Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Light-Metal-Based Nanostructures for Energy and Biomedical Applications

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 603586 | 6 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/603586

Surface Nanocrystallization of 3Cr13 Stainless Steel Induced by High-Current Pulsed Electron Beam Irradiation

Academic Editor: Kemin Zhang
Received07 Dec 2012
Accepted01 Feb 2013
Published28 Feb 2013

Abstract

The nanocrystalline surface was produced on 3Cr13 martensite stainless steel surface using high-current pulsed electron beam (HCPEB) technique. The structures of the nanocrystallized surface were characterized by X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy. Two nanostructures consisting of fine austenite grains (50–150 nm) and very fine carbides precipitates are formed in melted surface layer after multiple bombardments via dissolution of carbides and crater eruption. It is demonstrated that the dissolution of the carbides and the formation of the supersaturated Fe (C) solid solution play a determining role on the microstructure evolution. Additionally, the formation of fine austenite structure is closely related to the thermal stresses induced by the HCPEB irradiation. The effects of both high carbon content and high value of stresses increase the stability of the austenite, which leads to the complete suppression of martensitic transformation.

1. Introduction

Nanomaterials with considerable fine grain sizes and significantly large volume fraction of grain boundaries have exhibited superior mechanical, physical, and chemical properties compared to conventional coarse-grained materials [1]. Surface nanocrystallization of a coarse-grained material provides a new approach to improve the properties of the materials [2]. In practice, surface nanostructures of metal materials can be obtained via severe plastic deformation using surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT) [3], high-energy shot peening (HESP) [4], ultrasonic shot peening [5], wire-brushing [6], and so forth.

Recently, the application of energetic beams such as ion, electron, laser, and plasma has been of increasing interest to modify the surface of the metallic materials [711]. Among these techniques, the high-current pulsed electron beam (HCPEB) is relatively new [12, 13]. The energy concentration per pulse is high and could be varied within a relatively large range. Hence, any type of exposure to the heat of the near-surface layers of materials could be achieved: heating, melting, and high-rate evaporation. A subsequent fast cooling is followed by high-rate crystallization of the melt and generation of the thermoelastic dynamic and quasistatic mechanical stresses in the region under irradiation, which inevitably cause high-rate deformation. The combination of the above-mentioned factors due to the HCPEB treatment can promote structural phase transformations and result in the formation of very fine grains within the irradiated surface layers, which would remarkably influence the physical-mechanical properties of the irradiated surface.

In this work, the surface nanocrystallization of 3Cr13 steel resulted from the HCPEB irradiation is reported. The surface nanocrystallization has potential applications in industries due to its high efficiency, simplicity, and reliability of the HCPEB technique.

2. Experimental

The HCPEB equipment, used in this work, is a Nadezhda-2 type, which can produce an electron beam with low electron energy in the range of 10–40 kV, high peak current with the range of 102-103 A/cm2, short pulsed duration of 0.5–1.5 μs, and cross-section area 30 cm2. The electron beam is generated by an explosive emission cathode, and the accelerating voltage, magnetic fields strength, and the anode-collector distance can be adjusted to control the beam energy density. More details about the HCPEB system are described in [7].

A typical 3Cr13 martensite stainless steel was used for study in this work. Its chemical composition was listed in Table 1. Before the electron beam treatment, the samples were machined to dimensions of 14 mm × 10 mm × 5 mm and austenitized at 1050°C for 30 min. Oil quenching terminated this heat treatment. The steel was subsequently tempered at 620°C for 2 h. The sample surface was prepared before the HCPEB treatment by mechanical polishing to ensure a similar initial surface state. The energy of the electron beam was kept constant at 24.3 keV, and different pulse numbers were used (5 and 10 times). For all treatments, the pulsing time was about 1.5 μs, and 10 s were set between each pulse.


SamplesChemical composition (wt.%)
CCrMnSPNiSi

3Cr130.2813.260.580.0150.0180.500.82

Surface and cross-section microstructures were characterized using a field emission gun scanning electron microscope (SEM, JEOL JSM-7001F). X-ray diffraction (XRD) was carried out with the CuKα in a Rigaku D/Max-2500/pc X-ray diffractometer. Microstructures were further examined with a transmission electron microscope (TEM) of type JEM-2100. The foils used for TEM observations were obtained by preparing one-sided mechanically prethinned, dimpled, and, in the last step, electrolytic thinning of the thin plates until the electron transparency occurred.

3. Results

The XRD patterns of the samples before and after the HCPEB irradiations are shown in Figure 1. The evident broadening of the Bragg reflection profiles may be attributed to fine grain size and high value of residual stress. Figure 1 also reveals that the peaks of the martensite phase are shifted to lower angles, signifying the increase of the lattice parameter. It might come from the presence of tensile residual stresses in the surface [12]. Additionally, the peaks of carbide (Cr7C3) vanish completely, and the peaks of γ austenite emerge after the irradiations with 5 and 10 pulses. It is indicated that the dissolved Cr7C3 carbide increased the content of carbon in the martensite, which could also result in the increase of the lattice parameter. Note that the peak intensity of the γ-Fe phase increases with the number of pulses, indicating that the volume fraction and/or grain sizes of the γ-phase increases with increasing the number of pulses.

The almost complete dissolving of the carbides is in good agreement with the SEM morphology observations shown in Figure 2. Figure 2(a) reveals the morphology of the treated surface where many craters are present. According to previous studies, such a typical morphology is the result of the local sublayer melting and eruption through the solid outer surface [10, 14]. Figures 2(b) and 2(c) show the typical cross-sectional micrograph of the etched samples after 5 and 10 pulses of the HCPEB irradiation, respectively. The top surface layer, corresponding to the melted layer that is known to be weakly etchable [9, 15] as shown in Figures 2(b) and 2(c), appears with a gray contrast, which completely differs from the other part of samples. The depth of the melted layer measured from Figures 2(b) and 2(c) is about 4–6 μm.

Figure 3(a) exhibits the SEM images of the irradiated surface where the craters are seldom presented. One can see that two typical characteristics of features were formed on the irradiated surface, namely island feature (indicated by letter A) and martensite-like feature (indicated by letter B). High magnification SEM images of both regions, as shown in Figures 3(b) and 3(c), reveal that very fine grains with sizes of 80 nm are approximately homogeneously dispersed on the irradiated surface, clearly indicating that the melted surface layer is mainly composed of refined grains or subgrains.

TEM micrograph shown in Figure 4(a) shows the typical microstructure of the untreated sample, consisting of Cr7C3 carbides and martensite. After 5 pulses, as shown in Figure 4(b), the original carbides phase disappears, and the grains with sizes from 50 to 150 nm are formed. After 10 pulses, similar microstructure was observed in Figure 4(c) compared to its 5 pulses counterpart. The primary differences lie in that a little larger grain sizes (about 80–200 nm) were obtained for 10 pulses sample. It is worth noting that the interiors of the fine grain appear to be clean without any detectable defects. The corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (Figure 4(d)) shows a random crystallographic orientation, indicating the formation of equiaxed fine γ austenite grain structure in the melted layer. A careful look at the micrograph in Figures 4(b) and 4(c) also reveals very fine precipitates with sizes below 20 nm. They are often present at the grain boundaries (Figure 4(b)) and triple junctions (Figure 4(c)). Their presence at grain boundary and/or triple junctions suggests that they precipitated from the solid state in nature.

The formation of fine precipitates can be attributed to the rapid quenching process from the supersaturated Fe (C) solid solution after the dissolution of the carbides. The transient cooling process inhibits the precipitation and growth of carbides and finally leads to the formation of very fine carbide precipitates.

The surface structure is more pronouncedly characterized by the nanostructure austenite. Stahli et al. observed the formation of a thin layer (about 0.3 μm) of a nanoaustenite structure after irradiating a prequenched bearing steel using a pulsed laser [16]. Similar results were also observed in D2 steel [9, 15] HSS S6-5-2 steel [17], and M50 steel [18] irradiated by the multiple pulses of the HCPEB irradiation. Our observation is a little different from the studies of Zou et al. [9, 15, 18]. In their studies, similar austenite grains were observed after the HCPEB remelting of the D2 steel, and so forth. However, they concluded that the austenite has a high orientation tendency. Comparatively, in our study, a random crystallographic orientation and equiaxed fine austenite grain structure were obtained.

An interesting phenomenon found in the present work is the stabilization of the austenite in the melted layer of the irradiated samples despite the very high cooling rate undergone by the surface of the sample. In the present case, the austenite directly grows from the melt during the rapid solidification process, and the high amounts of Cr and C in this phase due to the dissolution of the initial carbide particles are an important factor for suppressing the martensitic transformation [9]. In addition, the very fine size of the austenite grains is another factor for the stabilization of the austenite phase because it will significantly enhance its strength and make the accommodation of a martensitic variant more difficult [15]. Finally, in our opinion, the thermal stress induced by the surface irradiation may be an important factor which should affect the formation of fine austenite. Based on Bardenshtein et al.’s research [19], austenite is favored by the thermal stresses. When an electron beam irradiates the target, due to the drastic temperature change, a steep temperature gradient is generated along the incident direction of the beam. However, due to the lateral confinement along the surface, the thermal expansion in the directions vertical to the beam is strongly resisted, causing the surface thermal stress. This external force increased the internal stress to an extraordinarily high level [20]. The microstructure of the sublayer beneath the melted layer was also investigated, and the results are shown in Figure 5. It illuminates the substructure in some of the preformed martensite plates, indicating the formation of deformation twins within martensite plates. In Figure 5(b), very high density of dislocations was produced in the interior of pre-formed martensite plates. Apparently, high density of dislocations was introduced by the intense deformation under the action of high value of applied stresses. It is reasonably believed that the formation of the twins in the preformed martensite plates was mainly resulted from the high applied stresses and the strain rate due to the rapid heating and cooling caused by HCPEB irradiation [20]. Therefore, the formation of fine austenite structure in this work is closely related to the thermal stresses induced by HCPEB irradiation.

It is well known that surface nanostructures exhibit superior mechanical properties compared to conventional coarse-grained materials. Moreover, high value of residual stresses accumulated in the subsurface layer below the top nanostructure surface are favored to the improvement of the surface performance. In conclusion, HCPEB irradiations provide an effective method for fabricating surface nanostructure.

4. Conclusions

The initial samples of 3Cr13 steel were irradiated by high-current pulsed electron beam. The surface structures were investigated in detail using X-ray diffraction, SEM, and TEM. According to experimental results, we conclude as follows.

After HCPEB posttreatments, irradiated surface melted, and a supersaturated Fe (C) solid solution phase was formed after multiple bombardments. Rapid solidification caused the formation of two nanostructures consisting of fine austenite grains (50–150 nm) and very fine carbides precipitates in the melted surface layer via dissolution of carbides and crater eruption. Rapid heating and cooling induced heavy plastic deformation beneath the melted layer, which lead to the formation of deformation twins and high density of dislocations within martensite plates. The dissolution of the carbides and the formation of the supersaturated Fe (C) solid solution play a determining role on the microstructure evolution. Furthermore, the formation of the fine austenite structure is closely related to the thermal stresses induced by the HCPEB irradiation. The effects of both high carbon content and high value of stresses increase the stability of the austenite, which leads to the complete suppressing of martensitic transformation.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1233111 and 50671042), to which the authors are very grateful.

References

  1. R. W. Cahn, “Nanostructured materials,” Nature, vol. 348, no. 6300, pp. 389–390, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  2. Z. B. Wang, N. R. Tao, W. P. Tong, J. Lu, and K. Lu, “Diffusion of chromium in nanocrystalline iron produced by means of surface mechanical attrition treatment,” Acta Materialia, vol. 51, no. 14, pp. 4319–4329, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Z. B. Wang, N. R. Tao, S. Li et al., “Effect of surface nanocrystallization on friction and wear properties in low carbon steel,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 352, no. 1-2, pp. 144–149, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. H. Chen, R. M. Ren, X. J. Zhao, and Y. J. Zhang, “Surface nanostructures in commercial pure Ti induced by high energy shot peening,” Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 215–218, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  5. X. Wu, N. Tao, Y. Hong, B. Xu, J. Lu, and K. Lu, “Microstructure and evolution of mechanically-induced ultrafine grain in surface layer of AL-alloy subjected to USSP,” Acta Materialia, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 2075–2084, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Sato, N. Tsuji, Y. Minamino, and Y. Koizumi, “Formation of nanocrystalline surface layers in various metallic materials by near surface severe plastic deformation,” Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, vol. 5, no. 1-2, pp. 145–152, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. D. Pogrebnjak, V. S. Ladysev, N. A. Pogrebnjak et al., “Comparison of radiation damage and mechanical and tribological properties of α-Fe exposed to intense pulsed electron and ion beams,” Vacuum, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 45–52, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. L. E. Xiaoyun, Y. Sha, Z. Weijiang, H. Baoxi, W. Yugang, and X. Jianming, “Computer simulation of thermal-mechanical effects of high intensity pulsed ion beams on a metal surface,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 128-129, no. 1, pp. 381–386, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  9. J. X. Zou, T. Grosdidier, K. M. Zhang, and C. Dong, “Mechanisms of nanostructure and metastable phase formations in the surface melted layers of a HCPEB-treated D2 steel,” Acta Materialia, vol. 54, no. 20, pp. 5409–5419, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. M. Zhang, J. X. Zou, T. Grosdidier, and C. Dong, “Crater-formation-induced metastable structure in an AISI D2 steel treated with a pulsed electron beam,” Vacuum, vol. 86, no. 9, pp. 1273–1277, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. X. Zou, K. M. Zhang, S. Z. Hao, C. Dong, and T. Grosdidier, “Mechanisms of hardening, wear and corrosion improvement of 316 L stainless steel by low energy high current pulsed electron beam surface treatment,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 519, no. 4, pp. 1404–1415, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. M. Zhang, J. X. Zou, B. Bolle, and T. Grosdidier, “Evolution of residual stress states in surface layers of an AISI D2 steel treated by low energy high current pulsed electron beam,” Vaccum, vol. 87, pp. 60–68, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  13. K. M. Zhang, J. X. Zou, T. Grosdidier, and C. Dong, “Microstructure and property modifications of an AISI H13 (4Cr5MoSiV) steel induced by pulsed electron beam treatment,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1349–1355, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Y. Qin, X. G. Wang, C. Dong et al., “Temperature field and formation of crater on the surface induced by high current pulsed electron beam bombardment,” Acta Physica Sinica, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 3043–3048, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  15. J. X. Zou, T. Grosdidier, K. M. Zhang, B. Gao, S. Z. Hao, and C. Dong, “Microstructures and phase formations in the surface layer of an AISI D2 steel treated with pulsed electron beam,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 434-435, pp. 707–709, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. G. Stähli and C. Sturzenegger, “On the formation of austentic boundary layers by short laser-pulse reaction with steel,” Scripta Metallurgica, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 617–622, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  17. V. P. Rotshtein, D. I. Proskurovsky, G. E. Ozur, Y. U. F. Ivanov, and A. B. Markov, “Surface modification and alloying of metallic materials with low-energy high-current electron beams,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 180-181, pp. 377–381, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. G. Z. Tang, F. J. Xu, G. H. Fan, X. X. Ma, and L. Q. Wang, “Mechanisms of microstructure formations in M50 steel melted layer by high current pulsed electron beam,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, vol. 288, pp. 1–5, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  19. A. Bardenshtein, L. Bushnev, E. Dudarev, A. Markov, and V. Rotshtein, “Thermal stresses and twinning in thin copper samples irradiated with a high-current electron beam,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Congress on Radiation Physics, High Current Electronics and Modification of Materials, vol. 3, pp. 43–52, Tomsk, Russia, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  20. Q. F. Guan, Q. Y. Zhang, C. Dong, and G. T. Zou, “Deformation twining in single-crystal aluminum induced by high-current pulsed electron beam,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 40, no. 18, pp. 5049–5052, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Zhiyong Han et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1423 Views | 934 Downloads | 9 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.