Prevalence of Dyslipidemia and Management in the Thai Population, National Health Examination Survey IV, 2009
Table 2
Age-adjusted prevalence of high total cholesterol, high LDL-C, low HDL-C, high non-HDL-C, and high triglycerides by age group, area of residence, region, comorbidity, and CHD risk among Thai men and women aged ≥20 years, NHES 2009.
% High LDL-C*
% Low HDL-C (<40/50)
% High non-HDL-C
% High triglycerides (≥150)
Both sexes
19,021
29.6 (0.9)
47.1 (1.0)
32.6 (0.8)
38.6 (1.4)
Men
9,021
29.5 (1.0)
35.6 (1.1)c
34.0 (0.9)b
44.3 (1.7)c
Women
10,000
29.7 (0.9)
58.6 (1.2)
31.2 (0.8)
32.9 (1.2)
Men
Region
North
2,103
22.6 (2.0)c
35.1 (1.8)b
26.3 (1.9)c
41.7 (1.3)a
Central
2,201
38.2 (1.5)
32.5 (1.0)b
42.1 (1.5)
42.4 (1.9)a
Northeast
2,050
19.3 (0.9)c
42.9 (1.9)c
26.2 (1.3)c
52.5 (3.6)c
South
1,891
42.0 (1.5)
29.4 (0.9)
44.2 (1.4)
33.4 (1.8)
Bangkok
776
42.2 (2.4)
26.5 (1.4)
44.0 (2.4)
36.9 (0.9)
Diabetes
Yes
890
66.6 (2.8)c
54.6 (3.1)c
79.7 (2.4)c
55.3 (1.4)c
No
7,857
28.0 (1.1)
34.2 (1.1)
32.1 (0.9)
41.4 (2.0)
Hypertension
Yes
3,198
39.1 (1.7)c
35.3 (1.3)
47.9 (1.7)c
55.3 (1.4)c
No
5,809
26.4 (0.9)
35.9 (1.2)
29.7 (0.8)
41.4 (2.0)
CHD risk stratification
0-1 RF
3,509
19.4 (1.0)c
9.4 (0.5)c
19.3 (0.8)c
32.8 (1.5)c
2+ RF and/or 10-year risk 10–20%
3,871
35.1 (1.8)
72.1 (1.3)
44.5 (1.7)
54.3 (2.2)
CHD risk equivalent (10-year risk >20%)
1,465
70.8 (2.7)
47.9 (2.8)
80.5 (2.0)
59.6 (2.7)
Women
Region
North
2,232
23.3 (1.9)c
60.4 (2.2)c
24.7 (1.9)b
30.5 (1.8)c
Central
2,348
34.8 (2.0)
50.2 (2.6)
35.8 (1.6)a
29.7 (1.5)c
Northeast
2,141
25.5 (1.0)c
66.8 (1.6)c
29.1 (1.1)
41.4 (1.9)c
South
2,080
38.2 (1.0)c
58.3 (2.6)b
37.0 (1.7)a
28.1 (1.0)c
Bangkok
1,199
32.5 (1.0)
47.4 (1.2)
31.8 (0.8)
22.6 (0.8)
Diabetes
Yes
1,158
73.4 (2.5)c
59.6 (2.7)
78.0 (2.4)c
47.6 (2.6)c
No
8,584
27.0 (0.9)
57.8 (1.3)
28.1 (0.8)
30.2 (1.3)
Hypertension
Yes
3,398
42.0 (1.5)c
66.0 (1.5)c
45.4 (1.6)c
47.6 (2.6)c
No
6,597
25.2 (0.9)
58.0 (1.3)
26.0 (0.9)
30.2 (1.3)
CHD risk stratification
0-1 RF
5,968
20.8 (0.8)c
51.4 (1.3)c
20.6 (0.7)c
26.6 (1.2)c
2+ RF and/or 10-year risk 10–20%
2,195
34.7 (2.0)
90.2 (0.9)
39.8 (2.1)
54.9 (3.5)
CHD risk equivalent (10-year risk >20%)
1,759
76.5 (1.9)
58.8 (2.5)
(1.6)
55.2 (3.1)
*High LDL-C is based on ATP III classification, in which the CHD risk was calculated from the WHO CVD risk chart. Significant level: a; b; c. values for comparison among age groups and among CHD risk stratification were -for trend For comparison among regions: each region was compared with Bangkok.
