Review Article

Review: Biofunctionalized Quantum Dots in Biology and Medicine

Table 2

Comparison of properties of Fluoropores and QDs.

PropertyFluoroporesQuantum Dots

Absorption spectraVariable/narrow generally a mirror of the emission spectraBroad spectra, steadily increases towards the UV from the first absorption band edge

Maturation timeNeeded for fluorescent proteinsNA

Molar extinction coefficientsVariable, Generally 200,000 High, 10–100X that of fluorophores

Fluorescent lifetimeShort 5 nsLong 10–20 ns or greater

Spectral rangeNecessitates a different dye every 40–60 nmUV-IR depending upon binary/ternary materialVis-CdSe

Tunable emissionNAUnique to QDs / can be size-tuned from the UV to IR

Multiplexing capabilitiesRareExcellent, largely unexplored

Intermittency (blinking)NegligibleMaybe problematic in isolated circumstances (single molecule tracking)

Quantum yieldVariable, low to highGenerally high, 0.2 to 0.7 in buffer depending upon surface coating

PhotostabilityVariable to poorExcellent, strong resistance to photobleaching several orders of magnitude that of dyes multiple acceptor configurations possible

Multiphoton cross sectionVariable to poorExcellent 2-3 orders of magnitude that of dyes

Emission spectra Effective Stokes shiftsBroad, asymmetric red-tailed emissionNarrow-full width at half-maximum 25–40 nm for CdSe core materials

Chemical resistancevariableExcellent

ReactivityMultiple relativities commercially availableLimited conjugation chemistries available

Mono-valent attachmentEasyDifficult

Multi-valent attachmentRare-mostly bis-functionalGood possibilities, can attach several molecules to QDs depending upon size

Physical size 0.5 nm4–7 nm diameter for CdSe core material

Cost effectivenessVery good/multiple suppliersPoor/2 commercial suppliers

ElectrochromicityRareLargely untapped