1D Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties, and ApplicationsView this Special Issue
Research Article | Open Access
Nuengruethai Ekthammathat, Titipun Thongtem, Anukorn Phuruangrat, Somchai Thongtem, "Photoluminescence of Hexagonal ZnO Nanorods Hydrothermally Grown on Zn Foils in KOH Solutions with Different Values of Basicity", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2013, Article ID 208230, 4 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/208230
Photoluminescence of Hexagonal ZnO Nanorods Hydrothermally Grown on Zn Foils in KOH Solutions with Different Values of Basicity
Aligned hexagonal ZnO nanorods on pure Zn foils were hydrothermally synthesized in 30 mL solutions containing 0.05–0.50 g KOH. The products were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. In this research, wurtzite hexagonal ZnO nanorods grown along the  direction with green light emission at 541 nm caused by singly ionized oxygen vacancies inside were detected.
One-dimensional (1D) semiconducting materials are able to be used for a number of potential applications in short wavelength optical, nanoelectronic, and optoelectronic devices due to their tunable electronic and optoelectronic properties controlled by morphologies and dimensions [1–3]. Compared to two-dimensional (2D), three-dimensional (3D), and zero-dimensional (0D) nanostructures, the 1D nanostructure has unique characteristic: large aspect ratio, single crystalline structure, and oriented growth . Zinc oxide is an important low-cost II–VI basic semiconductor with 3.37 eV wide band gap and strong exciton binding energy of 60 meV at room temperature [4–7]. It possesses unique catalytic, electrical, optoelectronic, and photochemical properties—very interesting for a number of potential applications as room-temperature UV lasers, sensors, light-emitting diodes, optical switches, solar cells, and photocatalysis due to its low dielectric constant, high chemical stability, good photoelectric, and piezoelectric behaviors [4, 6, 8].
In the paper, hexagonal ZnO nanorods on Zn foils were hydrothermally synthesized in solutions containing 0.05–0.50 g KOH at 120°C. Their phase, morphology, and photoluminescence were investigated and discussed in more details.
2. Experimental Procedure
Reagents of the research were of analytical grade and used without further purification. The hexagonal prism ZnO nanorods were grown on Zn foils by the following. Several 10 × 10 mm square Zn foils with 0.25 mm thick were cleaned with deionized water and absolute alcohol in an ultrasound bath and put in 30 mL of 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.30, 0.40, and 0.50 g KOH aqueous solutions, containing 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 times of KOH in sequence. All of the solutions and zinc foils were transferred into 50 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclaves, which were tightly closed, heated at 120°C in a laboratory electric oven for 24 h, and naturally cooled to room temperature. In the end, the zinc foils were thoroughly rinsed by deionized water several times and alcohol, and dried at 70°C in an electric oven for 12 h for further characterization.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) operated on Philips X’Pert MPD X-ray diffractometer with Cu radiation in the 2θ of 20–70 deg with a scanning rate of 0.02 deg per step and Raman spectroscopy on T64000 HORIBA Jobin Yvon at 50 mW Ar Laser with 514.5 nm wavelength were used to determine phase, crystalline degree, purity, and vibration modes. Their morphologies were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM-6335F) with an accelerating voltage of 15 kV across the LaB6 cathode. Their nanostructures and growth direction were further investigated by transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) and selected area electronic diffraction (SAED) on a JEOL JEM-2010 TEM at 200 kV with LaB6 gun. At the end, optical properties of the products were analyzed by a LS50B Perkin Elmer fluorescence spectrometer in the wavelength range of 450–700 nm.
3. Results and Discussion
Figure 1(a) exhibits typical XRD patterns of the as-grown ZnO on Zn foils, revealing that all diffraction peaks were explicable in term of wurtzite ZnO structure with Å and Å (JCPDS No. 36-1451) . Sharp diffraction peaks indicate good crystalline degree of the as-synthesized crystals without other impurities detection.
Degree of orientation of the as-synthesized ZnO samples was explained by the relative texture coefficient (TC) [10, 11] of the (002) peak calculated using the formula TC002 is the relative texture coefficient of the (002) over (100) diffraction peaks. and are the measured diffraction intensities of the (002) and (100) peaks, including the corresponding and values of the randomly oriented standard powder, respectively. For randomly crystallographic orientation, the texture coefficient of ZnO is 0.5. In the solution containing 0.50 g KOH, calculated TC002 was 0.86, which supported the preferential orientation of the as-synthesized ZnO nanorods grown along the direction on the Zn foil.
Wurtzite ZnO structure belongs to (P63mc) space group with two formula units per primitive cell, and all atoms occupy the C3v sites. Group theory of wurtzite ZnO structure predicts eight sets of phonon modes: A1 + E1 + 2E2 (Raman active), 2B2 (Raman silent), and A1 + E1 (IR active). Moreover, the A1 and E1 symmetry are split into longitudinal (L) and transverse (T) optical (O) components due to the macroscopic electric fields associated with the LO phonons. Figure 1(b) shows Raman spectra of the as-synthesized ZnO nanorods. They show a dominant peak of typical characteristic of the wurtzite ZnO structure at 439 cm−1, assigned to be the optical phonon E2H mode. The weak peak at 332 cm−1 was assigned to be the second-order Raman scattering arising from the zone/zero boundary phonons E2H–E2L of multiphonon process, while the Raman peak at 379 cm−1 is attributed to A1 symmetry with the TO mode. Furthermore, Raman spectra of ZnO samples at 567 cm−1 are a contribution of the E1 (LO) mode which is directly associated with oxygen vacancies. The stronger E1 (LO) mode indicates the presence of higher oxygen vacancies inside [5, 12–14].
SEM images as shown in Figure 2 were investigated on surfaces of Zn foils after hydrothermal treatment in 30 mL solutions containing 1 (0.05 g), 2 (0.10 g), 4 (0.20 g), 6 (0.30 g), 8 (0.40 g), and 10 times (0.50 g) of KOH. An interesting feature of the nanostructures grown on the bottom surfaces exhibited the presence of aligned nanorods of ZnO with the diameter ranging from 400 nm to 700 nm without the detection of other nanostructures. The lengths of the ZnO nanorods are in the range of several micrometers to even longer than 5–7 μm. These nanorods were enlarged and lengthened in sequence with an increase in the degree of basicity. The inset of Figure 2(f) demonstrates the hexagonal ZnO nanorod which was fully grown on Zn foil in the solution containing 0.50 g KOH.
The hexagonal ZnO nanorods were also characterized through TEM and SAED (Figure 3). TEM image reveals a single hexagonal ZnO nanorod with smooth surface and the preferred growth in the direction. It shows the SAED pattern of bright spots corresponding to hexagonal wurtzite ZnO .
Based on the previous discussion, mechanism of the growth and morphology of ZnO nanostructure can be proposed as follows:
The formation of ions from Zn2+ and ions by a hydrothermal reaction is a key role in the formation of hexagonal wurtzite ZnO nanorods. The primary ZnO nanoparticles began to nucleate on Zn foil by the dissolution of Zn atoms into the solution and the cause of concentration gradient of Zn2+. The intrinsic electric fields of the polar ZnO lattice could be responsible for further growth of ZnO crystals, described as alternating planes of Zn2+ and O2−, stacked along the c-axis. The oppositely charged ions produced positively charged and negatively charged surfaces, resulting in polarization along the c-axis. The preferred c-axis orientation of ZnO nanostructure is driven by electrostatic interaction between the polar charges to minimize surface energy. Finally, ZnO nanorods grew on Zn foil as substrate .
The main emission of ZnO nanorods can be assigned as the recombination of free excitons. Other peaks probably originated from position of band-edge emission of ZnO of relatively large dimensions with different concentration of native defects . It is well known that visible photoluminescence mainly originates from defect states of Zn interstitials, zinc vacancies, and oxygen vacancies . Photoluminescence (PL) of ZnO nanorods grown on Zn foils was investigated using excitation wavelength of 214 nm at room temperature as shown in Figure 4. PL spectrum of hexagonal ZnO nanorods using 0.50 g KOH shows the highest strong green light emission at 541 nm, due to the singly ionized oxygen vacancies of ZnO, in accordance with other reports [16–18].
In summary, densely aligned hexagonal ZnO nanorods on Zn foils were synthesized by a 120°C and 24 h hydrothermal reaction. The XRD, SEM, and TEM analyses showed that the as-synthesized products were pure wurtzite ZnO nanorods with uniform hexagonal structure of 400–700 nm diameter and 5–7 μm long. Room temperature PL spectrum of the ZnO nanorods exhibited one strong green light emission at 541 nm due to the singly ionized oxygen vacancies inside.
The authors wish to thank the Thailand’s Office of the Higher Education Commission for providing financial support through the National Research University (NRU) Project for Chiang Mai University (CMU) and the Human Resource Development Project in Science Achievement Scholarship of Thailand (SAST) and the Thailand Research Fund (TRF) for providing financial support through the TRF Research Grant BRG5380020, including the Graduate School of CMU through a general support.
- L. Z. Pei, H. S. Zhao, W. Tan, H. Y. Yu, Y. W. Chen, and Q. F. Zhang, “Single crystalline ZnO nanorods grown by a simple hydrothermal process,” Materials Characterization, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 1063–1067, 2009.
- Z. Li, X. Huang, J. Liu, Y. Li, and G. Li, “Morphology control and transition of ZnO nanorod arrays by a simple hydrothermal method,” Materials Letters, vol. 62, no. 10-11, pp. 1503–1506, 2008.
- X. Wu, H. Chen, L. Gong, F. Qu, and Y. Zheng, “Low temperature growth and properties of ZnO nanorod arrays,” Advances in Natural Sciences, vol. 2, Article ID 035006, 2011.
- H. Zhang, J. Feng, J. Wang, and M. Zhang, “Preparation of ZnO nanorods through wet chemical method,” Materials Letters, vol. 61, no. 30, pp. 5202–5205, 2007.
- J. H. Yang, J. H. Zheng, H. J. Zhai, L. L. Yang, J. H. Lang, and M. Gao, “Growth mechanism and optical properties of ZnO nanosheets by the hydrothermal method on Si substrates,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 481, no. 1-2, pp. 628–631, 2009.
- X. Ren, D. Han, D. Chen, and F. Tang, “Large-scale synthesis of hexagonal cone-shaped ZnO nanoparticles with a simple route and their application to photocatalytic degradation,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 807–813, 2007.
- S. Suwanboon, R. Tanattha, and R. Tanakorn, “Fabrication and properties of nanocrystalline zinc oxide thin film prepared by sol-gel method,” Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 65–69, 2008.
- D. Wang, C. Song, Z. Hu, W. Chen, and X. Fu, “Growth of ZnO prisms on self-source substrate,” Materials Letters, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 205–208, 2007.
- Powder Diffract, File, JCPDS Internat. Centre Diffract. Data, PA, 19073–3273, U.S.A, 2001.
- J. H. Park, P. Muralidharan, and D. K. Kim, “Solvothermally grown ZnO nanorod arrays on (101) and (002) single- and poly-crystalline Zn metal substrates,” Materials Letters, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 1019–1022, 2009.
- F. Li, Z. Li, and F. J. Jin, “Structural and luminescent properties of ZnO nanorods,” Materials Letters, vol. 61, no. 8-9, pp. 1876–1880, 2007.
- L. l. Yang, J. H. Yang, D. D. Wang et al., “Photoluminescence and Raman analysis of ZnO nanowires deposited on Si(100) via vapor-liquid-solid process,” Physica E, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 920–923, 2008.
- O. Lupan, L. Chow, L. K. Ono et al., “Synthesis and characterization of Ag- or Sb-doped ZnO nanorods by a facile hydrothermal route,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 114, no. 29, pp. 12401–12408, 2010.
- S. J. Chen, Y. C. Liu, Y. M. Lu, J. Y. Zhang, D. Z. Shen, and X. W. Fan, “Photoluminescence and Raman behaviors of ZnO nanostructures with different morphologies,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 289, no. 1, pp. 55–58, 2006.
- J. Y. Kim, H. Jeong, and D. J. Jang, “Hydrothermal fabrication of well-ordered ZnO nanowire arrays on Zn foil: room temperature ultraviolet nanolasers,” Journal of Nanoparticles Research, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 6699–6706, 2011.
- W. Li, Y. Sun, and J. Xu, “Controllable hydrothermal synthesis and properties of ZnO hierarchicalmicro/nanostructures,” Nano-Micro Letters, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 98–102, 2012.
- Y. J. Gao, W. C. Zhang, X. L. Wu et al., “Hydrothermal self-assembling of ZnO nanorods into sphere-like superstructures and their optical characteristics,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 255, no. 5, pp. 1982–1987, 2008.
- G. Z. Wang, N. G. Ma, C. J. Deng et al., “Large-scale synthesis of aligned hexagonal ZnO nanorods using chemical vapor deposition,” Materials Letters, vol. 58, no. 16, pp. 2195–2198, 2004.
Copyright © 2013 Nuengruethai Ekthammathat et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.