Research Article

Evaluation of Humoral Immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Specific Antigens for Correlation with Clinical Status and Effective Vaccine Development

Table 3

Serum IgA responses to seven mycobacterial antigens.

GroupELISA index at 450 nm (mean ± SD) and positive rate (%)
ESAT-6CFP-10MDP1Ag85AAcrHBHAHrpA
Cut-off values1.4960.5671.1150.5770.7381.0150.901

Negative control1.564 ± 1.533 
32.4%
1.007 ± 1.041 
58.1%
2.290 ± 2.277 
63.5%
1.354 ± 1.382 
64.9%
0.881 ± 0.739 
41.9%
1.132 ± 1.140 
35.1%
0.932 ± 0.813 
39.2%
Active disease2.189 ± 2.192 
59.5%
1.246 ± 1.312 
78.4%
1.137 ± 0.828a
30.7%
1.470 ± 1.664 
85.2%
1.252 ± 1.549b
58.0%
1.713 ± 1.955 
55.7%
0.751 ± 0.333 
29.5%
Past disease1.336 ± 1.128c
23.8%
0.976 ± 0.715 
72.6%
1.166 ± 1.232d
34.5%
1.037 ± 0.686 
79.8%
0.831 ± 0.495 
50.0%
1.283 ± 0.954 
50.0%
0.771 ± 0.356 
35.7%
Latent TB infection0.783 ± 0.246e
0.0%
0.793 ± 0.307 
64.7%
0.879 ± 0.297f
11.8%
0.898 ± 0.395 
58.8%
0.606 ± 0.221 
23.5%
0.772 ± 0.299 
17.6%
0.595 ± 0.285 
17.6%

AUROC0.630.530.660.570.590.620.53

(active versus control), b (active versus past), c (active versus past), d (past versus control), e (active versus latent), f (latent versus control).
Optimal cut-off values were chosen when the Youden’s index (sensitivity and specificity − 1) was maximal.
AUROC: areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve.