Integrative Analyses of Genes Associated with Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis

Qiu, Kangli; Li, Kai; Zeng, Tianshu; Liao, Yunfei; Min, Jie; Zhang, Nan; Peng, Miaomiao; Kong, Wen; Chen, Lu-lu

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8263829

Journal of Immunology Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Regulation of Inflammation in Autoimmune Diseases 2021

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 8263829 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8263829

Integrative Analyses of Genes Associated with Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis

Kangli Qiu,^1,2Kai Li,³Tianshu Zeng,^1,2Yunfei Liao,^1,2Jie Min,^1,2Nan Zhang,^1,2Miaomiao Peng,^1,2Wen Kong ,^1,2and Lu-lu Chen^1,2

Academic Editor: Lihua Duan

Received14 May 2021

Revised18 Jul 2021

Accepted06 Aug 2021

Published29 Aug 2021

Abstract

Objective. Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, also known as chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis, is a common autoimmune thyroiditis, which mostly occurs in young and middle-aged women. It can be manifested as hyperthyroidism in the early stage; hypothyroidism may appear with the progression of the disease. Studies have shown that multiple factors such as heredity, environment, and autoimmunity are involved in the pathogenesis, but the specific mechanism is not clear. In our study, we tried to find key genes and potential molecular mechanisms of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis to provide new ideas for the therapeutic targets of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Method. GSE138198 and GSE54958 were downloaded from the GEO database, and two datasets were combined for analysis. The combined data were normalized to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs), and GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were performed. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks and hub genes between DEGs were identified. We also used the miRWalk database to identify regulatory miRNAs associated with expressions of DEGs. Result. We identified 182 DEGs (160 upregulated and 22 downregulated) between Hashimoto’s disease patients and the healthy control group. GO analysis showed that DEGs were mostly concentrated in detection of chemical stimulus involved in sensory perception, intermediate filament cytoskeleton, and olfactory receptor activity. KEGG pathway analysis showed that DEGs were mainly related to olfactory transduction. Some members of the KRTAP family and HTR5A, KNG1, DRD3, HTR1D, TAS2R16, INSL5, TAS2R42, and GRM7 are the most important hub genes in the PPI network. In addition, we recognized that OTUD4, LLPH, and ECHDC1 were the most important hub genes in the miRNA-target gene network. Conclusion. In this study, a series of bioinformatics analyses of DEGs were performed to identify the key genes and pathways associated with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. These genes and pathways provide a more detailed understanding of the pathogenesis of Hashimoto’s disease and provide new ideas for the therapeutic targets of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis.

1. Introduction

Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, also known as chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis, is an autoimmune thyroid disease, first described by Hiroshi Hashimoto in 1912. He reported on four patients with chronic thyroid disease, which he called thyroid lymphoma, which was characterized by diffuse lymphocytic infiltration, germinal centers, parenchymal atrophy, fibrosis, and eosinophilic changes in some thyroid follicular cells [1]. The incidence of Hashimoto’s disease is about 0.3-1.5 cases per 1000 people per year [2], and it is gradually increasing. The incidence of women is 5-10 times that of men, and it increases with age (peak age is between 45 and 65 years) [3]. However, it is worth noting that the disease can be diagnosed in patients of any age, including children [4]. HT is genetically susceptible, many of which are immune-related and thyroid-specific genes that confer disease susceptibility. It has been found that the increase in the incidence of HT is related to environmental factors, including improved sanitation, increased dietary iodine intake, new treatment modalities, and chemical agents. Other unchangeable predisposing factors include stress, climate, age, and gender [5]. The diagnosis of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis is based on clinical features, typical ultrasound patterns, cytological examination of lymphocytic infiltration, and positive serum antibodies to thyroid antigens (including thyroid peroxidase and thyroglobulin) [6]. HT is usually associated with other autoimmune diseases, such as hair loss, leukoplakia, celiac disease, and type 1 insulin-dependent diabetes. Thyroid function at the time of HT may be variable, from a short period of hyperthyroidism to obvious hypothyroidism. If there is obvious hypothyroidism, treatment with L-thyroxine should be started immediately [7].

At present, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis is believed to be related to multiple factors such as genetic susceptibility, environmental factors, and immune disorders [8], and cellular and humoral immunity plays a key role in the development of the disease. In the etiology of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, overstimulated CD4+ cells play the most important role. Recent studies have shown that newly discovered cells such as regulatory T cells (CD4+CD25+HighFoxP3+) or Th17 (CD4+IL-17+) play an important role in inducing autoimmune diseases [9]. Programmed cell death also plays an equally important role in the onset and development of hypothyroidism [10–12].

Until now, several loci have been found to be associated with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, such as HLA-DR, immunoregulatory genes (CD40, FoxP3, CD25, CTLA-4, and PTPN22), and thyroid-specific genes (thyrotropin (TSH) receptors and thyroglobulin) [13–16]. By analyzing the microarray data of GSE29315, Zheng et al. reported that 10 hub genes and interferon-γ, IFN-α, IL-6/JAK/STAT3, and inflammatory pathways may promote the occurrence and development of HT [17]. However, no studies have reported the possible regulatory mechanism of microRNAs related to the occurrence of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis.

In our study, GSE138198 and GSE54958 were analyzed by the bioinformatics method, and the two datasets were combined for analysis, and the combined data were normalized to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for functional enrichment analysis. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis and regulatory miRNAs were related to DEG prediction. Through these analyses, we expect to provide novel insights into the pathogenesis of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and provide a more detailed molecular mechanism for the development of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Selection

The GSE138198 and GSE54958 datasets were downloaded from the GEO website, and the GPL6244[hugene-1_0-st]Affymetrix human gene 1.0 ST array [transcript (gene version)] was used for the two expression matrices. The GSE138198 dataset included 13 samples of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, 3 normal thyroid samples, 12 samples of thyroid papillary carcinoma, and 8 samples of thyroid papillary carcinoma with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. The GSE54958 dataset included 7 normal thyroid samples and 25 thyroid papillary carcinoma samples. Since these two datasets are from the same chip platform, they can be combined and analyzed, and the combined data is normalized.

2.2. Data Processing

The GSE138198 and GSE54958 raw datasets were evaluated using the limma R package, and the two datasets were merged for joint analysis. We firstly corrected the data, obtained the expression matrix dataset of experimental requirements in the form of a subset, and then extracted the corresponding clinical information for the classification of subsequent samples according to the data samples of the expression matrix. Finally, the two datasets GSE138198 and GSE54958 were combined according to the gene ID. The combined samples were normalized to exclude the influence caused by the batch effect. By data processing, we finally get the normal thyroid samples (7 cases) as the control group with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis samples as the treatment group (13 cases) by using and adjusted to identify Hashimoto’s thyroiditis DEGs.

2.3. Functional and Pathway Enrichment Analysis

Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis, based on R software, were applied for the identification of pathways in which DEGs were significantly enriched. GO enrichment analysis includes three parts: biological process, molecular function, and cellular component. The http://org.hs.eg.db database file on the Bioconductor platform is used for the database, which contains 28 mainstream data files. We performed GO enrichment analysis of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis differentially expressed genes [18] and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis [19] to analyze the biological processes and key pathways in which the differentially expressed genes were mainly involved, and for GO enrichment analysis was the inclusion criteria, and for KEGG enrichment pathway analysis was the inclusion criteria.

2.4. PPI Network Construction

We used the online tool Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING V-11.0, https://string-db.org/) database to evaluate PPI information. In order to evaluate the interaction relationship between DEGs, DEGs were mapped to STRING, and the interaction relationship between DEGs was screened at the protein level to construct a PPI network with upregulation and downregulation of DEGs. Then, PPI network visualization is constructed by using Cytoscape software. Hub genes of the PPI network were screened by CytoHubba in Cytoscape, and the top 20 hub genes were selected for analysis.

2.5. MicroRNA-Target Gene Network Prediction

In the disease state, gene expression is affected by microRNA through the posttranscriptional control. In this study, the miRWalk database (http://miRWalk.umm.uni-heidelberg.de/) is used to search for miRNAs related to DEGs. miRWalk is a publicly available comprehensive resource, a comprehensive miRNA-target gene database, including predicted and experimentally verified microRNA- (miRNA-) target interaction pairs, including Human, Mouse, Rat, Dog, and Cow [20, 21]. The miRNA binding sites on the full-length sequence of the gene are not only recorded but also compared with the prediction binding information collection of the existing 12 miRNA-target prediction programs (DIANA-microTv4.0, miRanda-rel2010, DIANA-microT-CDS, miRDB4.0, miRmap, miRNAMap, miRBridge, doRiNA, i.e., PicTar2, RNAhybrid2.1, PITA, RNA22v2, and TargetScan6.2).

3. Results

3.1. Identification of DEGs in Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis (HT)

We identified 182 DEGs in HT patients, with a total of 160 upregulated genes and 20 downregulated genes compared with healthy controls. We drafted a volcano map of DEGs (Figure 1) and a hierarchical clustering heat map of the differentially expressed genes (Figure 2). The results showed that there were good differences in these DEGs between HT patients and healthy controls. OR2J3 and IL7R were identified as the most significantly upregulated and downregulated genes in HT patients, respectively.

3.2. Functional and Pathway Enrichment Analysis

We used R language to analyze the differentially expressed genes using the http://org.Hs.eg.db database file on the Bioconductor platform; a total of 11 GO in terms of biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components (Figures 3 and 4) and 1 KEGG (Table 1) were identified. BP was mainly concentrated in detection of chemical stimulus involved in sensory perception, detection of chemical stimulus, and sensory perception of smell involved in sensory perception and keratinization; CC was mainly concentrated in intermediate filament, intermediate filament cytoskeleton, and keratin filament; MF was mainly concentrated in odorant binding, olfactory receptor activity, trace-amine receptor activity, and G protein-coupled amine. In addition, KEGG pathway analysis showed that DEGs are closely related to olfactory transduction.

3.3. PPI Network and Hub Gene Identification

We submit DEGs to the STRING database to obtain PPI data. We used Cytoscape 3.8.2 to construct a PPI network (Figure 5) and identified the first 20 genes as hub genes (Figure 6). Among them, the first 12 belong to the KRTAP family of genes, and the last 8 are HTR5A, KNG1, DRD3, HTR1D, TAS2R16, INSL5, TAS2R42, and GRM7, all of which are upregulated genes.

3.4. MicroRNA-DEG Regulatory Network Analysis

Figure 7 shows the miRNAs of DEGs, 7 downregulated miRNAs regulate OTUD4, 4 upregulated miRNAs regulate LLPH, and 3 downregulated miRNAs regulate ECHDC1.

4. Discussion

HT was first discovered and described by Hiroshi Hashimoto. It is an autoimmune thyroid disease [22] and is related to multiple factors such as genetic susceptibility, environmental factors, and immune disorders [19, 20]. With the progression of the disease, hypothyroidism may occur, and alternative therapies are used [23–27]. It is of great significance to understand the molecular mechanism of HT. We downloaded and analyzed data information of 13 HT patients and 7 healthy controls from the GEO database. We identified a total of 182 DEGs, including 160 upregulated DEGs and 22 downregulated DEGs. Among 182 DEGs, we noticed that IL7R is the most downregulated gene in HT patients. The protein encoded by this gene is the receptor for interleukin 7 (IL-7). This protein plays a key role in V(D)J recombination during lymphocyte development and is essential for normal T cell development and homeostasis. The function of this receptor requires the interleukin 2 receptor gamma chain, which is a gamma chain shared by a variety of cytokine receptors. The defection of this gene may be related to severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) [28–34]. Studies have shown that IL7R signaling is essential for the development of thymocytes [35, 36]. A Japanese study found that there were no prominent differences in expression levels of IL7R and common cytokine receptor γ-chain between the CLTH, control, and TL cases, but the ISH method showed that compared with CLTH, the number of cells expressing IL-7 in TL increased significantly, but the study did not use the ISH method to compare the expression levels of IL-7 in CLTH and control cases [37]. The role of IL7R in HT needs to be further studied. Among the increased DEGs, OR2J3 is the most upregulated gene in HT, which encodes a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that functions as an olfactory receptor. Olfactory receptors interact with odor molecules in the nose, triggering neuronal responses that trigger the sense of smell. This gene is located in a cluster on chromosome 6 similar to the gene encoding the olfactory receptor [38, 39]. There is no research showing that OR2J3 is related to HT, and it is a new biomarker for the occurrence of HT.

In our research, the most important GO BP term for DEGs is detection of chemical stimulus involved in sensory perception. OR1N1, OR5M10, and OR51V1 are new biomarkers for the development of HT. The most important GO MF term is olfactory receptor activity. The most important GO CC term is intermediate filament cytoskeleton. KRTAP5-7, KRTAP19-8, and KRTAP5-11 are new biomarkers developed by FT1D. There were significant changes in OR4N4 gene expression in human thyroid epithelial cell lines after exposure to high-dose gamma radiation [40], and OR8B12, OR56A3, and OR4N4 are all new biomarkers for the development of HT.

Olfactory transduction is the most important KEGG pathway of DEGs, and OR7G1, OR8I2, OR9K2, OR2M5, and OR52N1 are new biomarkers of HT progression.

In this study, some members of the KRTAP family and HTR5A, KNG1, DRD3, HTR1D, TAS2R16, INSL5, TAS2R42, and GRM7 are considered to be the hub genes in the PPI network. Keratin-associated proteins (KRTAP) are the major components of hair [41]. KNG1 is believed to be related to the occurrence of thyroid cancer [42]. INSL5 and INSL3 are both members of the insulin-like hormone superfamily. Research indicates that the INSL3 hormone is upregulated in neoplastic and hyperplastic human thyrocytes, suggesting that the INSL3 isoforms may serve as markers for neoplastic and hyperplastic human thyrocytes [43], but there is no report on the correlation between INSL5 and HT. TAS2Rs control the production of thyroid hormones, and this regulation may be related to the susceptibility to thyroid diseases. TAS2R agonists can inhibit basic and TSH-dependent iodide outflow. TAS2R may mediate a protective response to excessive intake of toxic substances, as a new drug target for the treatment of hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism. Genetic variants in the TAS2R receptor may change the risk of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) [44, 45]. They are new biomarkers for the occurrence of HT.

OTUD4, LLPH, and ECHDC1 are the three most important target genes in the miRNA-target gene regulatory network. OTUD4 is the fifth frequently mutated gene in thyroid cancer, and its mutation rate in the thyroid is 2% [46]. LLPH and ECHDC1 are new biomarkers for the development of HT.

When we searched the articles, we found that there was a bioinformatics analysis on HT which used thyroid physiological hyperplasia (TPH) as a control group, not the healthy thyroid tissue, so there is no similarity with our conclusions [17]. There are no other reports about the discovery of HT hub genes and pathways. The results of our bioinformatics analysis will help to research HT in the future.

Our study has certain limitations. We only found 2 matrix datasets about HT in the GEO database. One of them is about HT and PTC, and there is no healthy thyroid sample as a control, so we did not use it. The GSE138198 dataset we used includes 13 cases of HT and 3 healthy thyroid samples. Since there are fewer healthy samples, we combined the 7 healthy thyroid samples in the GSE54958 dataset from the same chip platform and the 3 healthy thyroid samples in the GSE138198 dataset for analysis together and normalized the combined data to expand the healthy thyroid group samples. Given the potential analysis bias, we will conduct further molecular biology experiments in the follow-up work to verify the function of hub genes at the cell or specimen level.

5. Conclusions

Our study provides a comprehensive DEG bioinformatics analysis for finding molecular mechanisms related to the progression of HT. We discovered some meaningful genes to study the molecular mechanism of HT progression. Further experiments at the cell or specimen level will be conducted to confirm the role of these DEGs in the progression of HT.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Kangli Qiu and Kai Li contributed equally to this work and are considered co-first authors.

References

Y. Hiromatsu, H. Satoh, and N. Amino, “Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: history and future outlook,” Hormones, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Akamizu, N. Amino, and L. J. DeGroot, “Hashimoto’s thyroiditis,” Thyroid Disease Manager, 2012, http://www.thyroidmanager.org/chapter/hashimotos-thyroiditis/.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Pyzik, E. Grywalska, B. Matyjaszek-Matuszek, and J. Roliński, “Immune disorders in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: what do we know so far?” Journal of Immunology Research, vol. 2015, 979168 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Monaco, “Classification of thyroid diseases: suggestions for a revision,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1428–1432, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Ajjan and A. P. Weetman, “The pathogenesis of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: further developments in our understanding,” Hormone and Metabolic Research, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 702–710, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ralli, D. Angeletti, M. Fiore et al., “Hashimoto's thyroiditis: an update on pathogenic mechanisms, diagnostic protocols, therapeutic strategies, and potential malignant transformation,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 19, no. 10, article 102649, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Radetti, “Clinical aspects of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis,” Endocrine Development, vol. 26, pp. 158–170, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Hu and M. P. Rayman, “Multiple nutritional factors and the risk of Hashimoto's thyroiditis,” Thyroid, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 597–610, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Korn, E. Bettelli, M. Oukka, and V. K. Kuchroo, “IL-17 and Th17 cells,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 485–517, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Łącka and A. Maciejewski, “The role of apoptosis in the etiopathogenesis of autoimmune thyroiditis,” Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski, vol. 32, no. 188, pp. 87–92, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Feldkamp, E. Pascher, A. Perniok, and W. A. Scherbaum, “Fas-mediated apoptosis is inhibited by TSH and iodine in moderate concentrations in primary human thyrocytes in vitro,” Hormone and Metabolic Research, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 355–358, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Feldkamp, E. Pascher, M. Schott, P. Goretzki, J. Seissler, and W. A. Scherbaum, “Soluble Fas is increased in hyperthyroidism independent of the underlying thyroid disease,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 86, no. 9, pp. 4250–4253, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Menconi, M. C. Monti, D. A. Greenberg et al., “Molecular amino acid signatures in the MHC class II peptide-binding pocket predispose to autoimmune thyroiditis in humans and in mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences-PNAS, vol. 105, no. 37, pp. 14034–14039, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Stefan, E. M. Jacobson, A. K. Huber et al., “Novel variant of thyroglobulin promoter triggers thyroid autoimmunity through an epigenetic interferon α-modulated mechanism,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 36, pp. 31168–31179, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. M. Jacobson, A. K. Huber, N. Akeno et al., “A _CD40_ Kozak sequence polymorphism and susceptibility to antibody-mediated autoimmune conditions: the role of CD40 tissue-specific expression,” Genes and Immunity, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 205–214, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Tomer, “Genetic susceptibility to autoimmune thyroid disease: past, present, and future,” Thyroid, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 715–725, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zheng, X. Dou, H. Song, P. Wang, W. Qu, and X. Zheng, “Bioinformatics analysis of key genes and pathways in Hashimoto thyroiditis tissues,” Bioscience Reports, vol. 40, no. 7, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ashburner, C. A. Ball, J. A. Blake et al., “Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology,” Nature Genetics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Kanehisa and S. Goto, “KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 27–30, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Sticht, C. de la Torre, A. Parveen, and N. Gretz, “miRWalk: an online resource for prediction of microRNA binding sites,” PloS One, vol. 13, no. 10, article e0206239, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Dweep, N. Gretz, and C. Sticht, “miRWalk database for miRNA–target interactions,” in RNA Mapping, pp. 289–305, Humana Press, New York, NY, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
R. S. Brown, “Autoimmune thyroid disease: unlocking a complex puzzle,” Current Opinion in Pediatrics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 523–528, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Ben-Skowronek, L. Szewczyk, B. Kulik-Rechberger, and E. Korobowicz, “The differences in T and B cell subsets in thyroid of children with Graves’ disease and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis,” World Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 245–250, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Pyzik, E. Grywalska, B. Matyjaszek-Matuszek, and J. Roliński, “Immune disorders in hashimoto’s thyroiditis: What do we know so far?” Journal of Immunology Research, vol. 2015, pp. 1–8, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Garber, R. H. Cobin, H. Gharib et al., “Clinical practice guidelines for hypothyroidism in adults: cosponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American Thyroid Association,” Endocrine Practice, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 988–1028, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Armengol, M. Juan, A. Lucas-Martín et al., “Thyroid autoimmune disease: demonstration of thyroid antigen-specific B cells and recombination-activating gene expression in chemokine-containing active intrathyroidal germinal centers,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 159, no. 3, pp. 861–873, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yoshida, N. Amino, K. Yagawa et al., “Association of serum antithyroid antibodies with lymphocytic infiltration of the thyroid gland: studies of seventy autopsied cases,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 859–862, 1978.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. P. Zenatti, D. Ribeiro, W. Li et al., “Oncogenic _IL7R_ gain-of-function mutations in childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia,” Nature Genetics, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 932–939, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Jiang, W. Q. Li, F. B. Aiello et al., “Cell biology of IL-7, a key lymphotrophin,” Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 16, no. 4-5, pp. 513–533, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. J. Fry and C. L. Mackall, “The many faces of IL-7: from lymphopoiesis to peripheral T cell maintenance,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 174, no. 11, pp. 6571–6576, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. von Freeden-Jeffry, P. Vieira, L. A. Lucian, T. McNeil, S. E. Burdach, and R. Murray, “Lymphopenia in interleukin (IL)-7 gene-deleted mice identifies IL-7 as a nonredundant cytokine,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 181, no. 4, pp. 1519–1526, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Peschon, P. J. Morrissey, K. H. Grabstein et al., “Early lymphocyte expansion is severely impaired in interleukin 7 receptor-deficient mice,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 180, no. 5, pp. 1955–1960, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Puel, S. F. Ziegler, R. H. Buckley, and W. J. Leonard, “Defective _IL7R_ expression in T^-B⁺NK⁺ severe combined immunodeficiency,” Nature Genetics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 394–397, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Roifman, J. Zhang, D. Chitayat, and N. Sharfe, “A partial deficiency of interleukin-7Rα is sufficient to abrogate T-cell development and cause severe combined immunodeficiency,” Blood, vol. 96, no. 8, pp. 2803–2807, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Yu, B. Erman, J. H. Park, L. Feigenbaum, and A. Singer, “IL-7 receptor signals inhibit expression of transcription factors TCF-1, LEF-1, and RORgammat: impact on thymocyte development,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 200, no. 6, pp. 797–803, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Guo, C. Y. Wang, S. Wang et al., “Alteration in gene expression profile of thymomas with or without myasthenia gravis linked with the nuclear factor-kappaB/autoimmune regulator pathway to myasthenia gravis pathogenesis,” Thoracic Cancer, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 564–570, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Takakuwa, S. Nomura, F. Matsuzuka, H. Inoue, and K. Aozasa, “Expression of interleukin-7 and its receptor in thyroid lymphoma,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 80, no. 10, pp. 1483–1490, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. F. McRae, J. D. Mainland, S. R. Jaeger, K. A. Adipietro, H. Matsunami, and R. D. Newcomb, “Genetic variation in the odorant receptor OR2J3 is associated with the ability to detect the grassy smelling odor, cis-3-hexen-1-ol,” Chemical Senses, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 585–593, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Glusman, I. Yanai, I. Rubin, and D. Lancet, “The complete human olfactory subgenome,” Genome Research, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 685–702, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. S. Bang, M. H. Choi, C. S. Kim, and S. J. Choi, “Gene expression profiling in undifferentiated thyroid carcinoma induced by high-dose radiation,” Journal of Radiation Research, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 238–249, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Wu and D. M. Irwin, “Evolution of trichocyte keratin associated proteins,” in Anonymous Singapore, pp. 47–56, Springer Singapore, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Tang, D. Kong, Q. Cui et al., “Bioinformatic analysis and identification of potential prognostic microRNAs and mRNAs in thyroid cancer,” PeerJ, vol. 6, article e4674, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hombach-Klonisch, C. Hoang-Vu, A. Kehlen et al., “INSL-3 is expressed in human hyperplastic and neoplastic thyrocytes,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 993–1001, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
A. A. Clark, C. D. Dotson, A. E. T. Elson et al., “TAS2R bitter taste receptors regulate thyroid function,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 164–172, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Choi, J. Lee, S. Yang, E. K. Lee, Y. Hwangbo, and J. Kim, “Genetic variations in TAS 2 R3 and TAS 2 R4 bitterness receptors modify papillary carcinoma risk and thyroid function in Korean females,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 15004–15011, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Xu, A. Song, and Q. Xie, “The integrated analyses of driver genes identify key biomarkers in thyroid cancer,” Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment, vol. 19, article 1533033820940440, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Kangli Qiu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1496

Downloads

1303

Citations