Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nucleic Acids
Volume 2010, Article ID 319142, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/319142
Research Article

Differential Dynamics of ATR-Mediated Checkpoint Regulators

1Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Cancer Genome Center, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
3Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Ofra s/n, La Laguna 38320, Tenerife, Spain

Received 3 May 2010; Accepted 28 June 2010

Academic Editor: Ashis Basu

Copyright © 2010 Daniël O. Warmerdam et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Y. Shiloh, “ATM and related protein kinases: safeguarding genome integrity,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 155–168, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. S. Y. Huen, S. M. H. Sy, and J. Chen, “BRCA1 and its toolbox for the maintenance of genome integrity,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 138–148, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. S. Y. Huen and J. Chen, “Assembly of checkpoint and repair machineries at DNA damage sites,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 101–108, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. Zou and S. J. Elledge, “Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes,” Science, vol. 300, no. 5625, pp. 1542–1548, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Zou, D. Cortez, and S. J. Elledge, “Regulation of ATR substrate selection by Rad17-dependent loading of Rad9 complexes onto chromatin,” Genes and Development, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 198–208, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Kondo, T. Wakayama, T. Naiki, K. Matsumoto, and K. Sugimoto, “Recruitment of Mec1 and Ddc1 checkpoint proteins to double-strand breaks through distinct mechanisms,” Science, vol. 294, no. 5543, pp. 867–870, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. A. Melo, J. Cohen, and D. P. Toczyski, “Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo,” Genes and Development, vol. 15, no. 21, pp. 2809–2821, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Lee, A. Kumagai, and W. G. Dunphy, “The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 checkpoint clamp regulates interaction of TopBP1 with ATR,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 38, pp. 28036–28044, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Delacroix, J. M. Wagner, M. Kobayashi, K.-I. Yamamoto, and L. M. Karnitz, “The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp activates checkpoint signaling via TopBP1,” Genes and Development, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1472–1477, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Majka, A. Niedziela-Majka, and P. J. Burgers, “The checkpoint clamp activates Mec1 kinase during initiation of the DNA damage checkpoint,” Molecular Cell, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 891–901, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B.-B. S. Zhou and S. J. Elledge, “The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective,” Nature, vol. 408, no. 6811, pp. 433–439, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. Shiotani and L. Zou, “ATR signaling at a glance,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 301–304, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. W. Harper and S. J. Elledge, “The DNA damage response: ten years after,” Molecular Cell, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 739–745, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Bekker-Jensen, C. Lukas, R. Kitagawa et al., “Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 173, no. 2, pp. 195–206, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Lukas, J. Falck, J. Bartkova, J. Bartek, and J. Lukas, “Distinct spatiotemporal dynamics of mammalian checkpoint regulators induced by DNA damage,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 255–260, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Essers, A. B. Houtsmuller, and R. Kanaar, “Analysis of DNA recombination and repair proteins in living cells by photobleaching microscopy,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 408, pp. 463–485, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Essers, A. B. Houtsmuller, L. Van Veelen et al., “Nuclear dynamics of RAD52 group homologous recombination proteins in response to DNA damage,” EMBO Journal, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 2030–2037, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L. R. Van Veelen, T. Cervelli, M. W. Van De Rakt, A. F. Theil, J. Essers, and R. Kanaar, “Analysis of ionizing radiation-induced foci of DNA damage repair proteins,” Mutation Research, vol. 574, no. 1-2, pp. 22–33, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Lippincott-Schwartz and G. H. Patterson, “Development and use of fluorescent protein markers in living cells,” Science, vol. 300, no. 5616, pp. 87–91, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. H. P. Easwaran, H. Leonhardt, and M. C. Cardoso, “Cell cycle markers for live cell analyses,” Cell Cycle, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 453–455, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. O. Warmerdam, R. Freire, R. Kanaar, and V. A. J. Smits, “Cell cycle-dependent processing of DNA lesions controls localization of Rad9 to sites of genotoxic stress,” Cell Cycle, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1765–1774, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. Y. Bonilla, J. A. Melo, and D. P. Toczyski, “Colocalization of sensors is sufficient to activate the DNA damage checkpoint in the absence of damage,” Molecular Cell, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 267–276, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. Lukas, C. Lukas, and J. Bartek, “Mammalian cell cycle checkpoints: signalling pathways and their organization in space and time,” DNA Repair, vol. 3, no. 8-9, pp. 997–1007, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. Soutoglou and T. Misteli, “Activation of the cellular DNA damage response in the absence of DNA lesions,” Science, vol. 320, no. 5882, pp. 1507–1510, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. B. Houtsmuller, S. Rademakers, A. L. Nigg, D. Hoogstraten, J. H. J. Hoeijmakers, and W. Vermeulen, “Action of DNA repair endonuclease ERCC1/XPF in living cells,” Science, vol. 284, no. 5416, pp. 958–961, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Zotter, M. S. Luijsterburg, D. O. Warmerdam et al., “Recruitment of the nucleotide excision repair endonuclease XPG to sites of UV-induced DNA damage depends on functional TFIIH,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 26, no. 23, pp. 8868–8879, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. S. Luijsterburg, J. Goedhart, J. Moser et al., “Dynamic in vivo interaction of DDB2 E3 ubiquitin ligase with UV-damaged DNA is independent of damage-recognition protein XPC,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 120, no. 15, pp. 2706–2716, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. Giglia-Mari, F. Coin, J. A. Ranish et al., “A new, tenth subunit TFIIH is responsible for the DNA repair syndrome trichothiodystrophy group A,” Nature Genetics, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 714–719, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. G. Giglia-Mari, C. Miquel, A. F. Theil et al., “Dynamic interaction of TTDA with TFIIH is stabilized by nucleotide excision repair in living cells,” PLoS Biology, vol. 4, no. 6, article e156, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Toueille, N. El-Andaloussi, I. Fouin et al., “The human Rad9/Rad1/Hus1 damage sensor clamp interacts with DNA polymerase β and increases its DNA substrate utilisation efficiency: implications for DNA repair,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 3316–3324, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. M. Rendtlew Danielson, D. H. Larsen, K. B. Schou et al., “HCLK2 is required for activity of the DNA damage response kinase ATR,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 7, pp. 4140–4147, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. G. G. Jones, P. M. Reaper, A. R. Pettitt, and P. D. Sherrington, “The ATR-p53 pathway is suppressed in noncycling normal and malignant lymphocytes,” Oncogene, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1911–1921, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. L. Medhurst, D. O. Warmerdam, I. Akerman et al., “ATR and Rad17 collaborate in modulating Rad9 localisation at sites of DNA damage,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 121, no. 23, pp. 3933–3940, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. Mendez and B. Stillman, “Chromatin association of human origin recognition complex, Cdc6, and minichromosome maintenance proteins during the cell cycle: assembly of prereplication complexes in late mitosis,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 20, no. 22, pp. 8602–8612, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. V. A. J. Smits, P. M. Reaper, and S. P. Jackson, “Rapid PIKK-dependent release of Chk1 from chromatin promotes the DNA-damage checkpoint response,” Current Biology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 150–159, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. Dinant, M. de Jager, J. Essers et al., “Activation of multiple DNA repair pathways by sub-nuclear damage induction methods,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 120, no. 15, pp. 2731–2740, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. Essers, A. F. Theil, C. Baldeyron et al., “Nuclear dynamics of PCNA in DNA replication and repair,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 25, no. 21, pp. 9350–9359, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R. Y. Tsien, “The green fluorescent protein,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 67, pp. 509–544, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. R. Y. Tsien and A. Miyawaki, “Seeing the machinery of live cells,” Science, vol. 280, no. 5371, pp. 1954–1955, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. B. N. G. Giepmans, S. R. Adams, M. H. Ellisman, and R. Y. Tsien, “The fluorescent toolbox for assessing protein location and function,” Science, vol. 312, no. 5771, pp. 217–224, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. R. Heim, A. B. Cubitt, and R. Y. Tsien, “Improved green fluorescence,” Nature, vol. 373, no. 6516, pp. 663–664, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Prescott, S. Nowakowski, P. Nagley, and R. J. Devenish, “The length of polypeptide linker affects the stability of green fluorescent protein fusion proteins,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 273, no. 2, pp. 305–307, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. O'Driscoll, V. L. Ruiz-Perez, C. G. Woods, P. A. Jeggo, and J. A. Goodship, “A splicing mutation affecting expression of ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) results in Seckel syndrome,” Nature Genetics, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 497–501, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. R. S. Weiss, T. Enoch, and P. Leder, “Inactivation of mouse Hus1 results in genomic instability and impaired responses to genotoxic stress,” Genes and Development, vol. 14, no. 15, pp. 1886–1898, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. R. S. Weiss, P. Leder, and C. Vaziri, “Critical role for mouse Hus1 in an S-phase DNA damage cell cycle checkpoint,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 791–803, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. K. M. Hopkins, W. Auerbach, X. Y. Wang et al., “Deletion of mouse Rad9 causes abnormal cellular responses to DNA damage, genomic instability, and embryonic lethality,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 24, no. 16, pp. 7235–7248, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. G. Zachos, M. D. Rainey, and D. A. F. Gillespie, “Chk1-dependent S-M checkpoint delay in vertebrate cells is linked to maintenance of viable replication structures,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 563–574, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. R. Kitagawa, C. J. Bakkenist, P. J. McKinnon, and M. B. Kastan, “Phosphorylation of SMC1 is a critical downstream event in the ATM-NBS1-BRCA1 pathway,” Genes and Development, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1423–1438, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. S. Bekker-Jensen, C. Lukas, F. Melander, J. Bartek, and J. Lukas, “Dynamic assembly and sustained retention of 53BP1 at the sites of DNA damage are controlled by Mdc1/NFBD1,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 201–211, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. A. Bonner and T. S. Lawrence, “Doxorubicin decreases the repair of radiation-induced DNA damage,” International Journal of Radiation Biology, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 55–64, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. Majka, S. K. Binz, M. S. Wold, and P. M. J. Burgers, “Replication protein a directs loading of the DNA damage checkpoint clamp to 5-DNA junctions,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 38, pp. 27855–27861, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. L. Zou, D. Liu, and S. J. Elledge, “Replication protein A-mediated recruitment and activation of Rad17 complexes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 24, pp. 13827–13832, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. J. Majka and P. M. Burgers, “Function of Rad17/Mec3/Ddc1 and its partial complexes in the DNA damage checkpoint,” DNA Repair, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1189–1194, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. Modesti and R. Kanaar, “Dna repair: spot(light)s on chromatin,” Current Biology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. R229–R232, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. J. A. Marteijn, S. Bekker-Jensen, N. Mailand et al., “Nucleotide excision repair-induced H2A ubiquitination is dependent on MDC1 and RNF8 and reveals a universal DNA damage response,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 186, no. 6, pp. 835–847, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. M. J. Moné, M. Volker, O. Nikaido et al., “Local UV-induced DNA damage in cell nuclei results in local transcription inhibition,” EMBO Reports, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 1013–1017, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. M. Volker, M. J. Moné, P. Karmakar et al., “Sequential assembly of the nucleotide excision repair factors in vivo,” Molecular Cell, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 213–224, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. M. J. Moné, T. Bernas, C. Dinant et al., “In vivo dynamics of chromatin-associated complex formation in mammalian nucleotide excision repair,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 45, pp. 15933–15937, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. P.-O. Mari, B. I. Florea, S. P. Persengiev et al., “Dynamic assembly of end-joining complexes requires interaction between Ku70/80 and XRCC4,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 49, pp. 18597–18602, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. J. A. Aten, J. Stap, P. M. Krawczyk et al., “Dynamics of DNA double-strand breaks revealed by clustering of damaged chromosome domains,” Science, vol. 303, no. 5654, pp. 92–95, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. J. Stap, P. M. Krawczyk, C. H. Van Oven et al., “Induction of linear tracks of DNA double-strand breaks by α-particle irradiation of cells,” Nature Methods, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 261–266, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. E. S. Williams, J. Stap, J. Essers et al., “DNA double-strand breaks are not sufficient to initiate recruitment of TRF2,” Nature Genetics, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 696–698, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. A. B. Houtsmuller, “Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching: application to nuclear proteins,” Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, vol. 95, pp. 177–199, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. A. B. Houtsmuller and W. Vermeulen, “Macromolecular dynamics in living cell nuclei revealed by fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching,” Histochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. M. E. Stroppolo, M. Falconi, A. M. Caccuri, and A. Desideri, “Superefficient enzymes,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 1451–1460, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. J. Ricard and A. Cornish-Bowden, “Co-operative and allosteric enzymes: 20 years on,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 255–272, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. L. Zou and S. J. Elledge, “Sensing and signaling DNA damage: roles of Rad17 and Rad9 complexes in the cellular response to DNA damage,” Harvey Lectures, vol. 97, pp. 1–15, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. D. Hanahan and R. A. Weinberg, “The hallmarks of cancer,” Cell, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 57–70, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. A. S. Doré, M. L. Kilkenny, N. J. Rzechorzek, and L. H. Pearl, “Crystal structure of the rad9-rad1-hus1 DNA damage checkpoint complex—implications for clamp loading and regulation,” Molecular Cell, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 735–745, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. R. T. Abraham, “Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases,” Genes and Development, vol. 15, no. 17, pp. 2177–2196, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. A. Kumagai, J. Lee, H. Y. Yoo, and W. G. Dunphy, “TopBP1 activates the ATR-ATRIP complex,” Cell, vol. 124, no. 5, pp. 943–955, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. V. A. J. Smits, “Spreading the signal: dissociation of Chk1 from chromatin,” Cell Cycle, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1039–1043, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. M. E. van Royen, P. Farla, K. A. Mattern, B. Geverts, J. Trapman, and A. B. Houtsmuller, “Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to study nuclear protein dynamics in living cells,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 464, pp. 363–385, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  74. G. Giglia-Mari, A. F. Theil, P.-O. Mari et al., “Differentiation driven changes in the dynamic organization of basal transcription initiation,” PLoS Biology, vol. 7, no. 10, article e1000220, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. T. L. R. Tan, J. Essers, E. Citterio et al., “Mouse Rad54 affects DNA conformation and DNA-damage-induced Rad51 foci formation,” Current Biology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 325–328, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus