Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 602602, 7 pages
Research Article

Graphene Supported Pt/Ni Nanoparticles as Magnetically Separable Nanocatalysts

State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, Key Laboratory for Green Chemical Technology, School of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Received 12 March 2013; Accepted 10 September 2013

Academic Editor: Teng Li

Copyright © 2013 Ru Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Efficient recovery of nanocatalysts, especially the graphene supported noble metal catalysts, is a challenge. In this study, we report a simple one-step route to prepare the graphene supported Pt/Ni nanocatalysts with ideal superparamagnetic properties. We demonstrated that they had excellent catalytic activities in the catalytic reduction of aromatic nitro compounds and could be easily separated from the reaction mixtures by applying an external magnetic field.

1. Introduction

Graphene [1], a one-atom-thick planar sheet of hexagonally arrayed sp2 carbon atoms, has attracted tremendous attention in recent years [25]. Especially, graphene has been emerging as a promising supporting in heterogeneous catalytic processes [610] due to its large surface areas [11], impressive mechanical strength [12, 13], chemical inertness, and strong interactions with metal clusters. In recent years, many monometallic and bimetallic catalytic nanoparticles, such as Pd [14], Au [15], Pt [16], Au@Pd [17], and Pt-on-Pd [18], have been successfully dispersed on graphene. The obtained hybrids show impressive catalytic performances in various reactions. However, most of the time, noble metals act as key components of these nanocatalysts, and the efficient recovery of these noble metals from reaction systems remains a challenge. In this respect, a promising solution to solve this problem is the magnetic separation by which the magnetically separable nanoparticles are employed to efficiently separate the catalyst from reaction mixture [19, 20]. In fact, a number of functionalized magnetically separable nanoparticles have been employed in organic reactions as C–C coupling [21], hydrogenation [22], oxidation [23], amination [24], and nitrile hydration [25].

Here, we report a one-step route to prepare the graphene supported Pt/Ni hybrids (Pt/Ni-G) (Scheme 1), which have superparamagnetic properties and show superior catalytic activities in the model reaction of p-nitrophenol (4-NP) reduction.

Scheme 1: Illustration of preparing Pt/Ni-G hybrids.

2. Experimental

2.1. Synthesis of Pt/Ni-G Hybrids

Graphite oxide was prepared by the modified Hummers method [26] and exfoliated into graphene oxide (GO) at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL by sonication in water [27]. Typically, 100 mL of graphene oxide (GO) was dispersed in 50 mL Tannin (TA) aqueous solution (5 mg/mL) under sonication for 30 min. Then, the excess TA was discarded by centrifugation and the as-prepared TA-functionalized GO was dissolved into 50 mL of water. The concentrations of H2PtCl6 and NiSO4 were adjusted to 4.8 × 10−4 and 1.2 × 10−2 M in the TA-GO solution, respectively; thus, Pt : Ni became 1 : 25. Nitrogen was purged through the solution for 5 min, and then the solution was stirred in airtight conditions. After 30 min of stirring, 0.3 mL of N2H4 H2O (80%) and 2 mL of KOH solution (9.0 M) were injected into the solution. The solution turned black immediately and was kept stirred for 15 min. Finally, the product was washed 8–10 times with ethanol and deionized water for purification purposes.

2.2. Catalytic Reduction of p-Nitrophenol by Pt/Ni-G Hybrids

To investigate the catalytic activity of the as-prepared hybrids, the reduction of p-nitrophenol (4-NP) was tested in a quartz cuvette. In brief, 20 μL of 10−2 M aqueous 4-NP and 40 μL of ultrasonically dispersed Pt/Ni-G solution (0.1 mg/mL) were introduced into 2 mL deionized water, resulting in a constant metal loading of 4.0 μg. Then, 0.3 mL of 10−1 M aqueous NaBH4 was rapidly added. The yellow color of the solution gradually vanished, indicating the formation of p-aminophenol (4-AP) [28]. The time-dependent UV-Vis absorption spectra were recorded in a scanning range of 200–600 nm at 25 ± 1°C.

2.3. Characterization

The as-prepared Pt/Ni-graphene hybrids were characterized by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) (Philips Tecnai G2 F20), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Hitachi S-4800), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) (Philips Tecnai G2 F20 & Hitachi S-4800), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (PerkinElmer, PHI 1600 spectrometer). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted on a Bruker-Nonius D8 FOCUS diffractometer. The catalytic activity of Pt/Ni-G hybrids was measured by UV absorption spectra on a UV-2802H system with a temperature controller.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis of Pt/Ni-G Hybrids

The XRD diffraction pattern of the Pt/Ni-graphene hybrids was recorded to identify the product (Figure 1). The main diffraction peaks show the face-centered cubic (fcc) structure of both metallic nickel and nickel oxide [29]. Corresponding XPS pattern has authenticated this result. No peaks of Pt are observed because of the pretty low proportion of Pt : Ni, but the of Ni (111) peak shifts to a lower angle compared to that of nickel nanoparticles, indicating the alloy formation where the lattice expansion occurred due to the substitution of nickel atoms by larger platinum atoms [30]. Based on the Ni (111) peak, the crystallite size diameter ( ) of supported nanoparticles is calculated to be about 14.7 nm by Debye-Scherrer equation.

Figure 1: XRD pattern of the as-prepared Pt/Ni-G hybrids.

Further evidence for the chemical state and composition of the hybrids was obtained by X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS). Compared with GO (Figure 2(a)), the full range XPS spectra of the obtained hybrids (Figure 2(b)) show an obvious decrease of O : C atomic ratio. This result should be attributed to the partial removal of the oxide functional groups from GO during the reduction procedure (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)). In addition, clear evidence for the existence of Pt and Ni in the hybrids is readily observed. The Pt 4f spectrum (Figure 2(e)) consists of two peaks for metallic platinum at 71.3 (Pt 4f7/2) and 74.2 eV (Pt 4f5/2), without the peaks for Pt2+ and Pt4+ at 72.8 and 74.6 eV, respectively [31]. This result indicates that Pt is present in the zero-valent metallic state in the alloy nanoparticles. In contrast, the Ni 2p3/2 spectrum (Figure 2(f)) shows a complex structure with intense satellite signals of high binding energy adjacent to the main peaks, which may be ascribed to a multielectron excitation (shake-up peaks) [32]. After these shake-up peaks are considered, the Ni 2p3/2 spectrum has been deconvoluted into two peaks; the first small one located at 852.6 eV corresponds to metallic nickel, and the main one located at 854.0 is assigned to NiO [33]. From the intensities of the deconvoluted XPS signal of Ni, it is obvious that the surface of the nanoparticles is predominately NiO.

Figure 2: Survey XPS spectra of GO (a) and Pt/Ni-G (b). C1s XPS spectra of GO (c) and Pt/Ni-G (d). Pt 4f spectra (e) and Ni 2p3 spectra (f) of Pt/Ni-G.

The surface morphological study was carried out by using TEM. As shown in Figure 3(a), spherical nanoparticles were homogeneously dispersed on the surfaces of graphene. The sizes of nanoparticles are in the range of 12–19 nm, with a mean size of 15.4 nm. This value is in close agreement with the diameter of 14.7 nm obtained from XRD.

Figure 3: TEM image and size distribution (total no.: 101, mean diameter: 15.4 nm) (a) and HRTEM image (b) of Pt/Ni-G bimetallic nanoparticles homogeneously decorated on the surface of graphene. Line scanning analysis (c) and corresponding EDX results (d).

Interestingly, it is easy to find that the graphene supported nanoparticles show a dark core and a comparatively pale shell under the HRTEM image of Pt/Ni-G (Figure 3(b)), indicating the core-shell structure. The lattice spacing in the core of the graphene supported Pt/Ni nanoparticles (marked as “a,” Figure 3(b)) is 0.207 nm, whereas those of pure Pt (111) and Ni (111) are 0.23 and 0.203 nm, respectively. The supported Pt/Ni nanoparticles also show NiO lattice fringes on the particle surface (marked as “b”), with the d-spacing of 0.24 nm corresponding to the NiO (200) planes [34, 35]. These results suggest the alloy formation of Pt and Ni, and the particles would be covered by a NiO layer that was formed by the surface oxidation.

These results are further supported by line scanning analysis. As shown in Figure 3(c), Pt is primarily in the 8 nm core while Ni uniformly is distributed on the whole surface of the Pt/Ni nanoparticle.

Interestingly, quantitative analysis by EDX (Figure 3(d)) suggests that the Pt : Ni atomic ratio is 1 : 26, a value close to the stoichiometric ratio (1 : 25) of the metal precursors. But the surface Pt : Ni atomic ratio measured by XPS is only 1 : 57 (Figure 2(b)). Given that XPS can only penetrate several nanometers of the surface, this result strongly supports the formation of a NiO layer out of the supported Pt/Ni alloy. Quantitative energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping confirms that both Pt and Ni are homogeneously distributed on the whole surface of graphene, shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4: SEM image of Pt/Ni-G (a) and corresponding quantitative EDS element mapping of O (b), Ni (c), and Pt (d).
3.2. Magnetic Characterization

Figure 5(a) shows the magnetization versus field plots ( versus hysteresis loops) of Pt/Ni-G hybrids by Quantum Design SQUID-VSM magnetometer under −10 to 10 KOe at room temperature. The saturation magnetization ( ) for the sample is 11.6 emu/g. And the curve does not exhibit hysteresis, indicating that Pt/Ni-G hybrids at room temperature show superparamagnetic behavior. Previous studies on magnetic nanoparticles have demonstrated that when the size of the magnetic particles decreases they change from multidomain to single domain [36]. Therefore, when particles become small enough (typically below 35 nm [37]), the magnetic moment in the domain fluctuates in direction, leading to superparamagnetism (SPM).

Figure 5: Hysteresis loop of Pt/Ni-G hybrids measured by SQUID magnetometer at 300 K (a). Successive UV-Vis spectra showing the reduction of 4-NP catalyzed by 4.0 μg Pt/Ni-G hybrids (b).
3.3. Catalytic Reaction

To probe the catalytic performances of the obtained hybrids, reduction of p-nitrophenol (4-NP) to its corresponding amino derivative was used as the model reaction. In brief, the catalytic reduction of 4-NP by excessive NaBH4 was carried out at room temperature under solvent free condition by using as-synthesized Pt/Ni-G hybrids catalysts. The reaction process was monitored by the UV-Vis spectrophotometry and conducted in the absence of catalysts first. It was observed that the yellow color of the solution deepened after the addition of NaBH4, and a red shift of the peak from 317 to 400 nm occurred. This phenomenon was caused by the formation of p-nitrophenolate ions in alkaline condition [38]. The intensity of the absorbance remained unchanged at 400 nm even after several days, indicating that no reduction of 4-NP occurred. However, in the presence of the Pt/Ni-G hybrids, quick reduction of 4-NP to p-aminophenol (4-AP) by NaBH4 was observed (Figure 5(b)). The absorption of 4-NP at 400 nm completely vanished within 2.5 minutes, accompanied by the fast appearance of the new peaks of 4-AP at 300 nm [39].

The excellent catalytic activity of the Pt/Ni-G hybrids can be attributed to the alloy nature of the supported Pt/Ni nanoparticles, which usually show superior catalytic performance than their monometallic counterparts [40]. In addition, by dispersing on the two-dimensional graphene sheets with large surface areas, the Pt/Ni nanoparticles can prevent aggregation that shields their active catalytic sites. Therefore, 4-NP molecules readily access the catalytic Pt/Ni nanoparticles from two sides of the graphene sheets with limited mass transfer hindrance. Importantly, the Pt/Ni-G hybrids can be easily recycled by using an external magnetic field after the reaction and reused without observable decrease in their catalytic activities.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we developed a simple one-step route to prepare the graphene supported Pt/Ni nanoparticles (Pt/Ni-G). The supported Pt/Ni nanoparticles had a mean diameter of 15 nm and showed superparamagnetic behavior. Catalytic investigation revealed the excellent catalytic activity of the obtained hybrids in the catalytic reduction of aromatic nitro compounds. Notably, the Pt/Ni-G hybrids could be easily separated from the reaction mixtures by applying an external magnetic field. Given their excellent catalytic performances, as well as their magnetically separable nature, these Pt/Ni-G hybrids are ideal recoverable nanocatalysts and may find potential applications in a variety of reactions.


This study was supported by the National Natural Science Funds for Excellent Young Scholars (no. 21222608), Research Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21106099), Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of China (no. 201251), the Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (no. 11JCYBJC01700), and the Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (no. B06006).


  1. K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov et al., “Electric field in atomically thin carbon films,” Science, vol. 306, no. 5696, pp. 666–669, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, “The rise of graphene,” Nature Materials, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 183–191, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. H. Rümmeli, C. G. Rocha, F. Ortmann et al., “Graphene: piecing it together,” Advanced Materials, vol. 23, no. 39, pp. 4471–4490, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. J. Allen, V. C. Tung, and R. B. Kaner, “Honeycomb carbon: a review of graphene,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 132–145, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Stankovich, D. A. Dikin, G. H. B. Dommett et al., “Graphene-based composite materials,” Nature, vol. 442, no. 7100, pp. 282–286, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Li, X. Fan, J. Qi et al., “Palladium nanoparticle-graphene hybrids as active catalysts for the Suzuki reaction,” Nano Research, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 429–437, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Wang, C. An, J. Liu et al., “Graphene oxide coupled AgBr nanosheets: an efficient dual-functional visible-light-responsive nanophotocatalyst with enhanced performance,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 2827–2832, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  8. X. Cui, C. Zhang, R. Hao, and Y. Hou, “Liquid-phase exfoliation, functionalization and applications of graphene,” Nanoscale, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 2118–2126, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. Xue, S. Jiang, Y. Qu et al., “Graphene-supported hemin as a highly active biomimetic oxidation catalyst,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 51, no. 16, pp. 3822–3825, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Q. Zhao, D. Chen, Y. Li, G. Zhang, F. Zhang, and X. Fan, “Rhodium complex immobilized on graphene oxide as an efficient and recyclable catalyst for hydrogenation of cyclohexene,” Nanoscale, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 882–885, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. M. J. McAllister, J.-L. Li, D. H. Adamson et al., “Single sheet functionalized graphene by oxidation and thermal expansion of graphite,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 19, no. 18, pp. 4396–4404, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. A. Dikin, S. Stankovich, E. J. Zimney et al., “Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper,” Nature, vol. 448, no. 7152, pp. 457–460, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. Scarpa, S. Adhikari, and A. Srikantha Phani, “Effective elastic mechanical properties of single layer graphene sheets,” Nanotechnology, vol. 20, no. 6, Article ID 065709, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. Jin, S. Guo, J. l. Zuo, and S. Sun, “Synthesis and assembly of Pd nanoparticles on graphene for enhanced electrooxidation of formic acid,” Nanoscale, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 160–163, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  15. T. Zeng, X. Zhang, Y. Ma, H. Niu, and Y. Cai, “A novel Fe3O4-graphene-Au multifunctional nanocomposite: green synthesis and catalytic application,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 35, pp. 18658–18663, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  16. P. Kundu, C. Nethravathi, P. A. Deshpande, M. Rajamathi, G. Madras, and N. Ravishankar, “Ultrafast microwave-assisted route to surfactant-free ultrafine Pt nanoparticles on graphene: synergistic co-reduction mechanism and high catalytic activity,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 2772–2780, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. Chen, Y. Li, F. Zhang, G. Zhang, and X. Fan, “Graphene supported Au-Pd bimetallic nanoparticles with core-shell structures and superior peroxidase-like activities,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 44, pp. 17658–17661, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Guo, D. Wen, Y. Zhai, S. Dong, and E. Wang, “Platinum nanoparticle ensemble-on-graphene hybrid nanosheet: one-pot, rapid synthesis, and used as new electrode material for electrochemical sensing,” ACS Nano, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 3959–3968, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. Astruc, F. Lu, and J. R. Aranzaes, “Nanoparticles as recyclable catalysts: the frontier between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 44, no. 48, pp. 7852–7872, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Shylesh, V. Schünemann, and W. R. Thiel, “Magnetically separable nanocatalysts: bridges between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 49, no. 20, pp. 3428–3459, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Ceylan, C. Friese, C. Lammel, K. Mazac, and A. Kirschning, “Induktives heizen in der organischen synthese durch verwendung funktionalisierter magnetischer nanopartikel in mikroreaktoren,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 120, no. 46, pp. 9083–9086, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  22. Y. Chi, Q. Yuan, Y. Li et al., “Synthesis of Fe3O4@SiO2–Ag magnetic nanocomposite based on small-sized and highly dispersed silver nanoparticles for catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 383, no. 1, pp. 96–102, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. C. Kamonsatikul, T. Khamnaen, P. Phiriyawirut, S. Charoenchaidet, and E. Somsook, “Synergistic activities of magnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles and stabilizing ligands containing ferrocene moieties in selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 26, pp. 1–5, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  24. Y.-H. Liu, J. Deng, J.-W. Gao, and Z.-H. Zhang, “Triflic acid-functionalized silica-coated magnetic nanoparticles as a magnetically separable catalyst for synthesis of gem-dihydroperoxides,” Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, vol. 354, no. 2-3, pp. 441–447, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. V. Polshettiwar and R. S. Varma, “Nanoparticle-supported and magnetically recoverable ruthenium hydroxide catalyst: efficient hydration of nitriles to amides in aqueous medium,” Chemistry—A European Journal, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1582–1586, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Lerf, H. He, M. Forster, and J. Klinowski, “Structure of graphite oxide revisited,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 102, no. 23, pp. 4477–4482, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S. Park and R. S. Ruoff, “Chemical methods for the production of graphenes,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 217–224, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. T. R. Mandlimath and B. Gopal, “Catalytic activity of first row transition metal oxides in the conversion of p-nitrophenol to p-aminophenol,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, vol. 350, no. 1-2, pp. 9–15, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. F. Davar, Z. Fereshteh, and M. Salavati-Niasari, “Nanoparticles Ni and NiO: synthesis, characterization and magnetic properties,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 476, no. 1-2, pp. 797–801, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. K. Singh and Q. Xu, “Bimetallic Ni-Pt nanocatalysts for selective decomposition of hydrazine in aqueous solution to hydrogen at room temperature for chemical hydrogen storage,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 13, pp. 6148–6152, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. H. Gao, F. Xiao, C. B. Ching, and H. Duan, “One-step electrochemical synthesis of PtNi nanoparticle-graphene nanocomposites for nonenzymatic amperometric glucose detection,” ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 3049–3057, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. K. T. Ng and D. M. Hercules, “Studies of nickel-tungsten-alumina catalysts by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 80, no. 19, pp. 2094–2102, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. Schulz, A. van Neste, P. A. Zielinski et al., “A novel method to produce nanocrystalline metastable supported catalysts,” Catalysis Letters, vol. 35, no. 1-2, pp. 89–106, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Y. Li, L. Tang, and J. Li, “Preparation and electrochemical performance for methanol oxidation of pt/graphene nanocomposites,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 846–849, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. I. S. Lee, N. Lee, J. Park et al., “Ni/NiO core/shell nanoparticles for selective binding and magnetic separation of histidine-tagged proteins,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 128, no. 33, pp. 10658–10659, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. N. Amin, S. Arajs, and E. Matijevic, “Magnetic properties of submicronic α-Fe2O3 particles of uniform size distribution at 300 K,” Physica Status Solidi (A), vol. 104, no. 1, pp. K65–K68, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. T. Seto, H. Akinaga, F. Takano, K. Koga, T. Orii, and M. Hirasawa, “Magnetic properties of monodispersed Ni/NiO core-shell nanoparticles,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 28, pp. 13403–13405, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. N. Pradhan, A. Pal, and T. Pal, “Silver nanoparticle catalyzed reduction of aromatic nitro compounds,” Colloids and Surfaces A, vol. 196, no. 2-3, pp. 247–257, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. Huang, S. Vongehr, S. Tang, H. Lu, and X. Meng, “Highly catalytic Pd-Ag bimetallic dendrites,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 114, no. 35, pp. 15005–15010, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. H.-L. Jiang and Q. Xu, “Recent progress in synergistic catalysis over heterometallic nanoparticles,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 36, pp. 13705–13725, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus