Journal of Marine Sciences

Journal of Marine Sciences / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 953587 |

Apple Pui Yi Chui, Man Chung Wong, Siu Hong Liu, Ga Wun Lee, Sze Wai Chan, Pui Ling Lau, Sin Man Leung, Put Ang, "Gametogenesis, Embryogenesis, and Fertilization Ecology of Platygyra acuta in Marginal Nonreefal Coral Communities in Hong Kong", Journal of Marine Sciences, vol. 2014, Article ID 953587, 9 pages, 2014.

Gametogenesis, Embryogenesis, and Fertilization Ecology of Platygyra acuta in Marginal Nonreefal Coral Communities in Hong Kong

Academic Editor: Nobuyuki Miyazaki
Received02 Jun 2014
Revised31 Jul 2014
Accepted16 Aug 2014
Published08 Sep 2014


Understanding the reproductive biology of dominant coral species in subtropical nonreefal coral communities is critical in providing important information on the processes underlying the distribution limits of coral species and communities. This is the first study that investigates the reproduction cycle, gametogenesis, and fertilization ecology of Platygyra acuta. Results indicated that P. acuta is hermaphroditic and exhibits a single annual gametogenic cycle. Oogenic and spermatogenic cycle occurs for 6-7 months and for 2 months, respectively, prior to annual mass spawning event in May to June in Hong Kong. It took 18 hours for P. acuta to complete embryonic development, develop cilia, and start to rotate. High (>70%) fertilization success can be achieved under a broad range of sperm concentrations from 104 to 107 sperms mL−1. Fertilization success remained consistently high 6 h after spawning, indicating a prolonged viability of its gametes that is much longer than that recorded for other coral species. Significantly higher percentage of fertilization success was recorded in the first of the two consecutive nights of spawning, suggesting differences in the quality of the eggs and/or sperms between days of spawning. These results serve as important baseline information for better understanding of corals in marginal communities.

1. Introduction

Corals show two aspects of sexual reproductive patterns. They can be hermaphroditic or gonochoric in their sexuality, and they can broadcast their gametes in mass/multispecific spawning (broadcaster) or brood their larvae (brooder) as a mode of larval development. Hermaphroditic corals have both male and female gonads developed within polyp or in different polyps within the same colony, whereas gonochoric corals have separate sexes at the colony level. Broadcast spawners carry out external fertilization in the water column, whereas brooders carry out internal fertilization within the maternal polyp and release planula larvae [15]. Overall, based on the information on sexuality and mode of development available worldwide, most scleractinian corals are hermaphroditic broadcasters [3]. The breeding season for broadcast spawning species is relatively short and discrete; each colony usually spawns only once per year on a seasonal cycle, with oogenic cycle typically ranging from 6 to 14 months [1, 3].

Since corals are sessile organisms incapable of aggregating for reproduction, synchronous release of gametes for external fertilization is crucial for reproductive success. High degree of synchronized spawning maximizes fertilization success by increasing the chance for gametes from conspecific individuals to meet in the water column or surface, preventing gametes from being drifted away by current before fertilization takes place, reducing sperm dilution effect, and avoiding predation [4, 6, 7]. Therefore, detailed information on the timing of gametogenesis is needed as a baseline for better understanding of coral spawning pattern as well as its reproductive strategy and implication on its sustainability in a region.

Mass spawning of scleractinian corals was first documented in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia, in the early 1980s [8]. Since then, research on sexual reproduction and mass- or multispecific spawning of corals has greatly increased in number and has expanded to different geographical regions over the last two decades [14, 9, 10]. Although there have been reviews on coral reproduction and development, descriptions of development profile of many coral species are necessary [11]. This is particularly true for coral species found in marginal communities. Marginal coral reefs and communities are those that exist near or beyond normal environmental limits of reef distribution, such as low temperature, low aragonite saturation state, and light limitation [12]. Studies on marginal communities can provide important information about the processes underlying the distribution limits of coral species and communities.

Hong Kong, located in a subtropical region, experiences large annual thermal variation with monthly mean SST that ranges from 14–16°C in winter to 30°C in summer [13]. This large temperature range makes it a marginal environment for reef building scleractinian corals. Yet, the coral diversity in Hong Kong is relatively high with at least 84 scleractinian coral species recorded [13]. Coastal subtropical environment, like Hong Kong, may become an important refuge for coral range expansion in the future should current pattern of climate change continues [1417]. Platygyra acuta is one of the most dominant scleractinian corals in Hong Kong northeastern water [18]. Despite its key role in shaping the local coral community structures, its reproduction and gametogenesis have never been examined in detail neither locally nor elsewhere. An understanding of coral reproduction and development of P. acuta is therefore of particular importance if conservation of coral communities and coral reefs is considered in a global perspective.

Coral assemblages in Hong Kong are usually small and isolated. This is true as well in many other high latitude regions [19]. The total amount of spawned gametes is much limited when compared to that in tropical reef areas. Therefore, it is important to understand the adaptive strategies, if any, being employed by Hong Kong corals, as exemplified by P. acuta, to ensure or promote fertilization success. These strategies may include the capability to fertilize under lower sperm concentration or increase gamete longevity to enhance the chance of sperm-egg encounters [6]. Manipulative experiments on sperm density and gamete ageing effects were therefore conducted in this study to test if such reproductive strategies are exhibited by P. acuta. In addition, given the growing awareness of research in marginal coral areas due to their potential importance under climate change and limited description of coral developmental profile available, this study also looked into detailed embryogenesis of P. acuta. All these pieces of information will serve as important baseline for future experiments on other aspects of coral biology in marginal environment. The objectives of this study are therefore to document the reproductive cycle and gametogenesis of P. acuta in Hong Kong and to examine its fertilization ecology, including optimal sperm concentration for fertilization and gamete ageing effects that influence its fertilization success.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Gametogenetic Study

Samples of Platygyra acuta were collected monthly, within 5 days prior to the full moon and within 1–3 m water depth range from A Ma Wan (AMW), Tung Ping Chau (22°54′N, 114°44′E) for a period of 15 months between May 1998 and July 1999, and again from Chek Chau (22°50′N, 114°36′E) for a period of 14 months between August 2010 and September 2011 (Figure 1). Both sites are within Tai Pang Wan (Mirs Bay), NE Hong Kong. On each sampling occasion, five visibly healthy colonies were haphazardly sampled, with the criteria that they were already of reproductive size >30 cm in diameter [20]. Small fragments of approximately 2 × 4 cm in size were removed from the colonies using hammer and chisel. Resampling of the same colony was avoided during the study period to eliminate, if any, stress or injury induced response which may affect the ability of corals to reproduce properly.

Coral samples were fixed in 10% formalin in seawater immediately after collection and kept for one week. Following fixation, samples were decalcified in 10% hydrochloric acid for two days with active ingredients including 100 mL concentrated hydrochloric acid (32%), 0.7 g ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 0.008 g sodium potassium tartrate, and 0.14 g sodium tartrate dehydrate per liter of solution. Samples were subsequently immersed in running tap water overnight and preserved in 70% ethanol until histological processing. Single polyp was randomly selected and cut out from each sample for dehydration processing in an ethanol series in Automated Vacuum Tissue Processor (Leica TP 1050, Leica Instruments GmbH) and embedded in paraffin wax. Samples were oriented in longitudinal positions for serial cut at a thickness of 7 μm at intervals of 400 μm and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Slides were examined under a light microscope for oocytes or spermaries. The maximum length and perpendicular width of the six largest oocytes or spermaries were measured by the computer program Image-Pro Plus . The geometric mean diameter (GMD) for each oocyte or spermary was obtained by calculating the square root of the product of the length and width measurements.

2.2. Embryonic Development and Fertilization Ecology of Platygyra acuta
2.2.1. Gametes Collection

Gametes of Platygyra acuta were collected in June 2010 and 2012 from A Ye Wan (AYW), Tung Ping Chau Marine Park (TPCMP) (22°32′N, 114°25′E) (Figure 1). Ten individual colonies of Platygyra acuta were tagged at depths of −0.5 to −1.5 m chart datum (CD). During spawning event, egg-sperm bundles were collected separately from different colonies and transferred on shore for further processing. Bundles collected in June 2010 were targeted for embryonic development monitoring. Bundles from different colonies were therefore mixed together in a culture tank and gently stirred to ensure fertilization. The culture tank was located semi-indoor and was equipped with HOBO Temperature Pendant data loggers (Onset) to record the water temperature every 30 min. The subsequent culturing procedures of the developing embryos followed those described by Hatta et al. [21] and Guest et al. [22]. Egg-sperm bundles collected in June 2012 were targeted for fertilization ecology study. Therefore, after bundle collection, eggs and sperms were separated for subsequent experiments using methods adapted from Oliver and Babcock [6].

2.2.2. Embryonic Development

Spawning of Platygyra acuta was observed between 2100 and 2200 h on June 6, 2010. Egg bundles from 10 coral colonies were collected and mixed. Fertilization started at 2325 h, with sperm concentration of around 107 sperms mL−1. Early stages of development were examined by sampling the developing embryos in the culture tank at hourly intervals during the first 12 h after fertilization ( = 0 to = 12), every 2 h from = 12–24, every 4 h from = 24–72, and every 12 h thereafter. Approximately 50 eggs or embryos of Platygyra acuta were collected during each sampling and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (GA) for 4 h at 4°C. Fixed samples were washed by 0.2 M phosphate buffer (PBS) and postfixed in 1% buffered osmium tetroxide at 4°C. Postfixed samples were washed by 0.2 M phosphate buffer (PBS) and kept in Eppendorf tubes until being ready to be processed. To prepare the samples for scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the samples were dehydrated in increasing concentration of acetone-ethanol. Drying was carried out by using anhydrous acetone as intermediate liquid and tertramethylsilane (TMS) as the transition liquid. After the drying stage, samples were observed under the SEM (S-3400N, Hitachi, Japan) with a working voltage of 20 kV.

2.2.3. Optimal Sperm Concentration on Fertilization Success

The experiment was conducted in June 2012 and was repeated on two successive nights of spawning event. Concentration of undiluted sperm stock was adjusted to about 106 to 107 sperms mL−1. These suspensions were then serially diluted 10 times with 40 μm filtered sperm-free seawater to provide a standard range of sperm concentrations that ranged from 102 to 107 sperms mL−1. For each concentration, 50 mL of sperm suspension was added separately to three replicate glass bottles (100 mL). Approximately 100 eggs were added to each of the bottles, placed on a bench at ambient temperature (26°C) and left undisturbed. The number of fertilized eggs, that is, eggs that were at or beyond the two-cell stage, was examined under the stereomicroscope and recorded after 4 h.

2.2.4. Gamete Ageing Effects on Fertilization Success

The experiment was conducted in June 2012 and was repeated on two successive nights of spawning event. In each case, 50 mL sperm suspension (106 sperms mL−1) was added separately to three replicate glass bottles (250 mL). Approximately 100 eggs were then added to each of the bottles. In the first day of experiment, each set of mixing was carried out at 30 min intervals for 3.5 h to assess the potential longevity of gametes. In Day 2, mixing was carried out at 1 h intervals for 6 h. This change was necessary after reviewing the results from Day 1. The sperms were kept at a concentration of 106 sperms mL−1 until the time the gametes were mixed. All experiments were conducted on a bench at ambient temperature and left undisturbed after mixing. The number of fertilized eggs was examined under the stereomicroscope and recorded after 4 h.

2.2.5. Self-Fertilization in Platygyra acuta

To assess the ability for self-fertilization in P. acuta, egg bundles collected from the same colony () were stirred gently to break up the bundles and left undisturbed for at least 4 h. The number of fertilized eggs, as indicated by the presence of cleavage, was counted under the stereomicroscope. This experiment was conducted in 2012 and repeated in 2013 spawning event.

2.3. Data Analysis

All data were arcsine-transformed and tested for normality using one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and for homogeneity of variances using Levene’s test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was then used to determine if there was any significant difference () in the effect of sperm concentrations on the percent fertilization success in Experiment  1, as well as the effect of gamete age on the percent fertilization success in Experiment  2. Post hoc comparisons of means to find significant groupings were done using Tukey’s HSD tests. SPSS version 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., USA) was employed in all statistical analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Gametogenesis of Platygyra acuta

Sampled Platygyra acuta colonies covered three spawning events in 1998, 1999, and 2011; all had a single annual gametogenic cycle and similar annual patterns of gametogenesis with oogenesis occurring for 6-7 months from November 1998 to May 1999 and from November 2010 to June 2011 (Figures 2 and 3). Spermatogenesis was monitored only in 2011 and was found to occur two months before spawning from May to June 2011. Oocytes first appeared in P. acuta tissues in both November 1998 (μm) and November 2011 (μm) (Figure 3). Their sizes increased through the gametogenic cycle to reach the largest mean (±SD) size of μm, μm, and μm, respectively, in June 1998, May 1999, and June 2011. Spermaries first appeared in May 2011 with a mean (±SD) size of μm (Figure 3). They developed rapidly within a month and achieved their maximum mean size of μm in June 2011. Oocytes and spermaries coexisted in the polyps and all gametes disappeared in the samples of July 2011. Likewise, oocytes were also not detected in the samples of July 1998 and June 1999 (Figure 3). This indicates that P. acuta in Hong Kong started gametogenesis in November and mass spawning occurred in May or June in the following year. Two samples collected, one in November 2010 and another in March 2011, within the gametogenetic period were found to contain no gamete. The number of this type of samples is, however, small (5% of sampled colonies).

3.2. Embryogenesis of Platygyra acuta

Average (± SD) temperature of °C was maintained throughout the culturing period. Immediately after bundle collection, subsamples of the eggs (Figure 4(a)) released from the bundles were measured under dissecting microscope with the mean (± SD) diameter of the eggs recorded as μm ().

The first cleavage was initiated at 2 h after fertilization. Cleavage furrow appeared on one side of the blastomere, creating a heart-shaped zygote (Figure 4(b)). Four equally sized blastomeres were observed at 3 h after the second cleavage (Figure 4(c)). The third cleavage was perpendicular to the first two cleavage planes, creating eight blastomeres that further divided into 16 and 32 blastomeres in 5 h after fertilization (Figures 4(d)-4(f)). After the 32-cell stage, the blastomeres continued to divide into highly irregular shapes (Figures 4(g)-4(h)). Embryos began to flatten and became bowl shaped (cushion stage) at 7 h (Figures 4(i)-4(j)). Smoothening of the embryo surface was observed at 9 h (Figure 4(k)). After 10 h, the irregular shaped embryos expanded and gradually became spherical in shape (Figures 4(l)-4(m)). Invagination of the blastopore began at 16 h (Figure 4(n)), followed by shrinking in diameter of the blastopore (Figure 4(p)). Larvae began to develop cilia and started to rotate at 18 h. Planulae were observed to elongate in the oral-aboral axis and began to be highly mobile at 36 h (Figures 4(q)-4(r)). Formation of two blastopores that resulted in separate invagination was observed but only in two embryos during sampling at 20 and 22 h. This phenomenon is likely to be an abnormal growth pattern (Figure 4(o)).

3.3. Optimal Sperm Concentration on Fertilization Success

In both experimental days (10th and 11th of June 2012), spawning of Platygyra acuta was observed between 2050 and 2210 h. Fertilization success varied significantly with different sperm concentrations (Day 1: (5,12) = 182.57, ; Day 2: (6,14) = 132.48, ). High percent fertilization successes (>95% in Day 1 and >73% in Day 2) were obtained at a broad sperm density range between 104 and 106 sperms mL−1 (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). Mean (±SD) percent fertilization success was lowest at sperm concentration of 102 sperms mL−1 on Day 1 (%) and Day 2 (%). Very high sperm concentration of 107 sperms mL−1 could only be obtained on Day 2 of the experiment and showed no sign of significant inhibition of fertilization (Tukey’s HSD test: ) (Figure 5(b)). However, percent fertilization success varied at sperm concentration of 103 sperms mL−1 in the two experimental days with % observed in Day 1 but only % in Day 2. Highest fertilization success was achieved at 106 sperms mL−1 in both days with % in Day 1 and % in Day 2.

3.4. Gamete Ageing Effect on Fertilization Success

In both experimental days, egg bundles were collected from tagged colonies that spawned between 2050 and 2210 h. The fertilization experiment started a bit later after sperm wash to separate sperms from the eggs. Therefore, time = 0 indicated here referred to 2330 h, around 2.5 h after spawning. Fertilization success varied with different ages of gametes (Day 1: (8,18) = 112.39, ; Day 2: (7,16) = 187.87, ). Mean percent fertilization success was relatively high for the first 3 h ( = 0 to = 3 h) of the experiments, ranging from 96% to 94% in Day 1 and from 75% to 73% in Day 2 (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). Significant reduction in fertilization success was observed after 3 h (Tukey’s HSD test: ) with only % fertilization success at 6 h after the commencement of the experiment (Figure 6(b)).

3.5. Self-Fertilization in Platygyra acuta

No fertilized eggs or very low fertilization <0.6% was observed in this experiment either in 2012 or in 2013, indicating that eggs and sperms from the same colony of P. acuta cannot self-fertilize.

4. Discussion

In the present study, oocytes appeared from November to May or June, suggesting that the duration of the oogenic cycle is between six and seven months. The spermatogenic cycle was much shorter. Spermaries started to appear only approximately two months before spawning. Harrison and Wallace [3] reported that broadcast spawning coral species release their gametes subsequent to the full moon after gamete maturation. The disappearance of oocytes and spermaries after May (1999) or June (1998, 2011) therefore indicated that spawning of P. acuta in Hong Kong occurs after the full moon in May or June each year. Spawning of P. acuta has also been confirmed by field observations. Our results also supported those from previous studies from other localities suggesting that most Platygyra species are hermaphroditic broadcast spawners, with oocytes and spermaries present within the same polyp [7, 8, 23, 24].

Broadcast spawning of Platygyra species has been documented in different regions [4]. However, there are only two studies describing in detail the length and pattern of gametogenic cycles of Platygyra species, including P. daedalea in Kenya [25] and P. pini in Singapore [24]. Single annual gametogenic cycles were found in majority of P. daedalea colonies in Kenya, whereas a low proportion of the population spawned biannually. Duration of oogenic cycle lasted between six and seven months and spermatogenic cycle lasted five months [25]. Two spawning seasons were observed in P. pini colonies in Singapore, but whether the two spawning seasons were caused by multiple gametogenic cycles or population split spawning is not known. Duration of oogenic cycle of P. pini lasted between five and eight months and spermatogenic cycle approximately two to three months [24]. In the present study, P. acuta has a single annual gametogenic cycle, with comparable length of oogenic cycle as that of both species of Platygyra described above. Its spermatogenic cycle is, however, more comparable to that of P. pini. Biannual spawning is not restricted to equatorial reefs [24]. Future research is needed to investigate whether single annual gametogenic cycle is the more common reproductive mode at marginal reef communities. Having annual gametogenic cycle may be one of the adaptive reproductive strategies to ensure high sperm density for fertilization success [6].

Our study is the first detailed examination of the embryonic development of P. acuta. In general, the developmental stages are similar to those described for P. sinensis [7] and P. contorta [11]. The embryogenetic pattern of P. acuta also fits that of robust corals described by Okubo et al. [11]. However, Okubo et al. [11] documented the formation of blastopores with separate invagination in P. contorta, with the two pores that subsequently merged. In our current study, this stage with two pores was only observed in two but not in the rest of >100 embryos. We therefore suspect this to be an abnormal growth stage for P. acuta. It is still possible that this stage was very short and hence could have been missed between our sampling intervals of one h, or such characteristic of double invagination is not shared among Platygyra species.

While the general embryogenetic patterns and stages of P. acuta are similar to those of many of the other coral species examined thus far, they differ from those of the branching Acropora spp. [11, 26]. Instead of forming a very thin single layer prawn-chip stage which is typical for Acropora species, P. acuta develops a cushion stage (Figures 4(i) and 4(j)) which subsequently expands and develops a depression on its side referred to as “pseudoblastopore” by Okubo et al. [11]. This is then followed by a return to spherical shape before commencing a second invagination (Figure 4(m)). It is reported that the timing required for coral embryo to complete embryonic development through to larval motility stage varies among families and species. Acropora hyacinthus and Pectinia lactuca embryos were motile at 48 h and 18 h, respectively [27]. Favites pentagona and F. abdita embryos started swimming approximately 15 and 22 h after first cleavage [11]. In this study, P. acuta developed cilia and started to rotate 18 h after fertilization. This is comparable to P. contorta whose embryos were reported to start swimming 19 h after fertilization [11]. In both the present and P. contorta studies, the culturing temperature for embryonic development was maintained around 26°C.

Fertilization successes of P. acuta were strongly influenced by sperm concentrations. The pronounced decrease in percent fertilization success at low sperm concentrations is believed to be due to the decreased probability of successful egg-sperm encounters [6]. Our results were comparable to those from Oliver and Babcock [6] for P. sinensis, but with even broader optimal sperm concentrations recorded from 104 to 107 sperms mL−1. Inhibition of fertilization was reported when sperm concentration was greater than 106 sperms mL−1 [6], but such inhibition was not observed in the current study. However, it should be noted that the level of statistical significance to evaluate the difference in fertilization success between the highest sperm concentration of 107 sperms mL−1 and the lower sperm concentrations was marginal (i.e., ). Significant inhibitory effect might be detected with more replicates or in repeated experiments. Nonetheless, we were unable to test sperm concentration higher than 107 sperms mL−1. The overall fertilization success in the second day of spawning was also lower, with the highest only around 80%. This suggests that the quality of the eggs and sperms may differ between spawning days and may ultimately affect the optimal concentration of sperm for successful fertilization. In the present study, the most striking difference on optimal sperm concentration for fertilization success between the two days of spawning was observed at 103 sperms mL−1 concentration. The reason for a much lower percent fertilization success at this sperm concentration in the second day of spawning is not known but may be related to the lower quality of the sperms or their activity from subsequent days of spawning. Additional experiments should be carried out to evaluate this hypothesis.

Gamete ageing effect experiment indicated that viability of the gametes for successful fertilization is relatively short. The capability for fertilization remained high for up to 3.5 h after the experiment started. Given that the start of the experiment ( = 0) was about 2.5 h after spawning, this indicates that highest gamete viability could only last for 6 h. Nonetheless, the duration of this viability is already much longer than that reported for other corals. Oliver and Babcock [6] showed thatfertilization for P. sinensis remained high for only up to 2 h after spawning. The mechanisms behind such prolonged viability of P. acuta gametes in the present study are not clear. Apparently, given that the supply of gametes is usually limited in a marginal environment, such prolonged viability may be a reproductive strategy to enhance fertilization success by increasing the chances of egg-sperm encounter over time. It is also not clear whether the loss of viability was largely due to the eggs or the sperms or both. It has been suggested that the loss of viability may be related to a drop in sperm motility due to depletion of its limited energy reserves [6]. Prolonged gamete viability of more than 5 h has been demonstrated in other marine invertebrates, such as the abalone Haliotis laevigata [28] and mussel Mytilus edulis [29]. Even longer sperm longevities of more than 24 h were reported in the ascidians Ascidia mentula [30]. Although eggs and sperm of the coral P. acuta were still fertilizable for up to 6 h after release, the age of the gametes for optimal fertilization is comparatively short.

Plasticity in coral gametes released over the spawning period of several days has been documented before. Hédouin and Gates [31] reported a significant difference in the fertilization success of Montipora capitata between two consecutive spawning nights within a month and between spawning months under copper exposure. It has also been shown that the number, size, and lipid and protein concentrations of gametes released at different spawning days were different, thus contributing to differences in their quality [30, 31]. The generally much lower fertilization success observed in the second day of spawning in P. acuta observed in the present study may be part of an adaptive reproductive strategy for this coral. The best and most mature egg bundles could be released immediately upon receiving the first cue of a favorable condition for fertilization to ensure a higher probability of fertilization success. Those released in the second or subsequent days may thus be of a lesser quality. Further investigations should be conducted to assess this hypothesis.

Results of self-fertilization experiment indicated that eggs and sperms from the same colony of P. acuta were not able to self-fertilize. Scleractinian corals have been reported to demonstrate a self-recognition response [32]. However, the degree of specificity may vary with species [33]. One thing to be noted was that although self-fertilization experiment in this study was ended at least 4 h after gamete mixing, it has been reported that the effectiveness of the barrier that inhibits self-fertilization may decrease several hours after spawning [34]. There remains a possibility that the level of self-fertilization success might increase beyond 4 h after spawning in P. acuta. Nevertheless, the ability to avoid self-fertilization, together with successful fertilization under lower sperm concentration and prolonged gamete longevity, will all provide time for gametes from different colonies to mix, hence enhancing the chance of successful cross-fertilization in P. acuta under the natural condition [6].

5. Conclusions

Reproductive ecology and strategy of corals from marginal environment are understudied. Yet, marginal environment could be refuge for future coral expansion under the threat of global climate change. Our study provided the first detailed documentation on gametogenic cycles, embryonic development, and fertilization ecology of P. acuta, one of the most dominant massive coral species in subtropical marginal nonreefal coral communities in Hong Kong. Our study also contributed new insights to the understanding of the reproductive strategy of corals. These baseline pieces of information and insights may shed light on further understanding coral responses to and adaptations in a changing ocean environment and could contribute to the development of strategies for their conservation and protection.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The study was partly supported by the Research Grant Council of Hong Kong General Research Fund no. 460013 and the Chinese University of Hong Kong Research Committee Group Research Scheme. The authors thank K. H. Chan, C. H. Kwok, W. W. Wah, H. B. Yeung, and Y. H. Yung for technical support, M. H. Chau, K. W. Chu, Y. L. Hui, Y. L. Kam, C. K. Kwok, K. Y. Lam, H. N. Leung, Y. H. Leung, T. Y. Ng, H. L. Tsang, C. W. Yeung, L. C. Yeung, and final year project students of 2011, 2012, and 2013 for field and lab assistance. Permission to work in Tung Ping Chau Marine Park was kindly granted by the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department of the Hong Kong SAR Government.


  1. A. H. Baird, J. R. Guest, and B. L. Willis, “Systematic and biogeographical patterns in the reproductive biology of scleractinian corals,” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, vol. 40, pp. 551–571, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. P. L. Harrison, “Sexual reproduction of scleractinian corals,” in Coral Reefs: An Ecosystem in Transition, Z. Dubinsky and N. Stambler, Eds., pp. 59–85, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  3. P. Harrison and C. Wallace, “Reproduction, dispersal and recruitment of scleractinian corals,” in Ecosystems of the World: Coral Reefs, Z. Dubinsky, Ed., pp. 133–207, Elsevier, New York, NY, USA, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  4. R. H. Richmond and C. L. Hunter, “Reproduction and recruitment of corals: comparisons among the Caribbean, the Tropical Pacific, and the Red Sea,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 60, pp. 185–203, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  5. Y. H. Fadlallah, “Sexual reproduction, development and larval biology in scleractinian corals—a review,” Coral Reefs, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 129–150, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Oliver and R. Babcock, “Aspects of the fertilization ecology of broadcast spawning corals: sperm dilution effects and in situ measurements of fertilization,” Biological Bulletin, vol. 183, no. 3, pp. 409–417, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. R. C. Babcock and A. J. Heyward, “Larval development of certain gamete-spawning scleractinian corals,” Coral Reefs, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 111–116, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. L. Harrison, R. C. Babcock, G. D. Bull, J. K. Oliver, C. C. Wallace, and B. L. Willis, “Mass spawning in tropical reef corals.,” Science, vol. 223, no. 4641, pp. 1186–1189, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. R. H. Richmond, “Reproduction and recruitment in corals: critical links in the persistence of reefs,” in Life and Death of Coral Reefs, C. Birkeland, Ed., pp. 175–197, Chapman & Hall, New York, NY, USA, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  10. J. R. Guest, A. H. Baird, B. P. L. Goh, and L. M. Chou, “Seasonal reproduction in equatorial reef corals,” Invertebrate Reproduction and Development, vol. 48, no. 1–3, pp. 207–218, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. N. Okubo, T. Mezaki, Y. Nozawa et al., “Comparative embryology of eleven species of stony corals (Scleractinia),” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 12, Article ID e84115, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  12. J. A. Kleypas, J. W. McManu, and L. A. B. Mene, “Environmental limits to coral reef development: where do we draw the line?” The American Zoologist, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 146–159, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  13. P. O. Ang, L. S. Choi, M. M. Choi et al., “Hong Kong,” in Status of Coral Reefs of the East Asian Seas Region: 2004, pp. 121–152, Japan Wildlife Research Centre, Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  14. W. F. Precht and R. B. Aronson, “Climate flickers and range shifts of reef corals,” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 307–314, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  15. B. J. Greenstein and J. M. Pandolfi, “Escaping the heat: range shifts of reef coral taxa in coastal Western Australia,” Global Change Biology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 513–528, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. H. Yamano, K. Sugihara, and K. Nomura, “Rapid poleward range expansion of tropical reef corals in response to rising sea surface temperatures,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 38, no. 4, Article ID L04601, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. E. Couce, A. Ridgwell, and E. J. Hendy, “Future habitat suitability for coral reef ecosystems under global warming and ocean acidification,” Global Change Biology, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 3592–3606, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  18. T.-W. Tam and P. O. Ang Jr., “Repeated physical disturbances and the stability of sub-tropical coral communities in Hong Kong, China,” Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1005–1024, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. L. C. Wicks, J. P. A. Gardner, and S. K. Davy, “Spatial patterns and regional affinities of coral communities at the Kermadec Islands Marine Reserve, New Zealand-a marginal high-latitude site,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 400, pp. 101–113, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. C. C. Wallace, “Reproduction, recruitment and fragmentation in nine sympatric species of the coral genus Acropora,” Marine Biology, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 217–233, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Hatta, K. Iwao, H. Taniguchi, and M. Omori, “Restoration technology using sexual reproduction,” in Manual for Restoration and Remediation of Coral Reefs, M. Omori and S. Fujiwara, Eds., pp. 14–33, Nature Conservation Bureau, Ministry of the Environment, Tokyo, Japan, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  22. J. R. Guest, A. Heyward, M. Omori, K. Iwao, A. Morse, and C. Boch, “Rearing coral larvae for reef rehabilitation,” in Reef Rehabilitation Manual, A. J. Edwards, Ed., pp. 74–98, Coral Reef Targeted Research & Capacity Building for Management Program, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  23. Y. Shlesinger, T. L. Goulet, and Y. Loya, “Reproductive patterns of scleractinian corals in the Northern Red Sea,” Marine Biology, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 691–701, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. R. Guest, L. M. Chou, and B. Goh, “Reproductive seasonality of the reef building coral Platygyra Pini on Singapore's reefs,” Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, vol. 25, pp. 123–131, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  25. S. Mangubhai and P. L. Harrison, “Gametogenesis, spawning and fecundity of Platygyra daedalea (Scleractinia) on equatorial reefs in Kenya,” Coral Reefs, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 117–122, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. N. Okubo and T. Motokawa, “Embryogenesis in the reef-building coral Acropora spp,” Zoological Science, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1169–1177, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. T. C. Toh, J. Guest, and L. M. Chou, “Coral larval rearing in Singapore: observations on spawning timing, larval development and settlement of two common scleractinian coral species,” in Contributions to Marine Science, pp. 81–87, National University of Singapore, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  28. R. Babcock and J. Keesing, “Fertilization biology of the abalone Haliotis laevigata: laboratory and field studies,” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 1668–1678, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. L. A. Levy and C. A. Couturier, “Effects of sperm longevity and gamete concentrations on fertilization success in the blue mussel,” Bulletin of the Aquaculture Association of Canada, vol. 96, pp. 71–73, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  30. J. N. Havenhand, “Fertilization and the potential for dispersal of gametes and larvae in the solitary ascidian Ascidia mentula Muller,” Ophelia, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. L. Hédouin and R. D. Gates, “Assessing fertilization success of the coral Montipora capitata under copper exposure: does the night of spawning matter?” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 66, no. 1-2, pp. 221–224, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. W. H. Hildemann, R. L. Raison, G. Cheung, C. J. Hull, L. Akaka, and J. Okamoto, “Immunological specificity and memory in a scleractinian coral,” Nature, vol. 270, no. 5634, pp. 219–223, 1977. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. A. Stoddart, D. J. Ayre, B. Willis, and A. J. Heyward, “Self recognition in sponges and corals?” Evolution, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 461–463, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. J. Heyward and R. C. Babcock, “Self- and cross-fertilization in scleractinian corals,” Marine Biology, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 191–195, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Apple Pui Yi Chui et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.