Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2012, Article ID 217412, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/217412
Research Article

In Situ Synthesis of Poly(methyl methacrylate)/SiO2 Hybrid Nanocomposites via “Grafting Onto” Strategy Based on UV Irradiation in the Presence of Iron Aqueous Solution

Institute of Polymer Science and Engineering, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lanzhou University, 222 Tianshui South Road, Gansu 730000, China

Received 11 March 2011; Revised 6 May 2011; Accepted 1 June 2011

Academic Editor: Hai-Sheng Qian

Copyright © 2012 Hong Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Poly(methyl methacrylate)/SiO2 (PMMA/SiO2) hybrid composites were prepared via “grafting onto” strategy based on UV irradiation in the presence of iron aqueous solution. Two steps were used to graft polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) onto the surface of nanosilica, anchoring 3-(methacryloxy) propyl trimethoxysilane (MPTS) onto the surface of nanosilica to modify it with double bonds, and then grafting PMMA onto the surface of nanosilica with FeCl3 as photoinitiator. The products were characterized by FT-IR, TGA, TEM, DLS, and XPS. The results showed that it is easy to graft PMMA onto the surface of nanosilica under UV irradiation, and the hybrid particles are monodisperse and have core-shell structure with nanosilica as the core and PMMA layers as the shell. Furthermore, the products initiated by FeCl3 have higher monomer conversion, percent grafting, and better monodispersion compared with the products initiated by traditional photoinitiator such as 2-hydroxy-4-(2-hydroxyethoxy)-2-methyl-propiophenone (Irgacure 2959).

1. Introduction

Recently, the polymer/inorganic nanocomposites have gained great attention [15] because of their potential applications in many surface-based technologies such as composite materials, biomaterials, adhesion and wetting, molecular recognition, microfluidics, chemical sensing, and organic synthesis [612]. What is more is that the polymer/inorganic nanocomposites have excellent properties, such as mechanical properties, thermal stability, and flame retardance, gas barrier properties, and biodegradation and abrasion resistance [1316]. The polymer/inorganic hybrid materials are generally prepared by surface modification of the inorganic particles. At present, there are many approaches for modifying solid surfaces with polymers, including physisorption, covalent attachment, and electrostatic adsorption [17]. Physisorption is relatively an easy way, but it suffers from solvolytic and thermal instabilities due to the absence of stable covalent bonds on the surface [18]. There are three approaches to covalently graft polymer chains on the surface of inorganic particles: (1) the “grafting to” method [19, 20], where the end-functionalized polymers react with an appropriate surface; (2) the “grafting from” method [21, 22], where polymer chains are grown from initiator-terminated self-assembled monolayer; (3) the “grafting onto” method [23], where surface copolymerization is through a covalently linked monomer.

UV light has also become a useful tool for initiating polymerization due to its significant advantages [24, 25], and this method has been applied to emulsion polymerization [26, 27]. The polymerization can be easily varied by controlling the emulsifier concentration and the initiator concentration. Furthermore, it could accomplish high efficiency of the polymerization process in a short time even using a small percentage of photoinitiation. In contrast to thermally based applications which usually require elevated temperatures, photopolymerization can also be performed at room temperature and below. This is a striking advantage for both classical polymerization of monofunctional monomers and modern curing applications. Low-molecular-weight organic photoinitiators, however, have many intrinsic disadvantages such as hydrophobicity, odor, and toxicity, which limit the applications of photoinitiation in emulsion polymerization. One possible way to solve this problem is the use of water-soluble inorganic photoinitiators.

In this work, we used FeCl3 as photoinitiator to prepare PMMA/SiO2 hybrid nanocomposites. The likely mechanism of photoinitiation using Fe3+ as photoinitiator has been reported by Evans et al. [28]. It has been found in our research that it possesses high efficient photoinitiation even though using a small percentage of photoinitiation. Moreover, there are several advantages by using FeCl3 as photoinitiator such as water solublility, nonpollution, and odorlessness. After the polymerization, it could be scoured off easily. Compared to the traditional photoinitiation initiated by Irgacure 2959, the products initiated by FeCl3 have higher monomer conversion, percent grafting, and better monodispersion. Considering the above factors, herein, we describe an effective strategy to prepare PMMA/SiO2 hybrid composites via “grafting onto” strategy based on UV irradiation in the presence of iron aqueous solution. Nanosilica particles have been surface modified by 3-(methacryloxy) propyl trimethoxysilane (MPTS) to possess double bonds, so that methyl methacrylate (MMA) can been grafting onto SiO2 with nanosilica as the core and PMMA as the shell. FeCl3 was used for the photoinitiator under UV irradiation in this process. Scheme 1 shows the overall synthesis route. The products were characterized by FT-IR, TGA, TEM, XPS, and DLS. In addition, different proportions of SiO2 were added to discuss the best condition of preparing PMMA/SiO2 particles with better monodisperse and uniform morphology.

217412.sch.001
Scheme 1: The grafting polymerization of MMA from the MPTS-modified nanosilica surface.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

The silica having mean particle size of 20 nm was kindly supplied by Aladdin Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. 3-(methacryloxy) propyl trimethoxysilane (MPTS) was acquired from Aldrich Chemical Co., Ltd. Hexaaquo iron(III) chloride, FeCl3·6H2O (Across Organics, 99%), was used as received. MMA (Fluka, 99%) was distilled to an ice bath under reduced pressure in the presence of hydroquinone, washed twice with 5% NaOH in water, and dried over CaCl2. Cetyetrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo). 2-hydroxy-4-(2-hydroxyethoxy)-2-methyl-propiophenone (Irgacure 2959) was acquired from Sigma-Aldrich Co. All chemicals were of analytical grade and used without further purification. Doubly deionized water was used through all the processes.

2.2. Characterization

The FTIR measurements (Impact 400, Nicolet, Waltham, Mass) were carried out with the KBr pellet method. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) results were obtained with a TA Instrument 2050 thermogravimetric analyzer at a heating rate of 10°C/min from 25 to 800°C under a nitrogen atmosphere. The microstructure of these hybrid nanocomposites was imaged using Hitachi H-600 equipment, and TEM samples of nanoparticles were prepared by casting one drop of a dilute colloid solution onto a carbon-coated copper grid. X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were performed on a PHI-5702 instrument using MgKα radiation with pass energy of 29.35 eV. The product particle size and its distribution were determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) using a Malvern Zetasizer NanoZS apparatus with a laser of 660 nm wavelength at 25°C. Before the analysis, the latexes were diluted with deionized water to minimize the particle-particle interactions.

2.3. Synthesis
2.3.1. Surface Modification of Silica Particles

Into a 250 mL dried round-bottom flask, 3.0 g nanosilica was ultrasound dispersed in 100 mL ethanol for 30 min, then 2.5 g MPTS was added and ultrasound dispersed for 2 h. The product was washed by centrifugations/redispersions three times in ethanol and dried in vacuum at room temperature for 24 h. The grafting density of grafted vinyl group was determined by TGA and was calculated by [29]Graftingdensitymol/m2=𝑊60730/100𝑊60730×100𝑊silicaMSspec×100×106,(1) where 𝑊60730 is the weight loss from 60 to 730°C corresponding to the decomposition of the MPTS, M (g/mol) is the molar mass of the degradable part of the grafted molecule (205 g/mol), Sspec (m2/g) and 𝑊silica are the specific surface area and the weight loss of silica determined before grafting, respectively.

2.3.2. Photopolymerization of PMMA on SiO2@MPTS

PMMA/SiO2 hybrid nanoparticles were synthesized through surface-grafted photopolymerization using a high-pressure Hg lamp as the UV light source. The compositions of emulsion are listed in Table 1. A pre-emulsification of SiO2-g-MPTS, MMA, CTAB, FeCl3·6H2O (or Irgacure 2959), and water was carried out for 30 min in a flask with stirring at a speed of 400 rpm. The polymerization was conducted for 10 min in a reactor with a quartz cap as shown in Figure 1. The UV source used was a 1000 W high-pressure mercury lamp, and the light intensity was 20 mW/cm2. During the UV irradiation, stirring and a nitrogen purge were maintained at ambient temperature. Hybrid particles were isolated via centrifugation at 4000 rpm. Then the particles were dispersed into 10 mL of tetrahydrofuran (THF) to remove PMMA absorbed on the particles. The solvent (THF) was replaced every eight hours. Particles were purified by centrifugation/redispersion for three times and then dried at room temperature under a vacuum to generate PMMA/SiO2 hybrid nanoparticles.

tab1
Table 1: Compositions of the PMMA grafting onto silica nanoparticles.
217412.fig.001
Figure 1: A schematic representation of the UV initiated polymerization reacting setup.

The polymer grafting (%) was determined by TGA and calculated by [30]Polymergrafting(%)=Organiccomposition/gBaresilica/g×100,(2) where the amount of organic composition (g) was calculated from the TGA weight loss from 150 to 700°C corresponding to the decomposition of PMMA. Bare silica (g) is the weight retention by TGA corresponding to the bare silica.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Analysis of FTIR

MPTS is well accepted as a suitable coupling agent for silica since the trimethoxysilyl groups can be hydrolyzed and condensed with the silanol groups at the surface of silica particles. Then, the nanosilica can be chemically modified by the reaction between PMMA and MPTS. Figure 2 shows the FTIR spectra of SiO2, SiO2-g-MPTS, and PMMA/SiO2. It can be seen that there is a very pronounced band appearing at 1108 cm−1, together with two less pronounced bands at 805 and 475 cm−1 in the spectrum of SiO2 as shown in Figure 2(a), which corresponds to the vibration absorption of Si-O-Si groups. The similar consequence appears in SiO2-g-MPTS in Figure 2(b). In the spectrum of PMMA/SiO2 in Figure 2(c), there are peaks at 2952, 1732, and 1445 cm−1, which are assigned to CH, C–O, and CH3 stretching vibration of PMMA, respectively. This result indicates that PMMA has been grafted onto the surface of SiO2 successfully.

217412.fig.002
Figure 2: FTIR spectra of (a) bare silica particles, (b) SiO2@MPTS particles, and (c) SiO2@PMMA particles.
3.2. Analysis by TGA

The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of bare silica, SiO2-g-MPTS, and PMMA/SiO2 particles (S-3, S-4 and S-5) is shown in Figure 3. The high temperature required to decompose and evaporate the organic content of the modified silica particles demonstrates that the silane-coupling agent is strongly bound to the particle surface and one can expect a covalent bond [31]. Calculation based on TGA shows that the grafting density of grafted vinyl group is 0.92 μmol/m2 calculated from (1). The weight loss of bare silica below 200°C is 4.8% which is attributed to the physisorbed water and residual organic solvent. As for PMMA/SiO2 particles, the beginning decomposition at 300°C corresponds to the decomposed temperature of PMMA covalently attached to nanosilica particles. The weight loss is increased from 9.0% to 89.2% when the SiO2-g-MPTS decreased from 0.50 g to 0.05 g and polymer grafting is increased from 13.5% to 98.0%. These results show that the grafting degree increase resulted from the decreasing of the amount of the modified nanosilica.

217412.fig.003
Figure 3: Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of (a) bare silica, (b) SiO2@MPTS particles, (c) SiO2@PMMA particles (S-5), (d) SiO2@PMMA particles (S-4), and (e) SiO2@PMMA particles (S-3); TGA was performed in nitrogen at a heating rate of 10°C/min.
3.3. Analysis by TEM

The morphologies of bare silica particles and functional silica particles modified by PMMA were investigated by TEM as shown in Figure 4. Figure 4(a) revealed that the bare silica particles with an average effective diameter of 20 nm are low dispersed and have a few aggregates. However, the size of PMMA/SiO2 particles becomes larger than bare silica particles, and the dispersibility has been improved. With an increase of the concentration of SiO2-g-MPTS, the aggregates increased and the dispersibility got worse. Figures 4(b), 4(c), and 4(d) show better dispersibility. In Figure 4(d), silica particles are completely encapsulated with PMMA that free silica can nearly not be observed and most of the hybrid nanoparticles appeared to be roughly spherically symmetric, although several larger nanoparticles appeared to be rather irregular. It can be concluded that PMMA can successfully encapsulate on silica once silica particles are modified by the double bonds. Besides, it exists a suitable MMA/SiO2 ratio to prepare the core-shell structural PMMA/SiO2 effectively.

fig4
Figure 4: TEM images of (a) bare silica particles, (b) SiO2@PMMA particles (S-1), (c) SiO2@PMMA particles (S-2), (d) SiO2@PMMA particles (S-3), (e) SiO2@PMMA particles (S-4), and (f) SiO2@PMMA particles (S-5) cast from dilute deionized water.
3.4. Analysis by DLS

The sizes and distributions of bare silica particles and functional silica particles modified by PMMA have been investigated by DLS. Figure 5(a) shows that bare silica particles possess a narrow distribution with an average effective diameter of 20 nm. This result agreed with the measure of TEM. The size of PMMA/SiO2 in Figure 5(b) became bigger, and its size distribution ranged from 20 to 42 nm with one intensive peak at 32 nm. From the result obtained, it can be assumed that PMMA has been grafted onto the surface of the silica nanoparticles successfully, and finally the core/shell structural nanosilica/polymethyl methacrylate composite latex has been formed.

fig5
Figure 5: DLS images of (a) bare silica particles and (b) SiO2@PMMA particles (S-3).
3.5. Analysis by XPS

XPS measurement was used to further investigate the composition of the polymer on the silica surface. The wide scan XPS spectra of SiO2-g-MPTS (a) and PMMA/SiO2 (b) are shown in Figure 6. We can see that the signals of Si2s (160.9 eV) and Si2p (109.3 eV) in Figure 6(b) are much weaker than in Figure 6(a), which indicates that silica particles are basically encapsulated with PMMA. We can see from the wide scan XPS spectra of PMMA/SiO2 as shown in Figure 7(1)(b) that the strongest signal appears, which corresponds to the aliphatic hydrocarbon (C–C/C–H, at a binding energy of 284.7 eV). It is larger than the C1s signal (285.4 eV) intensity of SiO2-g-MPTS in Figure 7(1)(a). These signals indicate the presence of PMMA on the surface of silica. Figure 7(2) is the O1s XPS scan spectra; the O1s signal of MPTS-modified silica is due to the Si–O bond. As for O1s signal of the PMMA/SiO2, the weak signal shifted to a binding energy of 533.8 eV, which corresponds to the carbonyl oxygen (O=C) of methyl methacrylate. Judging by combination of FTIR and XPS results, we can conclude that a functionalized surface has been generated by the method outlined in Scheme 1.

fig6
Figure 6: XPS wide scan for (a) SiO2@MPTS particles and (b) SiO2@PMMA particles (S-3).
217412.fig.007
Figure 7: XPS analysis of C1s (1), O1s (2), and Si2p (3) spectra for (a) SiO2@MPTS particles and (b) SiO2@PMMA particles.
3.6. Analysis of Photoinitiation by Different Photoinitiator

Figure 8 shows the TEM images of PMMA/SiO2 particles initiated by FeCl3 and Irgacure 2959. It is obvious that PMMA/SiO2 particles initiated by FeCl3 presents better dispersion, uniformity, and higher encapsulated ratio. To make a further comparison between the FeCl3 and Irgacure 2959, different emulsions have been carried out and the results are presented in Table 2. As shown in Table 2, the two products have almost the same size. The particles initiated by FeCl3 have smaller polydispersity index (PDI) than initiated by Irgacure 2959. More significantly, the particles initiated by FeCl3 have higher monomer conversion and percent grafting. This proves that FeCl3 possesses higher efficiency than Irgacure 2959. The probable mechanisms of grafting polymerization initiated by Irgacure 2959 and FeCl3 are shown in Schemes 2 and 3, respectively. Consequently, we can conclude that FeCl3 has preferable property due to its well water-solubility, lower steric hindrance, and higher free radical production rate. Besides, small amounts of FeCl3 can promote the stability of emulsion.

tab2
Table 2: Comparison of UV-initiated polymerization initiated by FeCl3 and Irgacure 2959.
217412.sch.002
Scheme 2: The mechanisms of grafting polymerization initiated by Irgacure 2959.
217412.sch.003
Scheme 3: The mechanisms of grafting polymerization initiated by FeCl3.
fig8
Figure 8: TEM images of (a) SiO2@PMMA particles (S-3) and (b) SiO2@PMMA particles (S-6) cast from dilute deionized water.

4. Conclusions

A simple and convenient “grafting onto” strategy which involves two-step reaction to prepare PMMA/SiO2 hybrid composites by UV irradiation is reported. Well-defined hybrid particles have been obtained via emulsion polymerization. The grafting density of the polymer can be adjusted in a wide range by simply controlling the introduction and the conversion of the double bonds on the silica surface. Especially, a small amount of FeCl3 can initiate the polymerization in 10 min. It is highly efficient for the functionalization of nanosilica. Compared to the traditional photoinitiation initiated by Irgacure 2959, the products initiated by FeCl3 have higher monomer conversion, percent grafting, and better monodispersion.

References

  1. S. T. Milner, “Polymer brushes,” Science, vol. 251, no. 4996, pp. 905–914, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. P. Wang, Y. P. Wang, R. M. Wang, and S. C. Zhang, “Preparation of polymer brushes on palygorskite surfaces via RAFT polymerization,” Reactive and Functional Polymers, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 643–648, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. M. Granville, S. G. Boyes, B. Akgun, M. D. Foster, and W. J. Brittain, “Thermo-responsive behavior of semi-fluorinated polymer brushes on flat substrates,” Macromolecules, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 3263–3270, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  4. Q. Zhou, X. Fan, C. Xia, J. Mays, and R. Advincula, “Living anionic surface initiated polymerization (SIP) of styrene clay surfaces,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 2465–2467, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. X. Fan, C. Xia, T. Fulghum, M. K. Park, J. Locklin, and R. C. Advincula, “Polymer brushes grafted from clay nanoparticles adsorbed on a planar substrate by free radical surface-initiated polymerization,” Langmuir, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 916–923, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. A. Rider, J. I. L. Chen, J. C. Eloi et al., “Controlling the morphologies of organometallic block copolymers in the 3-dimensional spatial confinement of colloidal and inverse colloidal crystals,” Macromolecules, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 2250–2259, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. Norde and D. Gags, “Interaction of bovine serum albumin and human blood plasma with PEO-tethered surfaces: influence of PEO chain length, grafting density, and temperature,” Langmuir, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 4162–4167, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Lahiri, L. Isaacs, B. Grzybowski, J. D. Carbeck, and G. M. Whitesides, “Biospecifîc binding of carbonic anhydrase to mixed SAMs presenting benzenesulfonamide ligands: a model system for studying lateral steric effects,” Langmuir, vol. 15, no. 21, pp. 7186–7198, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Hucknall, S. Rangarajan, and A. Chilkoti, “In pursuit of zero: polymer brushes that resist the adsorption of proteins,” Advanced Materials, vol. 21, no. 23, pp. 2441–2446, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. E. Kataoka and S. M. Troian, “Patterning liquid flow on the microscopic scale,” Nature, vol. 402, no. 6763, pp. 794–797, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. Zhao and W. J. Brittain, “Polymer brushes: surface-immobilized macromolecules,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 677–710, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. W. Park and E. L. Thomas, “A surface-reactive rod-coil diblock copolymer: nano- and micropatterned polymer brushes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 514–515, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. Gong, M. Feng, C. Zhao, S. Zhang, and M. Yang, “Thermal properties of poly(vinyl chloride)/montmorillonite nanocomposites,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 289–294, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. Zheng, Y. Zhang, Z. Peng, and Y. Zhang, “Influence of clay modification on the structure and mechanical properties of EPDM/montmorillonite nanocomposites,” Polymer Testing, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 217–223, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Y. Lee and H. K. Lee, “Characterization of organobentonite used for polymer nanocomposites,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 85, no. 2-3, pp. 410–415, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. F. Gong, M. Feng, C. Zhao, S. Zhang, and M. Yang, “Particle configuration and mechanical properties of poly(vinyl chloride)/montmorillonite nanocomposites via in situ suspension polymerization,” Polymer Testing, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 847–853, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. C. Tully, A. R. Trimble, J. M. J. Fréchet, K. Wilder, and C. F. Quate, “Synthesis and preparation of ionically bound dendrimer monolayers and application toward scanning probe lithography,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 2892–2898, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. B. Zhao and W. J. Brittain, “Synthesis of polystyrene brushes on silicate substrates via carbocationic polymerization from self-assembled monolayers,” Macromolecules, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 342–348, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Y. Tran and P. Auroy, “Synthesis of poly(styrene sulfonate) brushes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 123, no. 16, pp. 3644–3654, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. Mansky, Y. Liu, E. Huang, T. P. Russell, and C. Hawker, “Controlling polymer-surface interactions with random copolymer brushes,” Science, vol. 275, no. 5305, pp. 1458–1460, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. O. Prucker and J. Rühe, “Synthesis of poly(styrene) monolayers attached to high surface area silica gels through self-assembled monolayers of azo initiators,” Macromolecules, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 592–601, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. O. Prucker and J. Rühe, “Mechanism of radical chain polymerizations initiated by azo compounds covalently bound to the surface of spherical particles,” Macromolecules, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 602–613, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. E. Bourgeat-Lami and J. Lang, “Encapsulation of inorganic particles by dispersion polymerization in polar media 1. Silica nanoparticles encapsulated by polystyrene,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 197, no. 2, pp. 293–308, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. L. Kuo, N. J. Turro, C. M. Tseng, M. S. El-Aasser, and J. W. Vanderhoff, “Photoinitiated polymerization of styrene in microemulsions,” Macromolecules, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1216–1221, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Atik and J. K. Thomas, “Photoinduced reactions in polymerized microemulsions,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 105, no. 14, pp. 4515–4519, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. N. J. Turro, M. F. Chow, C. J. Chung, and C. H. Tung, “Magnetic field and magnetic isotope effects on photoinduced emulsion polymerization,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 1572–1577, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. N. J. Turro and K. S. Arora, “Magnetic effects on photoinduced emulsion polymerization. Effects of lanthanide ion addition,” Macromolecules, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 42–46, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. G. Evans, M. Santappa, and N. Uri, “Photoinitiated free radical polymerizationof vinyl compounds in aqueous solution,” Journal of Polymer Science, vol. 7, no. 23, pp. 243–260, 1951. View at Google Scholar
  29. H. Zhang, J. Wang, L. Li, Y. Song, M. Zhao, and X. Jian, “Synthesis of liquid polysilisiquioxane resins and properties of cured films,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 517, no. 2, pp. 857–862, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Z. X. Guo and J. Yu, “Grafting of dendritic polyethers onto nanometre silica surface,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 468–472, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. Hartwig, M. Sebald, and M. Kleemeier, “Cross-linking of cationically polymerised epoxides by nanoparticles,” Polymer, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 2029–2039, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus