Research Article

Evaluating the Validity of Risk Scoring in Predicting Pacemaker Rates following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Table 1

Baseline patient characteristics: post-TAVR PPM versus no PPM.

Preoperative characteristicsNo PPMPPM value
N = 380N = 99

Male169 (44.6)52 (52.5)0.158
Age, years82.3 ± 7.882.2 ± 10.50.960
Valve type0.015
 Self-expanding182 (47.9)61 (61.6)
 Balloon-expandable198 (52.1)38 (38.4)
RBBB29 (7.7)30 (30.3)<0.001
QRS duration99.5 ± 23.7115.3 ± 27.6<0.001
QRS >140 ms35 (9.2)23 (23.2)<0.001
Valve oversizing, %12.91 ± 10.2614.62 ± 9.830.136
Valve oversizing >16.0%215 (56.6)53 (53.5)0.586
Syncope13 (3.4)5 (5.1)0.447
Emory risk score<0.001
 Score = 0178 (46.8)32 (32.3)
 Score = 1159 (41.8)32 (32.3)
 Score = 223 (6.1)12 (12.1)
 Score = 314 (3.7)15 (15.2)
 Score = 46 (1.6)8 (8.1)
 Score = 50 (0.0)0 (0.0)
STS-PROM, %6.2 ± 6.16.3 ± 3.60.901
Operator stratification0.692
 Low risk1 (0.3)0 (0.0)
 Intermediate risk206 (54.2)49 (50.0)
 High risk171 (45.0)49 (50.0)
Heart failure (NYHA)0.595
 Class II102 (26.9)22 (22.2)
 Class III252 (66.5)69 (69.7)
 Class IV25 (6.6)8 (8.1)
Ejection fraction, %61.8 ± 13.460.4 ± 13.50.352
Albumin, g/dL3.9 ± 0.73.9 ± 0.70.942
Creatinine, mg/dL1.3 ± 1.31.6 ± 1.70.079
Dialysis13 (3.4)4 (4.0)0.766
Cerebrovascular disease23 (6.1)8 (8.1)0.465
Peripheral artery disease53 (13.9)13 (13.1)0.833
Diabetes125 (32.9)32 (32.3)0.914
Body mass index27.9 ± 5.928.4 ± 6.80.498

Continuous factors are given as mean (±standard deviation), compared using Student’s t-test. Frequency and percent are given for categorical factors, compared using the chi-square test. NYHA = New York Heart Association; PPM = permanent pacemaker implantation; RBBB = right bundle branch block; STS-PROM = Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality.