Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Volume 2019, Article ID 3537256, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3537256
Research Article

Meta-Analysis Comparing Renal Outcomes after Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

1Division of Cardiology, West Virginia School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA
2Department of Medicine, West Virginia School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Mohamad Alkhouli; gro.enicidemuvw@iluohkla.damahom

Received 19 November 2018; Accepted 7 April 2019; Published 24 April 2019

Academic Editor: Vasileios Panoulas

Copyright © 2019 Kuldeep Shah et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. R. Holmes Jr., M. J. MacK, S. Kaul et al., “2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement: developed in collaboration with the american heart association, american society of echocardiography, european association for cardio-thoracic surgery, heart failure society of america, mended hearts, society of cardiovascular anesthesiologists,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 1340–1395, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. A. Nishimura, C. M. Otto, R. O. Bonow et al., “AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 63, pp. e57–185, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  3. N. Kumar and N. Garg, “Acute kidney injury after aortic valve replacement in a nationally representative cohort in the USA,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement,” International Journal of Surgery, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 336–341, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. Shah, Z. Chaker, T. Busu et al., “Meta-analysis comparing the frequency of stroke after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 122, no. 7, pp. 1215–1221, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Busu, F. Alqahtani, V. Badhwar, C. C. Cook, C. S. Rihal, and M. Alkhouli, “Meta-analysis comparing transcatheter and surgical treatments of paravalvular leaks,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 302–309, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. R. Smith, M. B. Leon, M. J. Mack et al., “Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, pp. 2187–2198, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  8. H. H. M. Nielsen, K. E. Klaaborg, H. Nissen et al., “A prospective, randomised trial of transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in operable elderly patients with aortic stenosis: The STACCATO trial,” EuroIntervention, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 383–389, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. H. Adams, J. J. Popma, M. J. Reardon et al., “Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 370, pp. 1790–1798, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  10. H. G. Thyregod, D. A. Steinbruchel, and N. Ihlemann, “Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: 1-year results from the all-comers notion randomized clinical trial,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 65, pp. 2184–2194, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  11. M. B. Leon, C. R. Smith, and M. J. Mack, “Transcatheter or surgical Aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 374, pp. 1609–1620, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. M. J. Reardon, N. M. Van Mieghem, J. J. Popma et al., “Surgical or transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients,” The New England Journal of Medicine, pp. 1321–1331, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  13. R. Bagur, J. G. Webb, F. Nietlispach et al., “Acute kidney injury following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Predictive factors, prognostic value, and comparison with surgical aortic valve replacement,” European Heart Journal, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 865–874, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Fusari, V. Bona, M. Muratori et al., “Transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement: A retrospective analysis assessing clinical effectiveness and safety,” Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 229–241, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. Stöhr, G. Dohmen, R. Herpertz et al., “Thirty-day outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgical valve replacement in patients with high-risk aortic stenosis: A matched comparison,” Coronary Artery Disease, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 595–600, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. M. Holzhey, W. Shi, A. Rastan, M. A. Borger, M. Hänsig, and F. W. Mohr, “Transapical versus conventional aortic valve replacement - A propensity-matched comparison,” Heart Surgery Forum, vol. 15, no. 1, p. -E8, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C.-F. Appel, H. Hultkvist, E. Nylander et al., “Transcatheter versus surgical treatment for aortic stenosis: Patient selection and early outcome*,” Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 301–307, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Latib, F. Maisano, L. Bertoldi et al., “Transcatheter vs surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate- surgical-risk patients with aortic stenosis: A propensity score-matched case-control study,” American Heart Journal, vol. 164, no. 6, pp. 910–917, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. D'Onofrio, A. Messina, R. Lorusso et al., “Sutureless aortic valve replacement as an alternative treatment for patients belonging to the “gray zone” between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and conventional surgery: A propensity-matched, multicenter analysis,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 1010–1018, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Wilbring, S.-M. Tugtekin, K. Alexiou, G. Simonis, K. Matschke, and U. Kappert, “Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs conventional aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with previous cardiac surgery: A propensity-score analysis,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol. 44, no. 1, Article ID ezs680, pp. 42–47, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. Papadopoulos, N. Schiller, S. Fichtlscherer et al., “Propensity matched analysis of longterm outcomes following transcatheter based aortic valve implantation versus classic aortic valve replacement in patients with previous cardiac surgery,” Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 99, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. Santarpino, S. Pfeiffer, J. Jessl et al., “Clinical outcome and cost analysis of sutureless versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation with propensity score matching analysis,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 116, no. 11, pp. 1737–1743, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. Schymik, M. Heimeshoff, P. Bramlage et al., “A comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement in 1,141 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and less than high risk,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 738–744, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. Muneretto, O. Alfieri, B. M. Cesana et al., “A comparison of conventional surgery, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, and sutureless valves in “real-world” patients with aortic stenosis and intermediate- to high-risk profile,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 150, no. 6, pp. 1570–1579, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. D. Wendt, F. Al-Rashid, P. Kahlert et al., “Conventional aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with previous cardiac surgery,” Journal of Cardiology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 292–297, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. B. Thakkar, A. Patel, B. Mohamad et al., “Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with cirrhosis,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 955–962, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. Thongprayoon, W. Cheungpasitporn, N. Srivali et al., “AKI after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1854–1860, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. F. Biancari, M. Barbanti, G. Santarpino et al., “Immediate outcome after sutureless versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement,” Heart and Vessels, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 427–433, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. F. Onorati, A. DOnofrio, F. Biancari et al., “Results of surgical aortic valve replacement and transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting,” Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, vol. 22, pp. 806–812, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  30. C. Fraccaro, G. Tarantini, S. Rosato et al., “Early and Midterm Outcome of Propensity-Matched Intermediate-Risk Patients Aged ≥80 Years with Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (from the Italian Multicenter OBSERVANT Study),” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 117, no. 9, pp. 1494–1501, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. G. Ailawadi, D. J. LaPar, A. M. Speir et al., “Contemporary costs associated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 154–161, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. J. M. Brennan, L. Thomas, and DJ. Cohen, “Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement: propensity-matched comparison,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 70, pp. 439–450, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  33. W. Reents, M. Hilker, J. Börgermann et al., “Acute kidney injury after on-pump or off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Vives, D. Wijeysundera, N. Marczin, P. Monedero, and V. Rao, “Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury,” Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 637–645, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. Y.-B. Liao, X.-X. Deng, Y. Meng et al., “Predictors and outcome of acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” EuroIntervention, vol. 12, no. 17, pp. 2067–2074, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. K. Chatani, M. Abdel-Wahab, N. Wübken-Kleinfeld et al., “Acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Impact of contrast agents, predictive factors, and prognostic importance in 203 patients with long-term follow-up,” Journal of Cardiology, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 514–519, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. Konigstein, E. Ben-Assa, S. Banai et al., “Periprocedural bleeding, acute kidney injury, and long-term mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation,” Canadian Journal of Cardiology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 56–62, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. Ma, W. D. Gao, Y. F. Gu, Y. S. Wang, Y. Zhu, and Y. He, “Clinical effects of acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. O. Kliuk-Ben Bassat, A. Finkelstein, and S. Bazan, “Acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and mortality risk-long-term follow-up,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2018. View at Google Scholar
  40. A. C. B. Nunes Filho, M. Katz, C. M. Campos et al., “Impact of acute kidney injury on short- and long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation,” Revista Española de Cardiología, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. A. J. Muñoz-García, E. Muñoz-García, M. F. Jiménez-Navarro et al., “Clinical impact of acute kidney injury on short- and long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve prosthesis,” Journal of Cardiology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 46–49, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. R. Higuchi, T. Tobaru, K. Hagiya et al., “Renoprotective transcatheter aortic valve implantation without contrast media,” International Heart Journal, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1469–1472, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. M. S. van Mourik, F. van Kesteren, R. N. Planken et al., “Short versus conventional hydration for prevention of kidney injury during pre-TAVI computed tomography angiography,” Netherlands Heart Journal, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 425–432, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. Elkaryoni, N. C. Nanda, P. Baweja et al., “Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography is an attractive alternative to cardiac multi-detector computed tomography for aortic annular sizing: Systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Echocardiography, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1626–1634, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. Renker, A. Varga-Szemes, U. J. Schoepf et al., “A non-contrast self-navigated 3-dimensional MR technique for aortic root and vascular access route assessment in the context of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: proof of concept,” European Radiology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 951–958, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. A. Pershad, G. Fraij, S. V. Girotra, H. K. Fang, and G. Gellert, “TEE-guided transcatheter aortic valve implantation with "Zero Contrast" - A viable alternative for patients with chronic kidney disease,” The Journal of Invasive Cardiology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. E25–E26, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. C. Hyman, S. Vemulapalli, W. Y. Szeto et al., “Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement:Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry,” Circulation, vol. 136, no. 22, pp. 2132–2140, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. D. R. Holmes Jr., R. A. Nishimura, F. L. Grover et al., “Annual Outcomes With Transcatheter Valve Therapy: From the STS/ACC TVT Registry,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 101, pp. 789–800, 2016. View at Google Scholar