Research Article

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Having Coronary Cusp Fusion versus Mixed Cusp Fusion Nonraphe Bicuspid Aortic Valve

Table 3

Clinical results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OutcomeTotal (N = 71)Mixed fusion (N = 44)Coronary fusion (N = 27) value

Left bundle branch block19 (26.8%)13 (29.5%)6 (22.2%)0.59
Permanent pacemaker implantation14 (19.7%)7 (15.9%)7 (25.9%)0.36
Annulus rupture000
Vascular complication0.74
 None56 (78.9%)36 (81.8%)20 (74.1%)0.55
 Minor10 (14.1%)5 (11.4%)5 (18.5%)0.49
 Major5 (7.0%)3 (6.8%)2 (7.4%)1.0
Bleeding complication0.27
 None49 (69.0%)33 (75%)16 (59.3%)0.19
 Minor14 (19.7%)6 (13.6%)8 (29.6%)0.13
 Major8 (11.3%)5 (11.4%)3 (11.1%)1.0
Coronary obstruction000
Cerebrovascular complication0.72
 None67 (94.4%)42 (95.5%)25 (92.6%)0.63
 Transient ischemic attack1 (1.4%)01 (3.7%)0.38
 Stroke3 (4.2%)2 (4.5%)1 (3.7%)1.0
30-day mortality5 (7.0%)3 (6.8%)2 (7.4%)1.0
1-year mortality6 (8.5%)3 (6.8%)3 (11.1%)0.67

The patients were stratified according to the type of cusp fusion. Data are shown as frequency (percentage).