Journal of Interventional Cardiology / 2020 / Article / Tab 1 / Research Article
Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Fractional Flow Reserve versus Quantitative Flow Ratio for Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenoses Included studies, author (reference number) Year No. of lesions Type of study FFR cut-off cFFR/QFR cut-off cFFR Johnson et al. [4 ] 2016 763 Multicenter, prospective 0.80 0.83 Topcu et al. [15 ] 2016 34 Single-center, prospective 0.80 0.85 MEMENTO-FFR [5 ] 2016 1026 Multicenter, retrospective 0.80 0.85 Kanaji et al. [16 ] 2016 80 Single-center, prospective 0.80 0.84 Shiode et al. [17 ] 2017 109 Single-center, prospective 0.80 0.82 Van Wyk et al. [18 ] 2017 100 Single-center, prospective 0.80 0.84 Cerrato et al. [19 ] 2018 108 Multicenter, prospective 0.80 0.84 QFR FAVOR pilot [9 ] 2016 84 Multicenter, prospective 0.80 0.80 Yazaki et al. [20 ] 2017 151 Single-center, retrospective 0.80 0.80 FAVOR II China [10 ] 2017 328 Multicenter, prospective 0.80 0.80 Spitaleri et al. [21 ] 2018 49 Single-center, prospective 0.80 0.80 Emori et al. [22 ] 2018 100 Single-center, retrospective 0.80 0.80 Ties et al. [23 ] 2018 101 Single-center, retrospective 0.80 0.80 Emori et al. [24 ] 2018 150 Single-center, retrospective 0.800 0.80 WIFI II [25 ] 2018 240 Multicenter, prospective 0.80 0.80 Mejia-Renteria et al. [26 ] 2018 300 Multicenter, prospective 0.80 0.80 Kołtowski et al. [27 ] 2018 306 Single-center, retrospective 0.80 0.79 FAVOR II Eur-Japan [28 ] 2018 317 Multicenter, prospective 0.80 0.80 Hwang et al. [29 ] 2019 358 Multicenter, prospective 0.80 0.80 Stähli et al. [30 ] 2019 516 Single-center, prospective 0.80 0.80
