Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin-Conjugated Peptides from Hepatitis C Virus Glycoproteins Elicit Neutralizing Antibodies in BALB/c Mice

Deng, Kai; Xu, Zhanxue; Chen, Mingxiao; Liu, Xiaoxiang

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3108157

Journal of Immunology Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 3108157 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3108157

Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin-Conjugated Peptides from Hepatitis C Virus Glycoproteins Elicit Neutralizing Antibodies in BALB/c Mice

Kai Deng,¹Zhanxue Xu,²Mingxiao Chen,^3,4and Xiaoxiang Liu⁵

Academic Editor: Enrique Ortega

Received29 Jun 2020

Revised18 Dec 2020

Accepted05 Jan 2021

Published18 Jan 2021

Abstract

Currently, no vaccine to prevent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is available. A major challenge in developing an HCV vaccine is the high diversity of HCV sequences. The purpose of immunization with viral glycoproteins is to induce a potent and long-lasting cellular and humoral immune response. However, this strategy only achieves limited protection, and antigen selection plays a crucial role in vaccine design. In this study, we investigated the humoral immune responses induced by intraperitoneal injection of keyhole limpet hemocyanin conjugated with 4 highly conserved peptides, including amino acids [aa]317-325 from E1 and aa418-429, aa502-518, and aa685-693 from E2, or 3 peptides from hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) of E2, including the N terminus of HVR1 (N-HVR1, aa384-396), C terminus of HVR1 (C-HVR1, aa397-410), and HVR1 in BALB/c mice. The neutralizing activity against HCV genotypes 1-6 was assessed using the cell culture HCV (HCVcc) system. The results showed that the 4 conserved peptides efficiently induced antibodies with potent neutralizing activity against 3 or 4 genotypes. Antibodies induced by aa685-693 conferred potent protection (>50%) against genotypes 2, 4, and 5. Peptide N-HVR1 elicited antibodies with the most potent neutralization activities against 3 HCV genotypes: TNcc(1a), S52(3a), and ED43(4a). These findings suggested that peptides within HCV glycoproteins could serve as potent immunogens for vaccine design and development.

1. Introduction

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a leading cause of chronic hepatitis and end-stage liver disease. It is estimated that 71 million individuals have chronic HCV infections worldwide, and this is a serious public health concern [1]. Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs are associated with a high cure rate for chronic hepatitis C [2], but the high cost is unaffordable for most patients [3]. In addition, the appearance of DAA-resistant HCV strains results in treatment failure [4–6], and DAA drugs do not prevent reinfection. As such, a vaccine against HCV remains urgently needed. HCV glycoproteins have not been shown to successfully induce a protective humoral or cellular immune response, most likely because of their high genetic diversity and weak immunogenicity.

Two main approaches have been explored for developing an HCV vaccine. HCV glycoproteins E1 and E2 have been used to elicit a protective humoral response and produce neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) [7, 8]. These nonstructural proteins have also been used to induce a broad cellular response [7]. In the phase I trial, however, E1/E2 with MF59 adjuvant only induced nAbs against HCV genotype 1a in a few subjects [9]. This may be partially attributed to the weak immunogenicity of HCV glycoproteins. In addition, the serum from poor responders exhibited antibody-dependent enhancement, which promoted HCV infection. It has been also reported that some nonneutralizing epitopes of the glycoproteins interfered with nAbs, thus facilitating HCV evasion [10, 11]. These intrinsic shortcomings are an obstacle to using E1/E2 as an immunogen for an HCV vaccine. On the other hand, a trivalent soluble E2 from HCV genotypes 1a, 1b, and 3a has been shown to induce a broad and synergistic humoral immune response in mice and nonhuman primates, indicating that E2 may be a preferred immunogen [12]. However, another study reported that E1 alone was able to induce a protective humoral response, while E2 failed to elicit nAbs [13].

The other approach is the development of cellular immunity-based vaccines. Swadling et al. demonstrated that adenoviral vectors expressing NS3-5 protein induced a CD8+ and CD4+ HCV-specific T cell response that was associated with viral control in humans [14]. However, a phase I/II clinical trial of this method that was completed in 2019 (NCT01436357) did not show superior efficacy to placebo.

HCV glycoprotein-derived peptides are generally considered to be less immunogenic and are rarely used to induce a protective humoral immune response. A peptide-induced humoral response seems unlikely to cover the hypervariable sequence of HCV glycoproteins to provide adequate protection. At least 2 decades ago, it was found that certain peptide-induced antisera can eliminate HCV infection [15–17]. However, most of these experiments were not conducted using the cell culture HCV (HCVcc) model [18, 19] because the model had not been established or widely used at that time.

This study is aimed at systematically evaluating the humoral response induced by conserved and nonconserved peptides within HCV genotype 1-6 glycoproteins using the HCVcc model.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cells, Antibodies, and Peptides

Huh7.5 cells were a gift from Professor Charles Rice (Apath, L.L.C., and Rockefeller University, New York) and routinely maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Thermo Fisher, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% nonessential amino acids (aa). Anti-HCV core (SC-57800) and mouse anti-flavivirus (Cat. MAB10216) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz (USA) and Millipore (USA) companies, respectively.

A total of 7 peptides were evaluated: four highly conserved peptides (aa positions according to H77 isolate YP_009506357.1) within E1 (aa317-325, N-RMAWDMMMN-C) and E2 (aa418-429, N-GSWHINSTALNC-C; aa502-518, N-VCGPVYCFTPSPVVVGT-C; and aa685-693, N-LSTGLIHLH-C) and 3 peptides within the HVR1 of E2 ([aa384-396] N-HVR1, N-GTYVTGGTMAKNT-C; [aa397-410] C-HVR1, N-LGITSLFSPGSSQK-C; and [aa384-410] HVR1, N-GTYVTGGTMAKNTLGITSLFSPGSSQK-C, aa positions according to CAB53095.1, genotype 1b). Peptides were synthesized by GL Biochem Company (China), and mass spectrometry analysis validated the purity of the peptide sequences to be >98%. An extra cysteine residue was added to the C terminus of some peptides to conjugate with keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) protein using a Conjugation Kit (Figure 1(a); Cat. MBK1, Sigma, USA).

(a)

(b)

Figure 1

(a) Conservation analysis of segments within glycoproteins E1/E2. A total of 536 HCV sequences were submitted to Clustal Omega (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/) for alignment. An “” (asterisk) indicates positions that have a single, fully conserved residue. A “:” (colon) indicates conservation between groups of strongly similar properties, i.e., , in the Gonnet PAM 250 matrix. A “.” (period) indicates conservation between groups of weakly similar properties, , in the Gonnet PAM 250 matrix. An extra cysteine residue was added to the C terminus of some peptides for conjugation with KLH. (b) Schematic diagram of the segments within glycoproteins E1/E2. TMD (black): transmembrane domain; HVR1: hypervariable region 1.

2.2. Sequence Alignment

For conservation analysis, a total of 536 HCV sequences were retrieved from the NCBI database and submitted to Clustal Omega (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/), as described in our previous study [20]. The sequences of the 7 synthesized peptides and TNcc(1a, AFX74877.1), J6/JFH1(2a, AEB71625.1), S52(3a, ADF97231.1), ED43(4a, CAA72338.1), SA13(5a, AC61696.1), and HK6a(6a, ACM69040.1) were also subjected to alignment with BioEdit 7.09 software (Figure S1).

2.3. Immunization of Mice

Antisera were generated by immunizing BALB/c mice with the 7 synthesized peptides. All animal studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Guangzhou Eighth People’s Hospital, and the animals were kept according to the institutional guidelines.

Fifty-four 6-week-old female BALB/c mice were purchased from GL Biochem Company (China) and divided into 9 groups ( for each group). Each group of mice was immunized with 1 peptide. One group of mice was immunized with KLH protein alone, and 1 group received no treatment; these groups were used as control groups. Briefly, 100 μg of the peptide was conjugated with KLH protein at a molar ratio of 1000 : 1 using a Conjugation Kit (Cat. MBK1, Sigma, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The KLH-conjugated peptide was then mixed with 100 μL of complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA, Cat. F5881, Sigma, USA) for intraperitoneal inoculation at week 0. Fifty micrograms of KLH-conjugated peptide and 50 μL of incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA, Cat. F5506, Sigma, USA) were mixed for reimmunization at weeks 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. KLH protein alone was also mixed with complete or incomplete Freund’s adjuvant for inoculation as a control.

At week 9, all mice were euthanized with carbon dioxide. Antiserum titers were determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the IgG of pooled antisera was purified using Magne™ Protein G Beads (Promega, USA).

2.4. ELISA

Antiserum titers were measured using an indirect ELISA, as previously described [21]. Briefly, 96-well microplates preincubated with streptavidin were coated with biotinylated peptide (1 μg/well), and then 2-fold dilutions of the mouse antisera were added to the wells. For each group, nonimmunized mouse serum was used as a negative control. After incubation at 37°C for 1 h and washing with PBS, horseradish peroxidase- (HRP-) conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Ray Antibody Biotech, China) was added, and the optical density (OD) values were measured at 450 nm using an ELISA reader (Tecan, USA). The endpoint titer was defined as the reciprocal of the highest dilution with a positive absorbance ().

2.5. HCVcc Production and Neutralization Assay

HCVcc plasmids were a kind gift from Professor Jens Bukh (Hvidovre Hospital and University of Copenhagen, Denmark). HCVcc genotypes 1-6 including TNcc(1a) [22], JFH1-based J6 5UTR-NS2 recombinant J6/JFH1(2a) [23], and isolate-specific 5UTR-NS5A recombinants S52(3a), ED43(4a), SA13(5a), and HK6a(6a) [24] were generated and maintained as previously described, with some modifications [19]. Briefly, the cell culture supernatant was collected from 10 μg of full-length HCV RNA-transfected Huh7.5 cells and was used to infect Huh7.5 cells grown in 100 mm dishes at a multiplicity of infection of 0.01. The infected cells were passaged at 3-day intervals. Approximately 2 weeks postinfection, viral supernatants were obtained and clarified by centrifugation and stored in aliquots at -80°C. The focus-forming units (FFU) of the viral stock was defined as HCV core-positive foci using an indirect immunofluorescence assay.

For the HCVcc neutralization assay, Huh7.5 cells were seeded onto a 96-well plate 1 day before infection. One hundred FFU of HCVcc stock was incubated with mouse antisera or IgG at 37°C for 1 h. The mixture was then incubated with Huh7.5 cells at 37°C for 6 h, and the medium was replaced with a fresh medium. At 72 h postinfection, HCV infection was evaluated in an indirect immunofluorescence assay. Each experiment was performed in duplicate.

For HCV indirect immunofluorescence assay, at 72 h postinfection, the cells in the 96-well plate were fixed with methanol at -20°C for 25 min and blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 30 min, followed by incubation with a primary mouse anti-HCV core antibody [22] and secondary Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (Invitrogen, USA). The fluorescent foci were observed and enumerated on a standard fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX70).

2.6. Dengue Virus Neutralization Assay

Dengue virus (DV2; Thai strain 16681) was generously provided by Dr. Andrew Yue (National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan) [25]. Antisera were diluted 1 : 50, incubated with 10⁴ FFU Dengue virus for 1 h, and then added to Huh7.5 cells. Three days postinfection, DV2 infection was evaluated with a mouse anti-flavivirus group antigen monoclonal antibody in an indirect immunofluorescence assay, as described above.

2.7. Immunoprecipitation of Viral Particles and qRT-PCR

To reduce nonspecific binding, TNcc(1a) or ED43(4a) viral stock was incubated with 2 μg of normal mouse IgG for 2 h at room temperature, followed incubation with 50 μL of Dynabeads™ Protein G (Invitrogen, USA) for 30 min at room temperature. The viral stock (~106 IU) was mixed with 2 μg of antiserum IgG for 2 h, followed by mixing with 50 μL of Dynabeads™ Protein G for 30 min. The Dynabeads™ were washed 3 times with 200 μL of cold PBS (5 min per wash) and then resuspended in 75 μL of PBS. The HCV RNA was extracted from the immunoprecipitants with an E.Z.N.A.® Viral RNA Kit (Omega BIO-TEK, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and then dissolved in 40 μL nuclease-free water. The viral RNA was quantified by the PCR-fluorescent probe method with a commercial Diagnostic Kit for Quantification of HCV RNA (Cat. #DA-Z070, Da An Gene, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions [26].

2.8. Western Blotting

One hundred micrograms per milliliter of serum IgG and 400 FFU of HCVcc stock were incubated at 37°C for 1 h and then inoculated onto a 24-well plate preseeded with Huh7.5 cells 1 day before the experiment. Three days postinfection, the cells were washed with 500 μL of PBS twice and digested with 100 μL of Pierce IP Lysis Buffer (Cat. 87787) for 15 minutes on periodic ice mixing. The lysate was transferred to a microcentrifuge tube and centrifuged at for 10 min at 4°C to pellet the cell debris. The protein concentration of the supernatant was measured using a Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Cat. 23225).

Twenty micrograms of protein sample per lane was separated on an SDS-12% PAGE gel and transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Cat. PVM020C-160, Pall). The membrane was blocked with 3% BSA in Tris-Buffered Saline and Tween 20 (TBST) for 0.5 h at room temperature and probed with a mouse anti-core antibody (1 : 200 dilution) with 1% BSA in TBST for 1 h at room temperature, or overnight at 4°C, followed by the addition of an HRP-goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (1 : 2000, Beijing Ray Antibody Biotech, China). The signal was detected with Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate (Cat. 32109) or High-Sig ECL Western Blotting Substrate (Cat. 180-501, Tanon Corp., China).

3. Results

3.1. Conservation Analysis of Peptides within HCV Glycoproteins

In a conservation analysis performed in our previous study [20], we manually downloaded 536 HCV sequences, including 85 genotype 1a, 272 genotype 1b, 2 genotype 1c, 20 genotype 2a, 82 genotype 2b, 5 genotype 2c, 37 genotype 3a, 1 genotype 3b, 10 genotype 4, 3 genotype 5, and 19 genotype 6 from the NCBI database. The alignment results showed that at least 4 segments (aa317-325, aa418-429, aa502-518, and aa685-693 within the HCV glycoproteins, aa positions according to H77 isolate YP_009506357.1) were highly conserved (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). In contrast, the segment with the HVR1 of E2 was highly variable. Three peptides ([aa384-396] N-HVR1, N-GTYVTGGTMAKNT-C; [aa397-410] C-HVR1, N-LGITSLFSPGSSQK-C; and [aa384-410] HVR1, N-GTYVTGGTMAKNTLGITSLFSPGSSQK-C, aa positions according to CAB53095.1, genotype 1b) within this segment were also synthesized.

We also conducted an alignment of the sequences of peptide immunogens and HCVcc strains. As shown in Figure S1, aa317-325 and aa502-518 were absolutely conserved across the 6 genotypes, and the sequences of these 2 peptides were absolutely identical to the HCVcc tested. The sequence of peptide aa418-429 was absolutely identical to TNcc(1a) and S52(3a) and 91.7% (11/12) identical to J6/JFH1(2a), ED43(4a), SA13(5a), and HK6a(6a). The sequence of peptide aa685-693 was 88.9% (8/9) identical to J6/JFH1(2a) and absolutely identical to the other 5 genotypes. In contrast, segment HVR1 was highly variable across the 6 genotypes. Overall, it seemed that C-HVR1 was more conserved, as the similarities between peptide N-HVR1 and HCVcc were from 23.1% (3/13) to 61.5% (8/13), while the similarities between peptide C-HVR1 and HCVcc were from 50.0% (7/14) to 64.3% (9/14).

3.2. Protective Effect of Antisera

Seven peptides conjugated to KLH, or KLH alone was used to immunize BALB/c mice. The procedure is illustrated in Figure 2(a). The antibody titers of mouse antisera were determined at weeks 0, 3, 6, and 9 by ELISA (Figure 2(b)). The serum of a normal mouse without immunization across the whole experiment period served as a baseline. The antibody titers specific to the 7 peptides could be detected as early as 3 weeks postimmunization and continued to increase through week 6, then peaked (4.1-5.7 log10) at week 9, indicating that this immunization protocol can induce a potent and specific humoral response. We did not determine the antibody titer past week 9 because we believed that the titer at week 9 was sufficient for the following neutralization test.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 2

Humoral response induced by peptides. (a) Illustration of the immunization procedure. The peptide plus KLH protein, or PBS plus KLH protein, together with CFA or IFA, was inoculated into BALB/c mice at the indicated time points. (b) Kinetics of peptide-specific antibody titers of the antisera. The endpoint titers of antisera collected at weeks 0, 3, 6, and 9 were determined by ELISA. Sera from mice without immunization, defined as “normal mouse serum,” served as a baseline. The of each group is shown. (c) The antiserum of each mouse was diluted at 1 : 50, mixed with 100 FFU of HCVcc, and then added to naïve Huh7.5 cells. HCVcc without sera was added as a “mock” control. Seventy-two hours postinfection, the FFU was determined by an indirect immunofluorescence assay. The infection of “mock” was arbitrarily set to 100%, and the relative infection rates were calculated using GraphPad Prism 8 software. Each experiment was repeated in triplicate, and the representative data of 1 experiment is shown. The geometric mean of each group is displayed. (d) HCVcc TNcc(1a) or ED43(4a) stock (~106 IU as “input”) was precipitated with 2 μg/mL IgG-coated Protein G Beads. Normal mouse IgG (nmIgG) and IgG purified from a convalescent hepatitis C patient (anti-HCV) were used as the negative and positive controls, respectively. HCVcc nonspecifically binding to Protein G Beads without an IgG coating was defined as a “mock.” HCV RNA of virus precipitated with beads was determined by qRT-PCR.

To determine whether these antisera conferred protection against HCV infection, a 1 : 50 dilution of antisera was mixed with HCVcc of genotypes 1-6, and the infection rate was assessed by an indirect immunofluorescence assay (Figure 2(c)). As expected, normal mouse serum or antiserum induced by KLH alone had little effect on HCVcc infectivity. By contrast, both aa317-325 and aa418-429 antisera inhibited >50% of TNcc(1a), S52(3a), ED43(4a), and SA13(5a) infectivity. However, these antisera did not affect J6/JFH1(2a) or HK6a(6a) infectivity. The aa502-518 antisera efficiently neutralized 3 genotypes, including TNcc(1a), S52(3a), and SA13(5a), and mildly neutralized 39.5% of ED43(4a) but could not block infection of J6/JFH1(2a) or HK6a(6a). Antisera of aa685-693 stopped >50% of infections of TNcc(1a), J6/JFH1(2a), ED43(4a), and SA13(5a) and mildly inhibited S52(3a) and HK6a(6a). Interestingly, antisera of N-HVR1 potently prevented TNcc(1a), S52(3a), and ED43(4a) infections, but that of the other 3 genotypes (Table 1). Both C-HVR1 and full-length HVR1 antisera efficiently inhibited infections of ED43(4a) and HK6a(6a). To ensure that the protection of the antisera was HCV-specific, their neutralization activities against the Dengue virus, a member of the Flaviviridae family, were also evaluated using the same protocol. As shown in Table 1 and Figure S2, none of the antisera displayed an anti-Dengue effect.

To test whether the antisera could recognize HCV particles, we isolated the IgG of the pooled antisera of each group and determined their interactions with HCVcc in an immunoprecipitation assay. The precipitated HCV RNA was detected by qRT-PCR. Since all the antisera could neutralize the ED43(4a) strain, we tested whether the purified IgG recognized the HCVcc ED43(4a) particle first. Human IgG (anti-HCV) with broad neutralization activity purified from the serum of a convalescent hepatitis C patient served as a positive control. As shown in Figure 2(d), anti-HCV recognized 70.2% of HCVcc, while the IgG of normal mice and that induced by KLH only recognized <20%. A range of 34.3% to 74.2% of input HCVcc was immunoprecipitated by the IgG induced by the 7 peptides, indicating that the peptide immunogens indeed induced a genotype 4 HCV-specific humoral response. However, IgG antisera of C-HVR1 and HVR1 did not recognize TNcc(1a), and the HCV RNA levels were similar to those of the normal mouse IgG group, which may explain why they cannot affect TNcc(1a) infection. Taken together, these data highlight the protective effect of antisera induced by peptides within glycoproteins.

3.3. Protective Effect of Antiserum IgG

To exclude the possibility that other factors in antisera may contribute to the antiviral effect, the neutralization activities of IgG purified from antisera were determined. We mixed 100 μg/mL of IgG and 400 FFU HCVcc stock and detected the infectivity in Huh7.5 cells using an anti-core monoclonal antibody for Western blotting. As shown in Figure 3(a), a band of ~17 kD could be detected in the normal mouse IgG group infected with HCVcc genotypes 1-6, but not in the “no virus” group, indicating that this antibody can effectively detect the HCV core antigen. After normalizing with the Tublin reference protein, the relative infection of each group compared to the “normal mouse IgG” group was determined (Figure 3(b)). The IgG of aa317-325, aa502-518, aa685-693, and N-HVR1 potently neutralized >50% of infection of the 3 genotypes, while aa418-429 IgG potently inhibited 4 genotypes (Figure 3(c)). For the J6/JFH1(2a) strain, only the IgG of aa685-693 exhibited remarkable neutralization activity. IgG of N-HVR1 exhibited the most potent inhibitory effect against genotypes 1, 3, and 4 but had little protective effect against the other 3 genotypes.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 3

Neutralization activity of antiserum IgG. (a) IgG (100 μg/mL) induced by each peptide was mixed with 400 FFU of HCVcc for 1 h and added to Huh7.5 cells preseeded in a 24-well plate. Seventy-two hours later, infectivity was evaluated by Western blotting. nmIgG: normal mouse IgG. (b) The density of each band was analyzed with ImageJ software, and the core/Tublin ratio was calculated. The infection of nmIgG was set to 100%, and the relative infection of each group was calculated with GraphPad Prism 8 software. (c) Neutralization breadth of mouse IgG (100 μg/mL). Green, neutralization is >50%; yellow, neutralization is 20%-50%.

The neutralization activities of IgG were also evaluated at a greater concentration by an indirect immunofluorescence assay (Figure 4(a)). The results showed that only IgG of aa685-693 exhibited neutralization activity against HCVcc genotypes 1-6 (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). However, even at 4000 μg/mL, the highest concentration tested in this study, IgG of E2 aa685-693, could not completely prevent infections of TNcc(1a), S52(3a), and HK6a(6a). Consistent with the Western blotting result, IgG of N-HVR1 prevented TNcc(1a), S52(3a), and ED43(4a) infections, with an IC₅₀ ranging from 5.318 to 6.518 μg/mL.

(a)

(b)

4. Discussion

HCV glycoproteins are the main immunogens that induce a host humoral response during the natural course of infection, and most neutralizing epitopes within HCV glycoproteins are conformational [27, 28]. However, a vaccine against glycoproteins E1/E2 tested in chimpanzees exhibited effective protection against a homologous [29] but not a heterologous virus challenge [30]. In a phase I clinical trial of the E1/E2 vaccine, neutralizing activity against a homologous strain was detected only in about 25% of the volunteer sera [9]. These results indicate that optimization of the immunogen is required, and it was recently reported that altered glycosylation could enhance the immunogenicity of E2 and induce potent neutralizing antibodies [31].

Another strategy to induce a protective humoral response is the use of linear peptides as immunogens because linear epitopes have also been found within HCV glycoproteins [32]. The humoral response induced by linear peptides has been reported to be effective in preventing HCV infection by some genotypes [33, 34]. For example, the aa313-327 within E1 is highly conserved and immunodominant during HCV infection [35, 36]. Peptide aa315-323-induced antisera were shown to inhibit the binding and entry of genotype 4 HCV to HepG2 cells, and another vaccine using aa315-326 conferred protection against JFH1(2a) and ED43(4a) infections in hepatoma cells [33]. Two monoclonal antibodies targeting this epitope also prevented infections of HCV-pseudotyped particles (HCVpp) genotypes 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 and HCVcc strains H77(1a), JFH1(2a), and J6/JFH1(2a). In this study, we found that a peptide aa317-325-induced humoral immune response could inhibit infections of HCVcc strains TNcc(1a), S52(3a), ED43(4a), and SA13(5a) but had little effect on infections of J6/JFH1(2a) and HK6a(6a) (Figure 3(c)). These data support that aa317-325 may serve as a vaccine immunogen for inducing a protective humoral immune response. Peptide aa502-518 is highly conserved and plays a crucial role in the association of HCV and host receptors [37]. Our results showed that aa502-518-induced antisera can efficiently neutralize 3 HCV genotypes, TNcc(1a), S52(3a), and SA13(5a). In contrast, Czarnota et al. recently reported that aa502-520 present on hepatitis B virus (HBV) small surface antigen virus-like particles could not induce neutralizing antibodies [38]. This discrepancy may be partially due to different immunogen coupling strategies; in our study, aa502-518 was conjugated to KLH protein. We found that aa418-429-induced antisera potently prevented infections of 4 genotypes, TNcc(1a), S52(3a), ED43(4a), and SA13(5a), but had little effect on J6/JFH1(2a) and HK6a(6a), while aa685-693-induced antisera strongly inhibited J6/JFH1(2a), ED43(4a), and SA13(5a) and mildly inhibited S52(3a) and HK6a(6a) (Figures 3(c) and 4(b)). Thus, a combination of these 2 peptide immunogens may induce neutralization of all HCV genotypes; however, this possibility requires further study.

The role of HVR1 within E2 with respect to vaccine development remains controversial. Induction of the HVR1 antibody is associated with an acute self-limited infection in which viral attachment is prevented [39, 40]. In addition, anti-HVR1 antiserum has been shown to prevent homogenous HCV infection in vitro and in vivo [15, 41]. In contrast, it has been reported that the HVR1 antibody interferes with nAbs [11], and thus, HVR1 should not be included in a vaccine [42]. However, Law et al. recently showed that the deletion of HVR1 did not result in better protection as compared with the wild-type E1/E2 immunogen [43]. In this study, the antiserum of the full-length HVR1 of genotype 1b potently inhibited ED43(4a) and mildly inhibited S52(3a), SA13(5a), and HK6a(6a) infections but did not influence TNcc(1a) strain infectivity. In fact, despite the extremely high sequence diversity of HVR1, it has been reported that there is significant cross-reactivity between its variants [44, 45]. This may explain why the HVR1 of 1 genotype of HCV can elicit nAbs against other genotypes. The neutralization epitopes in HVR1 are generally considered to be within the C terminus, and monoclonal nAbs against this segment have been reported [46–48]. We found that C-HVR1 elicited nAbs against HCVcc of 2 genotypes, ED43(4a) and HK6a(6a). Unexpectedly, the N-HVR1 of genotype 1b elicited the most potent nAbs against 3 genotypes, 1, 3, and 4 (Figure 3(a)), while it had little effect on other genotypes. Indeed, Mosa et al. recently reported that patient-derived HVR1 peptides induced cross-genotype neutralization [49]. Since nAbs targeting the C terminus of HVR1 usually have stringent isolate specificity [50], there is a possibility that N-HVR1 peptide can induce a protective humoral immune response against various genotypes. Whether N-HVR1 peptide will have the same effect on genotypes other than 1b needs to be further explored.

Conservation variance may not account for the distinct neutralization activities of the antibodies induced by peptide immunogens. For example, the sequences of peptides aa317-325 and aa502-518 were absolutely identical to the HCVcc 6 genotypes tested in this study; however, IgG induced by these 2 peptides had little effect on J6/JFH1(2a) and HK6a(6a) but neutralized the other 4 genotypes. The sequence of aa418-429 was 91.7% (11/12) identical to J6/JFH1(2a), ED43(4a), SA13(5a), and HK6a(6a), but the IgG induced by aa418-429 only efficiently neutralized 2 of the 4 genotypes, ED43(4a) and SA13(5a). Peptide aa685-693 was the only immunogen that induced potent neutralization activity against J6/JFH1(2a) in this study. However, the humoral response induced by aa685-693 did not neutralize the other 5 HCVcc genotypes examined, although their sequences were absolutely identical. N-HVR1 is less identical to the HCVcc 6 genotypes compared to C-HVR1 (similarity 23.1% to 61.5% vs. 50.0% to 64.3%, Figure S1); however, IgG induced by N-HVR1 potently neutralized 3 genotypes while IgG induced by C-HVR1 only neutralized 2 genotypes (Figure 3). These findings suggest that the neutralization activity against heterologous strains induced by N-HVR1 is less likely to be dependent on sequence similarity. Recently, another group also reported that the sequence similarity of HVR1 was not associated with its cross-neutralization [49].

In this study, we determined the neutralization activities of IgG directly purified from antisera and confirmed the protective humoral responses elicited by peptide immunogens. Nevertheless, we did not determine the peptide related to cellular immune response, which also plays a central role in controlling HCV infection [3, 51, 52]. A comprehensive evaluation of both the cellular and humoral responses induced by the peptides in nonhuman primate models would undoubtedly provide a more complete and better understanding of peptide immunology and facilitate vaccine development.

5. Conclusions

Conserved peptides aa317-325, aa418-429, aa502-518, and aa685-693 efficiently induced antibodies with potent neutralizing activity against 3 or 4 HCV genotypes. The peptide aa685-693 within the C terminus of E2 elicited antibodies that achieved more than 50% neutralization of genotypes 2, 4, and 5 and less than 50% for genotypes 1, 3, and 6. Peptide N-HVR1 of E2 elicited antibodies with potent neutralization activities against 3 genotypes, TNcc(1a), S52(3a), and ED43(4a). These findings suggest that peptides within conserved and variable regions of envelope proteins could serve as immunogen candidates for an HCV vaccine.

Data Availability

The research data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor Jens Bukh (Hvidovre Hospital and University of Copenhagen, Denmark) for providing HCVcc, Professor Charles Rice (Apath, L.L.C., and Rockefeller University, New York) for providing Huh7.5 cell, and Dr. Andrew Yue (National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan) for providing Dengue virus. This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province under Grant 2017A030310035.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1: (A) alignment of peptide sequences; (B) similarities between the sequences of peptides and 6 HCVcc genotypes. Figure S2: the antisera of each group were diluted at 1 : 50 and incubated with 10⁴ FFU of Dengue virus (DV2; Thai strain 16681) for 1 h, followed by the addition to naïve Huh7.5 cells. At 72 h postinfection, the virus foci were determined by an indirect immunofluorescence assay. (Supplementary Materials)

References

World Health Organization, “Global hepatitis report,” 2017, https://www.who.int/hepatitis/publications/global-hepatitis-report2017/en/.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Geddawy, Y. F. Ibrahim, N. M. Elbahie, and M. A. Ibrahim, “Direct acting anti-hepatitis C virus drugs: clinical pharmacology and future direction,” Journal of Translational Internal Medicine, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 8–17, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. J. Liang, “Current progress in development of hepatitis C virus vaccines,” Nature Medicine, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 869–878, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-M. Pawlotsky, “Hepatitis C virus resistance to direct-acting antiviral drugs in interferon- free regimens,” Gastroenterology, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 70–86, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Paolucci, M. Premoli, S. Novati et al., “Baseline and breakthrough resistance mutations in HCV patients failing DAAs,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 16017, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z.-w. Chen, H. Li, H. Ren, and P. Hu, “Global prevalence of pre-existing HCV variants resistant to direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs): mining the GenBank HCV genome data,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. J. Law, A. Landi, W. C. Magee, D. L. Tyrrell, and M. Houghton, “Progress towards a hepatitis C virus vaccine,” Emerging Microbes & Infections, vol. 2, no. 11, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. E. Drummer, “Challenges to the development of vaccines to hepatitis C virus that elicit neutralizing antibodies,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 5, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Meyer, A. Banerjee, S. E. Frey, R. B. Belshe, and R. Ray, “A weak neutralizing antibody response to hepatitis C virus envelope glycoprotein enhances virus infection,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 8, article e23699, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Zhang, L. Zhong, E. B. Struble et al., “Depletion of interfering antibodies in chronic hepatitis C patients and vaccinated chimpanzees reveals broad cross-genotype neutralizing activity,” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 18, pp. 7537–7541.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Y. Keck, C. Girard-Blanc, W. Wang et al., “Antibody response to hypervariable region 1 interferes with broadly neutralizing antibodies to hepatitis C virus,” Journal of Virology, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 3112–3122, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, Y. Yan, T. Gan et al., “A trivalent HCV vaccine elicits broad and synergistic polyclonal antibody response in mice and rhesus monkey,” Gut, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 140–149, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. E. Verstrepen, E. Depla, C. S. Rollier et al., “Clearance of genotype 1b hepatitis C virus in chimpanzees in the presence of vaccine-induced E1-neutralizing antibodies,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 204, no. 6, pp. 837–844, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Swadling, S. Capone, R. D. Antrobus et al., “A human vaccine strategy based on chimpanzee adenoviral and MVA vectors that primes, boosts, and sustains functional HCV-specific T cell memory,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 6, no. 261, p. 261ra153, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. K. Shimizu, H. Igarashi, T. Kiyohara et al., “A hyperimmune serum against a synthetic peptide corresponding to the hypervariable region 1 of hepatitis C virus can prevent viral infection in cell cultures,” Virology, vol. 223, no. 2, pp. 409–412, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. EL-Awady, “Antibody to E1 peptide of hepatitis C virus genotype 4 inhibits virus binding and entry to HepG2 cells in vitro,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 12, no. 16, pp. 2530–2535, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. El-Awady, A. A. Tabll, Y. S. El-Abd et al., “Conserved peptides within the E2 region of hepatitis C virus induce humoral and cellular responses in goats,” Virology Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 66, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. D. Lindenbach, M. J. Evans, A. J. Syder et al., “Complete replication of hepatitis C virus in cell culture,” Science, vol. 309, no. 5734, pp. 623–626, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Wakita, T. Pietschmann, T. Kato et al., “Production of infectious hepatitis C virus in tissue culture from a cloned viral genome,” Nature Medicine, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 791–796, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Deng, R. Liu, H. Rao et al., “Antibodies targeting novel neutralizing epitopes of hepatitis C virus glycoprotein preclude genotype 2 virus infection,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 9, article e0138756, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Liu, H. Rao, J. Wang et al., “Determination of the human antibody response to the neutralization epitopes encompassing amino acids 313-327 and 432-443 of hepatitis C virus E1E2 glycoproteins,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 6, article e66872, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. P. Li, S. Ramirez, S. B. Jensen, R. H. Purcell, J. M. Gottwein, and J. Bukh, “Highly efficient full-length hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (strain TN) infectious culture system,” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 48, pp. 19757–19762.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. P. Li, J. M. Gottwein, T. K. Scheel, T. B. Jensen, and J. Bukh, “MicroRNA-122 antagonism against hepatitis C virus genotypes 1-6 and reduced efficacy by host RNA insertion or mutations in the HCV 5' UTR,” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 12, pp. 4991–4996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. P. Li, S. Ramirez, D. Humes, S. B. Jensen, J. M. Gottwein, and J. Bukh, “Differential sensitivity of 5’UTR-NS5A recombinants of hepatitis C virus genotypes 1−6 to protease and NS5A inhibitors,” Gastroenterology, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 812–821.e4, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Miller, B. J. M. DeWet, L. Martinez-Pomares et al., “The mannose receptor mediates dengue virus infection of macrophages,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 4, no. 2, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Strassl, K. Rutter, A. F. Stättermayer et al., “Real-time PCR assays for the quantification of HCV RNA: concordance, discrepancies and implications for response guided therapy,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 8, p. e0135963, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. J. Kinchen, M. N. Zahid, A. I. Flyak et al., “Broadly neutralizing antibody mediated clearance of human hepatitis C virus infection,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 717–730.e5, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Giang, M. Dorner, J. C. Prentoe et al., “Human broadly neutralizing antibodies to the envelope glycoprotein complex of hepatitis C virus,” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 16, pp. 6205–6210.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. L. Choo, G. Kuo, R. Ralston et al., “Vaccination of chimpanzees against infection by the hepatitis C virus,” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 1294–1298.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Meunier, J. M. Gottwein, M. Houghton et al., “Vaccine-induced cross-genotype reactive neutralizing antibodies against hepatitis C virus,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 204, no. 8, pp. 1186–1190, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Li, M. von Schaewen, X. Wang et al., “Altered glycosylation patterns increase immunogenicity of a subunit hepatitis C virus vaccine, inducing neutralizing antibodies which confer protection in mice,” Journal of Virology, vol. 90, no. 23, pp. 10486–10498, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. J. Broering, K. A. Garrity, N. K. Boatright et al., “Identification and characterization of broadly neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies directed against the E2 envelope glycoprotein of hepatitis C virus,” Journal of Virology, vol. 83, no. 23, pp. 12473–12482, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. Dawood, R. I. Moustafa, T. H. Abdelhafez et al., “A multiepitope peptide vaccine against HCV stimulates neutralizing humoral and persistent cellular responses in mice,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 932, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. S. El Abd, A. A. Tabll, N. El Din et al., “Neutralizing activities of caprine antibodies towards conserved regions of the HCV envelope glycoprotein E2,” Virology Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 391, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Siemoneit, M. D. S. Cardoso, K. Koerner, A. Wölpl, and B. Kubanek, “Human monoclonal antibodies for the immunological characterization of a highly conserved protein domain of the hepatitis C virus glycoprotein E1,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 278–283, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Ray, A. Khanna, L. M. Lagging et al., “Peptide immunogen mimicry of putative E1 glycoprotein-specific epitopes in hepatitis C virus,” Journal of Virology, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 4420–4426, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Lavie, S. Sarrazin, R. Montserret et al., “Identification of conserved residues in hepatitis C virus envelope glycoprotein E2 that modulate virus dependence on CD81 and SRB1 entry factors,” Journal of Virology, vol. 88, no. 18, pp. 10584–10597, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Czarnota, A. Offersgaard, A. F. Pihl et al., “Specific antibodies induced by immunization with hepatitis B virus-like particles carrying hepatitis C virus envelope glycoprotein 2 epitopes show differential neutralization efficiency,” Vaccines, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 294, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Zibert, H. Meisel, W. Kraas, A. Schulz, G. Jung, and M. Roggendorf, “Early antibody response against hypervariable region 1 is associated with acute self-limiting infections of hepatitis C virus,” Hepatology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1245–1249, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Zibert, E. Schreier, and M. Roggendorf, “Antibodies in human sera specific to hypervariable region 1 of hepatitis C virus can block viral attachment,” Virology, vol. 208, no. 2, pp. 653–661, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Farci, A. Shimoda, D. Wong et al., “Prevention of hepatitis C virus infection in chimpanzees by hyperimmune serum against the hypervariable region 1 of the envelope 2 protein,” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 26, pp. 15394–15399.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Prentoe, L. Verhoye, R. V. Moctezuma et al., “HVR1-mediated antibody evasion of highly infectious in vivo adapted HCV in humanised mice,” Gut, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 1988–1997, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. M. Law, M. Logan, J. Wong et al., “Role of the E2 hypervariable region (HVR1) in the immunogenicity of a recombinant hepatitis C virus vaccine,” Journal of Virology, vol. 92, no. 11, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. S. Campo, Z. Dimitrova, J. Yokosawa et al., “Hepatitis C virus antigenic convergence,” Scientific Reports, vol. 2, no. 1, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Prentoe and J. Bukh, “Hypervariable region 1 in envelope protein 2 of hepatitis C virus: a linchpin in neutralizing antibody evasion and viral entry,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 9, p. 2146, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Owsianka, R. F. Clayton, L. D. Loomis-Price, J. A. McKeating, and A. H. Patel, “Functional analysis of hepatitis C virus E2 glycoproteins and virus-like particles reveals structural dissimilarities between different forms of E2,” The Journal of General Virology, vol. 82, no. 8, pp. 1877–1883, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Bartosch, A. Vitelli, C. Granier et al., “Cell entry of hepatitis C virus requires a set of co-receptors that include the CD81 tetraspanin and the SR-B1 scavenger receptor,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 43, pp. 41624–41630, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zucchelli, R. Roccasecca, A. Meola et al., “Mimotopes of the hepatitis C virus hypervariable region 1, but not the natural sequences, induce cross-reactive antibody response by genetic immunization,” Hepatology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 692–703, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. I. Mosa, M. G. AbouHaidar, R. A. Urbanowicz, J. E. Tavis, J. K. Ball, and J. J. Feld, “Role of HVR1 sequence similarity in the cross-genotypic neutralization of HCV,” Virology Journal, vol. 17, no. 1, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Vieyres, J. Dubuisson, and A. H. Patel, “Characterization of antibody-mediated neutralization directed against the hypervariable region 1 of hepatitis C virus E2 glycoprotein,” The Journal of General Virology, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 494–506, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. H. Shoukry, “Hepatitis C vaccines, antibodies, and T cells,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Bailey, E. Barnes, and A. L. Cox, “Approaches, progress, and challenges to hepatitis C vaccine development,” Gastroenterology, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 418–430, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Kai Deng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

547

Downloads

759

Citations