and caspase-1 increases lethality and bacterial dissemination [28]. Yet direct evidence for binding, engagement, and activation of TLRs by the β-hemolysin/cytolysin is not available.

A second pore-forming toxin of GBS is the CAMP factor that has long been used for microbiological identification of GBS, since it characteristically synergizes with secreted sphingomyelinase of S. aureus to lyse erythrocytes on blood agar plates [4749]. However, its role in neonatal sepsis is not clear, as it was not required for systemic infection in a mouse model of GBS infection [50].

6. Listeriolysin O from Listeria monocytogenes

Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes) is a Gram-positive bacterium that causes early- and late-onset neonatal sepsis and meningitis. L. monocytogenes has the capacity to breach the intestinal barrier, thereby causing food-borne listeriosis, the blood-brain barrier, causing meningitis, and the maternal-placental barrier, causing early-onset listeriosis. Listeriolysin O (LLO), a member of the PFT class of cholesterol-dependent cytolysins (CDCs), is a major virulence factor of L. monocytogenes with multivalent functions [51]. In the late 1980s, Kathariou et al. and Portnoy et al. reported that L. monocytogenes mutants lacking functional LLO were avirulent in mice [52, 53]. Furthermore, LLO mutants did not induce secretion of cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, or IFN-γ, when injected intravenously into C57BL/6 mice [54]. Recently, a single-gene signature-tag-based approach was used to assess the contribution of individual amino acids of LLOs to its virulence in mice [55].

Based on structural homology with other toxins such as pneumolysin from Streptococcus pneumoniae [56] and perfringolysin from Clostridium perfringens [57], common pore-forming properties can be proposed [58] (see Figure 3(a)). LLO engages cholesterol as a native membrane receptor in dependence on the two amino acids threonine 515 and leucine 516, oligomerises to a prepore complex of up to 50 monomers, and forms a membrane pore in a concerted refolding step with each protomer contributing two beta-hairpins to the membrane-spanning β-barrel, which originates from five α-helices in the soluble state [16, 5961]. The allosteric monomer assembly and prepore refolding process were recently shown to rely on an undecapeptide sequence (483-ECTGLAWEWWR-493), which was originally thought to be soley responsible for cholesterol binding [62]. The exact nature of the membrane pore remains controversial, as arciform pores, that is, membrane pores with a seemingly incomplete protein ring lining the aqueous membrane hole, are often observed in electron microscopic and atomic force microscopic imaging of various CDCs [22, 6365]. Moreover, LLO does not lose its membrane targeting properties after incubation with cholesterol [66].

Listeria are classical intracellular pathogens [67] and LLO pore formation was traditionally thought to only mediate escape of Listeria from the phagolysosome [68]. This concept was based on the finding that LLO was active only at acidic and not at neutral pH, which is found in the maturing phagolysosome [58]. However, host factors also play an important part in regulating the activity of LLO in the phagolysosome. LLO hijacks the reductive capacity of the γ-interferon-inducible lysosomal thiol reductase GILT to maintain cysteine 484 of LLO in its reduced thiol state [69], thus greatly increasing bacterial escape from the phagolysosome. Intriguingly, CDCs were originally, that is, before the identification of cholesterol as a membrane receptor, termed sulfhydryl-activated [70] or thiol-activated, oxygen-labile cytolysins [71], as chemical reduction activated the toxins towards hemolysis of red blood cells. Additionally, the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), which transports chloride not only across the apical plasma membrane of epithelial cells in the lung but also into the phagolysosomes of macrophages, potentiates LLO oligomerisation on the phagosomal membrane and its lytic activity and phagolysosomal escape of L. monocytogenes [72]. However, the role of LLO extends beyond mediating phagosomal escape. LLO reduces formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by inhibiting the NADPH oxidase NOX2 in RAW 264.7 macrophages [73]. This activity seems to rely on pore formation in the phagosomal membrane and prevents degradation of bacteria inside the phagosome. Pore formation at the plasma membrane of target cells induces the dynamin-/F-actin-dependent but clathrin-independent uptake of L. monocytogenes into HepG2 cells [74]. This finding questions the traditional model of LLO pore-forming activity being strictly dependent on the low phagosomal pH [58], whereby premature lysis of target cells by (secreted) LLO is prevented [75]. Residual lytic activity and structural integrity of LLO at neutral pH [74, 76, 77] are in line with LLO-mediated calcium influx into epithelial Hep-2 [78] and HEK 293 cells [79] along with concomitant L. monocytogenes uptake. Indeed LLO seems to form pores at neutral pH in the plasma membrane, which do not result in lysis of the target cell but rather in uptake of the pathogen [74]. As pneumolysin from S. pneumoniae can replace LLO in the uptake of L. monocytogenes into HepG2 cells, CDCs from other bacterial pathogens may similarly induce cellular uptake. The contribution of TLR signalling in response to CDC has been subject of several studies. As examples, the LLO homologues anthrolysin (Bacillus anthracis) and pneumolysin can signal via TLR4 [80, 81]. On the other hand, LLO induces an inflammatory cellular response in a TLR-independent fashion [82]. Moreover, LLO activity at the plasma membrane induces clustering of lipid rafts [83], suppression of antigen-induced T-cell activation [84], inflammasome activation, and histone H3 dephosphorylation [30], all of which might contribute to sepsis progression either at the stage of heightened inflammation or at later stages of immune suppression.

7. α-Hemolysin, γ-Hemolysin, and Leukocidins from Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is well recognised as a significant cause of neonatal sepsis [85]. Around ten bacteria are sufficient to colonise the umbilical cord. After birth, S. aureus can colonise the upper respiratory tract in up to 40% of infants [86]. S. aureus produces a number of PFTs with distinct specificity for target cell membranes. Although most clinical isolates produce the PFTs α-hemolysin, bicomponent γ-hemolysins, and bicomponent leukocidins, none of these toxins was found to be a necessary and sufficient virulence determinant of neonatal sepsis. In contrast, other factors such as the antigenic, peptidoglycan-associated protein A [87], superantigens [88], and sphingomyelinase C (β-hemolysin, [89]) contribute to host invasion, subversion of the immune system, and sepsis manifestation. However, there is evidence that pore formation by α-hemolysin (α-toxin, AFT) contributes to the pathogenesis of sepsis [90]. As an example, erythrocyte lysis by AFT could be directly imaged [91]. Downregulation of AFT expression in vivo clearly reduces virulence of S. aureus [92, 93]. In a model using C57BL/6J mice, AFT activates the NLRP3 inflammasome, thereby promoting necrotising pneumonia [94]. Moreover, monoclonal antibodies to AFT are protective against staphylococcal pneumonia [95]. Indeed, a nonhemolytic variant of AFT was used to vaccinate rabbits, and antisera could be used to passively immunize mice against an otherwise lethal challenge with wild-type S. aureus [96]. In a mouse model of mastitis, coagulase and AFT proved to be the primary virulence determinants [97]. Heat-inactivated S. aureus and an AFT mutant greatly reduced the bacterial burdens in a mouse brain abscess model and attenuated the expression of inflammatory mediators [98]. In an in vivo model of corneal virulence, AFT also proved to be a decisive virulence factor [99].

AFT is one of the best-studied PFTs to date. It was the first toxin of which the membrane structure was solved by X-ray crystallography (see Figure 3(c3), [100]). AFT consists of 293 amino acids and oligomerises on the plasma membrane of target cells to a heptamer (potentially a hexamer) prior to membrane insertion and pore formation. It was shown to have an important role in bacterial pathogenesis, especially by its ability to induce necrotic cell death [90], by which it can cause vascular leakage when perfused into the lung [101]. Recently the metalloprotease ADAM10 was identified as the membrane receptor of AFT [102]. At low toxin concentrations, ADAM10 is required to mediate the cytotoxic effects of AFT. Interestingly, binding of AFT to ADAM10 resulted in the upregulation of ADAM10 in alveolar epithelial cells and concomitant cleavage of E-cadherin. This leads to epithelial barrier disruption thereby aggravating staphylococcal pneumonia in mice [103]. Moreover, activation of the NLRP3-inflammasome by AFT might contribute to later stages of sepsis, although the molecular mechanism underlying inflammasome activation remains elusive at this stage [31]. In this respect, it is interesting to note that, whereas direct TLR activation has not been demonstrated for AFT, NOD2-dependent sensing of S. aureus was dependent on AFT [104].

Next to AFT, S. aureus expresses the bicomponent cytotoxins leukocidins (Luk) and the γ-hemolysins (Hlg). Bicomponent implies that class S toxins (LukS-PV, LukE, HlgA, HlgC, and LukS) have to associate with class F toxins (LukF, LukD, LukF-PV, and HlgB) in a 1 : 1 stoichiometric ratio to form a functional oligomer before insertion into the membrane (see Figure 3(c)). Pathogenic S. aureus can produce several different bicomponent toxin pores, among the most prominent are LukE/LukD [105], Panton-Valentine leukocidin LukS-PV/LukF-PV, γ-hemolysins LukF/HlgA [106], HlgA/HlgB, HlgB/HlgC, and the M/F-PV-like leukocidins, all of which might be expressed at different stages during sepsis. The Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), which was first isolated from furuncles in 1936 [107], is probably the most widely studied member. In a mouse model, secreted PVL promotes tissue invasion and causes necrotizing pneumonia, via mechanisms including upregulation of protein A and other adhesins [108]. PVL is an important factor in the early stages of skin infection, as shown in a rabbit skin infection model [109]. Association of pvl and spa (protein A) genes seems to be an important virulence determinant in methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Moreover, PVL was reported to directly bind to TLR2 and induce inflammation in the mouse lung [110]. LukE/LukD promotes systemic bacterial growth in vivo by specifically targeting neutrophils [111]. Interestingly, via engagement of their native receptor CCR5 (CC-motif-chemokine-receptor type 5), LukE/LukD toxin pores clear antigen-presenting cells (macrophages and dendritic cells) and S. aureus-specific CCR5-positive Th1/Th17 cells [112], thus greatly contributing to the spread of S. aureus in the host.

AFT, Hlg, and the leukocidins belong to the class of β-pore-forming toxins [17]. Despite their moderate sequence identity (around 30% for the pairwise alignment with AFT), they share a common structural fold (see Figure 3(c)). The structures of the soluble, monomeric LukF (Figure 3(c1), top, [113]), LukF-PV (Figure 3(c1), middle, [114]), LukS-PV (Figure 3(c1), bottom, [115]), and the octameric, membrane complex of Hlg (LukF/HlgA, Figure 3(c2), [116]) are available. A common molecular mechanism could be proposed in which a prestem, triple stranded β-sheet in the soluble monomer, refolds to a double, stranded, membrane-inserted β-sheet (Figures 3(c2) and 3(c3), left), resulting in a hexadeca- or tetradecastranded β-barrel that penetrates the membrane.

The target membrane specificities of S. aureus PFTs hint towards their role in neonatal sepsis. Whereas AFT has a broad specificity and might thus be involved at the initial stages of sepsis manifestation, where the lung epithelium needs to be breached, bicomponent leukocidins and Hlgs mainly attack polymorphonuclear neutrophils, macrophages and lymphocytes [117, 118]. Bearing in mind that PVL does not attack lymphocytes and Hlg can be hemolytic, at least in vitro, their restricted but highly directed mode of attack predisposes the bicomponent leukocidins to be important factors for the subversion of the immune system once the initial barrier has been breached.

8. α-Hemolysin and Cytolysin A from Escherichia coli

Pathogenic Escherichia coli (E. coli) cause around 25% of invasive neonatal sepsis [119], and antibiotic resistance is an emerging threat in this context [120]. Generally, E. coli can persist in the intestine as a normal constituent of the intestinal microbiota. However, extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPECs) are the most common gram-negative bacterial species isolated from neonates with bacterial infections, and neonatal mortality from gram-negative sepsis remains high [121]. Urinary tract infections of pregnant women can lead to aspiration of ExPECs during partition with subsequent uncontrolled growth in the lung of the newborn and potential progression to a systemic infection. Pathogenic E. coli often secrete the pore-forming toxin α-hemolysin (HlyA, CylA), a 107 kDa member of the RTX class of toxins [122], which is usually associated with strains causing uropathogenic infections [123]. Deletion of HlyA in E. coli greatly reduced mortality and cytokine production as compared to the isogenic wild type bacteria in an intravenous infection model [124]. HlyA furthermore induced hemorrhagic bleeding of bladder tissue and exfoliation of urothelium when pathogenic bacteria were administered into the urethra [125]. HlyA is encoded by at least 50% of all ExPEC clinical isolates [126]. Around 80% of meningitis- and sepsis-associated E. coli belong to the K1 serotype [127, 128]. The E. coli K1 strain RS218 expressed HlyA in a zebrafish model of systemic infection [126] and the hlyA gene was present in more than 40% of E. coli from the genital tracts of pregnant women [129]. As a member of the repeats in toxin (RTX) family of hemolysins, the hlyA gene is part of the chromosomal hlyCABD operon, which also encodes a type 1 ABC transporter for secretion of the PFT. The amino acid toxin repeats, which are located in the C-terminal portion of the protein, are composed of the sequence GGXGCDXUX (with U being a large hydrophobic residue). These repeats are responsible for Ca2+ binding, which is a prerequisite for membrane association and pore formation by the N-terminal, hydrophobic, and acylated domain of HlyA [130]. Interestingly, other pore-forming proteins, such as the human cytotoxic lymphocyte encoded perforin, also require binding of Ca2+ for membrane association and pore formation [131]. HlyA oligomerises on the plasma membrane of target cells, where it accumulates in cholesterol-rich microdomains [132, 133]. However, rather than cholesterol being a direct, lipid membrane receptor as in the case of the CDCs listeriolysin or pneumolysin, cholesterol seems to contribute to the physicochemical environment necessary for HlyA membrane engagement. The exact nature of the pore formation mechanism is under considerable debate. It seems now accepted that HlyA forms membrane pores as an oligomer, at least in artificial membrane mimics [134136], albeit possibly heterogeneous in size [137]. In this respect, it is intriguing that the P2X7 receptor and pannexin 1 were found to mediate HlyA-dependent pore formation [138, 139]. Sublytic doses of HlyA initiate degradation of paxillin and proteolytic cascades inside epithelial cells and macrophages, thus attenuating the inflammatory host response and promoting epithelial exfoliation [140]. Similarly, HlyA inhibits epithelial cytokine production potentially promoting epithelial invasion of E. coli [141].

Another PFT of E. coli is ClyA (also termed hemolysin-E or SheA), which is expressed by various pathogenic and nonpathogenic E. coli including K12 strains, that are also found in clinical isolates of neonatal meningitis [142], bacteremia [143, 144], and neonatal sepsis [145]. However, three neonatal meningitis K1 strains isolated by Ludwig and colleagues harboured deletion mutations at the clyA gene locus [146]. Nevertheless, a synergistic enhancement of extraintestinal infection was recently reported between nonpathogenic E. coli K12 and pathogenic ExPEC strains in a mouse model of septicaemia [147], which hints towards a potential involvement of ClyA. ClyA is a 34 kDa protein belonging to the class of α-PFTs. The mechanism of pore formation is well understood, as crystal structures for the soluble [148] and membrane state [149] are available (see Figure 3(b)). Upon association with the membrane, insertion of the so-called β-tongue induces a series of substantial structural rearrangements in the now membrane-anchored monomer, resulting in a perpendicular position to membrane with the amphiphatic helix a1 now lying along its surface. After oligomerisation to a dodecamer, helices a1 become inserted into the membrane forming a 130 Å hollow cylinder with a 30 Å aperture protruding through the membrane.

9. Synopsis and Medical Outlook

Neonatal sepsis is a syndrome caused by systemic inflammation and defined by clinical criteria such as tachycardia, respiratory distress, temperature instability, and unusually high amount of immature immune cells in the blood. Pathogenic bacteria that are aspirated by the fetus in the birth canal during parturition can cause neonatal sepsis if their infection is not controlled locally by the innate defence mechanisms of the respiratory and alveolar epithelia. Toxins, either proteinaceous or of other molecular nature, are important factors contributing to neonatal sepsis. While endotoxins such as the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Gram-negative bacteria contribute to the sepsis phenotype by activating monocytes and macrophages via Toll-like receptor 4 binding, pore-forming proteinaceous exotoxins act by permeabilising target membranes of host cells. Whereas the membrane targeting effects of PFTs, that is, engagement of membrane, oligomerisation, and pore formation, are well defined, their secondary downstream effects are manifold, owing to the fact that defined ionic and molecular gradients across cellular membranes modulate a diverse set of signalling cascades. Unregulated cell death and its consequences are important in neonatal sepsis [150]. The PFTs described above can cause direct necrotic cell death, which in the case of E. coli, GBS, and S. aureus contributes to overcoming the epithelial and endothelial barriers in the lung. LLO of L. monocytogenes is critical for cell invasion and cell-to-cell spread of this intracellular pathogen and thus also contributes to breaching the epithelial barriers of the host. Necrotic cell death can release proinflammatory cytokines from leukocytes thus contributing to the inflammatory storm during sepsis. Interestingly, several PFTs discussed above can induce the inflammasome: AFT [31], β-hemolysin/cytolysin [28], LLO [29, 151], HlyA [140], and leukocidins [32, 152]. Inflammasome activation ultimately may contribute to hyperinflammation in newborn infants similar to what has been shown in GBS and E. coli sepsis in mice [28, 153]. PFTs can also elicit and alter apoptosis of host immune cells, that is, AFT via caspase-2 [154, 155], leukocidins via activation of caspases 3 and 9 [156], LLO via release of cytochrome C from mitochondria [157], β-hemolysin/cytolysin independently of caspase activation [36, 39], HlyA [158], and ClyA [159], thus potentially contributing to the apparent immunodeficiency of the patient that is characteristic during stages of sepsis [160]. Despite the formation of hydrophilic channels by all PFTs, the ways in which they induce the inflammasome are varied, hinting towards the fact that functions of PFTs at cellular membranes are more subtle than might be expected from their general mode of action. In this respect, effects of sublytic concentrations of PFTs have recently been explored. For instance, sublytic doses of LLO induce mitochondrial network disorganisation with transient alteration of the metabolic state of the target cell, thus weakening the cell for L. monocytogenes entry without destroying it [161]. Moreover, targeting of organs by PFTs might also contribute to the septic phenotype. GBS β-hemolysin/cytolysin, for example, had marked effects on cardiomyocyte contractility and viability [162].

Due to their role in neonatal sepsis and bacterial infection in general, PFTs present attractive therapeutic targets. In cases where membrane receptors have been defined, specific inhibitors, akin to viral entry inhibitors, might prevent membrane binding and pore formation. Monoclonal antibodies against PFTs that prevent membrane binding and/or refolding to the pore state could be a way of neutralising the toxin, at least in the blood stream. Moreover, vaccines based on PFTs may be used for immunizing women and thereby protecting newborn infants through placental transfer of specific immunoglobulins, given the fact that pneumolysin from S. pneumoniae is considered a vaccine candidate [163]. Indeed, novel vaccines based on AFT are currently developed [164]. As PFTs elicit specific cellular responses, it might, however, also be promising to designing therapeutics based on the pathways that the toxins induce in the target cell, as has been proposed for p38 MAPK and β-hemolysin/cytolysin from GBS [45]. In any case, it is exactly these cellular responses towards PFTs that need to be investigated in the context of neonatal sepsis in the future to improve therapeutic strategies.


This work was supported by a Grant from the German Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF 01 EO 0803).


  1. H. Verstraelen and A. Swidsinski, “The biofilm in bacterial vaginosis: implications for epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 86–89, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  2. C. E. Rubens, H. V. Raff, J. C. Jackson, E. Y. Chi, J. T. Bielitzki, and S. L. Hillier, “Pathophysiology and histopathology of group B streptococcal sepsis in Macaca nemestrina primates induced after intraamniotic inoculation: evidence for bacterial cellular invasion,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 164, no. 2, pp. 320–330, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  3. E. Herting, X. Gan, P. Rauprich, C. Jarstrand, and B. Robertson, “Combined treatment with surfactant and specific immunoglobulin reduces bacterial proliferation in experimental neonatal group B streptococcal pneumonia,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 159, no. 6, pp. 1862–1867, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  4. R. E. Black, S. Cousens, H. L. Johnson et al., “Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2008: a systematic analysis,” The Lancet, vol. 375, no. 9730, pp. 1969–1987, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. D. Kochanek, J. Xu, S. L. Murphy, A. M. Mininö, and H.-C. Kung, “Deaths: final data for 2009,” National Vital Statistics Reports, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1–95, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  6. B. J. Stoll, “The global impact of neonatal infection,” Clinics in Perinatology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  7. R. Libster, K. M. Edwards, F. Levent et al., “Long-term outcomes of group B streptococcal meningitis,” Pediatrics, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 8–15, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  8. P. Ehrlich, “Diskussion waehrend der Gesellschaft der Charite Aerzte,” Klinische Medizin, vol. 35, article 273, 1898. View at: Google Scholar
  9. A. Pokorny, T. H. Birkbeck, and P. F. F. Almeida, “Mechanism and kinetics of δ-lysin interaction with phospholipid vesicles,” Biochemistry, vol. 41, no. 36, pp. 11044–11056, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. H. Freer and J. P. Arbuthnott, “Toxins of Staphylococcus aureus,” Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 55–106, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  11. A. W. Bernheimer and B. Rudy, “Interactions between membranes and cytolytic peptides,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 864, no. 1, pp. 123–141, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  12. J. E. Alouf, “Bacterial protein toxins. An overview,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 145, pp. 1–26, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  13. R. H. P. Law, N. Lukoyanova, I. Voskoboinik et al., “The structural basis for membrane binding and pore formation by lymphocyte perforin,” Nature, vol. 468, no. 7322, pp. 447–451, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. A. Hadders, D. X. Beringer, and P. Gros, “Structure of C8α-MACPF reveals mechanism of membrane attack in complement immune defense,” Science, vol. 317, no. 5844, pp. 1552–1554, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. C. J. Rosado, A. M. Buckle, R. H. P. Law et al., “A common fold mediates vertebrate defense and bacterial attack,” Science, vol. 317, no. 5844, pp. 1548–1551, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. J. Tilley, E. V. Orlova, R. J. C. Gilbert, P. W. Andrew, and H. R. Saibil, “Structural basis of pore formation by the bacterial toxin pneumolysin,” Cell, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 247–256, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. E. Gouaux, “Channel-forming toxins: tales of transformation,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 566–573, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. G. Anderluh and J. H. Lakey, “Disparate proteins use similar architectures to damage membranes,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 482–490, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. W. Parker and S. C. Feil, “Pore-forming protein toxins: from structure to function,” Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 91–142, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. R. J. C. Gilbert, “Pore-forming toxins,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 832–844, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. G. Anderluh, M. Dalla Serra, G. Viero, G. Guella, P. Maček, and G. Menestrina, “Pore formation by equinatoxin II, a eukaryotic protein toxin, occurs by induction of nonlamellar lipid structures,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 46, pp. 45216–45223, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. J. C. Gilbert, “Inactivation and activity of cholesterol-dependent cytolysins: what structural studies tell us,” Structure, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1097–1106, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. V. Idone, C. Tam, J. W. Goss, D. Toomre, M. Pypaert, and N. W. Andrews, “Repair of injured plasma membrane by rapid Ca2+ dependent endocytosis,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 180, no. 5, pp. 905–914, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Corrotte, M. C. Fernandes, C. Tam, and N. W. Andrews, “Toxin pores endocytosed during plasma membrane repair traffic into the lumen of MVBs for degradation,” Traffic, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 483–494, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  25. C. Tam, V. Idone, C. Devlin et al., “Exocytosis of acid sphingomyelinase by wounded cells promotes endocytosis and plasma membrane repair,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 189, no. 6, pp. 1027–1038, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Husmann, K. Dersch, W. Bobkiewicz, E. Beckmann, G. Veerachato, and S. Bhakdi, “Differential role of p38 mitogen activated protein kinase for cellular recovery from attack by pore-forming S. aureus α-toxin or streptolysin O,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 344, no. 4, pp. 1128–1134, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. Bischofberger, I. Iacovache, and F. G. van der Goot, “Pathogenic pore-forming proteins: function and host response,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 266–275, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  28. A. Costa, R. Gupta, G. Signorino et al., “Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by group B streptococci,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 188, no. 4, pp. 1953–1960, 1950. View at: Google Scholar
  29. S. Mariathasan, D. S. Weiss, K. Newton et al., “Cryopyrin activates the inflammasome in response to toxins and ATP,” Nature, vol. 440, no. 7081, pp. 228–232, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. A. Hamon and P. Cossart, “K+ efflux is required for histone H3 dephosphorylation by Listeria monocytogenes listeriolysin o and other pore-forming toxins,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 79, no. 7, pp. 2839–2846, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. R. R. Craven, X. Gao, I. C. Allen et al., “Staphylococcus aureusα-hemolysin activates the NLRP3-inflammasome in human and mouse monocytic cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 10, Article ID e7446, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. D. Holzinger, L. Gieldon, V. Mysore et al., “Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine leukocidin induces an inflammatory response in human phagocytes via the NLRP3 inflammasome,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 1069–1081, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  33. K. Fluegge, S. Supper, A. Siedler, and R. Berner, “Serotype distribution of invasive group B streptococcal isolates in infants: results from a nationwide active laboratory surveillance study over 2 years in Germany,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 760–763, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. P. Henneke and R. Berner, “Interaction of neonatal phagocytes with group B streptococcus: recognition and response,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 3085–3095, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. E. Hensler, G. Y. Liu, S. Sobczak, K. Benirschke, V. Nizet, and G. P. Heldt, “Virulence role of group B Streptococcus β-hemolysin/cytolysin in a neonatal rabbit model of early-onset pulmonary infection,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 191, no. 8, pp. 1287–1291, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. Reiss, J. S. Braun, K. Jäger et al., “Bacterial pore-forming cytolysins induce neuronal damage in a rat model of neonatal meningitis,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 203, no. 3, pp. 393–400, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. C. A. Pritzlaff, J. C. W. Chang, S. P. Kuo, G. S. Tamura, C. E. Rubens, and V. Nizet, “Genetic basis for the β-haemolytic/cytolytic activity of group B streptococcus,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 236–247, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. W. Tapsall, “Pigment production by Lancefield-group-B streptococci (Streptococcus agalactiae),” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 75–81, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  39. G. Y. Liu, K. S. Doran, T. Lawrence et al., “Sword and shield: linked group B streptococcal β-hemolysin/cytolysin and carotenoid pigment function to subvert host phagocyte defense,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 40, pp. 14491–14496, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. V. Nizet, R. L. Gibson, E. Y. Chi, P. E. Framson, M. Hulse, and C. E. Rubens, “Group B streptococcal beta-hemolysin expression is associated with injury of lung epithelial cells,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 3818–3826, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  41. V. Nizet, R. L. Gibson, and C. E. Rubens, “The role of group B streptococci β-hemolysin expression in newborn lung injury,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 418, pp. 627–630, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  42. R. L. Gibson, V. Nizet, and C. E. Rubens, “Group B streptococcal β-hemolysin promotes injury of lung microvascular endothelial cells,” Pediatric Research, vol. 45, no. 5, part 1, pp. 626–634, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  43. V. Nizet, K. S. Kim, M. Stins et al., “Invasion of brain microvascular endothelial cells by group B streptococci,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 5074–5081, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  44. C. E. Rubens, M. R. Wessels, J. M. Kuypers, D. L. Kasper, and J. N. Weiser, “Molecular analysis of two group B streptococcal virulence factors,” Seminars in Perinatology, vol. 14, no. 4, supplement 1, pp. 22–29, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  45. M. Bebien, M. E. Hensler, S. Davanture et al., “The pore-forming toxin β hemolysin/cytolysin triggers p38 MAPK-dependent IL-10 production in macrophages and inhibits innate immunity,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 8, no. 7, Article ID 100281, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  46. A. Ring, C. Depnering, J. Pohl, V. Nizet, J. L. Shenep, and W. Stremmel, “Synergistic action of nitric oxide release from murine macrophages caused by group B streptococcal cell wall and β-hemolysin/cytolysin,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 186, no. 10, pp. 1518–1521, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. S. Lang and M. Palmer, “Characterization of Streptococcus agalactiae CAMP factor as a pore-forming toxin,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 40, pp. 38167–38173, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. S. Lang, J. Xue, Z. Guo, and M. Palmer, “Streptococcus agalactiae CAMP factor binds to GPI-anchored proteins,” Medical Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 196, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. R. Christie, N. E. Atkins, and E. Munch-Petersen, “A note on a lytic phenomenon shown by group B streptococci,” The Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Science, vol. 22, pp. 197–200, 1944. View at: Google Scholar
  50. M. E. Hensler, D. Quach, C. J. Hsieh, K. S. Doran, and V. Nizet, “CAMP factor is not essential for systemic virulence of Group B Streptococcus,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 84–88, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. M. A. Hamon, D. Ribet, F. Stavru, and P. Cossart, “Listeriolysin O: the Swiss army knife of Listeria,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 360–368, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  52. D. A. Portnoy, P. S. Jacks, and D. J. Hinrichs, “Role of hemolysin for the intracellular growth of Listeria monocytogenes,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 167, no. 4, pp. 1459–1471, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  53. S. Kathariou, P. Metz, H. Hof, and W. Goebel, “Tn916-induced mutations in the hemolysin determinant affecting virulence of Listeria monocytogenes,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 169, no. 3, pp. 1291–1297, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  54. R. M. Poston and R. J. Kurlander, “Cytokine expression in vivo during murine listeriosis: infection with live, virulent bacteria is required for monokine and lymphokine messenger RNA accumulation in the spleen,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 149, no. 9, pp. 3040–3044, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  55. J. A. Melton-Witt, S. L. McKay, and D. A. Portnoy, “Development of a single-gene, signature-tag-based approach in combination with alanine mutagenesis to identify listeriolysin O residues critical for the in vivo survival of Listeria monocytogenes,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 2221–2230, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  56. J. Rossjohn, R. J. C. Gilbert, D. Crane et al., “The molecular mechanism of pneumolysin, a virulence factor from Streptococcus pneumoniae,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 284, no. 2, pp. 449–461, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. J. Rossjohn, S. C. Feil, W. J. McKinstry, R. K. Tweten, and M. W. Parker, “Structure of a cholesterol-binding, thiol-activated cytolysin and a model of its membrane form,” Cell, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 685–692, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  58. D. W. Schuerch, E. M. Wilson-Kubalek, and R. K. Tweten, “Molecular basis of listeriolysin O pH dependence,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 35, pp. 12537–12542, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. R. J. C. Gilbert, J. L. Jiménez, S. Chen et al., “Two structural transitions in membrane pore formation by pneumolysin, the pore-forming toxin of Streptococcus pneumoniae,” Cell, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 647–655, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. O. Shatursky, A. P. Heuck, L. A. Shepard et al., “The mechanism of membrane insertion for a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin: a novel paradigm for pore-forming toxins,” Cell, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 293–299, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. L. A. Shepard, A. P. Heuck, B. D. Hamman et al., “Identification of a membrane-spanning domain of the thiol-activated pore-forming toxin Clostridium perfringens perfringolysin O: an α-helical to β-sheet transition identified by fluorescence spectroscopy,” Biochemistry, vol. 37, no. 41, pp. 14563–14574, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. K. J. Dowd and R. K. Tweten, “The cholesterol-dependent cytolysin signature motif: a critical element in the allosteric pathway that couples membrane binding to pore assembly,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 8, no. 7, Article ID 100278, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  63. S. Bhakdi, J. Tranum-Jensen, and A. Sziegoleit, “Mechanism of membrane damage by streptolysin-O,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 52–60, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  64. M. Palmer, I. Vulicevic, P. Saweljew, A. Valeva, M. Kehoe, and S. Bhakdi, “Streptolysin O: a proposed model of allosteric interaction between a pore-forming protein and its target lipid bilayer,” Biochemistry, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 2378–2383, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. D. M. Czajkowsky, E. M. Hotze, Z. Shao, and R. K. Tweten, “Vertical collapse of a cytolysin prepore moves its transmembrane β-hairpins to the membrane,” EMBO Journal, vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 3206–3215, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. T. Jacobs, A. Darji, N. Frahm et al., “Listeriolysin O: cholesterol inhibits cytolysis but not binding to cellular membranes,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1081–1089, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. L. G. Tilney and D. A. Portnoy, “Actin filaments and the growth, movement, and spread of the intracellular bacterial parasite, Listeria monocytogenes,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 109, no. 4, part 1, pp. 1597–1608, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  68. M. M. Gedde, D. E. Higgins, L. G. Tilney, and D. A. Portnoy, “Role of listeriolysin O in cell-to-cell spread of Listeria monocytogenes,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 999–1003, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. R. Singh, A. Jamieson, and P. Cresswell, “GILT is a critical host factor for Listeria monocytogenes infection,” Nature, vol. 455, no. 7217, pp. 1244–1247, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. H. P. Bernheimer and J. G. Tiraby, “Inhibition of phage infection by pneumococcus capsule,” Virology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 308–309, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  71. C. J. Smyth and J. A. Duncan, “Thiol-activated cytolysins,” in Bacterial ToxIns and Cell Membranes, J. Jeljaszewicz and T. Wadstrom, Eds., pp. 129–183, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  72. A. L. Radtke, K. L. Anderson, M. J. Davis, M. J. DiMagno, J. A. Swanson, and M. X. O'Riordan, “Listeria monocytogenes exploits cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) to escape the phagosome,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 1633–1638, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. G. Y. Lam, R. Fattouh, A. M. Muise, S. Grinstein, D. E. Higgins, and J. H. Brumell, “Listeriolysin O suppresses phospholipase C-mediated activation of the microbicidal NADPH oxidase to promote Listeria monocytogenes infection,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 627–634, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  74. S. Vadia, E. Arnett, A. C. Haghighat, E. M. Wilson-Kubalek, R. K. Tweten, and S. Seveau, “The pore-forming toxin listeriolysin O mediates a novel entry pathway of L. monocytogenes into human hepatocytes,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 7, no. 11, Article ID e1002356, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  75. I. J. Glomski, M. M. Gedde, A. W. Tsang, J. A. Swanson, and D. A. Portnoy, “The Listeria monocytogenes hemolysin has an acidic pH optimum to compartmentalize activity and prevent damage to infected host cells,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 156, no. 6, pp. 1029–1038, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. A. Bavdek, N. O. Gekara, D. Priselac et al., “Sterol and pH interdependence in the binding, oligomerization, and pore formation of listeriolysin O,” Biochemistry, vol. 46, no. 14, pp. 4425–4437, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. A. Bavdek, R. Kostanjšek, V. Antonini et al., “pH dependence of listeriolysin O aggregation and pore-forming ability,” The FEBS Journal, vol. 279, no. 1, pp. 126–141, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  78. S. Dramsi and P. Cossart, “Listeriolysin O-mediated calcium influx potentiates entry of Listeria monocytogenes into the human Hep-2 epithelial cell line,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 3614–3618, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. H. Repp, Z. Pamukçi, A. Koschinski et al., “Listeriolysin of Listeria monocytogenes forms Ca2+-permeable pores leading to intracellular Ca2+ oscillations,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 483–491, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. R. Malley, P. Henneke, S. C. Morse et al., “Recognition of pneumolysin by Toll-like receptor 4 confers resistance to pneumococcal infection,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 1966–1971, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. M. P. Jin, V. H. Ng, S. Maeda, R. F. Rest, and M. Karin, “Anthrolysin O and other gram-positive cytolysins are toll-like receptor 4 agonists,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 200, no. 12, pp. 1647–1655, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. N. O. Gekara, N. Dietrich, M. Lyszkiewicz, S. Lienenklaus, and S. Weiss, “Signals triggered by a bacterial pore-forming toxin contribute to toll-like receptor redundancy in gram-positive bacterial recognition,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 199, no. 1, pp. 124–133, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. N. O. Gekara, T. Jacobs, T. Chakraborty, and S. Weiss, “The cholesterol-dependent cytolysin listeriolysin O aggregates rafts via oligomerization,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 1345–1356, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. N. O. Gekara, N. Zietara, R. Geffers, and S. Weiss, “Listeria monocytogenes induces T cell receptor unresponsiveness through pore-forming toxin listeriolysin O,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 202, no. 11, pp. 1698–1707, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. G. H. McCracken Jr. and H. R. Shinefield, “Changes in the pattern of neonatal septicemia and meningitis,” American Journal of Diseases of Children, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 33–39, 1966. View at: Google Scholar
  86. L. M. Harrison, J. A. Morris, D. R. Telford, S. M. Brown, and K. Jones, “The nasopharyngeal bacterial flora in infancy: effects of age, gender, season, viral upper respiratory tract infection and sleeping position,” FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, vol. 25, no. 1-2, pp. 19–28, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. A. J. Brosnahan and P. M. Schlievert, “Gram-positive bacterial superantigen outside-in signaling causes toxic shock syndrome,” The FEBS Journal, vol. 278, no. 23, pp. 4649–4667, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  88. G. Arad, R. Levy, I. Nasie et al., “Binding of superantigen toxins into the CD28 homodimer interface is essential for induction of cytokine genes that mediate lethal shock,” PLoS Biology, vol. 9, no. 9, Article ID e1001149, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  89. Y. Ramu, Y. Xu, and Z. Lu, “Inhibition of CFTR Cl- channel function caused by enzymatic hydrolysis of sphingomyelin,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 15, pp. 6448–6453, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. S. Bhakdi, F. Grimminger, N. Suttorp, D. Walmrath, and R. Seeger, “Proteinaceous bacterial toxins and pathogenesis of sepsis syndrome and septic shock: the unknown connection,” Medical Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 183, no. 3, pp. 119–144, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  91. R. Plummer, J. Bodkin, T. W. Yau et al., “Modelling Staphylococcus aureus-induced septicemia using NMR,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 656–665, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. Y. Ji, A. Marra, M. Rosenberg, and G. Woodnutt, “Regulated antisense RNA eliminates alpha-toxin virulence in Staphylococcus aureus infection,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 181, no. 21, pp. 6585–6590, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  93. D. S. Kernodle, R. K. R. Voladri, B. E. Menzies, C. C. Hager, and K. M. Edwards, “Expression of an antisense hla fragment in Staphylococcus aureus reduces alpha-toxin production in vitro and attenuates lethal activity in a murine model,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 179–184, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  94. C. Kebaier, R. R. Chamberland, I. C. Allen et al., “Staphylococcus aureus alpha-hemolysin mediates virulence in a murine model of severe pneumonia through activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 205, no. 5, pp. 807–817, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  95. B. E. Ragle and J. Bubeck Wardenburg, “Anti-alpha-hemolysin monoclonal antibodies mediate protection against Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 2712–2718, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. B. E. Menzies and D. S. Kernodle, “Passive immunization with antiserum to a nontoxic alpha-toxin mutant from Staphylococcus aureus is protective in a murine model,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 1839–1841, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  97. P. Jonsson, M. Lindberg, I. Haraldsson, and T. Wadstrom, “Virulence of Staphylococcus aureus in a mouse mastitis model: studies of alpha hemolysin, coagulase, and protein A as possible virulence determinants with protoplast fusion and gene cloning,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 765–769, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  98. T. Kielian, A. Cheung, and W. F. Hickey, “Diminished virulence of an alpha-toxin mutant of Staphylococcus aureus in experimental brain abscesses,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 6902–6911, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. M. C. Callegan, L. S. Engel, J. M. Hill, and R. J. O'Callaghan, “Corneal virulence of Staphylococcus aureus: roles of alpha-toxin and protein A in pathogenesis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 2478–2482, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  100. L. Song, M. R. Hobaugh, C. Shustak, S. Cheley, H. Bayley, and J. E. Gouaux, “Structure of staphylococcal α-hemolysin, a heptameric transmembrane pore,” Science, vol. 274, no. 5294, pp. 1859–1866, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. M. C. McElroy, H. R. Harty, G. E. Hosford, G. M. Boylan, J. F. Pittet, and T. J. Foster, “Alpha-toxin damages the air-blood barrier of the lung in a rat model of Staphylococcus aureus-induced pneumonia,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 5541–5544, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  102. G. A. Wilke and J. Bubeck Wardenburg, “Role of a disintegrin and metalloprotease 10 in Staphylococcus aureusα-hemolysin—mediated cellular injury,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 30, pp. 13473–13478, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. I. Inoshima, N. Inoshima, G. A. Wilke et al., “A Staphylococcus aureus pore-forming toxin subverts the activity of ADAM10 to cause lethal infection in mice,” Nature Medicine, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1310–1314, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  104. P. Hruz, A. S. Zinkernagel, G. Jenikova et al., “NOD2 contributes to cutaneous defense against Staphylococcus aureus through α-toxin-dependent innate immune activation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 31, pp. 12873–12878, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. A. Gravet, D. A. Colin, D. Keller, R. Giradot, H. Monteil, and G. Prévost, “Characterization of a novel structural member, LukE-LukD, of the bi-component staphylococcal leucotoxins family,” FEBS Letters, vol. 436, no. 2, pp. 202–208, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. J. Cooney, Z. Kienle, T. J. Foster, and P. W. O'Toole, “The gamma-hemolysin locus of Staphylococcus aureus comprises three linked genes, two of which are identical to the genes for the F and S components of leukocidin,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 768–771, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  107. J. Wright, “Staphylococcal leucocidin (Neisser-Wechsberg type) and antileucociddin,” The Lancet, vol. 227, no. 5879, pp. 1002–1005, 1936. View at: Google Scholar
  108. M. Labandeira-Rey, F. Couzon, S. Boisset et al., “Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine leukocidin causes necrotizing pneumonia,” Science, vol. 315, no. 5815, pp. 1130–1133, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. U. Lipinska, K. Hermans, L. Meulemans et al., “Panton-Valentine leukocidin does play a role in the early stage of Staphylococcus aureus skin infections: a rabbit model,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 8, Article ID e22864, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. A. Zivkovic, O. Sharif, K. Stich et al., “TLR 2 and CD14 mediate innate immunity and lung inflammation to staphylococcal panton-valentine leukocidin in vivo,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 186, no. 3, pp. 1608–1617, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. F. Alonzo, M. A. Benson, J. Chen, R. P. Novick, B. Shopsin, and V. J. Torres, “Staphylococcus aureus leucocidin ED contributes to systemic infection by targeting neutrophils and promoting bacterial growth in vivo,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 423–435, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  112. F. Alonzo, L. Kozhaya, S. A. Rawlings et al., “CCR5 is a receptor for Staphylococcus aureus leukotoxin ED,” Nature, vol. 493, no. 7430, pp. 51–55, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  113. R. Olson, H. Nariya, K. Yokota, Y. Kamio, and E. Gouaux, “Crystal structure of staphylococcal lukF delineates conformational changes accompanying formation of a transmembrane channel,” Nature Structural Biology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 134–140, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. J. D. Pédelacq, L. Maveyraud, G. Prévost et al., “The structure of a Staphylococcus aureus leucocidin component (LukF-PV) reveals the fold of the water-soluble species of a family of transmembrane pore-forming toxins,” Structure, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 277–287, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. V. Guillet, P. Roblin, S. Werner et al., “Crystal structure of leucotoxin S component: new insight into the staphylococcal β-barrel pore-forming toxins,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 39, pp. 41028–41037, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. K. Yamashita, Y. Kawai, Y. Tanaka et al., “Crystal structure of the octameric pore of staphylococcal γ-hemolysin reveals the β-barrel pore formation mechanism by two components,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 42, pp. 17314–17319, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  117. F. Meyer, R. Girardot, Y. Piémont, G. Prévost, and D. A. Colin, “Analysis of the specificity of panton-valentine leucocidin and gamma-hemolysin F component binding,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 266–273, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. S. Szmigielski, E. Sobiczewska, G. Prévost, H. Monteil, D. A. Colin, and J. Jeljaszewicz, “Effect of purified staphylococcal leukocidal toxins on isolated blood polymorphonuclear leukocytes and peritoneal macrophages in vitro,” Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie, vol. 288, no. 3, pp. 383–394, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  119. E. J. Weston, T. Pondo, M. M. Lewis et al., “The burden of invasive early-onset neonatal sepsis in the United States, 2005–2008,” The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 937–941, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  120. A. L. Shane and B. J. Stoll, “Recent developments and current issues in the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of bacterial and fungal neonatal sepsis,” American Journal of Perinatology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 131–141, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  121. B. J. Stoll, N. Hansen, A. A. Fanaroff et al., “Changes in pathogens causing early-onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 347, no. 4, pp. 240–247, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. T. J. Wiles and M. A. Mulvey, “The RTX pore-forming toxin α-hemolysin of uropathogenic Escherichia coli: progress and perspectives,” Future Microbiology, vol. 8, pp. 73–84, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  123. J. B. Kaper, J. P. Nataro, and H. L. T. Mobley, “Pathogenic Escherichia coli,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 123–140, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. A. K. May, R. G. Sawyer, T. Gleason, A. Whitworth, and T. L. Pruett, “In vivo cytokine response to Escherichia coli alpha-hemolysin determined with genetically engineered hemolytic and nonhemolytic E. coli variants,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 2167–2171, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  125. Y. C. Smith, S. B. Rasmussen, K. K. Grande, R. M. Conran, and A. D. O'Brien, “Hemolysin of uropathogenic Escherichia coli evokes extensive shedding of the uroepithelium and hemorrhage in bladder tissue within the first 24 hours after intraurethral inoculation of mice,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 76, no. 7, pp. 2978–2990, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. T. J. Wiles, J. M. Bower, M. J. Redd, and M. A. Mulvey, “Use of zebrafish to probe the divergent virulence potentials and toxin requirements of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 5, no. 12, Article ID e1000697, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  127. E. Bingen, B. Picard, N. Brahimi et al., “Phylogenetic analysis of Escherichia coli strains causing neonatal meningitis suggests horizontal gene transfer from a predominant pool of highly virulent B2 group strains,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 177, no. 3, pp. 642–650, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  128. G. H. McCracken Jr., L. D. Sarff, and M. P. Glode, “Relation between Escherichia coli K1 capsular polysaccharide antigen and clinical outcome in neonatal meningitis,” The Lancet, vol. 2, no. 7875, pp. 246–250, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  129. E. Guiral, J. Bosch, J. Vila, and S. M. Soto, “Prevalence of Escherichia coli among samples collected from the genital tract in pregnant and nonpregnant women: relationship with virulence,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 314, no. 2, pp. 170–173, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. R. A. Welch, “RTX toxin structure and function: a story of numerous anomalies and few analogies in toxin biology,” Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 257, pp. 85–111, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  131. K. Baran, M. Dunstone, J. Chia et al., “The molecular basis for perforin oligomerization and transmembrane pore assembly,” Immunity, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 684–695, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  132. L. Bakás, M. P. Veiga, A. Soloaga, H. Ostolaza, and F. M. Goñi, “Calcium-dependent conformation of E. coliα-haemolysin. Implications for the mechanism of membrane insertion and lysis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1368, no. 2, pp. 225–234, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  133. V. Herlax, S. Maté, O. Rimoldi, and L. Bakás, “Relevance of fatty acid covalently bound to Escherichia coli -hemolysin and membrane microdomains in the oligomerization process,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 37, pp. 25199–25210, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. R. Benz, A. Dobereiner, A. Ludwig, and W. Goebel, “Haemolysin of Escherichia coli: comparison of pore-forming properties between chromosome and plasmid-encoded haemolysins,” FEMS Microbiology Immunology, vol. 105, no. 1–3, pp. 55–62, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  135. R. Benz, A. Schmid, W. Wagner, and W. Goebel, “Pore formation by the Escherichia coli hemolysin: evidence for an association-dissociation equilibrium of the pore-forming aggregates,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 887–895, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  136. A. Ludwig, R. Benz, and W. Goebel, “Oligomerization of Escherichia coli haemolysin (HlyA) is involved in pore formation,” Molecular and General Genetics, vol. 241, no. 1-2, pp. 89–96, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  137. L. Bakás, A. Chanturiya, V. Herlax, and J. Zimmerberg, “Paradoxical lipid dependence of pores formed by the Escherichia coliα-hemolysin in planar phospholipid bilayer membranes,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 91, no. 10, pp. 3748–3755, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. M. Skals, N. R. Jorgensen, J. Leipziger, and H. A. Praetorius, “α-hemolysin from Escherichia coli uses endogenous amplification through P2X receptor activation to induce hemolysis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 10, pp. 4030–4035, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  139. M. Skals, J. Leipziger, and H. A. Praetorius, “Haemolysis induced by α-toxin from Staphylococcus aureus requires P2X receptor activation,” Pflügers Archiv: European Journal of Physiology, vol. 462, no. 5, pp. 669–679, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  140. B. K. Dhakal and M. A. Mulvey, “The UPEC pore-forming toxin α-hemolysin triggers proteolysis of host proteins to disrupt cell adhesion, inflammatory, and survival pathways,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 58–69, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  141. D. W. Hilbert et al., “Clinical Escherichia coli isolates utilize alpha-hemolysin to inhibit in vitro epithelial cytokine production,” Microbes and Infection / Institut Pasteur, vol. 14, no. 7-8, pp. 628–638, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  142. A. Cravioto, R. J. Gross, S. M. Scotland, and B. Rowe, “Mannose-resistant haemagglutination of human erythrocytes by strains of Escherichia coli from extraintestinal sources: lack of correlation with colonisation factor antigen (CFA/I),” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 41–44, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  143. Z. Bian, A. Brauner, Y. Li, and S. Normark, “Expression of and cytokine activation by Escherichia coli curli fibers in human sepsis,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 181, no. 2, pp. 602–612, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  144. D. J. Evans Jr., D. G. Evans, and C. Hohne, “Hemolysin and K antigens in relation to serotype and hemagglutination type of M isolated from extraintestinal infections,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 171–178, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  145. W. R. McCabe, B. Kaijser, and S. Olling, “Escherichia coli in bacteremia: K and O antigens and serum sensitivity of strains from adults and neonates,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  146. A. Ludwig, C. Von Rhein, S. Bauer, C. Hüttinger, and W. Goebel, “Molecular analysis of cytolysin A (ClyA) in pathogenic Escherichia coli strains,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 186, no. 16, pp. 5311–5320, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  147. J. Tourret, M. Aloulou, L. Garry et al., “The interaction between a non-pathogenic and a pathogenic strain synergistically enhances extra-intestinal virulence in Escherichia coli,” Microbiology, vol. 157, part 3, pp. 774–785, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  148. A. J. Wallace, T. J. Stillman, A. Atkins et al., “E. coli hemolysin E (Hlye, ClyA, SheA): X-ray crystal structure of the toxin and observation of membrane pores by electron microscopy,” Cell, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 265–276, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  149. M. Mueller, U. Grauschopf, T. Maier, R. Glockshuber, and N. Ban, “The structure of a cytolytic α-helical toxin pore reveals its assembly mechanism,” Nature, vol. 459, no. 7247, pp. 726–730, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  150. F. Pinheiro Da Silva and V. Nizet, “Cell death during sepsis: integration of disintegration in the inflammatory response to overwhelming infection,” Apoptosis, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 509–521, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  151. J. Eitel, N. Suttorp, and B. Opitz, “Innate immune recognition and inflammasome activation in listeria monocytogenes infection,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 1, article 149, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  152. M. Perret, C. Badiou, G. Lina et al., “Cross-talk between Staphylococcus aureus leukocidins-intoxicated macrophages and lung epithelial cells triggers chemokine secretion in an inflammasome-dependent manner,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1019–1036, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  153. J. S. Ayres, N. J. Trinidad, and R. E. Vance, “Lethal inflammasome activation by a multidrug-resistant pathobiont upon antibiotic disruption of the microbiota,” Nature Medicine, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 799–806, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  154. G. Imre and K. Rajalingam, “Role for caspase-2 during pore-forming toxin-mediated apoptosis,” Cell Cycle, vol. 11, no. 20, pp. 3709–3710, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  155. G. Imre, J. Heering, A. N. Takeda et al., “Caspase-2 is an initiator caspase responsible for pore-forming toxin-mediated apoptosis,” EMBO Journal, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 2615–2628, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  156. A. L. Genestier, M. C. Michallet, G. Prévost et al., “Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine leukocidin directly targets mitochondria and induces Bax-independent apoptosis of human neutrophils,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 115, no. 11, pp. 3117–3127, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  157. J. A. Carrero and E. R. Unanue, “Mechanisms and immunological effects of apoptosis caused by Listeria monocytogenes,” Advances in Immunology, vol. 113, pp. 157–174, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  158. C. Fernandez-Prada, B. D. Tall, S. E. Elliott, D. L. Hoover, J. P. Nataro, and M. M. Venkatesan, “Hemolysin-positive enteroaggregative and cell-detaching Escherichia coli strains cause oncosis of human monocyte-derived macrophages and apoptosis of murine J774 cells,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 3918–3924, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  159. X. H. Lai, I. Arencibia, A. Johansson et al., “Cytocidal and apoptotic effects of the ClyA protein from Escherichia coli on primary and cultured monocytes and macrophages,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 4363–4367, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  160. D. Rittirsch, M. A. Flierl, and P. A. Ward, “Harmful molecular mechanisms in sepsis,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 776–787, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  161. F. Stavru, F. Bouillaud, A. Sartori, D. Ricquier, and P. Cossart, “Listeria monocytogenes transiently alters mitochondrial dynamics during infection,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 9, pp. 3612–3617, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  162. M. E. Hensler, S. Miyamoto, and V. Nizet, “Group B streptococcal β-Hemolysin/cytolysin directly impairs cardiomyocyte viability and function,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 6, Article ID e2446, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  163. R. Malley and P. W. Anderson, “Serotype-independent pneumococcal experimental vaccines that induce cellular as well as humoral immunity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, vol. 109, no. 10, pp. 3623–3627, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  164. R. P. Adhikari, H. Karauzum, J. Sarwar et al., “Novel structurally designed vaccine for S. aureus alpha-hemolysin: protection against bacteremia and pneumonia,” PloS One, vol. 7, no. 6, Article ID e38567, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  165. N. Justin, N. Walker, H. L. Bullifent et al., “The first strain of Clostridium perfringens isolated from an avian source has an alpha-toxin with divergent structural and kinetic properties,” Biochemistry, vol. 41, no. 20, pp. 6253–6262, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Andreas F.-P. Sonnen and Philipp Henneke. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.