Clinical Characteristics and Serum Cytokines Profiling in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in Lebanon

Abou Hassan, Farouk F.; Bou Hamdan, Mirna; Melhem, Nada M.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7258585

Journal of Immunology Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2023 | Article ID 7258585 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7258585

Clinical Characteristics and Serum Cytokines Profiling in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in Lebanon

Farouk F. Abou Hassan,¹Mirna Bou Hamdan,¹and Nada M. Melhem^1,2

Academic Editor: Vladimir Jurisic

Received19 Nov 2022

Revised13 Apr 2023

Accepted27 Apr 2023

Published16 May 2023

Abstract

Since its emergence, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains a public health threat worldwide. While the majority of patients recover in 3–4 weeks, complications in severely ill patients, including acute respiratory distress syndrome, cardiac injury, thrombosis, and sepsis, can lead to death. Several biomarkers, in addition to cytokine release syndrome (CRS), have been associated with severe and fatal outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. The aim of this study is to assess clinical characteristics and cytokines profiles in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Lebanon. A total of 51 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were recruited between February 2021 and May 2022. Clinical data and sera were collected at two time points: at hospital presentation (T0) and last collected results during hospitalization (T1). Our results showed that 49% of participants were >60 years with males accounting for the majority (72.5%). Hypertension, followed by diabetes and dyslipidemia, were the most frequent comorbid conditions among study participants accounting for 56.9% and 31.4%, respectively. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was the only significantly different comorbid condition between intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients. Our results also showed that the median level of D-dimer was significantly elevated among patients in ICU and those who died compared to non-ICU patients and those who survived. Moreover, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were significantly higher at T0 compared to T1 in ICU and non-ICU patients. The median level of IL-12p70 was significantly higher in patients >60 years compared to those ≤60 years (). Our data are in agreement with previous reports suggesting the importance of IL-6, CRP, and IL-12p70 in the assessment of risk of severe disease and mortality.

1. Introduction

Since its emergence in December 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), remains a global public health threat. COVID-19 causes a wide range of clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic to severe illness and death [1]. In symptomatic individuals, fever, cough, and shortness of breath are the most commonly reported symptoms; these symptoms can be accompanied by fatigue, myalgia, gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), headache, weakness, rhinorrhea, anosmia, and ageusia [1, 2]. The majority of patients recover in 3–4 weeks [3]. A number of complications have been reported in severely ill patients leading to COVID-19-related deaths; these include pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), liver injury, cardiac injury, thrombosis, including stroke, renal disease, neurologic disease, and sepsis [1, 2]. Older age, male gender, and preexisting medical conditions, such as hypertension, diabetes, obesity, allergy and asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease, chronic liver diseases (CLD), chronic kidney diseases, cancer, and immunodeficiency, are risk factors for severe illness [4]. Few patients experience postacute COVID-19 syndrome, whereby patients suffer from a range of lingering COVID-19-related symptoms that can affect a number of organ systems and may last for weeks or months [3, 5].

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a collection of clinical manifestations resulting from a life-threatening systemic inflammatory syndrome characterized by elevated levels of circulating cytokines and immune-cell hyperactivation [6, 7]. CRS was reported among patients with COVID-19; the former is characterized by increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines correlating with disease severity; these cytokines include interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, interferon (IFN)-γ, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), IFN-γ-inducible protein 10 (IP-10), granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) [8–12]. Particularly, high levels of serum IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, TNF, as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) at presentation, were strong predictors of disease severity and patients’ survival [8, 12, 13]. These inflammatory mediators result in an influx of immune cells (macrophages, neutrophils, and T cells) to the site of inflammation leading to tissue damage, multiorgan failure, and death [13]. TNF mostly triggers apoptosis and necrosis in sensitive tissues, and excessive secretion of TNF is a key factor in the pathological development and can induce the development of several diseases [14, 15]; TNF also plays an important role during SARS-CoV-2 infection as it is upregulated in acute lung injury, triggers CRS and facilitates SARS-CoV-2 interaction with angiotensin–converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) [16]. Importantly, CRS may play a role in postacute sequelae of COVID-19. Elevated levels of plasma IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF were shown to be associated with postacute sequelae of COVID-19 [17].

High levels of cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, G-CSF, IP10, MCP-1, MIP-1A, TNF, and IFN-γ) were detected in sera of patients with severe COVID-19 illness [9, 18, 19]. Evidence suggests the possible role of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and related complications [20, 21]. These pro-inflammatory cytokines mainly include IL-1, IL-6, TNF, and MIP-1A [22]. Specifically, a high level of IL-6 was found to be associated with disease progression and respiratory failure in severe cases [23–25]. Other biomarkers, including CRP, procalcitonin (PCT), ferritin, and D-dimer, were also important prognostic indicators correlated with in-hospital mortality [25]. Several studies highlighted the potential role of D-dimer as a predictive biomarker for poor prognosis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients [26–28]. Few studies in the Eastern Mediterranean Region reported higher serum levels of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF in severe COVID-19 patients compared to mild cases [29]. Moreover, the expression level of genes encoding for IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-17, TGF-B, IL-8, and IL-1β was significantly higher in hospitalized COVID-19 patients compared to healthy controls; however, there was no significant difference in the expression level between intensive care unit (ICU)-admitted and non-ICU admitted patients in reported data [30].

The aim of our study is to compare the levels of cytokines among ICU, and non-ICU admitted patients following SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort of hospitalized patients in Lebanon.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design, Population, and Data Collection

This study was approved by the Biomedical Institutional Review Board at the American University of Beirut (AUB). All participants signed a written informed consent. A total of 51 hospitalized COVID-19 patients (≥18 years) were recruited between February 2021 and May 2022 at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC). During that time, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2) was the main vaccine widely available in Lebanon; the Oxford-AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1) and Johnson & Johnson (Ad26.COV2) vaccines were also administered, albeit less frequently [31]. The BNT162b2 was the first vaccine to be delivered to Lebanon. The administration of the vaccine was prioritized into four phases to target high-risk individuals based on the risk of exposure and infection, risk of complications following infection, essential personnel (front-line responders to the pandemic, workers in primary healthcare centers), and the availability of vaccines [31]. During the first phase, the vaccine was administered to healthcare workers and all individuals ≥75 years old (Phase IA), followed by all individuals 65–74 years old, all individuals 55–64 years with comorbidities, and individuals working in COVID-19 epidemiological surveillance (Phase IB) [31]; the remaining phases included individuals 16–54 years with comorbidities (Phase IIA), essential personnel in the public sector and those working in nursing homes in addition to inmates with special needs (Phase IIB), teachers and workers in areas with a high risk of infection and people who care for elderly (Phase III), and finally all individuals willing to receive the vaccine (Phase IV). Prioritizing COVID-19 vaccine doses in Lebanon was in accordance with the recommendations of the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) framework for the allocation and prioritization of COVID-19 vaccination in targeting high-risk groups at different stages of vaccine supply availability [32]. Our patients were recruited during the circulation of the Alpha (January–April 2021), Delta (June–July 2021), and Omicron (December 2021–May 2022) variants of concern [33, 34]. We categorized our study participants into two groups, as previously described [35]. The mild/moderate group included patients who did not require ICU admission, whereas the severe group included those requiring ICU admissions. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the medical records of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Data were collected at two time points: at hospital presentation (T0) and last results during hospitalization (T1) (i.e., discharge or death). These data include age, sex, smoking history, preexisting comorbid conditions, COVID-19 vaccination status, date of COVID-19 testing, history of SARS-CoV-2 exposure, signs, and symptoms at presentation and during hospitalization, ICU admission, length of hospitalization/ICU admission until discharge or death, oxygen requirement, chest X-ray (CXR) and CT-scan reports, and list of medications. Moreover, data on hematological parameters were collected; these included a complete blood count, which was performed as part of the clinical care during hospitalization. We also collected the levels of CRP, D-dimer, and PCT from the medical charts, when available.

2.2. Cytokines Assay

Sera were only available for 23 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Collected samples were stored at −80°C until processed. The levels of 11 cytokines (GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-12p70, IL-13, IL-18, and TNF) were measured using a commercially available Th1/Th2 Cytokine 11-Plex Human ProcartaPlex™ Panel (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA; cat#: EPX110-10810-901; LOT: 253603-002) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were analyzed in duplicates using the Luminex xMAP instrument (Software: xPonent v.4.2). The concentration of the cytokines was calculated using the standard curve generated by the 5-parameter logistic regression method on the online ProcartaPlex Analysis App (Thermo Fisher Scientific). We excluded from the analysis values that were out of range (OOR).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data were summarized descriptively using counts and frequencies for categorical variables and mean, standard deviation, and range for continuous variables. Fisher’s exact test was used to investigate the association between qualitative variables (gender, hospitalization, comorbid conditions, and COVID-19 complications). We used the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test or Kruskal–Wallis test to compare the levels of cytokines between groups as appropriate. Paired data were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed rank test. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. All analyses were performed using STATA SE 13.0. Figures were generated using GraphPad Prism 9.3.1.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients

A total of 51 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were included in this study, with almost half of the former being >60 years old. The majority of our participants were males (72.5%) and suffered from at least one comorbid condition (80%) (Table 1). The majority of hospitalized patients (70.5%) were not vaccinated against COVID-19. Four participants only (7.8%) received ≥2 doses of the vaccine, while vaccination data were not available on the remaining participants (n = 11; 21.5%). Hypertension, followed by diabetes and dyslipidemia, were the most frequent comorbid conditions among study participants accounting for 56.9% and 31.4%, respectively. Upon hospitalization and as documented in the medical charts of our study participants, the most commonly reported symptoms at presentation were fever (72.5%), followed by cough (66.7%) and dyspnea (66.7%). Supplementary oxygen was needed for 35 patients (70%). Out of the 51 hospitalized patients, 11 (21.6%) were admitted to the ICU. CXR and CT-scan findings at the presentation were available for 28 (54.9%) and 44 (86.3%) patients, respectively. While the CXR results showed diffuse bilateral interstitial and airspace opacities in 19 patients, the chest CT-scan showed severe pneumonia in 11 patients, out of which four patients were admitted to the ICU. A total of nine patients died during hospitalization (median age 81 years); six out of the former were in ICU and needed mechanical ventilation (Table 1). Most deaths (88.9%; n = 8) were among patients >60 years compared to one death of a patient <60 years old (); moreover, the majority of patients who died (66.7%; n = 6) had hypertension (data not shown). The medical records did not reveal any data on COVID-19 vaccination for deceased patients.

The median age of ICU-admitted patients was 70 years compared to 57.5 years among non-ICU admitted patients () (Table 2). All ICU-admitted patients were males (). COPD was the only significantly different comorbid condition between ICU and non-ICU patients (). As expected, all ICU patients required supplementary oxygen compared to 61.5% of those who were not admitted (); none of the latter required mechanical ventilation. The median duration of supplementary oxygen requirement was longer among ICU patients. Moreover, 63.6% (n = 7) and 54.6% (n = 6) of ICU-admitted patients were treated with CRS and IL-6 receptor antagonist treatments, respectively, compared to 12.5% (n = 5) and 15.4% (n = 6) of patients who did not require ICU admission (Table 2). We did not detect any significant difference in CXR and CT scan findings between the two groups (data not shown). More than 50% of patients who were admitted to the ICU died compared to 7.9% of those who were not (). Among those patients who were admitted to the ICU and died with available chest CT-scan results (n = 8), 62.5% (n = 5) had severe pneumonia compared to 12.5% (n = 1) with mild/moderate pneumonia () (data not shown).

3.2. Laboratory Biomarkers and Cytokines Measurement

Clinical laboratory biomarkers were available from medical records for 20 hospitalized patients (8 ICU and 12 non-ICU). At presentation, the median level of white blood cell (WBC) counts was significantly lower among patients in ICU () (Table 3). This may be due to viral erosion that results in direct inflammation and infection and consequently, excessive destruction of WBCs [36]. This is in agreement with previous studies reporting an association between decreased levels of WBCs in COVID-19 patients at presentation and disease severity and adverse outcomes [9, 37, 38]. Importantly, the mean level of D-dimer was significantly elevated among patients in ICU compared to those who did not require ICU admission (); we did not detect any significant difference in the levels of CRP, IL-6, and PCT (Figure 1). Moreover, we detected significantly higher levels of D-dimer among deceased patients compared to those who survived () (data not shown). When we stratified patients by ICU admission, we did not detect any significant difference in the levels of D-dimer, CRP, IL-6, and PCT based on age, duration of hospitalization, and the presence of comorbidities (Figure 2). Nevertheless, the mean level of D-dimer in ICU patients was higher compared to non-ICU patients reflecting the importance of D-dimer in predicting disease severity; the mean levels of CRP, IL-6, and PCT were similar among the two groups. The lack of significant difference might be attributed to our small sample size.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 2

Impact of age, duration of hospitalization, and comorbidities on clinical parameters of COVID-19 patients following hospitalization. Data on D-dimer (a), CRP (b), IL-6 (c), and procalcitonin (d) were extracted from the medical charts of COVID-19 patients at presentation. The levels of these markers were compared among ICU and non-ICU admitted patients while stratifying for age, duration of hospitalization, presence or absence of comorbidities as well as survival. The y-axis represents the mean and standard deviation (SD). Blue bars represent age, red/pink bars represent the duration of hospitalization, green bars represent comorbidities, and black/grey bars represent mortality status.

When comparing laboratory biomarkers at T0 and T1, our results showed that CRP levels were significantly higher at T0 in ICU and non-ICU patients (Table 4). When we stratified by age, CRP levels at T0 remained significantly higher than T1 in patients <60 years (Z = 2.667; ) and patients >60 years (Z = 2.429; ) (data not shown). Similarly, CRP levels at T0 were significantly higher among males (Z = 3.243; ). Moreover, CRP levels among patients with mild/moderate pneumonia and those with diffuse bilateral interstitial and airspace opacities were significantly higher at T0 compared to T1 (Z = 2.934; and Z = 2.903; , respectively) (data not shown). This is expected since CRP is elevated following infection or inflammation, with higher levels indicating severe infection; the latter linked to hospitalization [39, 40]. When we stratified by patients who developed ARDS, we observed significantly higher levels of WBC counts and PCT at T1 compared to T0 (Z = −2.023; ). However, we did not detect a significant difference in IL-6 levels. This is probably due to our small sample size.

We compared the level of 11 cytokines (GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-12p70, IL-13, IL-18, and TNF) in hospitalized patients (8 ICU and 15 non-ICU admitted) at T0. We excluded GM-CSF, IL-1β, IL-2, and IL-13 during analysis since their values were OOR. Our data showed no significant difference when comparing the median of these cytokines between ICU and non-ICU admitted patients (Figure 3) despite the higher levels of IL-4, IL-5, and TNF detected among ICU-admitted patients. Interestingly, the median level of IL-12p70 was significantly higher in patients >60 years compared to those ≤60 years () regardless of ICU admission (data not shown). There was no significant difference when we compared cytokine levels with respect to the duration of hospitalization. Similarly, there was no significant difference between patients with and without comorbidities. Nevertheless, we observed higher IL-12p70 median levels among hypertensive compared to nonhypertensive patients though the difference was not statistically significant (data not shown). We did not detect any significant difference when we compared the mean levels of IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-18, and TNF between T0 and T1 (Figure 4), which might be attributed to our small sample size. We were unable to compare the levels of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-12p70 between T0 and T1 as their levels at T1 were OOR.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

4. Discussion

COVID-19 remains a global public health threat despite the availability of effective vaccines. The continuous spread of SARS-CoV-2 is mainly driven by the emergence of new variants with immune-escape characteristics. Advanced age, male gender, and history of comorbid conditions (hypertension, diabetes, obesity, malignancy, kidney disease, cardiovascular disease (CVD), COPD, and chronic liver disease) are associated with severe disease (i.e., patients having severe dyspnea, extremely low oxygen saturation, respiratory distress, or requiring mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, or death) [4, 41, 42]. Our results are in agreement with previous studies assessing the clinical characteristics of hospitalized COVID-19 patients [43–45], whereby patients who required ICU admission in our cohort had higher median age than those who were not admitted to the ICU with hypertension and diabetes most commonly reported among all hospitalized patients. Moreover, COPD was associated with severe disease.

The assessment of laboratory biomarkers in COVID-19 patients is important in order to closely monitor the progression of illness and to guide treatment. The increase in the level of several biomarkers, including CRP, IL-6, as well as WBC counts, and D-dimer, has been associated with severe COVID-19 [46]. Importantly, D-dimer and CRP are considered important prognostic markers and predictors of COVID-19 severity and mortality [18, 25, 27, 28, 47–51]. Elevated D-dimer levels are most likely due to acute lung injury or the increased rate of thromboembolic complications among COVID-19 patients and thus the need for ICU admission [52]. Our results are aligned with previously reported data whereby high D-dimer levels were significantly associated with severe COVID-19 disease and mortality [39, 53–55]. Our results showed that CRP levels were significantly higher during hospitalization than at presentation in both groups of patients (ICU and non-ICU). Moreover, higher CRP levels were observed in ICU patients at presentation compared to non-ICU patients. This suggests that CRP increases during hospitalization and ICU admission of COVID-19 patients. This is in accordance with previously published data reporting CRP as an early indicator of COVID-19 disease progression and death [39, 40, 56].

The level of cytokines and immunologic dysregulation play a role in the severity of COVID-19 as well as multiple organ failure, respiratory distress syndrome, and septic shock [57, 58]. Hospitalized COVID-19 patients with ICU admission have higher plasma levels of IL-2, IL-7, IL-10, G-CSF, IP10, MCP-1, MIP-1A, and TNF compared to non-ICU patients [9]. Moreover, levels of IL-2, IL-2R, IL-4, IL-8, IFN-γ, and specifically IL-6 and IL-10 were significantly increased in severe compared to nonsevere cases [18, 51]. IL-6 is the primary trigger of CRS inducing the production of CRP by the liver; importantly, previous data showed a significant increase in IL-6 and CRP in severely ill patients [24, 37, 51] and thus predicted fatal outcomes [57]. In this study, we did not detect a significant difference in IL-6 levels (pro-inflammatory cytokine) between ICU and non-ICU admitted patients. This is in contrast to other reported data whereby the level of IL-6 was found to be higher in COVID-19 patients compared to healthy controls and was highly associated with disease severity and disease progression [59]. This is probably due to our small sample size. However, our data showed that the median level of IL-12p70, a pro-inflammatory cytokine, was significantly higher in older patients with severe illness compared to those with mild/moderate disease (≤60 years). This is consistent with previous studies reporting higher IL-12p70 levels in COVID-19 patients and those with severe outcomes [59–61]. Moreover, our results showed that IL-12p70 levels at presentation were higher among hypertensive compared to non-hypertensive COVID-19 patients, which is in line with previous data [60]. Limited data exist about the role of IL-12p70 in COVID-19. However, IL-12 is a heterodimeric cytokine activated by viral entry into the cells. Once activated, the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-12 will activate other cytokines (such as IFN-γ and TNF) and immune cells involved in mediating inflammatory responses [60, 62]. Therefore, measuring the levels of IL-6, IL-12p70, CRP, and D-dimer at presentation can predict the risk of disease progression in COVID-19 patients.

Our study has several limitations. Our participants were recruited from a single tertiary hospital. Moreover, our study has a small sample size, and sera were not available for all participants for the measurement of cytokines. Importantly, this study lacks a control group of non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We were also unable to follow-up the patients longitudinally and measure their cytokine levels as well as laboratory biomarkers at multiple time points during hospitalization and following discharge. This is important in order to monitor the trends of biomarkers and cytokines between patients with mild/moderate and severe illness, determine the peak level of each cytokine and biomarker during hospitalization and correlate them with severe and fatal outcomes.

5. Conclusion

The CRS described in COVID-19 patients with severe outcomes results in deleterious clinical manifestations that might lead to death. There is a lack of studies on cytokines and clinical characteristics of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Lebanon. Consequently, more studies are needed to assess the kinetics of cytokines in these patients and their clinical impact on organ systems as well as on the course of treatment. Moreover, more studies are needed to longitudinally assess cytokine levels in COVID-19 patients and correlate them with postacute COVID-19 syndrome. The latter is increasingly being reported in a large portion of COVID-19 patients 3–12 months following recovery from the acute phase of illness [63].

Data Availability

The clinical, biological, and demographic data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

FFA performed laboratory experiments, data analysis, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript; MBH performed laboratory experiments and contributed to data analysis and writing; NMM designed the study, oversaw all aspects of the study, edited, and finalized the manuscript.

All authors reviewed, edited, and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by the Lebanese National Council for Scientific Research (Award A103930).

Acknowledgments

We thank the laboratory of Dr. Rami Mahfouz at the American University of Beirut Medical Center as well as Ms. Fatmeh Abbas for her technical assistance in running the Th1/Th2 Cytokine 11-Plex Human ProcartaPlex™ Panel on the Luminex xMAP instrument.

References

M. Merad, C. A. Blish, F. Sallusto, and A. Iwasaki, “The immunology and immunopathology of COVID-19,” Science, vol. 375, no. 6585, pp. 1122–1127, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Joost Wiersinga, A. Rhodes, A. C. Cheng, S. J. Peacock, and H. C. Prescott, “Pathophysiology, transmission, diagnosis, and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a review,” JAMA, vol. 324, no. 8, pp. 782–793, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Garg, M. Maralakunte, S. Garg et al., “The conundrum of ‘Long-COVID-19’: a narrative review,” International Journal of General Medicine, vol. 14, pp. 2491–2506, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-D. Gao, M. Ding, X. Dong et al., “Risk factors for severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients: a review,” Allergy, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 428–455, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Phillips and M. A. Williams, “Confronting our next national health disaster—long-haul COVID,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 385, pp. 577–579, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. C. Fajgenbaum and C. H. June, “Cytokine storm,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 383, pp. 2255–2273, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Karki and T.-D. Kanneganti, “The ‘cytokine storm’: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic prospects,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 681–705, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Del Valle, S. Kim-Schulze, H.-H. Huang et al., “An inflammatory cytokine signature predicts COVID-19 severity and survival,” Nature Medicine, vol. 26, pp. 1636–1643, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Huang, Y. Wang, X. Li et al., “Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China,” The Lancet, vol. 395, no. 10223, pp. 497–506, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Ruan, K. Yang, W. Wang, L. Jiang, and J. Song, “Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 46, pp. 846–848, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Zanza, T. Romenskaya, A. C. Manetti et al., “Cytokine storm in COVID-19: immunopathogenesis and therapy,” Medicina, vol. 58, no. 2, Article ID 144, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhu, T. Cai, L. Fan et al., “Clinical value of immune-inflammatory parameters to assess the severity of coronavirus disease 2019,” International Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 95, pp. 332–339, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Ragab, H. S. Eldin, M. Taeimah, R. Khattab, and R. Salem, “The COVID-19 cytokine storm; what we know so far,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 11, Article ID 1446, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D.-I. Jang, A.-H. Lee, H.-Y. Shin et al., “The role of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) in autoimmune disease and current TNF-α inhibitors in therapeutics,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 22, no. 5, Article ID 2719, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Jurisic, S. Colic, and M. Jurisic, “The inflammatory radicular cysts have higher concentration of TNF-α in comparison to odontogenic keratocysts (odontogenic tumour),” Acta Medica (Hradec Králové), vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 233–238, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Guo, K. Hu, Y. Li et al., “Targeting TNF-α for COVID-19: recent advanced and controversies,” Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 10, Article ID 833967, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Schultheiß, E. Willscher, L. Paschold et al., “The IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF cytokine triad is associated with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19,” Cell Reports Medicine, vol. 3, no. 6, Article ID 100663, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Liu, T. Yang, X.-F. Peng et al., “A systematic meta-analysis of immune signatures in patients with COVID-19,” Reviews in Medical Virology, vol. 31, no. 4, Article ID e2195, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Lucas, P. Wong, J. Klein et al., “Longitudinal analyses reveal immunological misfiring in severe COVID-19,” Nature, vol. 584, pp. 463–469, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Fara, Z. Mitrev, R. A. Rosalia, and B. M. Assas, “Cytokine storm and COVID-19: a chronicle of pro-inflammatory cytokines,” Open Biology, vol. 10, no. 9, Article ID 200160, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Montazersaheb, S. M. H. Khatibi, M. S. Hejazi et al., “COVID-19 infection: an overview on cytokine storm and related interventions,” Virology Journal, vol. 19, Article ID 92, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Jurisic, “Multiomic analysis of cytokines in immuno-oncology,” Expert Review of Proteomics, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 663–674, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Liu, J. Zhang, Y. Yang et al., “The role of interleukin-6 in monitoring severe case of coronavirus disease 2019,” Embo Molecular Medicine, vol. 12, no. 7, Article ID e12421, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Cruz, A. Mendes-Frias, A. I. Oliveira et al., “Interleukin-6 is a biomarker for the development of fatal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pneumonia,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 12, Article ID 613422, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Samprathi and M. Jayashree, “Biomarkers in COVID-19: an up-to-date review,” Frontiers in Pediatrics, vol. 8, Article ID 607647, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Poudel, Y. Poudel, A. Adhikari et al., “D-dimer as a biomarker for assessment of COVID-19 prognosis: D-dimer levels on admission and its role in predicting disease outcome in hospitalized patients with COVID-19,” PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 8, Article ID e0256744, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yao, J. Cao, Q. Wang et al., “D-dimer as a biomarker for disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients: a case control study,” Journal of Intensive Care, vol. 8, Article ID 49, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhang, X. Yan, Q. Fan et al., “D-dimer levels on admission to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with Covid-19,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1324–1329, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Alosaimi, A. Mubarak, M. E. Hamed et al., “Complement anaphylatoxins and inflammatory cytokines as prognostic markers for COVID-19 severity and in-hospital mortality,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 12, Article ID 668725, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Samsami, A. Fatemi, R. J. Khoshnoud et al., “Abnormal transcript levels of cytokines among Iranian COVID-19 patients,” Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 72, pp. 27–36, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. F. Abou Hassan, M. B. Hamdan, F. Ali, and N. M. Melhem, “Response to COVID-19 in Lebanon: update, challenges and lessons learned,” Epidemiology & Infection, vol. 151, Article ID e23, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO), “WHO SAGE values framework for the allocation and prioritization of COVID-19 vaccination,” September 2020, https://www.nitag-resource.org/sites/default/files/2020-09/WHO-2019-nCoV-SAGE_Framework-Allocation_and_prioritization-2020.1-eng.pdf.
View at: Google Scholar
H. AlKalamouni, F. F. Abou Hassan, M. B. Hamdan et al., “Genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 vaccinated healthcare workers in Lebanon,” BMC Medical Genomics, vol. 16, Article ID 14, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Merhi, A. J. Trotter, L. de Oliveira Martins et al., “Replacement of the Alpha variant of SARS-CoV-2 by the Delta variant in Lebanon between April and June 2021,” Microbial Genomics, vol. 8, no. 7, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Petrey, F. Qeadan, E. A. Middleton, I. V. Pinchuk, R. A. Campbell, and E. J. Beswick, “Cytokine release syndrome in COVID-19: innate immune, vascular, and platelet pathogenic factors differ in severity of disease and sex,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 55–66, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Zhang, Y. Yuan, Z. Yang et al., “Leukopenia of asymptomatic COVID-19 infections under 18 years old in recovery stage,” Research Square, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Palladino, “Complete blood count alterations in COVID-19 patients: a narrative review,” Biochemia Medica, vol. 31, no. 3, Article ID 030501, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W.-J. Guan, Z.-Y. Ni, Y. Hu et al., “Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 382, no. 18, pp. 1708–1720, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Milenkovic, A. Hadzibegovic, M. Kovac et al., “PCT, and IL-6 levels at admission to ICU can predict in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2022, Article ID 8997709, 9 pages, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Sharifpour, S. Rangaraju, M. Liu et al., “C-reactive protein as a prognostic indicator in hospitalized patients with COVID-19,” PLOS ONE, vol. 15, no. 11, Article ID e0242400, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Li, X. Zhong, Y. Wang, X. Zeng, T. Luo, and Q. Liu, “Clinical determinants of the severity of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 5, Article ID e0250602, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Chen, S. L. Klein, B. T. Garibaldi et al., “Aging in COVID-19: vulnerability, immunity and intervention,” Ageing Research Reviews, vol. 65, Article ID 101205, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Apiyo, R. Olum, A. Kabuye et al., “Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 at case hospital,” Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases, vol. 2022, Article ID 5477790, 11 pages, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Matsunaga, K. Hayakawa, M. Terada et al., “Clinical epidemiology of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Japan: report of the COVID-19 registry Japan,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. e3677–e3689, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Li, D. Q. Huang, B. Zou et al., “Epidemiology of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes,” Journal of Medical Virology, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 1449–1458, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kermali, R. K. Khalsa, K. Pillai, Z. Ismail, and A. Harky, “The role of biomarkers in diagnosis of COVID-19—a systematic review,” Life Sciences, vol. 254, Article ID 117788, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Rostami and H. Mansouritorghabeh, “D-dimer level in COVID-19 infection: a systematic review,” Expert Review of Hematology, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1265–1275, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. E. Elkhalifa, “D-dimer as a predictive and prognostic marker among COVID-19 patients,” Saudi Medical Journal, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 723–729, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Wang, C. Wu, Q. Zhang et al., “C-reactive protein level may predict the risk of COVID-19 aggravation,” Open Forum Infectious Diseases, vol. 7, no. 5, Article ID ofaa153, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Shah, K. Shah, S. B. Patel et al., “Elevated D-dimer levels are associated with increased risk of mortality in coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Cardiology in Review, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 295–302, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Han, Q. Ma, C. Li et al., “Profiling serum cytokines in COVID-19 patients reveals IL-6 and IL-10 are disease severity predictors,” Emerging Microbes & Infections, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1123–1130, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Lehmann, H. Prosch, S. Zehetmayer et al., “Impact of persistent D-dimer elevation following recovery from COVID-19,” PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 10, Article ID e0258351, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. A. Nasif, A. S. El-Moursy Ali, M. H. Mukhtar et al., “Elucidating the correlation of D-dimer levels with COVID-19 severity: a scoping review,” Anemia, vol. 2022, Article ID 9104209, 9 pages, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Soni, R. Gopalakrishnan, R. Vaishya, and P. Prabu, “D-dimer level is a useful predictor for mortality in patients with COVID-19: Analysis of 483 cases,” Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 2245–2249, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-H. Yu, C. Qin, M. Chen, W. Wang, and D.-S. Tian, “D-dimer level is associated with the severity of COVID-19,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 195, pp. 219–225, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Myari, E. Papapetrou, and C. Tsaousi, “Diagnostic value of white blood cell parameters for COVID-19: Is there a role for HFLC and IG?” International Journal of Laboratory Hematology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 104–111, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. de Morais Batista, M. A. M. Puga, P. V. da Silva et al., “Serum biomarkers associated with SARS-CoV-2 severity,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, Article ID 15999, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Kalinina, A. Golovkin, E. Zaikova et al., “Cytokine storm signature in patients with moderate and severe COVID-19,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 23, no. 16, Article ID 8879, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Guo, S. Wang, H. Xia et al., “Cytokine signature associated with disease severity in COVID-19,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 12, Article ID 681516, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Moll-Bernardes, A. S. de Sousa, A. V. S. Macedo et al., “IL-10 and IL-12 (P70) levels predict the risk of Covid-19 progression in hypertensive patients: insights from the BRACE-CORONA trial,” Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 8, Article ID 702507, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. E. Young, S. W. X. Ong, L. F. P. Ng et al., “Viral dynamics and immune correlates of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 73, no. 9, pp. e2932–e2942, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Guo, W. Cao, and Y. Zhu, “Immunoregulatory functions of the IL-12 family of cytokines in antiviral systems,” Viruses, vol. 11, no. 9, Article ID 772, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Alkodaymi, O. A. Omrani, N. A. Fawzy et al., “Prevalence of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome symptoms at different follow-up periods: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 657–666, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Farouk F. Abou Hassan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

399

Downloads

397

Citations