A Helminth-Derived Chitinase Structurally Similar to Mammalian Chitinase Displays Immunomodulatory Properties in Inflammatory Lung Disease

Ebner, Friederike; Lindner, Katja; Janek, Katharina; Niewienda, Agathe; Malecki, Piotr H.; Weiss, Manfred S.; Sutherland, Tara E.; Heuser, Arnd; Kühl, Anja A.; Zentek, Jürgen; Hofmann, Andreas; Hartmann, Susanne

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6234836

Journal of Immunology Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Abbreviations Data Availability Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Modulation of the Immune Response by Pathogen-Derived Molecules in Respiratory Diseases

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 6234836 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6234836

A Helminth-Derived Chitinase Structurally Similar to Mammalian Chitinase Displays Immunomodulatory Properties in Inflammatory Lung Disease

Friederike Ebner,¹Katja Lindner,¹Katharina Janek,²Agathe Niewienda,²Piotr H. Malecki,^3,4Manfred S. Weiss,³Tara E. Sutherland,⁵Arnd Heuser,⁶Anja A. Kühl,⁷Jürgen Zentek,⁸Andreas Hofmann,⁹and Susanne Hartmann¹

Academic Editor: Yolanda González

Received02 Sept 2021

Accepted25 Oct 2021

Published25 Nov 2021

Abstract

Immunomodulation of airway hyperreactivity by excretory-secretory (ES) products of the first larval stage (L1) of the gastrointestinal nematode Trichuris suis is reported by us and others. Here, we aimed to identify the proteins accounting for the modulatory effects of the T. suis L1 ES proteins and studied six selected T. suis L1 proteins for their immunomodulatory efficacy in a murine OVA-induced allergic airway disease model. In particular, an enzymatically active T. suis chitinase mediated amelioration of clinical signs of airway hyperreactivity, primarily associated with suppression of eosinophil recruitment into the lung, the associated chemokines, and increased numbers of RELMα⁺ interstitial lung macrophages. While there is no indication of T. suis chitinase directly interfering with dendritic cell activation or antigen presentation to CD4 T cells, treatment of allergic mice with the worm chitinase influenced the hosts’ own chitinase activity in the inflamed lung. The three-dimensional structure of the T. suis chitinase as determined by high-resolution X-ray crystallography revealed high similarities to mouse acidic mammalian chitinase (AMCase) but a unique ability of T. suis chitinase to form dimers. Our data indicate that the structural similarities between the parasite and host chitinase contribute to the disease-ameliorating effect of the helminth-derived chitinase on allergic lung inflammation.

1. Introduction

Chronic helminth infections are known to be accompanied by various immunomodulatory processes. The active modulation of host immune responses is believed to ensure long-term persistence of the parasites and most likely involves proteins released by the worms (reviewed in [1–3]). Over the last decade, research has focused on identifying secreted helminth immunomodulators and mechanisms of suppression in order to understand natural infection and in parallel with the aim to exploit this knowledge for the benefit of unwanted human inflammatory diseases.

We and others have identified secreted products with immunosuppressive effects in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases from diverse parasitic helminths such as Acanthocheilonema viteae [4–11], Schistosoma [12–15], Fasciola hepatica [16, 17], Heligmosomoides polygyrus [18, 19], and Wuchereria bancrofti [20, 21]. Among the organisms currently explored for helminth-induced therapy of humans are the pig whipworm (Trichuris suis, TSO), the human hookworm (Necator americanus, NC), and also the human whipworm (T. trichiura, TTO). As T. suis can be easily maintained in pigs but cannot multiply in humans, its administration as live parasite (TSO therapy) has been tested in a variety of clinical studies to improve human immune disorders (reviewed in [22]). Early success stories of treatments of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) with TSO [23–25] were followed by larger trials with only modest results for various autoimmune diseases [22, 26–28] and implicated the need for a greater understanding for the immunomodulatory mechanisms. In a rather small cohort of MS patients receiving controlled TSO treatment, we demonstrated varying degrees of parasite-specific T cell responses and cellular functionality across individuals receiving treatment, indicating the need to understand responders and nonresponders in order to develop more tailored treatment regimens [29].

T. suis has a direct life cycle. Upon ingestion of larval stage 1 (L1) containing infective eggs, the larvae hatch and invade the mucosa of the large intestine and develop into adults by molting several times [30]. When administered therapeutically to humans, there is evidence for a self-limiting, sterile colonization of T. suis [23]; thus, repeated TSO treatments are required. However, this transient exposure highlights the role of early larval stages to possess immunomodulatory properties. Using soluble products (Ts-SPs) or excretory-secretory proteins (Ts-ES) or isolated fractions from both adult worms and larval stages, several immunomodulatory mechanisms have been investigated [31–34]. Ts-SPs from adult worms have been shown to interfere with activation of human dendritic cells and macrophages [32, 35–38]. We have previously reported on the immunomodulatory activity of proteins collected from Ts L1 which interfere with CD4⁺ T cell priming and clinical parameters of experimental airway hyperreactivity [34]. Similarly, a recent study shows that Ts-ES proteins released by adult and larval stages of T. suis possess anti-inflammatory properties. Indeed, the authors identified a subset of proteins with anti-inflammatory properties within adult Ts-ES [31]. However, immunoregulators of the very early larval stages of T. suis remain elusive.

Here, we focus on the identification and characterization of proteins selectively secreted by the first larval stages of T. suis. We screened a set of recombinant larval proteins for immunomodulatory properties and identified an enzymatically active T. suis chitinase that interfered with recruitment of immune cells and inflammatory reactions in a murine model of allergic airway disease. While our in vitro data suggest no direct immunomodulatory effects on, e.g., DC function or T cell activation, we observed disease amelioration to be associated with suppression of eosinophil recruitment into the lung and increased numbers of alternatively activated RELMα⁺ lung macrophages. X-ray crystallography revealed the structure of the nematode enzyme to be highly similar to the host’s own chitinases. Since mammalian host chitinases, both true chitinases with enzymatic activity (AMCase and chitotriosidase) and chitinase-like protein (CLP) molecules which can bind to chitin but lack enzymatic activity, are implicated as either mediators or biomarkers involved in airway inflammation and fibrosis, disease amelioration by treating with a worm chitinase was rather surprising. Our findings further reveal that T. suis chitinase treatment of allergic mice not only inhibited host AMCase expression on mRNA level but also interfered with host chitinase activity in the BAL fluid, suggesting an alternative mechanism that might involve the high degree of structural similarity between host and nematode chitinases.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

Mice were cared for in accordance with the principles outlined in the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes and the German Animal Welfare Law. The mouse study was approved by the State Office of Health and Social Affairs Berlin, Germany (Landesamt für Gesundheit und Soziales; approval numbers G0144/10, T0407/17, and G0068/16).

The T. suis life cycle was maintained in pigs (Sus scrofa) in accordance with the principles outlined in the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes and the German Animal Welfare Law. The generation of larval material was approved by the State Office of Health and Social Affairs Berlin, Germany (Landesamt für Gesundheit und Soziales; approval number H0296/12).

2.2. Animals

Female BALB/c mice were purchased from Janvier Labs (Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France) and maintained together with DO11.10 (OVA-TCR tg) mice at the Institute of Immunology, Department of Veterinary Medicine in Berlin. DO11.10 were typed for expression of the transgenic (tg) T cell receptor (TCR) using flow cytometry, and only mice with more than 90% of the CD4⁺ T cells expressing the OVA-tg TCR were used in the study. The T. suis life cycle was maintained in pigs (Sus scrofa) bred and cared for at the Institute of Animal Nutrition, Department of Veterinary Medicine in Berlin.

2.3. Murine OVA-Induced Allergic Airway Disease

Allergic airway inflammation was induced as previously described [4]. Briefly, female BALB/c mice (8 weeks old) were sensitized on days 0 and 14 with 20 μg ovalbumin protein (OVA, grade VI, Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Munich, Germany) emulsified in 2 mg alum (Imject™ Alum, ThermoFisher Scientific, IL, USA). Nonallergic control animals (PBS) received equal volumes of PBS on days 0 and 14 instead of OVA. Mice were treated with 20 μg recombinant, intact T. suis proteins or heat-inactivated proteins on days 0, 7, and 14 i.p. or left untreated. Intranasal OVA challenge (50 μg OVA/25 μl PBS) was performed on all groups of mice on days 28 and 29. Where indicated, lung function was assessed on day 30 at the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) in Berlin. On day 31, mice were sacrificed, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed, and samples were taken for analysis.

2.4. Airway Hyperreactivity

Airway resistance and lung function were assessed via double-chamber plethysmography (emka Technologies, Paris, France) in response to increasing doses of acetyl-ß-methylcholine (Methacholine, Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Munich, Germany).

Mice were placed into a restrainer without anesthesia and adjusted (5 min), and the following protocol was applied: baseline measurement (4 min), PBS (1 min), measurement (4 min), 6.25 mg/ml methacholine (1 min), measurement (4 min), 12.5 mg/ml methacholine (1 min), measurement (4 min), 25 mg/ml (1 min) methacholine, measurement (4 min), 50 mg/ml methacholine (1 min), and measurement (4 min).

Data were sampled once per second. For data analysis, averages of 5 sec intervals were used. Airway resistance () and expiratory time values were generated and analyzed using iox2 software (iox v2.8.0.13, emka Technologies). Resulting data points were averaged again per mouse and methacholine dose. Data points with % and were excluded from the analysis.

2.5. Bronchoalveolar Lavage

Intratracheal bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed on i.p. anaesthetized mice by inflating the lungs with 800 μl PBS containing protease inhibitor cocktail (cOmplete™, Mini, EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The 1^st BAL was pelleted, and the supernatant was stored at -20°C for cytokine/chemokine detection. Four additional lavages ( μl PBS) were performed for cell isolation and pelleted by centrifugation. All cells were pooled in 500 μl PBS and counted using a Neubauer cell chamber. μl cell suspension per sample was used for cytospin preparation. Object slides were dried and stained with Diff-Quick solutions (Labor und Technik Eberhard Lehmann GmbH, Berlin, Germany) for differential cell counts. Residual cells were used for flow cytometry.

2.6. Histology and Immunohistochemistry

Following lung lavage, the left lobe was split into two pieces. The lower tissue was degassed and fixed in a formalin solution (Roti-Histofix 10%, Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany) for 6 h at room temperature and then stored at 4°C. The tissue was embedded in paraffin, and sections were stained with an antibody against RELM-α (polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Nuclei were stained with hematoxylin (Merck). Interstitial RELM-α⁺ cells were quantified in 5 HPF (high-power fields, 400x magnification). Pictures are presented at 400x magnification. For evaluation of histomorphological changes, paraffin sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and scored for inflammation and goblet cell hyperplasia. Briefly, score 1 is for minor perivascular inflammation, score 2 for moderate perivascular and peribronchial inflammation and minimal goblet cell hyperplasia, score 3 for increased perivascular and peribronchial inflammation and increased goblet cell hyperplasia (beginning in smaller airways), and score 4 for severe perivascular, peribronchial, and interstitial inflammation with goblet cell hyperplasia in smaller and larger airways.

2.7. Generation of Bone Marrow-Derived Dendritic Cell (DC) and Activation Assay

Isolated bone marrow cells from the tibia and femur of female BALB/c mice were seeded at cells/ml in 10 ml RPMI-1640 media (PAN-Biotech) containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 20 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (PAN-Biotech) and differentiated in the presence of recombinant GM-CSF (20 ng/μl) (PeproTech). At days 6–8, nonadherent cells were collected. For studying effects of Ts-Chit on DC activation, BM-DCs were preincubated with 10 μg/ml recombinant Ts-Chit protein for 2.5 h and stimulated with 100 ng/ml LPS-B5 (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Munich, Germany) or 1 μM CpG (ODN 1668, InvivoGen, CA, USA) for additional 20 h. Cell culture supernatants were collected and stored at -20°C for cytokine ELISA, and DCs were analyzed for activation markers CD86, MHCII, and Ox40-L by flow cytometry.

2.8. T Cell Proliferation Assays In Vitro

For studying effects of Ts-Chit on antigen-independent T cell proliferation, splenocytes were isolated from female BALB/c mice, labeled with CFSE in PBS (8 min, RT, 5 μM), and seeded at a density of cells/ml in round-bottom 96-well plates. After 4 days of incubation (37°C, 5% CO₂) in the presence of plate-bound mouse αCD3/αCD28 (1 μg/ml) and recombinant Ts-Chit (10 μg/ml), DCs were harvested and analyzed for CFSE dilution in CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells.

For studying effects of Ts-Chit on antigen-dependent T cell proliferation and differentiation, MACS-purified OVA-TCR tg CD4⁺ T cells isolated from DO11.10 mice were labeled with CFSE (5 μM, eBioscience) in PBS for 8 min at room temperature. CFSE-labeled CD4⁺ T cells () were cocultured with OVA-loaded and Ts-Chit pretreated BM-DC () for 4 days and analyzed by flow cytometry for CFSE dilution and Treg/Th transcription factors.

2.9. Multiplex Assay

Bronchoalveolar lavage supernatants were analyzed for cytokine and chemokine levels using the Mouse Cytokine & Chemokine 26-Plex ProcartaPlex™ Panel (ThermoFisher, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The MAGPIX™ instrument (Luminex) was used, and data were analyzed with ProcartaPlex™ Analyst 1.0.

2.10. Flow Cytometry

The following monoclonal fluorochrome conjugated anti-mouse antibodies were used: CD11b (clone M1/70, APC-Cy7), CD64 (clone X54-5/7.1, PE-Cy7), IgG1 (clone RMG1-1, APC), and IgG2a (clone RMG2a-62, PerCP-Cy5.5) were purchased from BioLegend, CA, USA. CD45 (clone 30-F11, eF450), MHC-II (clone M5/114.15.2, PE-Cy5), Gr1 (clone RB6-8C5, PE-Cy7), and EpCAM (clone G8.8, APC) were purchased from eBioscience, CA, USA. CD11c (clone HL3, FITC), MHC-II (clone M5/114.15.2, PE), CD86 (clone GL1, Pe-Cy7), IL-13 (clone eBio13A, A488), CD4 (clone RM4-5, Horizon V500), GATA3 (clone TWAJ, A660), Foxp3 (clone FJK-16s, PE), Tbet (4B10, BV 421), and SiglecF (clone E50-2440, PE) were purchased from BD Biosciences, CA, USA. Viability dye in eFluor 506, eF660, and eF780 and streptavidin (FITC) were purchased from eBioscience, CA, USA. Polyclonal biotinylated anti-mouse RELM-α was purchased from PeproTech, NJ, USA. Samples were acquired using Canto II (BD Biosciences, CA, USA) and analyzed using FlowJo software v9, Tristar.

2.11. Quantitative RT-PCR

Following lung lavage, the upper right lobe was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. RNA isolation from lung tissues was performed using the innuPREP RNA Mini Kit (Analytic Jena AG, Jena, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription of 1 μg RNA into cDNA was done using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). RT-PCR was performed on the LightCycler® 480 instrument using the LightCycler® 480 SYBR Green I Master Mix (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and oligonucleotides listed in Table 1. Gene expression is described relative to the housekeeping gene peptidylprolyl isomerase A (PPIA) and normalized to mRNA levels of the PBS group if not indicated differently.

2.12. Isolation of T. suis Larvae and Production of Excretory-Secretory (ES) Proteins

Pigs were orally infected with 8000 embryonated T. suis eggs in 2 ml NaCl (0.9%). Following euthanasia on days 10, 18, and 28 dpi, T. suis larvae were manually collected from the caecum and colon. Larvae were washed 4 times for 15 min each in RPMI-1640 (PAN-Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany) supplemented with 200 U/ml penicillin, 200 μg/ml streptomycin, and 1.35 μg/ml amphotericin B (all purchased from PAN-Biotech) by sedimentation and incubated overnight in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 1% glucose (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, US), 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 0.625 μg/ml amphotericin B. Culture medium was replaced, and larvae were incubated for another 5 days while conditioned media were collected every 2^nd day, sterilized by filtration (0.45 μm Minisart Syringe Filter, Sartorius AG, Göttingen, Germany), and stored at -20°C.

T. suis L1 ES proteins were isolated from freshly hatched larvae as previously described [34]. Identification of T. suis larva ES proteins (in vitro-hatched L1, 10 dpi, 18 dpi, and 28 dpi) was done by mass spectrometry as previously described [34]. In brief, TCA-precipitated dried protein pellets of T. suis were suspended, reduced, alkylated, and tryptic digested. The resulting peptides were analyzed by LC-MSMS on a 4700 Proteomics Analyzer (ABSCIEX, Framingham, MS). Database searches were performed with Mascot software against NCBI database 20150331 (64057457 sequences). Proteins were accepted as identified if at least two MS/MS spectra provided a MASCOT score for identity (.

2.13. Recombinant Protein Expression

T. suis mRNA was isolated out of 10-20 mg worms by using the innuPREP RNA Mini Kit (Analytic Jena AG, Jena, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription of 1 μg RNA into cDNA was done using the Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany).

The genes corresponding to selected T. suis proteins were amplified and cloned into the vector pLEXSYsat2 of the Leishmania expression system (LEXSYcon2 Expression Kit, Jena Bioscience GmbH, Jena, Germany). The cloning vector was sequenced for verification. Leishmania tarentolae cells were transfected via electroporation (Nucleofector™ 2b Device, Amaxa™ Human T Cell Nucleofector™ Kit, Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) with the respective expression cassette containing the selective antibiotic marker nourseothricin (NTC) and the T. suis protein-coding gene. Transfected L. tarentolae cells were polyclonally selected and maintained as described in the manual.

2.14. Protein Purification

His₆-tag fused, recombinant proteins secreted by transfected Leishmania cells were purified by liquid chromatography over His-Trap™ excel columns (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). Protein-containing fractions were pooled and dialyzed two times against PBS (4 h and overnight). Finally, protein concentrations were assessed using Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Rockford, USA). Identity of purified, recombinant proteins was verified by LC-MSMS analysis after tryptic digestion.

2.15. SDS-PAGE

To validate recombinant expression of T. suis proteins, a 12% SDS gel was loaded with 1-2 μg purified, recombinant T. suis proteins and developed using silver staining (Pierce Silver Stain Kit, ThermoFisher Scientific, Rockford, US).

2.16. Chitinase Assay

Chitinase activity was analyzed by using the substrate and standard solutions of the fluorimetric chitinase assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Munich, Germany). Substrates 4-MU-(GlcNAc)₂ (exochitinase activity) and 4-MU-(GlcNAc)₃ (endochitinase activity) were adjusted to 1.1 mM in DMSO and diluted 1 : 20 in assay buffer (100 mM citric acid, 200 mM sodium phosphate, pH 5.6) immediately prior to starting the assay by adding 50 μl of diluted substrate solution to 10 μl of protein KFD48490.1 (Ts-Chit) (5 μg/ml). The reaction mix was incubated for 30 min at 37°C and then quenched by adding 500 μl stop solution (500 mM sodium carbonate, 500 mM sodium bicarbonate, pH 10.7). 250 μl of the reaction solution was transferred in duplicate into a black 96-well plate, and fluorescence of liberated 4-MU was measured using an excitation wavelength of 360 nm and recording emission at 450 nm. The effect of pH on KFD48490.1/Ts-Chit chitinase activity was determined by using assay buffers adjusted to , 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10. Heat stability of Ts-Chit chitinase was assessed by preincubation of the protein for 60 min at different temperatures (4°C–90°C) followed by the chitinase assay.

2.17. Crystallization and X-Ray Data Collection

The recombinant protein solution was dialyzed after initial purification in 20 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5) and purified over a HiLoad 16/600 Superdex 200 pg column with a HEPES running buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.7, 200 mM NaCl, and 1 mM TCEP). Elution fractions were concentrated using Amicon Ultra-4 concentrator tubes (30,000 MWKO) to a final concentration of 33 mg/ml. A Gryphon pipetting robot was used to set up crystallization plates using the JSCG-plus Screen by mixing 0.25 μl protein solution with 0.25 μl crystallization cocktail solution. Plates were sealed and incubated at 20°C. Crystal growth was monitored regularly under an optical microscope. The crystals appeared in condition H7 (0.8 M ammonium sulfate, 0.1 M BIS-Tris pH 5.5, and 25% () PEG 3350). Protein crystals were harvested, cryoprotected using reservoir solution supplemented with 25% () ethylene glycol, and stored in liquid nitrogen. Diffraction data were collected on BL14.1 at the BESSY II synchrotron of the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin [39] and processed using XDSAPP [40]. Relevant processing statistics are shown in Table 2. The structure was solved by molecular replacement using the structure of human chitotriosidase (CHIT1) as a search model (PDB-Id 5HBF, [41]). After several cycles of manual rebuilding using COOT [42] and refinement using REFMAC5 [43], refinement converged at factors of 19 and 23% for the working and the free , respectively (Table 3). The refined structure features good refinement statistics and excellent geometric parameters. The refined coordinates and the associated structure factor amplitudes were deposited in the PDB using the accession code 6G9C.

2.18. Structure-Based Sequence Alignment and Surface Electrostatics

To obtain an overview of structural similarities and differences between Ts-Chit and host chitinases, the topology and secondary structure elements of Ts-Chit were compared to six mouse chitinases and chitinase-like proteins by means of a structure-based amino acid sequence alignment (see Supplementary Information S2). Secondary structure elements were predicted with PSIPRED [44], and a structure-based amino acid sequence alignment was constructed using SBAL [45].

In order to assess whether Ts-Chit possesses any features that might serve as a potential molecular mimicry of host chitinases when acting as an antigen, we undertook a comparison of surface features of Ts-Chit with mouse chitinases. In general, this approach is limited by the availability of only one experimental 3D structure of mouse chitinases. Using the amino acid sequences of three mouse chitinases (M. musculus AMCase, Chit1 isoform 1, and Ym1), known 3D structures or close structural homologues of these proteins were identified in the PDB using pGenThreader [46], revealing mouse AMCase as the only mouse protein suitable for comparison in this context.

Using the monomer and dimer structures of Ts-Chit as well as the structure of mammalian AMCase (PDB 3FY1), surface electrostatics for these three proteins were calculated with APBS [47] and visualized with UCSF Chimera [48].

2.19. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was done using GraphPad Prism software v7 (GraphPad Software, Ca, USA) using the Kruskal-Wallis test (Dunn’s multiple comparisons test), Mann-Whitney test, or unpaired Student -test as indicated. Values with (), p <0.005 (), and p <0.001 () were considered to be significant.

3. Results

3.1. T. suis L1 Stage-Specific Excretory-Secretory Protein KFD48490.1 Affects Allergic Airway Inflammation

We previously showed that T. suis excretory/secretory proteins (ES proteins) collected from L1 hatched in vitro reduced clinical signs of murine allergic airway disease [34]. To identify proteins responsible for this effect, we now investigated the protein composition of L1 ES proteins and compared it to L2, L3, and L4 larval stages of T. suis-released products. For stage-specific expression patterns, parasites were isolated from pigs infected with 8000 TSO at 10, 18, and 28 days postinfection (resulting in L2, L3, and L4 larvae, respectively) and cultivated to collect conditioned media for mass spectrometry. Alternatively, eggs were hatched in vitro to generate L1 larvae and conditioned media, as previously described [34]. Comparative proteomic analysis of T. suis ES proteins (Figure 1(a) and Supplementary Table S1) revealed some overlap between first stage (in vitro hatched) L1 larvae and L2 larvae (10 day larvae), but no overlap of L1 ES proteins with later stages of larval development (L3 ES from 18 day larvae and L4 ES from 28 day larvae). Four L1-specific proteins and two L1/L2-specific proteins with predicted signal sequences and a lack of transmembrane domains (Table 2) were recombinantly expressed. Since glycosylation can be crucial for the immunomodulatory effects of secreted helminth proteins, we used the eukaryotic expression system LEXSY, based on the protozoan L. tarentolae (Figure 1(b)). Notably, selected T. suis L1 proteins were distinct in size (ranging from 13 to 56 kDa, Figure 1(c)), predicted glycosylation sites and homology-based annotation (Table 2).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 1

T. suis L1 ES proteins are highly stage-specific, and candidates reduce allergic airway hyperreactivity when recombinantly expressed and applied. (a) Protein ID counts resulting from proteomic MS-based analysis (see Supplementary Table S1) were compared across the proteomic datasets of T. suis L1, L2, L3, and L4 ES proteins. Shown are protein IDs selected for recombinant expression. (b) Expression cassette of LEXSY eukaryotic expression system illustrating positioning of the export signal peptide that mediates secretion (SP), the selection antibiotic (nourseothricin, NTC), and the His₆-tag for purification (H₆). The cassette was integrated into the L. tarentolae genome. (c) Silver-stained SDS/PAGE gel of recombinantly expressed T. suis L1 proteins. (d) Experimental setup of acute ovalbumin- (OVA-) induced allergic airway hyperreactivity model and treatment regimen with recombinant T. suis proteins. Animals were OVA-sensitized on days 0 and 14 and challenged with OVA intranasally on days 28 and 29. BAL fluid was collected from pretreated or untreated animals at day 31. (e) Total number of cellular infiltrates in BAL fluid. Shown are nonallergic mice (PBS controls), untreated allergic mice (OVA), and treatments with recombinant T. suis proteins indicated by GenBank IDs. (f) Numbers of eosinophils in BAL fluid detected by differential cell counts of cytospin preparations stained with Diff-Quick over the different treatment groups. Data shown are of –10 animals from 2 separate experiments. Statistically significant differences were determined using a Kruskal-Wallis test (Dunn’s multiple comparisons test) and are indicated, .

We initially screened for immunomodulatory effects of the six recombinant T. suis L1 proteins using the OVA- (ovalbumin-) induced allergic airway hyperreactivity model in female BALB/c mice. Mice were treated with recombinant T. suis proteins during sensitization with the allergen OVA on days 0, 7, and 14 (Figure 1(d)). The numbers of total BAL infiltrates and BAL eosinophils were detected 2 days after the 2^nd intranasal OVA challenge at day 31 (Figure 1(d)) and analyzed in parallel to control mice lacking OVA sensitization, but receiving OVA-challenged mice (PBS) and untreated allergic mice (OVA). Analysis of total cell numbers and cellular composition of the BAL fluid found that KFD48490.1 (homologous to T. trichiura acidic mammalian chitinase) and KFD45500.1 (homologous to T. trichiura venom allergen 5) reduced the total numbers of cellular BAL fluid infiltrates, but only KFD48490.1-treated mice showed a significant reduction of eosinophils infiltrating the lungs in comparison to untreated allergic (OVA) mice (Figures 1(e) and 1(f)).

3.2. Immunoregulatory KFD48490.1 Is an Active Chitinase of T. suis L1 Larvae

Based on amino acid sequence similarity, database research predicted KFD48490.1 was homologous to acidic mammalian chitinase (AMCase) of T. trichiura (Table 2). The amino acid sequence of KFD48490.1 revealed the presence of the catalytic motive DxDxE (T. suis DLDWE, Figure 2(a)), typically observed for active chitinases, and a C-terminal chitin-binding domain with cysteine residues responsible for the chitin binding (Figure 2(a)). Alignment studies additionally proved high sequence similarities to other known helminth chitinases including a putative endochitinase from the pig infecting Ascaris suum and a glycosyl hydrolase from the human hookworm N. americanus (Figure 2(b)). Active chitinases cleave chitin from the end of a polymer chain (exochitinase) and/or hydrolyse small oligomers to generate N-acetylglucosamine monomers within the oligomer chain (endochitinase) [49]. To examine whether KFD48490.1 exerts true chitinase activity, we used two different substrates, 4-MU-(GlcNAc)₃ and 4-MU-(GlcNAc)₂, allowing us to evaluate both endo- and exochitinase activity, respectively (Figure 2(c)). KFD48490.1 clearly presented both, endo- and exochitinase activity, whereas extensive, heat-induced proteolysis resulted in a loss of chitinase activity (Figure 2(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 2

KFD48490.1 is an active chitinase. (a) KFD48490.1 amino acid sequence with mapped signal peptide (red), catalytically active residues (highlighted in blue and red), and the chitin-binding domain (black, italic). (b) Amino acid sequence alignment of KFD48490.1 and known nematode chitinases. (c) Fluorimetric chitinase assay testing recombinant KFD48490.1, heat-inactivated KFD48490.1, and a chitinase control enzyme (ctrl) with substrates for endochitinase (left) and exochitinase (right) activity. Data shown are of replicates from one of three independent experiments. (d) Chitinase assay testing KFD48490.1 activity depending on pH (range 2-10). (e) Chitinase assay testing KFD48490.1 preincubated at different temperatures (4–90°C) for 1 h prior to the assay. Data shown are of replicates.

With regard to the biology of nematodes, we explored the influence of low pH and high temperatures hypothesizing that T. suis chitinase will be active at low pH and elevated temperatures in the pig’s intestine to support larval hatching and development [50, 51]. Interestingly, KFD48490.1 remained enzymatically active over a wide range of pH 4–7 (Figure 2(d)) and up to temperatures of 50°C (Figure 2(e)). Together, these data confirmed the functional annotation of KFD48490.1 as T. suis L1 true chitinase, and thus, the protein is referred to as Ts-Chit from hereon.

3.3. T. suis Chitinase Does Not Act on DC Activation Marker or T Cell Proliferation

Direct immunomodulatory effects of ES or soluble proteins from adult and larval parasitic nematodes have previously been shown in vitro, and various modulatory activities were found such as targeting proinflammatory cytokine release from bone marrow-derived dendritic cells or macrophages and induction of arginase-1, IL-10, and NO in macrophages [4, 31, 36, 52, 53], the suppression of antigen-specific or unspecific CD4⁺ T cell proliferation [54], or induction of Foxp3⁺ regulatory T cells [19, 55]. Hence, we investigated T. suis chitinase (Ts-Chit) activity on dendritic cell activation and T cell proliferation. Recombinant Ts-Chit did not interfere with upregulation of LPS- or CpG-induced activation markers on bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDC) such as MHCII, CD86, or Ox40L (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). While CpG-induced proinflammatory cytokine expression was not affected (Figure 3(c)), we observed reduced secretion of LPS-induced IL-12p40 and TNFαwhen BMDC were treated with Ts-Chit. We could also not detect induction of regulatory IL-10 in BMDC (Figure 3(c)). Similarly, TCR-unspecific proliferation of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells was not affected (Figures 3(d) and 3(e)) when cultured in the presence of Ts-Chit. OVA-tg CD4⁺ T cells loaded onto OVA-presenting BMDC resulted in similar proliferation of OVA-recognizing T cells in both Ts-Chit-treated and Ts-Chit-untreated cultures (Figures 3(f) and 3(g)). Again, we did not observe significant effects on T cell polarization (Figure 3(g)). Although a strong, direct immunomodulatory activity of Ts-Chit was not established by the in vitro assays that we performed, we aimed to decipher what caused the in vivo effects of the nematode chitinase and went back to the mouse model of AHR.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

Figure 3

No direct effects of T. suis chitinase on DC activation or T cell proliferation. (a) Experimental setup of analyzing effects of Ts-Chit on activation marker und cytokine release from bone marrow-derived dendritic cells. (b) MFI of MHCII, CD86, and Ox40L expression analyzed by flow cytometry. Data are presented as individual values and of animals from separate experiments. (c) Cytokine levels of IL-6, IL-12p40, IL-10, and TNFα of BMDC supernatants harvested 24.5 h following TLR ligation and Ts-Chit treatment detected by ELISA. Data are presented as individual values and of -9 animals from separate experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test, and results are indicated by . (d) Experimental setup of analyzing effects of Ts-Chit on CD3e/CD28-induced T cell proliferation using CFSE-labeled splenocytes. (e) Exemplary histogram of CFSE dilution in CD4⁺ T cells with (gray) and without (black) anti-CD3e/CD28 stimulation and summarized in bar graphs for CD4 and CD8 T cell proliferation. Data are presented as individual values and of animals from separate experiments. (f) Experimental setup of analyzing effects of Ts-Chit on antigen-dependent T cell proliferation and differentiation. MACS-purified CD4⁺ T cells from DO11.10 mice were cocultured with OVA-loaded BMDC in the absence or presence of Ts-Chit. (g) CFSE dilution of CD4⁺ T cells and transcription factor expression of Foxp3, Tbet, and GATA3 were analyzed in CFSE^low CD4⁺ T cell and were analyzed by flow cytometry and presented as summarized for n =5 mice from two independent experiments.

3.4. T. suis Chitinase- (Ts-Chit-) Mediated Regulation of Airway Hyperreactivity Only Partially Depends on Protein Integrity

To investigate the effects of Ts-Chit treatment on allergic airway disease, we analyzed airway resistance, expiration time, and BAL fluid profiles in more detail. In addition, we included a group of mice treated with heat-inactivated, recombinant Ts-Chit to assess whether immunomodulatory effects were linked to the enzymatically active T. suis chitinase protein.

Treatment of animals with intact and active Ts-Chit significantly reduced the number of total cells (Figure 4(a)) and eosinophils (Figure 4(b)) present in BAL fluid 2 days after 2^nd OVA challenge. Differential cell counts of BAL fluid further revealed that neutrophil numbers were largely unaffected (Figure 4(c)). A trend towards an increase of alveolar macrophage cell numbers was observed in Ts-Chit compared to allergic (OVA) mice (Figure 4(d)). Flow cytometry of BAL cells confirmed the reduced frequency of eosinophils (CD45⁺CD11b⁺GR1^lowCD11c^-SiglecF⁺) in Ts-Chit-treated compared to untreated (OVA) allergic animals (Figures 4(e) and 4(f)) and also supported increased frequencies of alveolar macrophages, identified as CD11b^lowCD11c⁺ cells among CD45⁺ cells (Figure 4(g)), as observed as a trend in differential cell counts. The respiratory responses resulting from Ts-Chit treatment were measured using noninvasive whole-body plethysmography 24 h after OVA challenge. Importantly, also, the nonsensitized control group (PBS) was intranasally challenged with OVA. Preventative administration of Ts-Chit caused restoration of expiration time to the level of PBS control mice at baseline (Figure 4(h)). A trend in recovery was also noticed for treating with heat-inactivated Ts-Chit (Figure 4(h)). Measuring airway resistance to increasing doses of methacholine (MCh) revealed that Ts-Chit treatment attenuated exacerbation of MCh-induced airway hyperreactivity, but treatment with inactivated Ts-Chit also had some effects (Figures 4(h)–4(j)). We next evaluated whether the reduced cellularity and improved lung function observed in Ts-Chit-treated animals were reflected in BAL cytokine levels. OVA sensitization and challenge caused a significant increase of the cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 detected in BAL fluid; however, Ts-Chit treatment did not reduce but rather enhanced local Th2 cytokine production (Figure 4(k)). Of note, TNFα levels in BAL did not vary among groups (data not shown). Interestingly, Ts-Chit and heat-inactivated Ts-Chit alike accelerated IL-18 levels in BAL fluid (Figure 4(k)), a cytokine known to induce IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 release by mast cells and basophils [56]. Thus, cellular infiltration and the respiratory response were improved in mice treated with Ts-Chit, but Th2 cytokine level in BAL was unchanged or elevated in comparison to untreated allergic mice (OVA). Phenotyping of lung inflammatory CD4 T cells revealed elevated frequencies of IL-13-producing and GATA3-expressing Th2 cells in mice receiving Ts-Chit or inactivated Ts-Chit (Figure 4(l)), supporting our findings on enhanced local Th2 responses in chitinase-treated mice independent from the functional integrity of the nematode chitinase.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

(k)

(l)

Figure 4

Ts-Chit treatment mediates attenuation of airway hyperreactivity. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed two days after OVA challenge, and the BAL fluid was examined for (a) total number of infiltrating cells (Neubauer chamber), (b) BAL eosinophils, (c) BAL neutrophils, and (d) monocytes/macrophages using cytospin preparations and Diff-Quik staining. (e) Representative plots of BAL-infiltrating cells using flow cytometry and focusing on eosinophil frequencies (identified as CD45⁺CD11b⁺GR1^lowCD11c^-SiglecF⁺). Summary of flow cytometric analysis of (f) BAL eosinophils and (g) alveolar macrophages (CD45⁺CD11b^lowCD11c⁺). (h) Basal expiration time during PBS inhalation measured using whole-body double-chamber plethysmography 24 h after OVA challenge. (i) Concentration response curve of methacholine sensitivity. Specific airway resistance () was assessed in response to increasing doses of methacholine. (j) values recorded when nebulizing 50 mg/ml of methacholine. (k) BAL cytokines detected two days after challenge using bead-based multiplexing. (l) Exemplary contour plots showing IL-13/GATA3 coexpression among lung-infiltrating CD4⁺ T cells of allergic mice. Bar graph summarizes GATA3 frequency among CD4⁺Foxp3^- T cells of lung lymphocytes of treatment groups (–5 mice per group). (a–k) Data are presented as of –12 animals from separate experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test, and results are indicated by , , and .

To further delineate the direct effects of Ts-Chit treatment on lung inflammation of OVA-sensitized and OVA-challenged mice, we investigated lung tissue pathology and recruitment of alternatively activated macrophages (AAM). While histopathological findings remained overall similar in the lungs of untreated (OVA) and Ts-Chit-treated allergic animals (Figure 5(a)), immunohistochemistry revealed increased numbers of interstitial RELMα⁺ cells, a signature marker for AAM that mediates lung vascularization and tissue repair [57, 58] when mice were treated with Ts-Chit compared to OVA (Figures 5(b) and 5(c)). A similar trend was observed for inactivated Ts-Chit-treated animals. Since this was in contrast to our previous observation on Ts-ES L1-induced suppression of RELMα⁺ cells [34] and given that the resistin-like molecule (RELM) α is expressed not only in macrophages but also in epithelial cells and tissue-infiltrating eosinophils, we used smaller groups of mice to define RELMα expression to a interstitial macrophage phenotype by flow cytometry. Lung tissue macrophages were analyzed in homogenates of lavaged lungs and defined as EpCAM^-CD11c⁺CD64⁺MHCII⁺SiglecF^- (Figure 5(d)). While overall frequencies of tissue macrophages were not affected by Ts-Chit treatment (Figure 5(e)), we again detected an increase in RELMα⁺ macrophages but did not reach statistical significance (Figure 5(f)). However, we found no indication for direct effects of Ts-Chit on RELMα⁺ expression in macrophages when analyzing RELMα⁺ mRNA levels in bone marrow-derived macrophages stimulated with recombinant Ts-Chit in vitro (data not shown).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

Figure 5

Ts-Chit-mediated effects on lung parenchymal macrophages. (a) Histopathological evaluation of tissue inflammation. (b) Histological sections of paraffin-embedded lung tissues from treated (Ts-Chit and Ts-Chit inact.), untreated (OVA), and nonsensitized (PBS) controls stained for RELMα (red) and hematoxylin (steel blue) and presented at 400× magnification. (c) Histological quantification of interstitial RELMα⁺ cells. (d) Gating strategy and representative plots of RELMα⁺ macrophages (EpCAM^-CD11c⁺CD64⁺MHCII⁺Siglec^-) of lung homogenates from OVA-sensitized and challenged mice with or without Ts-Chit treatment summarized in (e) and (f). (g) mRNA expression of arginase-1, monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP1/CCL-2), and CCL-11/eotaxin in lung tissue samples of mice from challenge experiments after lung lavage. Expression was normalized by using the housekeeper gene peptidyl prolyl isomerase A (PPIA) and is presented as fold difference to the PBS control group. (a, c, g) Data are presented as of –12 animals from separate experiments. (d–f) Data are generated from –10 mice from two independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test and is indicated by and .

Contrary to the increase of RELMα⁺ cells in the lung, RT-PCR of homogenized lung tissue of all groups of mice revealed downregulation of arginase-1 and MCP-1 mRNA when mice were treated with intact and also inactivated Ts-Chit compared to PBS (Figure 5(g)). Supporting reduced numbers of eosinophil infiltration upon Ts-Chit treatment, we detected downregulation of CCL11/eotaxin mRNA, a potent eosinophil chemoattractant that stimulates recruitment of eosinophils from the blood to sites of allergic inflammation (Figure 5(e)). Together, these data illustrate that protein integrity of the Ts-Chit is only partially responsible for the treatment effects leading to attenuated airway hyperreactivity.

3.5. T. suis Chitinase Treatment Interferes with Murine Chitinase in AHR

From our in vitro and AHR experiments, we concluded that a direct immunomodulatory effect of T. suis chitinase or its chitinase activity was very unlikely. However, considering the high sequence similarities to known chitinases and CLPs, we asked whether Ts-Chit treatment of allergic mice interfered with the effector functions of its murine counterpart, the acidic mammalian chitinase (AMCase). AMCase is secreted by macrophages and epithelial cells of the lung and gut and in the lungs constitutively expressed and secreted into the airway lumen. STAT6-activating signals, such as IL-13, further induce AMCase expression, and elevated AMCase mRNA and protein levels are detected in BAL of OVA-induced asthmatic mice [59]. Experimentally, the administration of anti-AMCase sera was shown to reduce BAL and tissue eosinophilia and BAL chitinase activity [59]. We therefore examined BAL fluid of allergic mice for chitinase activity. And indeed, chitinase activity was found to be reduced in the BAL of allergic mice treated with intact and inactivated Ts-Chit compared to untreated (OVA) mice (Figure 6(a)). In line with that, we detected decreased AMCase transcript level (Chia1) mRNA transcripts in lung tissue snips of allergic Ts-Chit-treated compared to untreated (OVA) mice (Figure 6(b)). We therefore examined the implications of Ts-Chit treatment on the family of murine chitinases and chitinase-like proteins (CLP) that are highly implicated in pathology of Th2-mediated allergic airway inflammation [60]. Interestingly, T. suis chitinase was shown to have a high percentage of amino acid sequence identity when compared to the two true murine chitinases (AMCase (41.6%) and Chit1 (41.5%)) or the murine CLPs Ym1 (39%), Ym2 (37.5%), or BRP-39 (36.7%) (Suppl. Fig. 2); its protein structure, however, is not known so far.

(a)

(b)

Figure 6

Ts-Chit treatment interferes with murine chitinase activity. (a) Chitinase assay testing BAL samples of allergic mice with endochitinase substrate. Data shown are of –5 replicates. (b) mRNA expression of murine chitinase AMCase (Chia1) in lung tissue samples of mice from AHR challenge experiments after lung lavage. Expression was normalized by using the housekeeper gene peptidyl prolyl isomerase A (PPIA) and is presented as fold difference to the PBS group. Data are presented as of animals from separate experiments. Data were analyzed statistically using an unpaired -test.

3.6. T. suis Chitinase Reveals High Structural Similarity to Murine Chitinase but Presents Dimeric Structure

To better understand structural differences between nematode and mammalian chitinases, we determined the crystal structure of the nematode chitinase protein by X-ray crystallography. The final model analysis data collection and refinement statistics are summarized in Table 3. They indicate that the structure is of high resolution, that it is well refined to very good statistics, and hence that it is of high quality. The overall structure reveals a TIM-barrel or (βα)8-barrel motif, which means that 8 β-strands form the central barrel which is surrounded by 8 α-helices (Figures 7(a) and 7(c)). The active site with the sequence motif D₁₄₉xD₁₅₁xE₁₅₃ is depicted in Figure 7 A.2. The crystal structure furthermore revealed a C2-symmetric dimer of the protein, which is stabilized by an intermolecular disulfide bond formed by a cysteine residue at position 180 (Figures 7 A.1 and 7(b)). Such dimerization has not been described so far for human or murine chitinases, nor has the occurrence of a cysteine residue at position 180. In addition, the structural alignment with human AMCase (3FXY), human chitotriosidase (1GUV), human YKL-40 (1NWR), and murine Ym1 (1VF8) (Figure 7(c)) indicates highly similar structural features in the core regions (marked in red) and certain areas, mostly at the protein surface, where the structure differs between nematode and mammalian chitinases (highlighted in green/blue). A detailed structure-based sequence alignment of T. suis chitinase, mouse chitinases, and CLPs is given in Supplementary S2. Notably, the C-terminal region of Ts-Chit from amino acids 401 to 495 contains many threonine repeats and is referred to as unordered region. The T. suis chitinase dimerization was further examined by comparing reducing (+ β-mercaptoethanol) and nonreducing (- β-mercaptoethanol) conditions for SDS/PAGE loading. We indeed detected a second, higher band at around 75 kDa indicative for dimerization under nonreducing conditions (Figure 7(d)).

Figure 7

Three-dimensional structure of T. suis chitinase (Ts-Chit). (a) Overall structure of Ts-Chit forming a C2-symmetric dimer (α-helices in red, ß-strands in blue). The inset A.1 depicts the dimer-stabilizing disulfide bond-forming cysteine residue at position 180, while the inset A.2 highlights the catalytic DxDxE center. (b) Ts-Chit dimer rotated by 90° compared to (a). (c) Ts-Chit monomer and its structural alignment with AMCase (PDB Id 3FXY, [84]), human Chit1 (PDB-Id 1GUV, [85]), human YKL-40 (PDB-Id 1NWR, [86]), and murine Ym1 (PDB-Id 1VF8, [87]). (d) Silver-stained SDS/PAGE gel of recombinantly expressed Ts-Chit (1 μg) under reducing (+ß-Merc.) and nonreducing (-ß-Merc.) loading conditions.

Following the idea that T. suis interferes with murine chitinase activity during allergic airway hyperreactivity, we more specifically compared surface features of Ts-Chit and AMCase (PDB: 3FY1), the only acidic chitinase with known experimental 3D structure. To that effect, the surface electrostatics for mammalian AMCase and the Ts-Chit monomer were visualized and appraised. While investigating the monomer alone did not reveal any strikingly identical surface patches, looking at the dimerization region around α3/α4-α3/α4 (α3:~127-142; α4:~161-180) revealed similarities with an acidic surface patch of AMCase (Figure 8(a)).

Figure 8

Electrostatic surface representation of mammalian AMCase (PDB 3FY1) and the Ts-Chit dimer. (a) In the Ts-Chit dimer, a surface patch of similar charge and shape as observed in mammalian AMCase is formed. The similar, acidic surface patch in both molecules is circled. (b) Cartoon rendering of AMCase and Ts-Chit in the same orientation as in the upper panel. The location of the circled residues in AMCase is highlighted in blue. Helices α3 and α4 contributing to the dimer formation in Ts-Chit are colored turquoise and orange, respectively. The surface electrostatics were calculated with APBS and visualized with UCSF Chimera.

In summary, this first crystallographic structure analysis of a parasitic nematode chitinase revealed Ts-Chit dimerization and the concomitant existence of surface patches absent in the monomeric protein. The surface electrostatics of these dimer-specific patches show a remarkable similarity between T. suis chitinase and murine AMCase. The structural und functional similarity of T. suis chitinase and murine AMCase could either mean that Ts-Chit is sensed similar to murine AMCase resulting in cumulative effects or in turn that Ts-Chit interferes with murine AMCase function during lung inflammation.

4. Discussion

An efficient strategy of parasitic nematodes to ensure survival, growth, and reproduction in immunocompetent hosts involves immunoregulation of the host immune response. Being equipped with excretory and secretory systems [61], parasitic nematodes release several products (ES products) that shape their host immune response [1]. It is those yet unidentified ES immunomodulatory molecules that bear the therapeutic potential for targeting immune-mediated diseases.

Following the complex life cycles of parasitic nematodes, there is evidence for life cycle stage-specific expression and release of distinct sets of ES molecules needed to fulfill specific tasks [31, 62, 63]. We have previously reported that total ES proteins of the very early larval stage (L1) of the whipworm T. suis very efficiently ameliorate allergic lung disease in a model of OVA-induced AHR when applied during the sensitization phase [34]. Notably, in TSO therapy for indications such as ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, or various autoimmune diseases including diabetes and multiple sclerosis (MS), patients are repeatedly exposed to the early larval stages of T. suis owing to the fact that T. suis only transiently infects human intestines [23, 64]. Patients receiving TSO therapy, however, seem to not equally benefit from the worm therapy [22, 26–28]. In this context, we observed a considerable degree of interindividual variability in the adaptive immune responses to this helminth treatment [29] suggesting that even how the anti-TSO response is formed depends on the environmental and inflammatory context of the individual treatment.

This led us to suggest a role for mediators being released very early during infection by the first larval stages, and we therefore focused on the identification of specific L1 ES immunomodulators of T. suis and their potential immunomodulatory mechanisms. We compared ES proteins collected from hatched L1 versus later larval stages (10, 18, and 28 day old) isolated from the intestines of infected pigs by using LC-MS/MS. Among the 33 proteins that were identified in the ES of in vitro-hatched T. suis L1, 8 proteins were also found in the ES of L2 larvae, but no overlap to later larval stages. We concentrated on proteins selectively expressed by the first two larval stages (L1 and L2), equipped with a signal peptide and devoid of a transmembrane domain. A large proportion of proteins detected in T. suis ES are not encoded with a signal peptide, which is in line with reports from other species [65–67]. Over the course of this study, the genome of the porcine whipworm T. suis published in 2014 [68] had been complemented with two slightly larger assemblies of male and female worms that in turn added on to the number of identified protein IDs.

Screening six recombinantly expressed L1 ES proteins, eukaryotically produced in L. tarentolae, in a model of OVA-induced allergic airway hyperreactivity revealed that the application of T. suis KFD48490.1 markedly reduced inflammatory lung infiltrates, partly mimicking the effects of total T. suis L1 ES [34]. Our results further proved that KFD48490.1 is an enzymatically active chitinase of T. suis. The enzyme retained its high activity in the pH range from 4 to 6 and thus is relatively resistant to acidic pH similar to what has been documented for acidic mammalian chitinases [69, 70].

Chitinases are glycosyl hydrolases (GH) with the ability to directly degrade chitin polymers to low molecular weight chitooligomers (reviewed in [71]). Based on amino acid sequence similarity, the T. suis chitinase belongs to GH family 18 characterized by an enzyme core of 8 β-strands forming a barrel that is surrounded by α-helices, as well as the conserved sequence DxDxE forming the active site. Chitinases have essential roles in the life cycle of many parasites, supported by the existence of multiple genes as well as tissue- and stage-specific expression patterns [72–74]. Chitinase activity in helminth biology is thought to be essential during embryonic development, larval molting, and degradation of the chitinous matrix [75, 76], suggesting that chitinases might be attractive intervention targets [50].

In the context of allergic lung disease, however, chitinases play a key role in mediating the Th2-driven inflammatory responses commonly associated with asthma and have been investigated to indicate disease severity [59, 77, 78]. Mice express two enzymatically active chitinases, acidic mammalian chitinase (AMCase) and chitotriosidase (Chit), and a set of enzymatically inactive chitinase-like proteins (Ym1, Ym2, and BRP39). AMCase is secreted by macrophages and epithelial cells of the lung and gut. In the lungs, it is constitutively expressed and secreted into the airway lumen. STAT6-activating signals, such as IL-13, further induce AMCase expression, and elevated AMCase mRNA and protein levels are detected in BAL of OVA-induced asthmatic mice [59]. Even though the mechanism of action of most mammalian chitinases and CLPs is not fully understood, stimulation of alveolar macrophages and enhancing tissue inflammation are likely to be involved. Hartl and coworkers [79] who showed that AMCase physically interacts with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) to induce the production of, e.g., MCP-1, CCL17, and IL-8, in lung epithelial cells also reported an autocrine and/or paracrine feedback mechanism for AMCase in protecting airway epithelial cells from Fas ligand- (FasL-) and growth factor withdrawal-induced apoptosis [79, 80]. Therefore, it is not surprising that blocking AMCase activity by administration of anti-AMCase sera reduced BAL and tissue eosinophilia [59]. Similarly, in a gut inflammation model, it has been shown that the panchitinase inhibitor caffeine was able to dampen inflammation in a DSS-induced colitis model [81].

We now demonstrate that treating mice with a worm-derived chitinase from T. suis (Ts-Chit) during sensitization reduced BAL infiltrates and eosinophilia, increased numbers of RELMα⁺ interstitial cells, and improved overall lung function. Finding increased RELMα⁺ lung macrophages might reflect an increased capacity of Ts-Chit-treated animals to limit Th2-mediated inflammation and initiate tissue repair [57].

Disease amelioration was linked to enhanced local Th2 responses in lung tissues, and heat-inactivated Ts-Chit was able to partly phenocopy these effects in vivo, suggesting that the functional chitinase domain is not entirely responsible for the effects observed. Using different in vitro assays, we investigated potential immunomodulatory effects of Ts-Chit on DC and T cell activation but found no evidence for a direct effect on immune cells as shown in other studies [31, 55]. Yet, we cannot rule out any direct cellular effects of Ts-Chit on mammalian cells.

Our in vivo results, however, suggest a mechanism related to the one suggested by Zhu and colleagues [59] that report on blocking AMCase activity using antiserum treatment to reduce AHR severity. Similar to that study, we show here that Ts-Chit treatment had no suppressive effects on Th2 inductive responses such IL-4 and IL-13 as well as IL-5 levels. Zhu and coworkers further demonstrated that anti-AMCase sera diminished the ability of IL-13 to stimulate eotaxin and monocyte-chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1), reflected by our results following treatment with the worm chitinase. Besides anti-AMCase treatment, other approaches have been used to address AMCase activity, such as inhibition with small molecule [82] or RNA interference [83], and demonstrated suppressed eotaxin, MCP-1, and MIP-1ß levels when AMCase activity or expression was inhibited.

Sequence alignment demonstrates a relatively high degree of similarity between T. suis chitinase and AMCase, but also to CLPs such as YM1, Ym2, or BRP39. Given the high homology of T. suis and murine chitinases, both summative and interfering effects would be conceivable. Our in vivo observations on reduced chemokine expression and eosinophil infiltration, but nonsuppressed Th2 responses, rather points towards a scenario where treatment with the worm chitinase interferes with the host’s own chitinase activity triggered upon lung inflammation. As a first indication, we observed decreased host chitinase activity in BAL and a decrease in lung tissue AMCase transcripts following treatment with the structurally highly similar worm chitinase. Whether these findings are a consequence of the overall reduced lung inflammation or result from chitinase protein interference still needs to be verified.

The X-ray crystal structure of Ts-Chit reported here confirmed the expected high structural similarity of the nematode chitinase with murine acidic mammalian chitinase. In addition, analysis of surface electrostatics of the Ts-Chit dimer suggests the existence of an acidic surface patch on the nematode protein that bears similarity to a surface feature on AMCase monomers. This might point to molecular mimicry mechanisms, a phenomenon that is triggered by a high degree of similarity of pathogen and host epitopes. Future studies need to investigate whether structural similarity between T. suis chitinase and murine chitinases or CLPs is potentially linked to a serological response limiting activity of host AMCase similar to the study of Zhu and colleagues that applied anti-AMCase sera to ameliorate lung inflammation [59].

5. Conclusion

In summary, we investigated L1 stage-specific, secreted proteins of T. suis and their capacity for immunomodulation of allergic lung disease. We identified an active chitinase of T. suis that, when applied during sensitization of an allergic response, reduced eosinophilia and lung chemokine responses. These findings add to our understanding of specific functions of early secreted T. suis products in helminth biology and when considered as therapeutics to create an anti-inflammatory environment. The structural similarity between the worm chitinase and its host equivalent, the absence of direct cellular effects, and the potential to interfere with murine chitinase activity suggest an alternative mechanism of Ts-Chit ameliorating OVA-induced, allergic lung disease that likely involves structural mimicry. Such a mechanism of immunomodulation could be one of those unrecognized strategies of mediating anti-inflammatory responses.

Abbreviations

AAM:	Alternatively activated macrophages
AHR:	Airway hyperreactivity
AMCase:	Acidic mammalian chitinase
BAL:	Bronchoalveolar lavage
Chit:	Chitinase
CLPs:	Chitinase-like proteins
ES:	Excretory-secretory
ESP:	Excretory-secretory proteins
GH:	Glycosyl hydrolases
L1:	Fist larval stage
LEXSY:	Leishmania expression system
MS:	Mass spectrometry
OVA:	Ovalbumin
RELMα:	Resistin-like molecule alpha
SPs:	Soluble proteins
TCEP:	Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine
T. suis:	Trichuris suis
Ts-Chit:	Trichuris suis chitinase
Ts-ES:	Trichuris suis excretory-secretory proteins
TSO:	Trichuris suis ova
TTO:	Trichuris trichiura ova
UC:	Ulcerative colitis.

Data Availability

The authors provide the MS/MS dataset in the Supplementary Information files. Additional data will be made available through the authors upon request.

Disclosure

Piotr H. Malecki’s current address is Department of Structural Biology of Prokaryotic Organisms, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Science, Poland.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

F. E. and S. H. were responsible for conceptualization. K. L., F. E., M. S. W., P. H. M., J. Z., and K. J. were responsible for the methodology. K. L., F. E., A. A. K., K. J., A.N., M. S. W., P. H. M., and A. H. were responsible for investigation. K. J., A. N., and P. H. M. were responsible for data curation. F. E., K. L., and S. H. were responsible for writing. S. H. was responsible for funding acquisition. T. E. S., A. H., M. S. W., J. Z., and S. H. were responsible for resources. A. H., A. A. K., and A. H. were responsible for formal analysis. F. E., K. L., P. H. M., M. S. W., and A. H. were responsible for visualization. F. E., M. S. W., and S. H. were responsible for supervision. Friederike Ebner and Katja Lindner contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully thank Marion Müller, Christiane Palissa, Yvonne Weber, Bettina Sonnenburg, and Beate Anders for the excellent technical assistance and Franziska Rohr for her help within the animal facility. We also thank Prof. Judith E. Allen for her expertise, critical advice, and intellectual discussion of the topic. This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (GRK 1673 to S. H.), the FAZIT Stiftung (to K. L.), and Coronado Biosciences (to S. H.).

Supplementary Materials

Table S1: mass spectrometric identification of T. suis larval ES proteins. Precipitated proteins were reduced, alkylated, tryptic digested, and analyzed by LC-MSMS and Mascot searches against the NCBI database. Significant hits (+) were identified with >2 peptides (); nonsignificant candidates (c) are also listed. Homologous proteins are grouped to the same number. S2: comparison of topology and secondary structure elements of T. suis chitinase with mouse chitinases and chitinase-like proteins (CLPs). Structure-based amino acid sequence alignment of T. suis chitinase (Ts-Chit) with murine Ym1 (Chil3), Ym2 (Chil4), chitotriosidase isoforms 1 and 2 (Chit1_1, Chit1_2), AMCase (Chia), and BRP-39 (Chil1). Secondary structure elements were predicted and visualized with PSIPRED [1] and SBAL [2], indicating α-helices in green, β-strands in red, and cysteines in yellow. The top line shows the annotation with secondary structure elements observed in the crystal structure of Ts-Chit and the catalytic motive DxDxE [44, 45]. (Supplementary Materials)

References

J. P. Hewitson, J. R. Grainger, and R. M. Maizels, “Helminth immunoregulation: the role of parasite secreted proteins in modulating host immunity,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 167, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. J. McSorley, J. P. Hewitson, and R. M. Maizels, “Immunomodulation by helminth parasites: defining mechanisms and mediators,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 43, no. 3-4, pp. 301–310, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Coakley, A. H. Buck, and R. M. Maizels, “Host parasite communications--messages from helminths for the immune system: parasite communication and cell-cell interactions,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Schnoeller, S. Rausch, S. Pillai et al., “A helminth immunomodulator reduces allergic and inflammatory responses by induction of IL-10-producing macrophages,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 180, no. 6, pp. 4265–4272, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Daniłowicz-Luebert, S. Steinfelder, A. A. Kühl et al., “A nematode immunomodulator suppresses grass pollen-specific allergic responses by controlling excessive Th2 inflammation,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 43, no. 3–4, pp. 201–210, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Whelan, S. Rausch, F. Ebner et al., “A transgenic probiotic secreting a parasite immunomodulator for site-directed treatment of gut inflammation,” Molecular Therapy [Internet], vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1730–1740, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ziegler, S. Rausch, S. Steinfelder et al., “A novel regulatory macrophage induced by a helminth molecule instructs IL-10 in CD4+ T cells and protects against mucosal inflammation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 194, no. 4, pp. 1555–1564, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Pineda, F. Lumb, M. M. Harnett, and W. Harnett, “ES-62, a therapeutic anti-inflammatory agent evolved by the filarial nematode Acanthocheilonema viteae,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 194, no. 1–2, pp. 1–8, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. T. Rodgers, M. A. McGrath, M. A. Pineda et al., “The parasitic worm product ES-62 targets myeloid differentiation factor 88–dependent effector mechanisms to suppress antinuclear antibody production and proteinuria in MRL/lpr mice,” Arthritis & Rhematology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 1023–1035, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. B. McInnes, B. P. Leung, M. Harnett, J. A. Gracie, F. Y. Liew, and W. Harnett, “A novel therapeutic approach targeting articular inflammation using the filarial nematode-derived phosphorylcholine-containing glycoprotein ES-62,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 171, no. 4, pp. 2127–2133, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Rzepecka, I. Siebeke, J. C. Coltherd et al., “The helminth product, ES-62, protects against airway inflammation by resetting the Th cell phenotype,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 43, no. 3–4, pp. 211–223, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Zaccone, Z. Fehérvári, F. M. Jones et al., “Schistosoma mansoni antigens modulate the activity of the innate immune response and prevent onset of type 1 diabetes,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1439–1449, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Zaccone, O. Burton, N. Miller, F. M. Jones, D. W. Dunne, and A. Cooke, “Schistosoma mansoni egg antigens induce Treg that participate in diabetes prevention in NOD mice,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1098–1107, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Janssen, G. L. Silva Santos, H. S. Muller, A. R. A. Vieira, T. A. de Campos, and V. de Paulo Martins, “Schistosome-derived molecules as modulating actors of the immune system and promising candidates to treat autoimmune and inflammatory diseases,” Journal of immunology research, vol. 2016, Article ID 5267485, 14 pages, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sarazin, A. Dendooven, M. Delbeke et al., “Treatment with P28GST, a schistosome-derived enzyme, after acute colitis induction in mice: decrease of intestinal inflammation associated with a down regulation of Th1/Th17 responses,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 12, article e0209681, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Ramos-Benitez, C. Ruiz-Jimenez, J. J. Rosado-Franco et al., “Fh15 blocks the lipopolysaccharide-induced cytokine storm while modulating peritoneal macrophage migration and CD38 expression within spleen macrophages in a mouse model of septic shock,” mSphere, vol. 3, no. 6, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Roig, M. L. Saiz, A. Galiano et al., “Extracellular vesicles from the helminth Fasciola hepatica prevent DSS-induced acute ulcerative colitis in a T-lymphocyte independent mode,” Frontiers in microbiology, vol. 9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. J. McSorley, N. F. Blair, K. A. Smith, A. N. J. McKenzie, and R. M. Maizels, “Blockade of IL-33 release and suppression of type 2 innate lymphoid cell responses by helminth secreted products in airway allergy,” Mucosal immunology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1068–1078, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. J. C. Johnston, D. J. Smyth, R. B. Kodali et al., “A structurally distinct TGF-β mimic from an intestinal helminth parasite potently induces regulatory T cells,” Nature communications, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1741, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. S. Togre, P. S. Bhoj, V. K. Khatri et al., “SXP-RAL family filarial protein, rWbL2, prevents development of DSS-induced acute ulcerative colitis,” Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 282–289, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. P. Amdare, V. K. Khatri, R. S. P. Yadav, A. Tarnekar, K. Goswami, and M. V. R. Reddy, “Therapeutic potential of the immunomodulatory proteins Wuchereria bancrofti L2 and Brugia malayi abundant larval transcript 2 against streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetes in mice,” Journal of Helminthology, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 539–548, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. O. Fleming and J. V. Weinstock, “Clinical trials of helminth therapy in autoimmune diseases: rationale and findings,” Parasite Immunology, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 277–292, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. W. Summers, D. E. Elliott, K. Qadir, J. F. Urban Jr., R. Thompson, and J. V. Weinstock, “Trichuris suis seems to be safe and possibly effective in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 98, no. 9, pp. 2034–2041, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. W. Summers, D. E. Elliott, J. F. Urban, R. A. Thompson, and J. V. Weinstock, “Trichuris suis therapy for active ulcerative colitis: a randomized controlled trial,” Gastroenterology, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 825–832, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. W. Summers, D. E. Elliott, Urban JF Jr, R. Thompson, and J. V. Weinstock, “Trichuris suis therapy in Crohn’s disease,” Gut, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 87–90, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Schölmerich, K. Fellermann, F. W. Seibold et al., “A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Trichuris suis ova in active Crohn’s disease,” Journal of Crohn's & Colitis, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 390–399, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Hollander, G. Uzunova, B. P. Taylor et al., “Randomized crossover feasibility trial of helminthic trichuris suis ova versus placebo for repetitive behaviors in adult autism spectrum disorder,” The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, pp. 1–9, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Fleming, G. Hernandez, L. Hartman et al., “Safety and efficacy of helminth treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results of the HINT 2 clinical trial,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 81–91, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. A. Yordanova, F. Ebner, A. R. Schulz et al., “The worm-specific immune response in multiple sclerosis patients receiving controlled Trichuris suis ova immunotherapy,” Life, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 101, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. S. Beer, “Studies on the biology of the life-cycle of Trichuris suis Schrank, 1788,” Parasitology, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 253–262, 1973.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L.-P. Leroux, M. Nasr, R. Valanparambil et al., “Analysis of the Trichuris sui excretory/secretory proteins as a function of life cycle stage and their immunomodulatory properties,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, article 15921, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Kuijk, E. J. Klaver, G. Kooij et al., “Soluble helminth products suppress clinical signs in murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and differentially modulate human dendritic cell activation,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 210–218, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. V. A. Hansen, A. R. Williams, M. Denwood, P. Nejsum, S. M. Thamsborg, and C. Friis, “Pathway of oxfendazole from the host into the worm: Trichuris suis in pigs,” International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 416–424, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Ebner, M. R. Hepworth, S. Rausch et al., “Therapeutic potential of larval excretory/secretory proteins of the pig whipwormTrichuris suisin allergic disease,” Allergy, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 1489–1497, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. J. Klaver, L. M. Kuijk, L. C. Laan et al., “Trichuris suis -induced modulation of human dendritic cell function is glycan-mediated,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 43, no. 3–4, pp. 191–200, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Ottow, E. J. Klaver, T. C. T. M. van der Pouw Kraan et al., “The helminth Trichuris suis suppresses TLR4-induced inflammatory responses in human macrophages,” Genes and Immunity, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 477–486, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Hoeksema, L. C. Laan, J. J. Postma et al., “Treatment withTrichuris suissoluble products during monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation reduces inflammatory responses through epigenetic remodeling,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 2826–2836, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. C. Laan, A. R. Williams, K. Stavenhagen et al., “The whipworm (Trichuris suis) secretes prostaglandin E2 to suppress proinflammatory properties in human dendritic cells,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 719–731, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Mueller, R. Förster, M. Hellmig et al., “The macromolecular crystallography beamlines at BESSY II of the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin: current status and perspectives,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 130, no. 7, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Sparta, M. Krug, U. Heinemann, U. Mueller, and M. S. Weiss, “XDSAPP2.0,” Journal of Applied Crystallography, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 1085–1092, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Fadel, Y. Zhao, A. Cousido-Siah, F. X. Ruiz, A. Mitschler, and A. Podjarny, “X-ray crystal structure of the full length human chitotriosidase (CHIT1) reveals features of its chitin binding domain,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 4, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Emsley, B. Lohkamp, W. G. Scott, and K. Cowtan, “Features and development ofCoot,” Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 486–501, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. N. Murshudov, A. A. Vagin, and E. J. Dodson, “Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method,” Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 240–255, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Bryson, L. J. McGuffin, R. L. Marsden, J. J. Ward, J. S. Sodhi, and D. T. Jones, “Protein structure prediction servers at University College London,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 33, pp. W36–W38, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. K. Wang, U. Broder, S. K. Weeratunga, R. B. Gasser, A. Loukas, and A. Hofmann, “SBAL: a practical tool to generate and edit structure-based amino acid sequence alignments,” Bioinformatics, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1026-1027, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Lobley, M. I. Sadowski, and D. T. Jones, “pGenTHREADER and pDomTHREADER: new methods for improved protein fold recognition and superfamily discrimination,” Bioinformatics, vol. 25, no. 14, pp. 1761–1767, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Jurrus, D. Engel, K. Star et al., “Improvements to theAPBSbiomolecular solvation software suite,” Protein Science, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 112–128, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. F. Pettersen, T. D. Goddard, C. C. Huang et al., “UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 13, pp. 1605–1612, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Dahiya, R. Tewari, and G. S. Hoondal, “Biotechnological aspects of chitinolytic enzymes: a review,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 773–782, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Tachu, S. Pillai, R. Lucius, and T. Pogonka, “Essential role of chitinase in the development of the filarial nematodeAcanthocheilonema viteae,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 221–228, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gooyit, N. Tricoche, S. Lustigman, and K. D. Janda, “Dual protonophore–chitinase inhibitors dramatically affectO. volvulus molting,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 13, pp. 5792–5799, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. M. J. Wolfs, J. L. Stöger, P. Goossens et al., “Reprogramming macrophages to an anti-inflammatory phenotype by helminth antigens reduces murine atherosclerosis,” The FASEB Journal., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 288–299, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. M. Paterson, P. Garside, M. W. Kennedy, and C. E. Lawrence, “Modulation of a heterologous immune response by the products ofAscaris suum,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 6058–6067, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hartmann, B. Kyewski, B. Sonnenburg, and R. Lucius, “A filarial cysteine protease inhibitor down-regulates T cell proliferation and enhances interleukin-10 production,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 2253–2260, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Grainger, K. A. Smith, J. P. Hewitson et al., “Helminth secretions induce de novo T cell Foxp3 expression and regulatory function through the TGF-β pathway,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 207, no. 11, pp. 2331–2341, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. L. Sanders and A. Mishra, “Role of interleukin-18 in the pathophysiology of allergic diseases,” Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 32, pp. 31–39, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. G. Nair, Y. du, J. G. Perrigoue et al., “Alternatively activated macrophage-derived RELM-α is a negative regulator of type 2 inflammation in the lung,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 206, no. 4, pp. 937–952, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. E. Sutherland, D. Rückerl, N. Logan, S. Duncan, T. A. Wynn, and J. E. Allen, “Ym1 induces RELMα and rescues IL-4Rα deficiency in lung repair during nematode infection,” PLOS Pathogens., vol. 14, no. 11, article e1007423, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhu, T. Zheng, R. J. Homer et al., “Acidic mammalian chitinase in asthmatic Th2 inflammation and IL-13 pathway activation,” Science, vol. 304, no. 5677, pp. 1678–1682, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. E. Sutherland, R. M. Maizels, and J. E. Allen, “Chitinases and chitinase-like proteins: potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of T-helper type 2 allergies,” Clinical & Experimental Allergy, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 943–955, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. A. Basyoni and E. M. A. Rizk, “Nematodes ultrastructure: complex systems and processes,” Journal of Parasitic Diseases, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1130–1140, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Wang, K. van Steendam, M. Dhaenens et al., “Proteomic analysis of the excretory-secretory products from larval stages of Ascaris suum reveals high abundance of glycosyl hydrolases,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 7, no. 10, article e2467, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Hewitson, Y. Harcus, J. Murray et al., “Proteomic analysis of secretory products from the model gastrointestinal nematode Heligmosomoides polygyrus reveals dominance of venom allergen-like (VAL) proteins,” Journal of Proteomics, vol. 74, no. 9, pp. 1573–1594, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. L. Kradin, K. Badizadegan, P. Auluck, J. Korzenik, and G. Y. Lauwers, “Iatrogenic Trichuris suis infection in a patient with Crohn disease,” Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Online, vol. 130, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
J. F. Chehayeb, A. P. Robertson, R. J. Martin, and T. G. Geary, “Proteomic analysis of adult Ascaris suum fluid compartments and secretory products,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 8, no. 6, article e2939, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Hewitson, Y. M. Harcus, R. S. Curwen et al., “The secretome of the filarial parasite, Brugia malayi : proteomic profile of adult excretory-secretory products,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 8–21, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Cass, J. R. Johnson, L. L. Califf et al., “Proteomic analysis of Schistosoma mansoni egg secretions,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 155, no. 2, pp. 84–93, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Jex, P. Nejsum, E. M. Schwarz et al., “Genome and transcriptome of the porcine whipworm Trichuris suis,” Nature Genetics, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 701–706, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. G. Boot, E. F. C. Blommaart, E. Swart et al., “Identification of a novel acidic mammalian chitinase distinct from chitotriosidase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 9, pp. 6770–6778, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Okawa, M. Ohno, A. Kashimura et al., “Loss and gain of human acidic mammalian chitinase activity by nonsynonymous SNPs,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 3183–3193, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Javed, M. Ahmad, M. Ahmad et al., “Chitinases: an update,” Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 21–29, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wu, G. Egerton, A. P. Underwood, S. Sakuda, and A. E. Bianco, “Expression and secretion of a larval-specific chitinase (family 18 glycosyl hydrolase) by the infective stages of the parasitic nematode, Onchocerca volvulus,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 45, pp. 42557–42564, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wu, R. Adam, S. A. Williams, and A. E. Bianco, “Chitinase genes expressed by infective larvae of the filarial nematodes, Acanthocheilonema viteae and Onchocerca volvulus,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 207–219, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Fuhrman, W. S. Lane, R. F. Smith, W. F. Piessens, and F. B. Perler, “Transmission-blocking antibodies recognize microfilarial chitinase in brugian lymphatic filariasis,” PNAS, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 1548–1552, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Adam, B. Kaltmann, W. Rudin, T. Friedrich, T. Marti, and R. Lucius, “Identification of chitinase as the immunodominant filarial antigen recognized by sera of vaccinated rodents (∗),” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 3, pp. 1441–1447, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. A. Ward and D. Fairbairn, “Chitinase in developing eggs of Ascaris suum (Nematoda),” The Journal of Parasitology, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 546–549, 1972.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Zimmermann, A. Mishra, N. E. King et al., “Transcript signatures in experimental asthma: identification of STAT6-dependent and -independent pathways,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 3, pp. 1815–1824, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhao, H. Zhu, C. H. Wong, K. Y. Leung, and W. S. F. Wong, “Increased lungkine and chitinase levels in allergic airway inflammation: a proteomics approach,” Proteomics, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 2799–2807, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Hartl, C. H. He, B. Koller et al., “Acidic mammalian chitinase is secreted via an ADAM17/epidermal growth factor receptor-dependent pathway and stimulates chemokine production by pulmonary epithelial cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 48, pp. 33472–33482, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Hartl, C. H. He, B. Koller et al., “Acidic mammalian chitinase regulates epithelial cell apoptosis via a chitinolytic-independent mechanism,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 182, no. 8, pp. 5098–5106, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I.-A. Lee, D. Low, A. Kamba, V. Llado, and E. Mizoguchi, “Oral caffeine administration ameliorates acute colitis by suppressing chitinase 3-like 1 expression in intestinal epithelial cells,” Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 1206–1216, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Matsumoto, H. Inoue, Y. Sato et al., “Demethylallosamidin, a chitinase inhibitor, suppresses airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 390, no. 1, pp. 103–108, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-J. Yang, Y.-K. Liu, C.-L. Liu et al., “Inhibition of acidic mammalian chitinase by RNA interference suppresses ovalbumin-sensitized allergic asthma,” Human Gene Therapy, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1597–1606, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Olland, J. Strand, E. Presman et al., “Triad of polar residues implicated in pH specificity of acidic mammalian chitinase,” Protein Science, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. NA–78, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Fusetti, H. Moeller, D. Houston et al., “Structure of human chitotriosidase:,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 28, pp. 25537–25544, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Fusetti, T. Pijning, K. H. Kalk, E. Bos, and B. W. Dijkstra, “Crystal structure and carbohydrate-binding properties of the human cartilage glycoprotein-39,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 39, pp. 37753–37760, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M.-L. Tsai, S.-H. Liaw, and N.-C. Chang, “The crystal structure of Ym1 at 1.31 Å resolution,” Journal of Structural Biology, vol. 148, no. 3, pp. 290–296, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Friederike Ebner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

678

Downloads

695

Citations