Research Article

Evaluation of Humoral Immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Specific Antigens for Correlation with Clinical Status and Effective Vaccine Development

Table 2

Serum IgG responses to seven mycobacterial antigens.

GroupOptical density at 450 nm (mean ± SD) and positive rate (%)
ESAT-6CFP-10MDP1Ag85AAcrHBHAHrpA
Cut-off values0.0670.0770.1180.0370.1290.1400.072

Negative control0.068 ± 0.155 
36.4%
0.084 ± 0.160 
41.9%
0.103 ± 0.108 
36.5%
0.037 ± 0.074 
44.6%
0.143 ± 0.213 
32.4%
0.091 ± 0.157 
23.0%
0.050 ± 0.210 
16.2%
Active disease0.248 ± 0.590a
55.7%
0.252 ± 0.508a
58.0%
0.157 ± 0.240 
48.9%
0.068 ± 0.246 
51.1%
0.487 ± 0.714b
76.1%
0.351 ± 0.502b
59.3%
0.256 ± 0.276b
77.3%
Past disease0.068 ± 0.129c
39.3%
0.230 ± 0.345 
64.3%
0.207 ± 0.259d
54.8%
0.080 ± 0.136 
56.0%
0.277 ± 0.381c
66.7%
0.300 ± 0.436d
58.3%
0.290 ± 0.264e
79.8%
Latent TB infection0.079 ± 0.100 
41.2%
0.195 ± 0.190 
76.5%
0.257 ± 0.320 
52.9%
0.040 ± 0.115 
41.2%
0.210 ± 0.292 
64.7%
0.277 ± 0.334 
64.7%
0.325 ± 0.368f
82.4%

AUROC0.630.590.520.510.740.740.82

(active versus control), b (active versus control), c (active versus past), d (past versus control), e (past versus control), f (latent versus control).
Optimal cut-off values were chosen when the Youden’s index (sensitivity and specificity − 1) was maximal.
AUROC: areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve.