Review Article

Cardiovascular Outcomes of PCSK9 Inhibitors: With Special Emphasis on Its Effect beyond LDL-Cholesterol Lowering

Table 2

Studies on evolocumab. E-mAb: evolocumab; EZE: ezetimibe; ATV: atorvastatin.

S. No.TrialParticipantsComparisonLDL-C reductionAdverse events (AE)

MENDEL-2
Completion date: October 2013
HypercholesterolemiaE-mAb versus Placebo versus EZEReduction in E-mab group; 55–57% more than placebo & 38–40% more than EZE44% versus 44% versus 46%

DESCARATES
Completion date: November 2013
Hypercholesterolemia, on background therapy with diet or ATV (10 mg or 80 mg) or EZE singly or in combination.E-mAb versus Placebo50.1% versus 6.8%74.8% versus 74.2%

GAUSS-2
Completion date: November 2013
HypercholesterolemiaE-mAb versus EZE53–56% versus 37–39%Muscle AE’s; more frequent in EZE group (23%) versus
E-mab group (12%)

RUTHERFORD-2
Primary completion date: November 2013
Familial HypercholesterolemiaE-mAb versus placebo60% in E-mAb groupSimilar adverse events profile

LAPLACE-2
Completion date: Dec. 2013
HypercholesterolemiaE-mAb versus EZE versus Placebo−66% to 75% in E-mAb group36% versus 40% versus 39%

FOURIER
Completion date: 2017
Patient with h/o CVD on maximum tolerated statin therapy but LDL is more than 70 mg/dlE-mAb versus placebo in statin treated patients59% reduction of LDL in comparison to placeboPrimary end point. that is, Cv events was 9.8% versus 11.3%;
Injection site reaction was more in E-mAb 2.1% versus 1.6%

OSLER I & OSLER II
Expected completion date: June 2018 & August 2018, respectively
Patients who completed “parent trials” of evolocumab and eligible patients were randomly assigned in 2 : 1 ratio to receive either evolocumab plus standard therapy or standard therapy aloneE-mAb versus standard therapy61% in E-mAb group.69.2% versus 64.8%