Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2012 / Article
Special Issue

Advanced Nanohybrid Materials: Surface Modification and Applications

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 741214 | 8 pages |

Effect of Particle Morphology on Sinterability of SiC- Z r O 𝟐 in Microwave

Academic Editor: Li-Hong Liu
Received02 Aug 2011
Revised26 Oct 2011
Accepted27 Oct 2011
Published08 Feb 2012


The effect of particle morphology on the sinterability of microwave-sintered SiC-ZrO2 was evaluated in this paper. A comparison was also made against the electric furnace and resulted in faster heating rate because of the difference of heat transfer in the sintering processes. High-energy mechanical milling process has been applied to obtain the homogeneous particle morphology and finer particles size. The microstructure of finer particles of SiC-ZrO2 after milling was better in the region sintered by microwave. The microstructure in the sintered region was smaller for the coarser particles which were obtained by heterogeneous nonmilled powder mixture. The result of the Vickers hardness test was higher for the powder homogeneously dispersed SiC-ZrO2 after milling and sintering by microwave. These are influenced by the difference of individual electric properties of the initial SiC and ZrO2 which have an effect on the absorption of the microwave energy.

1. Introduction

The principal advantages of ceramics are high hardness, extremely high melting point, high compressive strength and stiffness, and wear resistance [1, 2]. Silicon-carbide- (SiC-) based ceramics are also very promising high-temperature structural materials owing to their excellent thermal and mechanical properties, such as hardness and flexural strength [37]. One of the applications of SiC is in gas turbines. Mechanical properties of SiC, especially fracture toughness, can be improved by the addition of other phases into a material matrix to form a composite structure [812]. SiC-based ceramics are generally produced by cold die compaction with subsequent sintering or by hot isostatic pressing and finishing [13]. Among these procedures, the usage of sintering is the most important process for fabricating ceramics. One of the sintering technologies is microwave, which was initially used only in food production but now is also used in the powder processing. However, monolithic SiC is a highly covalently bonded silicon and carbon compound that is difficult to sinter without additives by any method [14] including microwaves [15]. Besides, SiC-based ceramics have low-dielectric-loss factor, that is, the materials with such properties are not easy to heat up by microwave, especially at lower temperature, as reported by Agrawal et al. [16, 17].

Dispersion of zirconia (ZrO2) particles in silicon carbide and other low dielectric loss ceramics is an effective method to enhance the absorption of energy in microwave sintering in room temperature. The preparation of ultrafine ZrO2-based ceramic particles by microwave sintering has been studied extensively [18, 19]. Dispersing of ultrafine particles is expected to improve the sintering ability in ceramics. This is because the specific surface area of the particles provides additional driving force for densification during sintering. Ultra-fine initial size of the particles normally results in higher densities, and in some cases may lead to lower firing temperatures due to faster sintering kinetics [20]. Ultra-fine ZrO2-based ceramic particles are usually known to contain agglomerates. One of most important factors in sintering is the agglomerate size. In microwave sintering, when the powders are milled and refined to nanometer-sized particles, the microwave absorption properties may be changed. Ruan et al. compared the microwave attenuation between the particles of different sizes of 5 μm and 65 nm and showed that the dielectric loss of nanometer-sized particles is larger than that of micrometer-sized particles [21].

Although SiC and ZrO2 have been sintered individually by microwave by many researchers, the formation of the particles morphology and its effect on the microstructure and mechanical properties have not been previously reported. Thus, the objective of this paper is to evaluate the two different formations of the particle morphology on the microstructure of SiC-ZrO2. The differences in the formation of the particles morphology were obtained by mechanical milling and compacted by microwave or electric furnace sintering. The hardness tests of SiC-ZrO2 with different particles morphology were also measured.

2. Experimental Procedure

2.1. Mechanical Milling

In this study, a fine 𝛼-SiC of 2~3 μm and an ultra-fine ZrO2 of 30 nm were used, as shown in Figure 1(a). Both ceramics were manually mixed with a weight ratio of 1 : 1. In another set, both ceramics were subjected to vibratory ball milling (Super Misuni NEV-MA-8, Nishin Gikken, Japan). Dense tungsten carbide-cobalt (WC-Co) of 5 mm in diameter was used as a grinding media and of 60 mm in diameter was used as a grinding pot. Figure 1(b) shows the illustration of vibration ball mill. A constant vibration frequency of 12.5 Hz and a total time of 144 ks were used to mill SiC and ZrO2 with the same ratio, 1 : 1. The milling time was chosen to achieve different morphology of the particles. The ratio of the grinding ball to milled powder was 5 : 1 by weight. After mixing and milling, the SiC-ZrO2 was precompacted in a 10 mm diameter stainless steel die under 50 MPa pressure, and then consolidated by nonconventional microwave and conventional electric furnace sintering.

2.2. Sintering

The schematic illustration of microwave sintering is shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(b) (IDX, MSS-TE0004, Japan) with a single-mode cavity and linked to a magnetron that delivers a variable forward power of up to 2 kW at a frequency of 2.45 GHz. Figure 2(a) shows the temperature measurement of the microwave sintering process. It was continuously measured by an infrared radiation thermometer camera cold air intake (Chino, IR-CAI). The microwave sintering was carried out in nitrogen atmosphere at a temperature of 1273 K for 600 s. The microwave heating was generated by 800 W power. The specimen was set upon a silica plate inside a silica tube for thermal insulation, as shown in the front view in Figure 2(b). An alumina stage was used as the susceptor for the purpose of thermally heating the low-dielectric-loss ceramic specimens to a certain temperature. The ceramic specimens directly absorb microwave energy to self-heat to the desired temperature at high heating rates, and the main function of the susceptor is to maintain a uniform temperature. The specimen was heated in the electric- (E-) field, which was controlled via a three-stub tuner. The maximum setting of the specimens on the E-field plunger was set to 142 mm.

For the conventional electric furnace sintering, the temperature of SiC-ZrO2 was controlled to the same value as the microwave, 1273 K. The sintering temperature was measured using an R-type thermocouple with a constant soak time of 600 s, which was generated by applying a nominal power of 2000 W.

2.3. Characterizations

The impurities of the powders, before and after mechanical milling, were investigated by X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD, RINT-2000, Japan). The morphology of the particles was characterized using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM S-4800, Hitachi, Japan). The sintered samples were cut in half and their cross-sections carefully polished. These were used for microstructure characterization by means of FE-SEM. The mechanical properties were examined using hardness testing. The hardness was measured with an HMV-1 (Shimadzu Corp., Japan) using the Vickers indents obtained by applying a 98.1 N load for 5 s. The measurement was conducted at 30 random points on each specimen.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Particle Morphology

Figure 3 shows FE-SEM images of SiC-ZrO2. As shown in the non-milled powder mixing in Figure 3(a), the shape of the SiC was irregular and the ZrO2 was agglomerate, which is similar to the initial one (Figure 1(a)). Before mixing, the amount of ZrO2 particles that attach on the surface of the SiC powders is very limited. As a result of mixture, there is no change in the appearance of both SiC and ZrO2. From this image, it appears that the particle morphology is heterogeneous.

After mechanical milling, the surface of the SiC powders becomes finer and almost fully covered with ZrO2 particles, as shown in Figure 3(b). In order to achieve homogeneous particle morphology, control of the milling time was very important. If the milling time was too short, the particle morphology of ZrO2 on the surface of SiC would remain heterogeneous. The homogeneous particle morphology could be fully achieved for a milling time of 144 ks. The size of the SiC powders was not significantly reduced, and their shape became somewhat spherical. In the case of ZrO2, the size was refined and the shape of the particles was deformed. These morphological changes are attributed to a fragmentation of the particle agglomerates which was caused by the high-energy mechanical milling.

The refinement of the particle size is consistent with the broadening of X-ray diffraction peaks in Figure 4. In the case of the nonmilled powder mixture (heterogeneous particle morphology), the diffraction peaks were slightly narrower than for the milled powders (homogeneous particle morphology). According to Scherrer’s formula, 𝜏=𝐾𝜆,𝛽cos𝜃(1) where 𝐾 is the shape factor, 𝜆 is the X-ray wavelength of the radiation used (Cu𝐾𝛼), β is the line broadening at half the maximum intensity (FWHM) in radians, 𝜃 is the Bragg angle, and τ is the mean size of the crystalline domains, which may be smaller or equal to the particle size; the broadening of diffraction peaks indicates a reduction in crystalline size [22]. No phase transformation or new phase formation for both SiC-ZrO2 was found in the heterogeneous and homogeneous powder mixtures such that SiC and ZrO2 maintain their rhombohedral and monoclinic structures, respectively.

3.2. Sintering Behaviors

The microwave heating profiles of SiC-ZrO2 separated into electric and magnetic fields are shown in Figure 5(a). The plot shows different heating results in microwave fields. In the E-field, SiC-ZrO2 powders could be sintered, unlike in the H-field. The temperature increased to around 40 s. To achieve the desired temperature of 1273 K, the time required in microwave heating is less than 60 s. It means that the heating rate in the microwave sintering is very rapid, 25 K/s on average.

In case of electric furnace sintering, the temperature remained almost constant at room temperature from 1 s to 30 s time. Then, the temperature increased until around 160 s, as shown in the heating profile in Figure 5(b). The heating rate in the electric furnace is slower than in microwave sintering, which is only 8 K/s on average. To achieve the temperature of 1273 K, the time required is as much as 200 s.

3.3. Sinterability and Microstructure of SiC-ZrO2

Figure 6 shows FE-SEM images of SiC-ZrO2 specimens sintered by microwave and electric-furnace sintering at the constant temperature of 1273 K. In low magnification of microwave sintering microstructures, there is an obvious difference in the microstructure of samples derived from heterogeneous and homogeneous particle morphology. It is clearly showed that the sintering ability of heterogeneous particle of SiC-ZrO2 in microwave is lower than that of the homogeneous one. In heterogeneous particle morphology microstructure, only a few scattered sintered regions are present, as shown in Figure 6(a). After mechanical milling for 144 ks, the particles morphology was changed, the particle morphology was homogeneous, and the average grain size was refined, as shown in Figure 6(b), the better homogeneity of ZrO2 particle on SiC surface, improve the sintering region in microwave. The grain size of SiC-ZrO2 is clearly shown in the FE-SEM micrographs at higher magnification in Figures 6(c) and 6(d). In the non-milled powder mixture (heterogeneous), the SiC size is bigger and coarser than the milled powder (homogeneous particle morphology).

The microstructures of the SiC-ZrO2 at 1273 K temperature, sintered by the conventional electric furnace, are shown in Figures 6(e) and 6(f). In this case, a very different appearance, as compared to the microstructure of microwave sintered powder, is shown for all electric furnace sintered specimens. The SiC-ZrO2 shows a coarse-grained aspect with high porosity. From the micrographs, there is almost no difference in the heterogeneous and homogeneous particles morphology of the SiC-ZrO2 after sintering by electric furnace.

3.4. Vickers Hardness

SiC-ZrO2 specimens sintered by microwave and electric furnace were measured by the Vickers hardness. Those specimens were tested on random points from top to bottom section. In the case of electric furnace sintering, both the heterogeneous and homogeneous particles morphology specimens showed very similar results, as shown in Figure 7. This result indicates that the sintering ability of SiC-ZrO2 in electric furnace is very low, regardless of grain size and/or particle morphology.

In the case of microwave sintering, the Vickers hardness of the homogeneous is higher than that of the heterogeneous particle morphology specimens. This is consistent with the microstructures of heterogeneous particle morphology of SiC-ZrO2 in microwave-sintered compacts which shows lower sintering ability than homogeneous particles morphology specimens.

3.5. Discussion

In microwave sintering, the 800 W applied power and E-field were chosen evaluation. In the E-field, SiC and ZrO2 ceramic powders could be sintered unlike the magnetic H-field; this indicates that the initial ceramics such as SiC and ZrO2 do not have the magnetic properties. Therefore, the E-field can be used to evaluate the effect of particle morphology of SiC-ZrO2 in microwave.

The heating profiles of microwave and electric furnace sintering show that for conventional electric furnace sintering, the heating rate required is 8 K/s on average from room temperature to 1273 K. For microwave sintering, the total time was only 50 s on average to reach 1273 K temperature. During electric furnace sintering, the heating rate is limited by the capability of the machine to achieve fast heating rates because of the slow resistive heating of the heating elements and heat transfer via thermal radiation to the material and also to prevent large thermal variation within the compacts to avoid cracking [23]. The slower heating rate, the need for holding at intermittent temperature to reduce thermal variation, and long soaking time for sintering increase the total processing time of the compacts [23]. For microwave, heating coupled with susceptors, rapid heating rates in excess of 25 K/s on average can be easily achieved since the powder compact can absorb microwave energy directly and can be heated rapidly from within. The susceptors provide radiant heating to the samples externally, thereby reducing the thermal variation in the compacts [23]. The rapid heating rate in microwave will activate the ion exchange and chemical reaction as material transport, thereby reducing the activation energy [24]. Rapid heating minimizes grain growth and enhances the mechanical properties of materials. Those rapid heating rates in microwave resulted in larger sintered regions of microstructure than in the case of electric furnace-sintered compact specimens.

The microwave sintering response in microstructure is not only caused by the rapid heating rates. The better response in microwave for mechanical milling powder is also due to ultrafine ZrO2 particles dispersed homogeneously on the SiC surface. It is known that smaller particle can enhance the sintering kinetics. Another important factor in the microstructure of SiC-ZrO2 is the absorption of microwave energy in each material. The absorption of ultrafine ZrO2 particles is better than that of fine SiC powders, considering the dielectric loss factor of ZrO2 is higher than that of SiC. As reported by Ruan et al., the dielectric loss of nanometer-sized particles is larger than that of micrometer-sized particles [21]. When the ultra-fine ZrO2 particles are dispersed homogeneously on the SiC surface, the absorption of the microwave energy is further increased. The homogeneous particle morphology and finer crystalline size that were obtained by high-energy mechanical milling leads to higher dielectric loss compared with the non-milled powder mixture (heterogeneous particle morphology). Therefore, larger sintered regions by microwave sintering could be obtained as an effect of the homogeneous particle morphology of SiC-ZrO2 ceramic composites.

Although the effects of the particle size and morphology of SiC-ZrO2 on the microwave sintering response were clearly mentioned, we still have a problem with microwave sintering that was performed in single-mode, 2.45 GHz microwave with small chamber, easy to maintain and to use. The drawback of these single-mode chambers is that they are relatively small, which only allows the heating of one small specimen at a time. Unfortunately, this method has a critical drawback since the electro magnetic field in the chamber is not uniform [25], resulting in inhomogeneous heating and the unavoidable formation of hot spots. One approach to achieve a uniform electro-magnetic field distribution in a single-mode chamber is to design a chamber with at least one of the major dimensions 100 times greater than the wavelength. A higher frequency is more convenient than using a huge chamber to enlarge the uniform field region. For this reason, higher microwave frequencies such as 28 GHz and 80 GHz could be used [2628].

In the present study, specimens were sintered by microwave single-mode furnace with a small chamber, in which the field distribution at the center of the chamber is not completely uniform and specimens sintered using the alumina susceptor show regional microstructures. The susceptor can also have a compensating or correcting effect with respect to the inhomogeneous electric field. In our experiments, the response of microwave sintering of SiC-ZrO2 with alumina susceptor shows excellent repeatability in microstructure and hardness test results, while sintering without susceptor resulted in differences in the repeatability of microstructure and hardness test results because of an extreme sensitivity to the materials response in the chamber.

4. Summaries

The effects of particles morphology of SiC-ZrO2 have been evaluated using microwave and electric furnace sintering. Several summaries obtained are as follows.(1)The heating rate obtained in the microwave furnace was faster compared with the electric furnace sintering.(2)The ZrO2 particles were refined and the morphology, of the ZrO2 particles was homogenized on the SiC surface by mechanical milling.(3)The homogeneous particle morphology resulted in larger sintered regions in microstructure and higher hardness values after sintering by microwave, compared with the nonmilled powder mixture (different particle morphology).


  1. R. J. Brook, “Superhard-ceramics,” Nature, vol. 400, no. 6742, pp. 312–315, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. M. Léger and J. Haines, “The search for superhard materials,” Endeavour, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 121–124, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Maître, A. V. Put, J. P. Laval, S. Valette, and G. Trolliard, “Role of boron on the Spark Plasma Sintering of an α-SiC powder,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1881–1890, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. Singh and J. A. Salem, “Mechanical properties and microstructure of biomorphic silicon carbide ceramics fabricated from wood precursors,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 22, no. 14-15, pp. 2709–2717, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Q.-W. Huang and L.-H. Zhu, “High-temperature strength and toughness behaviors for reaction-bonded SiC ceramics below 1400°C,” Materials Letters, vol. 59, no. 14-15, pp. 1732–1735, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Sánchez-González, A. L. Ortiz, F. Guiberteau, and C. Pascual, “Complex impedance spectroscopy study of a liquid-phase-sintered α-SiC ceramic,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 27, no. 13-15, pp. 3935–3939, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. F. M. Varela-Feria, J. Martínez-Fernández, A. R. De Arellano-López, and M. Singh, “Low density biomorphic silicon carbide: microstructure and mechanical properties,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 22, no. 14-15, pp. 2719–2725, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. N. Claussen, “Fracture toughness of Al2O3 with an unstabilized ZrO2 dispersed phase,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 59, no. 1-2, pp. 49–51, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  9. S. E. Dougherty, T. G. Nieh, J. Wadsworth, and Y. Akimune, “Mechanical properties of a 20 vol% SiC whisker-reinforced, yttria-stabilized, tetragonal zirconia composite at elevated temperatures,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 113–118, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  10. N. Claussen, K. L. Weisskopf, and M. Ruehle, “Tetragonal zirconia polycrystals reinforced with SiC whiskers,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 288–292, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  11. X. Miao, W. Mark Rainforth, and W. E. Lee, “Dense zirconia-SiC platelet composites made by pressureless sintering and hot pressing,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 913–920, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  12. H. L. Lee and H. M. Lee, “Effect of SiC on the mechanical properties of 3Y-TZP/SiC composites,” Journal of Materials Science Letters, vol. 13, no. 13, pp. 974–976, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. H. Park and K. T. Kim, “Consolidation behavior of SiC powder under cold compaction,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 299, no. 1-2, pp. 116–124, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Y. W. Kim, M. Mitomo, H. Emoto, and J. G. Lee, “Effect of initial α-phase content on microstructure and mechanical properties of sintered silicon carbide,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 81, no. 12, pp. 3136–3140, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  15. S. Mandal, A. Seal, S. K. Dalui, A. K. Dey, S. Ghatak, and A. K. Mukhopadhyay, “Mechanical characteristics of microwave sintered silicon carbide,” Bulletin of Materials Science, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 121–124, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  16. J. Cheng, R. Roy, and D. Agrawal, “Radically different effects on materials by separated microwave electric and magnetic fields,” Materials Research Innovations, vol. 5, pp. 170–177, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  17. K. H. Brosnan, G. L. Messing, and D. K. Agrawal, “Microwave sintering of alumina at 2.45 GHz,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 86, no. 8, pp. 1307–1312, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  18. S. Sano, S. Kawakami, Y. Takao, S. Takayama, and M. Sato, “Microwave absorbency change of zirconia powder and fiber during vacuum heating,” Advances in Science and Technology, vol. 63, pp. 85–90, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  19. Y. Fang, J. Cheng, R. Roy, D. M. Roy, and D. K. Agrawal, “Enhancing densification of zirconia-containing ceramic-matrix composites by microwave processing,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 32, no. 18, pp. 4925–4930, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  20. M. W. Barsoum, Fundamentals of Ceramics, McGraw Hill series in Materials Sciences, McGraw-Hill, 1997.
  21. S. Ruan, B. Xu, H. Suo, F. Wu, S. Xiang, and M. Zhao, “Microwave absorptive behavior of ZnCo-substituted W-type Ba hexaferrite nanocrystalline composite material,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 212, no. 1, pp. 175–177, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. V. Zdujić and O. B. Milošević, “Mechanochemical treatment of ZnO and Al2O3 powders by ball milling,” Materials Letters, vol. 13, no. 2-3, pp. 125–129, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  23. W. W. L. Eugene and M. Gupta, “Characteristics of aluminum and magnesium based nanocomposites processed using hybrid microwave sintering,” Journal of Microwave Power and Electromagnetic Energy, vol. 44, pp. 14–27, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  24. R. M. German, Sintering Theory and Practice, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1996.
  25. W. H. Sutton, “Microwave processing of ceramic materials,” American Ceramic Society Bulletin, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 376–386, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  26. B. Swain, “Advanced materials and processing,” Advanced Materials and Processes, vol. 134, p. 75, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  27. A. Birnboim, D. Gershon, J. Calame et al., “Comparative study of microwave sintering of zinc oxide at 2.45, 30, and 83 GHz,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 1493–1501, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  28. T. Kimura, H. Takizawa, K. Uheda, T. Endo, and M. Shimada, “Microwave synthesis of yttrium iron garnet powder,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 2961–2964, 1998. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Lydia Anggraini and Kei Ameyama. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

1477 Views | 950 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.