Role of Nampt and Visceral Adiposity in Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma

Table 4

Cox regression analysis of factors associated with death from EGA.

	Univariable analysis		Multivariable analysis
	HR (95% CI)		HR (95% CI)
iNampt (positive versus negative expression)	6.78 (1.81–25.33)	0.002	3.00 (1.03–8.69)	0.043
eNampt (below versus above the median)	0.15 (0.04–0.55)	0.002	0.38 (0.14–1.01)	0.052
Tumor (T1 & T2 versus T3 & T4)	0.14 (0.03–0.64)	0.004	0.76 (0.46–1.25)	0.759
Lymph nodes (N0 versus N1 & N2)	0.09 (0.02–0.41)	<0.001	0.63 (0.34–1.19)	0.156
TNM stage (I & II versus III & IV)	0.06 (0.01–0.46)	<0.001	0.20 (0.09–0.43)	<0.001

TNM: tumor node metastasis.
Statistically significant.