Research Article

Distal Transradial Access in Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Basic information of the included studies.

AuthorYearCountryStudy typeSampleMale (%)Overall ageHypertension (%)Diabetes mellitus (%)Smoking (%)Hyperlipidemia (%)BMIIndicatorsNOS scoreJadad score

Aoi [9]2019USARetrospective408 (202 vs. 206)64.9 vs.62.669.2 vs.68.885.6 vs.95.137.6 vs.45.633.3 vs.25.283.7 vs.91.726.5 vs.27.11, 2, 3, 5, 97 (3/2/2)
Amin [10]2017BangladeshProspective100 (50 vs.50)1, 2, 47 (4/0/3)
Bhambhani [11]2020IndiaProspective200 (100 vs.100)84 vs.7354.6 vs.54.959 vs.5040 vs.3539 vs.321, 5, 6, 7, 89 (4/2/3)
Coughlan [12]2018IrelandProspective94 (47 vs.47)83 vs.74.561 vs.61.86, 7, 8, 99 (4/2/3)
Gajurel [13]2018NepalProspective164 (82 vs.82)58.5 vs.53.657.7 vs.57.235.3 vs.29.225.6 vs.18.243.9 vs.32.920.7 vs.12.11, 2, 39 (4/2/3)
Hammami [14]2021TunisiaProspective177 (82 vs. 95)62 vs.7059.23 vs.60.3840 vs.4445 vs.4041.5 vs.421, 3, 49 (4/2/3)
Kis [15]2020TurkeyProspective41 (17 vs.24)70.6 vs.70.870.6 vs.79.247.1 vs.33.335.3 vs.29.241.2 vs.37.52, 39 (4/2/3)
Kaledin [16]2017RussiaProspective5874 (2775 vs.3099)17 (4/0/3)
Koutouzis [17]2019GreeceRandomized200 (100 vs.100)74 vs.7763.8 vs.62.873 vs.6327 vs.2835 vs.2871 vs.5928.6 vs.291, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 83 (2/0/1)
Lin [18]2020ChinaRandomized900 (450 vs.450)45.56 vs.5055.28 vs.58.8124.89 vs.25.1110.67 vs.12.4427.56 vs.22.4424.06 vs.24.361, 2, 4, 5, 93 (2/0/1)
Lu [19]2020ChinaProspective80 (40 vs.40)57.5 vs.62.554.3 vs.56.415 vs.17.51, 2, 48 (4/2/2)
Roghani-Dehkordi [20]2020IranProspective126 (70 vs.56)62.8 vs.64.355.1 vs.56.557.1 vs.67.874.2 vs.80.367.1 vs.78.631.4 vs.28.628.4 vs.27.21, 5, 6, 89 (4/2/3)
Soydan [21]2021TurkeyProspective70 (27 vs.43)63 vs.72.177.8 vs.76.740.7 vs.39.533.3 vs.27.948.1 vs.30.249 (4/2/3)
Wang [22]2020ChinaProspective620 (312 vs.308)51.3 vs.5150.1 vs.51.260.6 vs.56.531.4 vs.28.256.4 vs.54.544.2 vs.41.91, 2, 3, 4, 5, 88 (4/2/2)

1- Catheterization/puncture failure; 2- hematoma; 3- radial artery spasm; 4- radial artery occlusion; 5- access time; 6- fluoroscopy time; 7- radiation dose area product; 8- total procedure time; 9- hemostatic device removal time.