Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2011 / Article
Special Issue

Nanostructures for Medicine and Pharmaceuticals

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 484589 | 7 pages |

Efficient In Vitro TRAIL-Gene Delivery in Drug-Resistant A2780/DDP Ovarian Cancer Cell Line via Magnetofection

Academic Editor: Daxiang Cui
Received29 Apr 2011
Accepted14 Jun 2011
Published09 Aug 2011


Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) presents great promise as an anticancer agent for human cancer therapy. In this study, a magnetofection agent (polyMAG-l000) was evaluated for in vitro delivery of TRAIL gene towards drug-resistant A2780/DDP ovarian cancer cells. Transfection experiments showed that polyMAG-l000 was able to transfect A2780/DDP cells in vitro, leading to a higher level of TRAIL gene expression in the presence of a static magnetic field as compared to other transfection agent, such as Lipofectamine 2000. TRAIL gene expression in the A2780/DDP cells was also confirmed by Western blot analysis. Moreover, the TRAIL gene expression exhibited remarkable decrease in the cell viability, as determined by MTT assay. Importantly, PolyMAG-l000-mediated TRAIL gene transfection in the presence of anticancer drug cisplatin (CDDP) induced much higher percentages of apoptotic A2780/DDP cells, compared to TRAIL gene transfection or CDDP treatment alone. A further study by Western blot analysis indicated that cytochrome c release and caspase-9 cleavage pathway were associated with the initiation of the apoptosis in A2780/DDP cells. The results of this study indicate that polyMAG-l000 can be used as an efficient agent for TRAIL gene transfection in ovarian cancer cells.

1. Introduction

Ovarian carcinoma is the fifth most common gynaecological cancer. Due to the lack of effective methods for early diagnosis of ovarian cancer, it is often detected in an advanced stage. As such, the patients usually have to undergo surgery for removal of the tumor and receive chemotherapy using anticancer drugs, such as cisplatin and doxorubicin. In many cases, chemotherapy has to be discontinued due to intrinsic or developed drug resistance of the ovarian cancer cells. To address this critical issue, chemotherapy in combination with biological therapy has been studied in the past decade. The combined approach was proven to be more efficacious than chemotherapy or biological therapy alone. For instance, the combined cisplatin treatment with trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody capable of interfering with the HER2/neu receptor, may enhance growth suppression of a few types of breast cancer cells [1]. In particular, some recent studies indicated that a combined use of anticancer drugs with TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) protein had a synergistic effect on the apoptotic activity in ovarian cancer cells [2].

TRAIL is a promising anticancer protein which is capable of inducing specific apoptosis in a broad range of cancer cells but not in normal cells [25]. However, the clinical use of TRAIL protein is seriously impeded due to its instability in vivo and potential resistance of cancer cells to the TRAIL. For enhanced tumor growth inhibition, a high dose of the protein has to be administrated in vivo. As an alternative approach, recombinant virus-mediated TRAIL-gene therapy has been investigated recently. This is attributed to the viruses being potent to transfer genes into the somatic cells, yielding high levels of gene expression. Griffith et al. constructed a TRAIL-encoded adenovirus and found that the virus may lead to TRAIL expression in ovarian cancer cell lines (e.g., A2780 and SKOV-3) and to their death mediated by a caspase-activated apoptosis [3]. These results indicate that TRAIL gene therapy is promising for ovarian cancer therapy. However, there remains serious safety concerns on recombinant viruses as gene vectors for TRAIL-gene transfection.

Nonviral carriers such as cationic polymers for gene transfection have received much attention in the past decades, as they do not present major safety issues compared to other viral vectors. The safety issues of these viral vectors cannot be easily addressed including immunogenicity, toxicity, mutagenicity, and oncogenicity [68]. Cationic polymers can condense DNA into nanosized polymer/DNA complexes (polyplexes) via an electrostatic interaction for targeted cells nucleus deliveries. Moreover, the polymers can effectively protect DNA from nuclease degradation in the cells, thereby inducing appreciable transfection efficiency. A variety of cationic polymers, such as poly-l-lysine [9], polyethyleneimine (PEI) [10], polyamidoamine dendrimer [11], and poly(2-dimethylamino)ethyl-methacrylate [12], were studied as gene carriers for nonviral gene delivery. However, these current systems generally induced either low transfection efficiency or high cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo [1315]. It was shown that in the presence of a static magnetic field, polycation-modified magnetic nanoparticles enabled more efficient gene transfection as compared to conventional polymer-based gene delivery systems [1621]. As a result of externally applied magnetic field, the magnetic nanoparticles/gene complexes can be effectively internalized in the cellular membrane. Therefore, cationic magnetic nanoparticles have been widely employed as new gene delivery systems for magnetofection in vitro and in vivo [22].

In this study, a commercial magnetofection agent, a cationic magnetic iron oxide (polyMag-1000), was evaluated for TRAIL gene delivery in vitro against drug-resistant A2780/DDP ovarian cancer cells, in terms of TRAIL gene transfection efficiency, cell viability, TRAIL gene transfection combined with cisplatin treatment and associated apoptotic mechanism.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles and Plasmids

Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles coated with PEI (polyMAG-1000) were ordered from Chemicell (Germany). Human TRAIL cDNA, kindly donated by Dr. H Yagita (Juntendo University School of Medicine, Japan), was subcloned into the EcoRI and BamH I site of the eukaryotic expression vector, pEGFP-N1 plasmid, (Clonetech), yielding the new plasmid pCMV-TRAIL-EGFP. A liposome transfection agent (Lipofectamine 2000) was purchased from Invitrogen (USA).

2.2. Cell Culture

Drug-resistant A2780/DDP cell line was provided by the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, Va, USA). The cells were maintained in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (GIBCO Life Technologies, Burlington, ON, Canada).

2.3. Zeta-Potential Measurements and Agarose Gel Retardation

The surface charges of polyMag-1000/plasmid complexes were measured at 25°C using a nanosizer NS90 (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK).

PolyMag-1000/DNA complexes were prepared at varying ratios from 1/8 to 5/1 (w/v). After addition of 2 μL of 6× loading buffer (Fermentas), the mixture was applied onto a 1% agarose gel containing 0.5 μg/mL ethidium bromide. After development of the gel, siRNA was visualized with a UV lamp using a Tanon Gel system (Tanon Gel Image System, Thermo Scientific).

2.4. In Vitro Gene Transfection

A2780/DDP cells ( ) were seeded into 6-well plates and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 24 h before transfection. PolyMAG-1000 to DNA ratio is expressed as volume (v) to weight (w) of DNA, and written as v/w. The dose of plasmid DNA used was 3 μg per well. These PolyMAG-1000/DNA complexes were added to 6-wel1 plates after incubation for 30 min at room temperature. A MagnetoFACTOR plate (130 mT) was then placed under each of the 6-well plates for 15 min. After 6 h incubation with serum-free DMEM at 37°C in 5% CO2, the medium was replaced with fresh DMEM containing 10% FBS and incubated for another 72 h. The polyMAG-1000 without TRAIL gene was served as a negative control. Liposome-mediated TRAIL gene transfection was served as a positive control and performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.5. Flow Cytometry Assay

The Annexin V apoptosis detection kit was used to measure the percentage of apoptotic cells following the manufacturer’s protocol (Pharmingen, BD Biosciences, San Diego, USA). Briefly, the TRAIL-gene transfection A2780/DDP cells were washed with PBS and resuspended in 100 μL of binding buffer, and then incubated with 5 μL of FITC-conjugated annexin V for 15 min at room temperature in the dark, followed by the addition of 400 μL of binding buffer. Cells were sorted by a FACScan cytometer using CELLQuest software (version 3.3; BD Biosciences, Mountain View, Calif, USA).

2.6. MTT Assay

Cell metabolic activity, determined by MTT assay, was studied as a function of cell incubation time from 1 day to 4 days. At different time intervals (day 1 to day 4), MTT solution (20 μL, 5 mg/mL) was added to each well and incubated with the cells for 4 h. The medium was then removed and DMSO (150 μL) was added to each well. The absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a plate reader (Thermo scientific). The percentage of relative cell viability was determined relative to control cells (untreated A2780/DDP cells), and taken as 100% cell viability. All cytotoxicity experiments were performed for eight times.

2.7. Western Blot

Proteins were developed by SDS-poly acrylamide gel and then transferred onto cellulose membranes (Millipore, Bedford, Mass, USA). The membranes were first incubated with primary antibodies (anti-TRAIL 1 : 1000) and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibodies. Peroxidase activity was visualized with the enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Relative band intensity of Western blot was quantified with Adobe Photoshop CS2, 9.0 edition.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

To determine significant differences in the parameters between the sample groups, a paired (for the same sample populations with different treatments) or an unpaired (for different sample population), Student’s t-test was utilized.

3. Results

3.1. PolyMAG-1000 Mediation of Efficient TRAIL Gene Transfection In Vitro

In this study, PolyMAG-1000, polyethylenimine-modified magnetic nanoparticles, is used as a transfection agent for TRAIL plasmid transfection. It was shown that PolyMAG-1000 is capable of efficiently binding DNA into positively charged complexes [17]. To proof this, gel retardation experiment and zeta-potential analysis were performed. As revealed in Figure 1(a), full DNA retardation was detected at and above the PolyMAG-1000/DNA ratio of 1/1 (v/w). Moreover, the complexes, prepared at the ratio of 1/1, displayed a positive surface charge of about +21 mV (Figure 1(b)). These results thus imply the formation of PolyMAG-1000/DNA complexes.

Magnetofection of polyMAG-1000 against A2780/DDP ovarian cancer cells was studied in vitro using pEGFP-N1-TRAIL plasmid, which was encoded with EGFP as a reporter gene, at a polyMag-1000/plasmid ratio of 1/1. The gene expression was easily visualized under a fluorescent microscope after 72 h transfection. The percentages of transfected cells were quantified using FACS. As shown in Figure 1(c), polyMAG-l000 is able to efficiently transfect A2780/DDP cells, with transfection efficiency significantly higher in the presence of a static magnetic field than that without the magnetic field (Figure 1(d), % versus %, ). As can be seen in this figure, the efficiency is also higher than that with another transfection agent, Lipofectamine 2000, as a positive control ( %, ).

3.2. TRAIL Expression in A2780 Ovarian Cancer Cells

To further confirm the expression of the TRAIL gene in the A2780/DDP cells after polyMAG-1000 mediated magnetofection, Western blot analysis was performed, and the results are shown in Figure 2(a). A strong immunoreactive protein is observed with a size of 32 kDa. This size is consistent with that of TRAIL in a transmembrane form, indicating successful gene expression of TRAIL in the cells [3, 5, 19].

3.3. Human TRAIL Inhibition of A2780/DDP Cells Proliferation In Vitro

Figure 2(b) shows metabolic activities of transfected A2780/DDP cells as a function of transfection time, determined by MTT assay. After 72 h transfection with TRAIL gene, a significant decrease in the metabolic activity is observed for the A2780/DDP transfection by polyMAG-1000/TRAIL compared with A2780/DDP cells by EGFP-N1 plasmid without encoding TRAIL, or untreated A2780/DDP cells as a blank control. These data indicate that TRAIL gene expression in A2780/DDP cell in vitro has an inhibitory effect on their survival activity.

3.4. TRAIL Enhances the Sensitivity of A2780 Cells to CDDP

To evaluate the effect of anticancer drug CDDP on apoptosis in TRAIL-transfected A2780/DDP cells, polyMAG-1000-induced TRAIL transfection was carried out in the presence of CDDP (20 μM). The percentage of apoptotic cells was quantified using an annexin V-FITC staining assay, which can report the loss of phosphatidylserine asymmetry of the plasma membrane at an early stage of apoptosis. It is found that TRAIL gene transfection in the presence of CDDP exhibits statistically higher percentages of apoptotic cells, as compared to TRAIL gene transfection or CDDP treatment alone (Figure 3(b), % versus % or %, resp., ,).

3.5. Cytochrome c Release and Cleaved Caspase-9 Activation Involving TRAIL Transfected A2780/DDP Cells

Cytochrome c release and caspase-9 activation have been described as the terminal operation in cell apoptosis [2325]. To understand cytochrome c release and cleaved caspase-9 activation involved in the apoptotic A2780/DDP cells, subcellular cytochrome c release and the activation of caspase-9 were studied by Western blot analysis (Figure 4(a)). The activation of caspase-9 was confirmed by detecting the generation of 37 kDa proteolytic fragment of caspase-9. It is shown that as compared to untreated A2780 cells, cytochrome c level increases for both TRAIL transfected and CDDP-treated A2780/DDP cells. Moreover, the combined TRAIL transfection and CDDP treatment induces upregulation of both cytochrome c and caspase-9 activation in A2780/DDP cells (Figure 4(b)).

4. Discussion

The key challenge for efficient nonviral gene delivery is to design potent carriers capable of overcoming multiple intracellular barriers, such as plasmid internalization, endosomes, cytoplasm trafficking, nuclear translocation, as well as the retention of plasmid in the nucleus [2632]. PolyMAG-l000 has shown great promise for TRAIL plasmid transfection since it is capable of binding plasmid into positively charged complexes (Figures  1(a) and 1(b)), and also promoting efficient cellular internalization of polyplexes in the presence of a static magnetic field [17, 18]. This may explain the fact that more efficient TRAIL-plasmid expression mediated by polyMAG-1000 magnetofection was observed in the presence of a static magnetic field and that the transfection efficiency is higher than that of Lipfectamine 2000, as a positive control (Figures  1(c) and 1(d)). PolyMAG-l000 has been previously used for plasmid magnetofection in various cell lines such as MCF-7 and stem cells [33]. However, to our knowledge, this is the first paper on TRAIL plasmid magnetofection in ovarian cancer cells.

TRAIL protein can lead to specific apoptosis in a broad range of cancer cells, such as melanomas, gliomas, and prostatic carcinomas rather than the normal cells [3]. Thus, TRAIL is expected as a potential therapeutic agent for ovarian cancer treatment. In this study, the TRAIL gene is found to induce apoptosis in drug-resistant A2780/DDP cells (Figure 3), which thus contributes to the decrease in the cell viability of the cells after 3-day transfection (Figure 2). Moreover, the TRAIL expression enhanced the sensitivity of the A2780/DDP cells to the anticancer drug CDDP. A higher percentage of apoptotic A2780/DDP cell was found when the cells were cotreated by both TRAIL transfection and cisplatin. The results thus imply that TRAIL gene therapy in combination with CDDP treatment is an efficient approach for the treatment of drug-resistant ovarian cancer. Further study will be focused on the combined use of the TRAIL magnetofection and CDDP treatment in the xenograft A2780/DDP tumor in a nude mouse model.

Two viable approaches of caspase activation have been identified [25, 34]. The activation of initiator caspase-8 or caspase-10 is triggered by the ligation of death receptors, such as Fas, TNFR1, or Death Receptor 3. The second one pathway is essentially controlled by mitochondria. In most cases, the apoptotic cascade is initiated by loss of integrity of the outer mitochondrial membrane accompanied by release of cytochrome c. Cytochrome c, released from mitochondria induces a conformational change in the apoptotic protease activating factor (Apaf-I). This mechanism results in the cleavage and activation of caspase-9 and the subsequent activation of a caspase cascade is responsible for the cell death [34]. In this study, enhanced cytochrome c and cleaved caspase-9 product are achieved in the A2780/DDP cells by combining the TRAIL transfection and CDDP.

5. Conclusions

We have demonstrated that PolyMag1000 is potent to transfection of drug-resistant A2780/DDP cells in vitro. TRAIL gene expression induces growth inhibition of A2780/DDP cell via activating cell apoptosis. PolyMag1000-mediated TRAIL transfection in combination with cisplatin treatment may lead to augmented apoptosis in A2780/DDP cells in vitro. These results indicate that PolyMag1000 is an efficient nonviral TRAIL-gene carrier for ovarian cancer therapy.


This work was supported by the grants from Science and Technology Committee of Shanghai (1052nm01200). The authors thank Professor Donglu Shi (University of Cincinnati, USA) for the writing assistance.


  1. J. Baselga, L. Norton, J. Albanell, Y. M. Kim, and J. Mendelsohn, “Recombinant humanized anti-HER2 antibody (herceptin(TM)) enhances the antitumor activity of paclitaxel and doxorubicin against HER2/neu overexpressing human breast cancer xenografts,” Cancer Research, vol. 58, no. 13, pp. 2825–2831, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. Ashkenazi, R. C. Pai, S. Fong et al., “Safety and antitumor activity of recombinant soluble Apo2 ligand,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 155–162, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  3. W. Roth, S. Isenmann, U. Naumann et al., “Locoregional Apo2L/TRAIL eradicates intracranial human malignant glioma xenografts in athymic mice in the absence of neurotoxicity,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 265, no. 2, pp. 479–483, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. Rieger, U. Naumann, T. Glaser, A. Ashkenazi, and M. Weller, “APO2 ligand: a novel lethal weapon against malignant glioma?” FEBS Letters, vol. 427, no. 1, pp. 124–128, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. E. Kendrick, J. M. Estes, J. M. Straughn, R. D. Alvarez, and D. J. Buchsbaum, “Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and its therapeutic potential in breast and gynecologic cancers,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 614–621, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. T. Merdan, J. Kopeček, and T. Kissel, “Prospects for cationic polymers in gene and oligonucleotide therapy against cancer,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 715–758, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. C. De Smedt, J. Demeester, and W. E. Hennink, “Cationic polymer based gene delivery systems,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 113–126, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. O. Han, R. I. Mahato, Y. K. Sung, and S. W. Kim, “Development of biomaterials for gene therapy,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 302–317, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. Gonsho, K. Irie, H. Susaki, H. Iwasawa, S. Okuno, and T. Sugawara, “Tissue-targeting ability of saccharide-poly(L-lysine) conjugates,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 275–282, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  10. O. Boussif, F. Lezoualc'h, M. A. Zanta et al., “A versatile vector for gene and oligonucleotide transfer into cells in culture and in vivo: polyethylenimine,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 16, pp. 7297–7301, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. X. Tang, C. T. Redemann, and F. C. Szoka Jr., “In vitro gene delivery by degraded polyamidoamine dendrimers,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 703–714, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. P. V. D. Wetering, J. Y. Cherng, H. Talsma, D. J. A. Crommelin, and W. E. Hennink, “2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate based (co)polymers as gene transfer agents,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 53, no. 1–3, pp. 145–153, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. G. A. Brazeau, S. Attia, S. Poxon, and J. A. Hughes, “In vitro myotoxicity of selected cationic macromolecules used in non- viral gene delivery,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 680–684, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. P. R. Dash, M. L. Read, L. B. Barrett, M. A. Wolfert, and L. W. Seymour, “Factors affecting blood clearance and in vivo distribution of polyelectrolyte complexes for gene delivery,” Gene Therapy, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 643–650, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. H. Bordelon, A. S. Biris, C. M. Sabliov, and W. Todd Monroe, “Characterization of plasmid DNA location within chitosan/PLGA/pDNA nanoparticle complexes designed for gene delivery,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2011, Article ID 952060, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Huth, J. Lausier, S. W. Gersting et al., “Insights into the mechanism of magnetofection using PEI-based magnetofectins for gene transfer,” Journal of Gene Medicine, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 923–936, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. W. Gersting, U. Schillinger, J. Lausier et al., “Gene delivery to respiratory epithelial cells by magnetofection,” Journal of Gene Medicine, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 913–922, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. F. Scherer, M. Anton, U. Schillinger et al., “Magnetofection: enhancing and targeting gene delivery by magnetic force in vitro and in vivo,” Gene Therapy, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 102–109, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. H. Kim, T. R. Billiar, and D. W. Seol, “The secretable form of trimeric TRAIL, a potent inducer of apoptosis,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 321, no. 4, pp. 930–935, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. Huth, J. Lausier, S. W. Gersting et al., “Insights into the mechanism of magnetofection using PEI-based magnetofectins for gene transfer,” Journal of Gene Medicine, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 923–936, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. B. Pan, D. Cui, Y. Sheng et al., “Dendrimer-modified magnetic nanoparticles enhance efficiency of gene delivery system,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 17, pp. 8156–8163, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. Basarkar and J. Singh, “Nanoparticulate systems for polynucleotide delivery,” International Journal of Nanomedicine, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 353–360, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  23. A. Mansouri, L. D. Ridgway, A. L. Korapati et al., “Sustained activation of JNK/p38 MAPK pathways in response to cisplatin leads to Fas ligand induction and cell death in ovarian carcinoma cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 21, pp. 19245–19256, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. Tournier, P. Hess, D. D. Yang et al., “Requirement of JNK for stress-induced activation of the cytochrome c- mediated death pathway,” Science, vol. 288, no. 5467, pp. 870–874, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. D. R. Green, “Apoptic pathways: the roads to ruin,” Cell, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 695–698, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Liu, “Research and development of nanopharmaceuticals in China,” Nano Biomedicine and Engineering, vol. 1, p. 1, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  27. C. Bao, H. Yang, P. Sheng et al., “Cloning, expression, monoclonal antibody preparation of human gene NBEAL1 and its application in targeted imaging of mouse glioma,” Nano Biomedicine and Engineering, vol. 1, p. 50, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  28. D. Cui, Y. Han, Z. Li et al., “Fluorescent magnetic nanoprobes for in vivo targeted imaging and hyperthermia therapy of prostate cancer,” Nano Biomedicine and Engineering, vol. 1, p. 61, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  29. S. Chen, Y. Ji, Q. Lian et al., “Gold nanorods coated with multilayer polyelectrolyte as intracellular delivery vector of antisense oligonucleotides,” Nano Biomedicine and Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 15, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  30. D. Cui, Q. Li, P. Huang et al., “Real time PCR based on fluorescent quenching of mercaptoacetic acid-modified CdTe quantum dots for ultrasensitive specific detection of nucleic acids,” Nano Biomedicine and Engineering, vol. 2, p. 45, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  31. P. Huang, Z. Li, J. Lin et al., “Photosensitizer-conjugated magnetic nanoparticles for in vivo simultaneous magnetofluorescent imaging and targeting therapy,” Biomaterials, vol. 32, no. 13, pp. 3447–3458, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. G. Gao, P. Huang, Y. Zhang, K. Wang, W. Qin, and D. Cui, “Gram scale synthesis of superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles and fluid via a facile solvothermal route,” CrystEngComm, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1782–1785, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. C. H. Lee, E. Y. Kim, K. Jeon et al., “Simple, efficient, and reproducible gene transfection of mouse embryonic stem cells by magnetofection,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 133–141, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. N. A. Thornberry and Y. Lazebnik, “Caspases: enemies within,” Science, vol. 281, no. 5381, pp. 1312–1316, 1998. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Fang Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

1100 Views | 535 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.