- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Journal of Nanomaterials

Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 976262, 5 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/976262

## Structural and Optical Characteristics of *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} Nanorods Grown on Si Substrates

^{1}Department of Physics and Center for Nano-Technology, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung-Li 32023, Taiwan^{2}Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Longtan, Taoyuan 32546, Taiwan^{3}Department of Electronic Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung-Li 32023, Taiwan^{4}Institute of Optoelectronic Sciences, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan

Received 7 July 2011; Accepted 9 August 2011

Academic Editor: Renzhi Ma

Copyright © 2011 M. D. Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

This study attempted to grow single-phase *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods on Si (111) substrates by metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD). High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) confirmed that the In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods are singularly crystallized in the *γ* phase. The photoluminescence of *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods at 15 K was referred to as free and bound exciton emissions. The bandgap energy of *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods at room temperature was determined to be *~*1.99 eV, obtained from optical absorption.

The III-VI semiconductors have been the subject of many investigations due to their peculiar electrical and optical properties,and their potential applications in electronic and optoelectronic devices, such as phase-change random access memories (PRAMs), solid-state batteries, and solar cells [1–4]. Among these III-VI semiconductors, In_{2}Se_{3} is a defective structure of tetrahedral bonding, where one-third of the sites is vacant and forms a screw array along the *c* axis. Due to many different crystalline phases existing in In_{2}Se_{3}, growth of high-quality In_{2}Se_{3} with a single phase is a challenging task. Several different methods have been demonstrated to grow In_{2}Se_{3} epilayers, such as evaporation [5, 6], the Bridgman-Stockbarger Method [7, 8], and metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) [9–11]. Recently, one-dimensional III-VI semiconductor nanostructures, such as nanowires and nanotubes, exhibited novel and device applicable physical properties, which can be used in a wide variety of applications in nanoelectronic and nano-optoelectronic devices [12–17]. For example, *α*-phase layer-structured In_{2}Se_{3} nanowires have been grown and have shown a large anisotropy in both structure and conductivity [12]. These III-VI semiconductor nanostructures can afford an efficient charge carrier transfer while maintaining a small cross-section for the applications. However, so far, little attention has been given to *γ*-phase In_{2}Se_{3} (*γ*-In_{2}Se_{3}) nanorods. Bulk *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} has been of particular interest for photovoltaic applications because it can be an absorbing layer in a solar cell. The one-dimensional *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanostructures may be more interesting materials since they exhibit excellent light absorption owing to their high surface-to-volume ratio. To be an absorbing layer in solar cells, *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} requires deposition on different substrates with a high crystalline quality. It is well known that Si can be a good substrate to grow nanostructures because it offers many attractive advantages, such as good doping properties and thermal conductivity. If Si substrate can be utilized in growing *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanostructures, various devices on Si-based integrated circuits could be developed in the future.

In our previous work, energy relaxation of hot electrons in *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods has been investigated [16]. It was found that the main path of energy relaxation for the hot electrons is LO-phonon emission. In this study, the detailed structures of the *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods on Si substrates were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and selected area electron diffraction (SAED). Also, the optical properties of *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods were explored by photoluminescence (PL), cathodoluminescence (CL), and the optical absorption spectra.

The *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods were directly grown on Si (111) substrates without any buffer layers using an MOCVD system with a vertical reactor [16]. The nanorods were grown using liquid MO and a trimethyl-indium (TMIn) compound at atmospheric pressure. Gaseous H_{2}Se was employed as the reactant source material. Gaseous N_{2} was used as the carrier gas in this process. Before growth, Si substrates were baked at 1100°C for 10 min in gaseous HCl and H_{2} in order to remove the native oxide. After the thermal etching process, the reactor cooled down to 425°C and then started to grow *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods. The total growth time was 50 min. The gaseous flow rate was kept at 3 *μ*mol/min for TMIn and 40 *μ*mol/min for H_{2}Se. Gaseous H_{2}Se was mixed with 85% hydrogen and 15% H_{2}Se. The gaseous flow rate and temperature play an essential role in growing nanorod structures in *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3}. The TEM lattice image and the SAED pattern of an individual In_{2}Se_{3} nanorod were taken by a JSM-2100F (JEOL Company) Transmission Electron Microscope. The room temperature CL measurement and morphology of the nanorods image were measured by using the JSM-7001F (JEOL Company). The PL measurements were performed using a 532 nm semiconductor laser as the excitation source. The temperature-dependent PL spectra were measured by a close-cycle helium cryostat and were analyzed by means of a 0.75 m monochromator and silicon detector.

A cross-section image of the SEM for the grown In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods is shown in Figure 1(a). The SEM image was taken with 10 keV of electron energy to present a magnification of 30,000. As shown in Figure 1(a), the In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods are straight and not tapered. The average diameter and the average height of the In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods are about 64 and 460 nm, respectively. To understand the structural and morphological characteristics of nanorods, TEM investigations were carried out. Figure 1(b) shows a low magnification TEM image of In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods. The diameter and height of In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods are in good agreement with the SEM image shown in Figure 1(a). Figure 1(c) is a high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image recorded from a segment of an In_{2}Se_{3} nanorod. The image exhibits the ordering feature across its entire width, with a uniform periodicity of *~*1.7 nm. This superlattice structure within the nanorods is a structural characteristic due to the effect of the vacancy ordering [12]. A similar behavior was also reported for the vacancy ordering in *α*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanowires and CuInSe_{2}-CdS Core-Shell nanowires [12, 13]. The SAED pattern taken along the [006] zone axis of In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods is displayed in the inset of Figure 1(c). The SAED pattern shows a rectangular array with characteristic distances of nm and nm, respectively. These regular spots in SAED suggest an epitaxial orientation relationship between the In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods and substrates; that is, the In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods are single crystalline. The SAED pattern is consistent with the previous established pattern for *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} with basis vectors of (−1,1,0) and (0,0,6) [17]. It is noted that the growth direction of the nanowire in Figure 1(c) is not along the [006] direction, but it makes an angle of 13.7° with respect to the [006] direction. Anyhow, the HRTEM image allows us to confirm that the grown In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods are well crystallized in the *γ* phase.

The PL spectrum of the *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods on Si (111) substructure at 15 K is shown in Figure 2. Three Gaussian components, peaked at 2.126, 2.147, and 2.155 eV, are resolved in Figure 2. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the PL peak at 2.155 eV is 8 meV, indicating good crystal quality for the *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods. In previous reports, the PL peak of *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} epilayers at low temperatures was referred to as the exciton-related emission [9]. Therefore, the main PL peak positioned at 2.155 eV is suggested to be the free exciton emission and the peaks in the lower energy side are suggested to be the bond exciton emissions. Figure 3 shows the temperature-dependent PL spectra from 15 to 180 K. The peak energy of the PL in *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods is red-shifted with increased temperature. The open circles in the inset of Figure 3 show temperature-induced bandgap shrinkage extracted from the PL spectra in Figure 2. This relation was fitted by the Varshini Empirical Formula as
where is the bandgap at 0 K,is the average temperature coefficient and is the Debye temperature of the material. Experimental data fitting is shown by the solid line in the inset in Figure 3. The experimental results show good agreement with data that fits using Varshini’s Equation with eV, eV/K, and K. By analyzing the variation of PL peak energy as a function of temperature and ability to fit with the Varshini Equation, the room temperature peak energy of the PL in the *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods was evaluated to be ~1.95 eV.

To explore the bandgap energy of *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods at room temperature, the CL and optical absorption spectra were investigated. The room temperature CL spectrum of *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods is shown in Figure 4(a). The peak energy of the CL is 1.95 eV, in good agreement with the predicated value by Varshini’s relation, as displayed in the inset of Figure 3. The optical absorption spectrum taken at room temperature is displayed in Figure 4(b). It is known that *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} is a direct bandgap semiconductor. Thus, the absorption coefficient near the band edge follows the relation of a direct bandgap transition [18] as
where is a constant, is the photon energy and is the energy, gap between the valence band and the conduction band. The bandgap can be derived from extrapolating the linear part of the curve to zero absorption. The straight line in Figure 4(b) shows the extrapolation, and the bandgap energy was estimated to be ~1.99 eV. Obtaining the bandgap energy and absorption coefficient is essential for developing *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods as absorber layers in photovoltaic applications.

Figure 5(a) shows the PL spectrum of *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods at 15 K in the infrared spectral range. A broad PL peak located at 1.24 eV was observed. The sharp peak with energy at 1.16 eV is the emission related to the excitation laser. To find out origin of the 1.24 eV PL, the dependence of PL intensity on the excitation intensity was studied. The PL spectra with the excitation power density varied from 17 to 270 W/cm^{2} were shown in Figure 5. The open circles in Figure 6 show the PL intensity as a function of the laser excitation density, indicating a linear increase of the PL intensity with excitation density. The dependence of the PL intensity on the excitation density can be fitted by a relation [19]:
where and are constants. The exponent depends on the mechanism of recombination: for an excitonic recombination , while for free carrier recombination . When , it may indicate a transition associated with the donor-acceptor pair transition or free-to-bound transition [20, 21]. The solid line in Figure 6 displays the fit from (3). A value of was determined to be around 0.6, which corresponds to the emission from the donor-acceptor pair transition or free-to-bound transition. In Figure 6, the PL peak at 1.24 eV shifts to the high-energy spectral region with increasing the excitation density. This blue shift, originating from the increase of the interaction between more closed donor-acceptor pairs, is a characteristic of the donor-acceptor pair transition. Therefore, according to these observations, the observed PL peak at 1.24 eV can be ascribed to the donor-acceptor pair transition in *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods.

In summary, *γ*-In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods deposited on Si (111) substrates were grown by MOCVD using dual-source precursors.The crystal structure and morphology of In_{2}Se_{3} nanorods were characterized by SEM and HRTEM. The SAED analysis taken along [006] reveals a rectangle spot pattern, confirming the single crystalline in the *γ* phase. The optical absorption, CL, and temperature-dependent PL have been investigated. The PL at 15 K contains three peaks, which are identified with recombination of free excitons and bound excitons. The energy of the direct bandgap at room temperature was found to be ~1.99 eV. An infrared PL, peaked at 1.24 eV, was observed in 15 K and assigned to be the donor-acceptor pair transition.

#### Acknowledgment

This project was supported in part by the National Science Council under Grant nos. NSC97-2112-M-033-004-MY3 and NSC 97-2627-B-033-002 and the Institute of Nuclear Energy Research under Grant no. 1002001INER042.

#### References

- K. Lai, H. Peng, W. Kundhikanjana et al., “Nanoscale electronic inhomogeneity in In
_{2}Se_{3}nanoribbons revealed by microwave impedance microscopy,”*Nano Letters*, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1265–1269, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - Z. D. Kovalyuk, V. M. Katerynchuk, A. I. Savchuk, and O. M. Sydor, “Intrinsic conductive oxide-p-InSe solar cells,”
*Materials Science and Engineering B*, vol. 109, no. 1–3, pp. 252–255, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - K. Yilmaz, M. Parlak, and Ç. Erçelebi, “Investigation of photovoltaic properties of amorphous InSe thin film based Schottky devices,”
*Semiconductor Science and Technology*, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1268–1271, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - A. Zubiaga, J. A. Garciá, F. Plazaola, V. Muñoz-Sanjosé, and C. Martínez-Tomás, “Near band edge recombination-mechanisms in GaTe,”
*Physical Review B*, vol. 68, no. 24, Article ID 245202, 6 pages, 2003. View at Google Scholar - C. H. De Groot and J. S. Moodera, “Growth and characterization of a novel In
_{2}Se_{3}structure,”*Journal of Applied Physics*, vol. 89, no. 8, pp. 4336–4340, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - M. Emziane and R. Le Ny, “Crystallization of In
_{2}Se_{3}semiconductor thin films by post-deposition heat treatment. Thickness and substrate effects,”*Journal of Physics D*, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1319–1328, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - A. A. Homs and B. Marí, “Photoluminescence of undoped and neutron-transmutation-doped InSe,”
*Journal of Applied Physics*, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 4654–4659, 2000. View at Google Scholar - B. Gürbulak, “Urbach tail and optical investigations of Gd doped and undoped InSe single crystals,”
*Physica Scripta*, vol. 70, no. 2-3, pp. 197–201, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - I. H. Choi and P. Y. Yu, “Properties of phase-pure InSe films prepared by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition with a single-source precursor,”
*Journal of Applied Physics*, vol. 93, no. 8, pp. 4673–4677, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - K. J. Chang, S. M. Lahn, and J. Y. Chang, “Growth of single-phase In
_{2}Se_{3}by using metal organic chemical vapor deposition with dual-source precursors,”*Applied Physics Letters*, vol. 89, no. 18, Article ID 182118, 3 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - D. Y. Lyu, T. Y. Lin, J. H. Lin et al., “Growth and properties of single-phase
*γ*-In_{2}Se_{3}thin films on (1 1 1) Si substrate by AP-MOCVD using H2Se precursor,”*Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells*, vol. 91, no. 10, pp. 888–891, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - H. Peng, C. Xie, D. T. Schoen, and Y. Cui, “Large anisotropy of electrical properties in layer-structured In
_{2}Se_{3}nanowires,”*Nano Letters*, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1511–1516, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - H. Peng, C. Xie, D. T. Schoen, K. Mcllwrath, X. F. Zhang, and Y. Cui, “Ordered vacancy compounds and nanotube formation in CuInSe2-CdS core-shell nanowires,”
*Nano Letters*, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 3734–3738, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - T. Zhai, Y. Ma, L. Li et al., “Morphology-tunable In
_{2}Se_{3}nanostructures with enhanced electrical and photoelectrical performances via sulfur doping,”*Journal of Materials Chemistry*, vol. 20, no. 32, pp. 6630–6637, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - Y. Li, J. Gao, Q. Li et al., “Thermal phase transformation of In
_{2}Se_{3}nanowires studied by in situ synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction,”*Journal of Materials Chemistry*, vol. 21, no. 19, pp. 6944–6947, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - M. D. Yang, C. H. Hu, J. L. Shen et al., “Hot photoluminescence in
*γ*-In_{2}Se_{3}nanorods,”*Nanoscale Research Letters*, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 427–430, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - S. Marsillac, A. M. Combot-Marie, J. C. Bernède, and A. Conan, “Experimental evidence of the low-temperature formation of
*γ*-In_{2}Se_{3}thin films obtained by a solid-state reaction,”*Thin Solid Films*, vol. 288, no. 1-2, pp. 14–20, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - C. M. Joseph and C. S. Menon, “Electrical, optical and structural properties of binary phase free CuInSe
_{2}thin films,”*Journal of Physics D*, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1143–1146, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - X. Zhongying, X. Jizong, G. Weikun, Z. Baozhen, X. Junying, and L. Yuzhang, “The excitonic properties and temperature behaviour of the photoluminescence from GaAs-GaAlAs multiple quantum well structures,”
*Solid State Communications*, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 707–711, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - S. Zott, K. Leo, M. Ruckh, and H. W. Schock, “Radiative recombination in CuInSe
_{2}thin films,”*Journal of Applied Physics*, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 356–367, 1997. View at Google Scholar - R. Jayakrishnan, K. G. Deepa, C. Sudha Kartha, and K. P. Vijayakumar, “Tuning donor-acceptor and free-bound transitions in CuInSe
_{2}/indium tin oxide heterostructure,”*Journal of Applied Physics*, vol. 100, no. 4, Article ID 046104, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus