Research Article

Familial Aggregation and Segregation Analysis in Families Presenting Autoimmunity, Polyautoimmunity, and Multiple Autoimmune Syndrome

Table 2

Parameter estimates from segregation analysis of autoimmune disease proband-ascertained pedigrees.

Model/parameterType 
susceptibilities
Transmission probabilitiesFreqMultifactorial/polygenic effect
= 0; =

(1) Random environmental0
(2) Dominant10.500
(3) Dominant multifactorial10.50
(4) Recessive10.500
(5) Recessive multifactorial10.50
(6) Codominant10.500
(7) Additive (1/2)10.500
(8) Mayor gene0
(9) General transmission

Parameters freely estimated within an appropriate range; : allele frequency; when = 1.0, = 0.5, and = 0.0, Mendelian transmission is assumed; when is estimated under Mendelian transmission, Hardy-Weinberg proportions ( = ; = ; = ) are assumed.
Father-mother correlations, set to 0 assuming absence of assortative mating or consanguineous mating.
Polygenic transmission effect inclusion assumes that the phenotype is determined by polygenic inheritance, so the phenotype has one distribution, and familial correlations can explain the familial aggregation of the trait.
All parameters are estimated in Model 9. As a result, all other models are nested, and thus the general model is used as the baseline to compare all other models in this study.
Models Description. Random environmental model (Model 1) assumes that the trait segregation is caused purely by a random environmental factor and there is no transmission from generation to generation ( = = = ). Pure major locus transmission models (Models 2, 4, 6, and 8) assume major locus transmission in a Mendelian mode, without multifactorial/polygenic inheritance. Major gene plus multifactorial/polygenic models (Models 3 and 5) assumes that both a major locus (transmitted in a Mendelian mode) and a multifactorial/polygenic effect influence the trait. The general model (Model 9) is the unrestricted full model, which subsumes all of the other models.