Clinical Study

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Implantation (TMVI) Using Edwards SAPIEN 3 Prostheses in Patients at Very High or Prohibitive Surgical Risk: A Single-Center Experience

Table 3

Clinical outcome (in-hospital, 30-day-, 6-month- and one-year follow-up).

Patients treated: n = 7

In-hospital follow-up
Clinical success (with improvement in at least one NYHA functional class after procedure)100% (7/7)
NYHA functional class post procedure
 Improvement by two NYHA functional classes29% (2/7)
 Improvement by one NYHA functional class71% (5/7)
 No improvement in NYHA functional class0% (0/7)
NYHA functional class after procedure
 NYHA class IV0% (0/7)
 NYHA class III29% (2/7)
 NYHA class II71% (5/7)
 NYHA class I0% (0/7)
Residual mitral regurgitation after TMVI at hospital discharge
 None29% (2/7)
 Trace or mild (MR grade I)57% (4/7)
 Moderate (MR grade 2)14% (1/7)
 Severe (MR grade 3)0% (0/7)
Complications
 Vascular access site bleeding complication0% (0/7)
 Device embolization0% (0/7)
 Need for second valve implantation0% (0/7)
 Cardiac perforation/cardiac tamponade0% (0/7)
 Major stroke0% (0/7)
 New arrhythmia14% (1/7)
 Conversion to open heart surgery0% (0/7)
 Acute kidney injury0% (0/7)
 LVOT obstruction by implanted mitral valve prosthesis0% (0/7)
 Major atrial septal defect (ASD) after TMVI, hemodynamically relevant43% (3/7)
  Interventional ASD closure29% (2/7)
 Pacemaker implantation post TMVI14% (1/7)
In-hospital mortality rate14% (1/7)
In-hospital stay from TMVI to hospital discharge (days, mean ± SD)12 ± 6.1
Clinical follow-up after hospital discharge
30-day mortality rate (all-cause)14% (1/7)
6-month mortality rate (all-cause)14% (1/7)
One-year mortality rate (all-cause, n = 6)17% (1/6)
NYHA functional class at 30-day and 6-month follow-up (n = 6)
 NYHA class IV0% (0/6)
 NYHA class III17% (1/6)
 NYHA class II83% (5/6)
 NYHA class I0% (0/6)
NYHA functional class at 1-year follow-up (available in n = 5)
 NYHA class IV0% (0/5)
 NYHA class III20% (1/5)
 NYHA class II80% (4/5)
 NYHA class I0% (0/5)