Research Article

Clinical Features and Genetic Analysis of 48 Patients with Chronic Granulomatous Disease in a Single Center Study from Shanghai, China (2005–2015): New Studies and a Literature Review

Table 6

Comparison of different subtypes of CGD in 4 major PID centers from Mainland China and large cohort studies from other countries.

PtsXL-CGD AR-CGDUDTotal
CYBBCYBANCF1NCF2

This study36/48
(75%)
1/48
(2%)
1/48
(2%)
1/48
(2%)
9/48
(19%)
48
Center 2 [15]30/38
(79%)
2/48
(5%)
3/48
(8%)
0/48
(0%)
3/48
(8%)
38
Center 3 [16, 20]31/48
(65%)
1/48
(2%)
2/48
(4%)
3/48
(6%)
11/48
(23%)
48
Center 4 [2130]36/42
(86%)
2/42
(5%)
1/42
(2%)
0/42
(0%)
3/42
(7%)
42
Japan [12]109/148
(74%)
16/148
(11%)
10/148
(7%)
13/148
(9%)
229
The United States [10]259/368
(70%)
7/368
(2%)
45/368
(12%)
10/368
(3%)
28/368
(8%)
368
Europe [11]290/429
(68%)
22/429
(5%)
69/429
(16 %)
11/429
(3%)
37/429
(9%)
429
Turkey [32]34/89
(38%)
20/89
(23%)
17/89
(19%)
13/89
(15%)
5/89
(6%)
89

Pts: patients; XL: X-linked; AR: autosomal recessive; UD: unidentified.
A total of 229 CGD patients were reported in a Japanese national registry, 148 of whom have been classified into four types based on flow cytometric and western blotting analysis.