Prevalence of Dyslipidemia and Management in the Thai Population, National Health Examination Survey IV, 2009
Table 3
Age-adjusted proportions of awareness, treatment, and control of high LDL-C among Thai adults aged ≥20 years with high LDL-C.
% Aware
% Treated among high LDL-C
% Treated among aware of high LDL-C
% Control among high LDL-C
% LDL-C at recommended level among treated
Total
17.8 (1.1)
11.7 (0.8)
60.6 (1.5)
6.3 (0.5)
57.6 (2.7)
Sex
Men
14.3 (1.2)b
9.2 (0.9)c
56.1 (2.4)a
4.5 (0.5)c
54.0 (3.4)
Women
21.2 (1.2)
14.2 (0.9)
65.1 (2.2)
8.2 (0.7)
61.2 (2.9)
Age
20–34
5.6 (1.2)c
3.9 (0.9)c
54.9 (7.9)c
2.7 (0.6)c
43.2 (3.3)b
35–59
18.5 (1.0)
11.0 (0.7)
58.0 (2.4)
6.4 (0.5)
60.0 (2.7)
≥60
27.3 (1.8)
21.5 (1.6)
79.0 (1.5)
9.6 (0.4)
44.1 (2.8)
Area of residence
Urban
24.2 (1.2)c
16.0 (0.9)c
63.8 (2.0)
7.4 (0.3)a
46.8 (1.9)c
Rural
13.8 (0.9)
9.0 (0.7)
61.3 (2.8)
5.6 (0.6)
66.6 (4.3)
Region
North
15.7 (1.1)c
10.1 (0.7)c
58.6 (4.1)
6.3 (0.8)
63.0 (8.0)
Central
16.1 (0.8)c
11.2 (0.7)c
61.3 (3.4)
5.8 (0.4)b
56.3 (3.4)
Northeast
14.2 (2.3)c
9.7 (1.8)c
64.4 (2.9)
6.8 (1.5)
69.0 (2.3)c
South
18.3 (0.8)c
11.2 (0.7)c
60.7 (4.0)
5.5 (0.5)b
43.4 (3.3)
Bangkok
30.1 (1.1)
19.8 (1.2)
59.8 (2.9)
8.2 (0.6)
48.8 (3.5)
Diabetes
Yes
27.4 (2.3)c
21.3 (1.8)c
76.3 (4.5)b
8.1 (1.4)
39.7 (2.6)c
No
15.5 (1.0)
9.5 (0.7)
56.9 (2.1)
5.8 (0.4)
62.7 (2.9)
Hypertension
Yes
25.5 (1.5)c
17.8 (1.3)c
70.0 (3.0)c
9.3 (0.7)c
54.6 (3.3)
No
13.0 (0.9)
7.5 (0.6)
53.5 (2.0)
4.5 (0.4)
61.8 (2.7)
CHD risk stratification
0-1 RF
14.8 (1.1)c
8.6 (0.8)c
51.7 (2.3)c
6.4 (0.6)
76.4 (3.2)c
2+ RF and/or 10-year risk 10–20%
19.2 (2.3)
15.2 (2.2)
73.3 (1.7)
11.2 (2.3)
60.5 (4.5)
CHD risk equivalent (10-year risk >20%)
25.5 (2.5)
19.3 (2.0)
73.1 (4.0)
5.9 (0.9)
32.9 (3.8)
Significant level: a; b; c. values for comparison among age groups and among CHD risk stratification were -for trend. For comparison among regions: each region was compared with Bangkok.
