Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

The Potential of Nanomaterials for Drug Delivery, Cell Tracking, and Regenerative Medicine 2013

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 719168 |

Basem A. Moosa, Afnan Mashat, Wengang Li, Karim Fhayli, Niveen M. Khashab, "pH Responsive Self-Assembly of Cucurbit[7]urils and Polystyrene-Block-Polyvinylpyridine Micelles for Hydrophobic Drug Delivery", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2013, Article ID 719168, 6 pages, 2013.

pH Responsive Self-Assembly of Cucurbit[7]urils and Polystyrene-Block-Polyvinylpyridine Micelles for Hydrophobic Drug Delivery

Academic Editor: Haifeng Chen
Received25 Jun 2013
Revised07 Sep 2013
Accepted09 Sep 2013
Published19 Nov 2013


Polystyrene-block-polyvinylpyridine (PS-b-P4VP) polypseudorotaxanes with cucurbit[7]urils (CB[7]) were prepared from water soluble PS-b-P4VPH+ polymer and CB[7] in aqueous solution at room temperature. At acidic and neutral pH, the pyridinium block of PS-b-P4VP is protonated (PS-b-P4VPH+) pushing CB[7] to preferably host the P4VP block. At basic pH (pH 8), P4VP is not charged and thus is not able to strongly complex CB[7]. This phenomenon was verified further by monitoring the release of pyrene, a hydrophobic cargo model, from a PS-b-P4VPH+/CB[7] micellar membrane. Release study of UV active pyrene from the membrane at different pH values revealed that the system is only operational under basic conditions and that the host-guest interaction of CB[7] with P4VPH+ significantly slows down cargo release.

1. Introduction

Self-assembly of polystyrene-block-poly(4-vinylpyridine) PS-b-P4VP amphiphilic block copolymer has been studied extensively with different metals (because a variety of metal salts can be selectively coordinated to the PVP block) and at different temperatures and pH values [18]. PS-b-P4VP is a well-known block copolymer that is commercially available and can be easily synthesized by sequential anionic polymerization of styrene followed by 4-vinylpyridine (4VP) in tetrahydrofuran (THF) at −78°C under nitrogen [9]. Multiple changes in aggregate morphology (spheres, rods, lamellae, and mixture of aggregates) of this block copolymer have been described as a function of pH [7]. The reason for this behavior or morphological complexity can be ascribed to the amphiprotic nature of P4VP where the addition of acid or base introduces ionic groups into the corona chains. Polymer micellar morphologies are useful in the field of controlled drug release, and so we reported the morphological changes and Dox release from PS-b-P4VP micellar membrane at different pH values [8].

Cucurbit[n]urils (CB[n], of glycoluril units) are a class of barrel-shaped macrocyclic hosts with symmetric carbonyl-lined portals [1016]. They are capable of forming inclusion complexes with appropriately sized guest compounds in water with high affinity (  M−1) [17]. Cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) has been shown to form a variety of strong, stable complexes with pyridinium cation type compounds. Polymers with such aromatic moieties promote the creation of a wide range of macromolecular architectures in water, which are held together by host-guest interaction with CB[7]. Pseudorotaxanes, a class of supramolecular species in which a molecular thread is encircled by a molecular bead, have been studied extensively [1821]. Many reports on CB[7] have been published, including the recognition of CB[7] towards the aliphatic amines ions, pyridylmethyl-ended alkylammonium ions, and other guest molecules. The formation of pseudorotaxanes, rotaxanes, pseudopolyrotaxanes, polyrotaxanes, molecular machines, molecular necklaces, and so forth from CB[7] has also been reported [1820, 2224]. Inclusion complexes with CB[7] can induce self-assembly of block copolymer complexes and result in the formation of systems of pseudorotaxane with different morphologies and physical properties [25]. By complexing stimuli-responsive polymers with CB[7], a wide variety of polymer/CB[7] complexes with amphiphilic properties may be produced. We recently reported the pH sensitive behavior of PS-b-P4VP micelles; however, the host-guest interaction and self-assembly of this block copolymer with macrocycles such as CB[7] have not been reported before [8]. Herein, self-assembly of PS-b-P4VPH+ with CB[7] to afford a controlled release system for hydrophobic cargo is reported. It is a supramolecular approach using CB[7] to slow cargo release, which can be very crucial for drug delivery systems. PS-b-P4VPH+ was used in this study because its self-assembly and morphology at different pH values are extensively studied in the literature. Pyrene was chosen as the cargo as it is a neutral, UV active, and hydrophobic molecule (most drugs are hydrophobic) that is too big to be enclosed by CB[7]. Moreover, CB[7] does not absorb at 245 nm, so it will not affect UV measurements [26]. PS-b-P4VP/CB[7] micellar solution was casted into a membrane and tested under different pH values (Figure 1).

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Polystyrene-b-poly(4-vinylpyridine) block copolymer (PS-b-P4VP, 81 000-b-57 000 g/mol) was purchased from Polymer Source, Inc. Dimethylformamide (DMF), CB[7], pyrene, and other buffer solutions were used as purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA.

2.2. PS-b-P4VPH+·CB[7] Polypseudorotaxanes Complex for NMR

To a stirred solution of 5 mg CB[7] in 1 mL, D2O/DCl (pD 3) was added a solution of 10 mg of PS-b-P4VP in 0.5 mL d7-DMF and stirred for 10 hours at room temperature. The solution was filtered and the filtrate was characterized by 1H-NMR, SEM, and TEM.

2.3. pH Responsive Micellar Membrane Preparation

A micellar solution containing 20 wt% PS-b-P4VP block copolymer was loaded with pyrene (0.005 μg per 2 μg polymer) in DMF. Water (0.5 mL) was then added dropwise to the DMF solution and stirred overnight. The mixture was then transferred into a dialysis bag where it was dialyzed in water (pH 3) and CB[7] (5 mg) aqueous solution at room temperature (20°C) overnight. The dialysis bag was then removed and washed with water three times before the contents were lyophilized for 48 hrs. The mixture was then redissolved in a minimum amount of DMF and casted on a glass plate using casting blades with 200 μm gate height. The room temperature was 20°C with 60% relative humidity. The glass plate was then immersed in water to peel the membrane off. The membrane was finally air dried overnight before UV testing. The control solution was prepared using the same method but without incorporating CB[7]. The release test was carried out using 2 mg of the casted membrane and using UV spectrometer Cary 5000, at 245 nm at a series of pH values (pH 4.0 to 8.0) two times on duplicate.

2.4. Instruments

Pyrene release from micellar membrane was measured using UV-Vis spectrophotometer Cary 5000, at 245 nm. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using a Quanta 600 FEG scanning electron microscope (SEM) from FEI company, USA. The 1H NMR spectrum was recorded on Bruker Avance III (400 MHz) spectrometer, using DMF-d7 as the solvent. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements were done using the Zetasizer Nano from Malvern Instruments. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images were obtained using Titan 3 80–300 electron microscope (TEM) from FEI company, USA.

3. Results and Discussion

The complexation of CB[7] with PS-b-P4VPH+ was first verified by NMR. Figure 2 revealed (i) disappearance of styrene peaks, (ii) shifting of pyridine peaks in acidic media, and (ii) broadening of all peaks. This suggests that the motion of both blocks in an aqueous solution is highly restricted and the absence of the styrene peaks (Figure 2(b)) proves the formation of what is called a “frozen micelle” [22, 23], as the NMR cannot detect the hydrophobic core of the particles. When CB[7] was added (Figure 2(c)), a clear shift of the pyridinium block was observed which suggests a complexation between the protonated pyridine and CB[7].

PS-b-P4VPH+ and PS-b-P4VPH+/CB[7] micelles were then characterized using SEM and TEM. More aggregates were observed using TEM in PS-b-P4VPH+/CB[7] sample (Figure 3(b)) versus PS-b-P4VPH+ (Figure 3(a)). A slight difference in terms of morphology between the nanoparticles with and without CB[7] can be seen using SEM. The surface of the polymeric micelles was smooth (Figure 4(a)), while that of the complex was coarse (Figure 4(b)).

DLS measurements showed a distribution of the hydrodynamic diameter with mean values of 76 and 66 nm for PS-P4VPH+ nanoparticles and PS-P4VPH+/CB[7] nanoparticles, respectively (Figure 4). The difference in size of nanoparticles in the dried and solvated phase is consistent with that of a swollen composite polymeric system in aqueous media. The diameter distribution observed by DLS can be explained by interparticle interactions or the statistical distribution of the number of macromolecules within individual particles [27].

3.1. Payload Release Investigation

To investigate the host-guest effect of CB[7] complexation on hydrophobic cargo release, pyrene was loaded into PS-P4VPH+ micelles as described in the experimental section. UV spectrometer was employed to measure the amount of pyrene released into the aqueous solution at a series of pH values (pH 4.0 to 8.0) at room temperature (Figure 5).

Two types of pyrene-loaded membranes were prepared, one with (pH 4′−8′) and the other without CB[7] (pH 4−8) (control experiment). PS-b-P4VP micellar membrane (2 mg) was placed in the bottom of a UV spectrometer cell without stirring. At pH 4-5, negligible amount of pyrene was released from both samples, where at pH 6-7, a very small amount of pyrene <5% was released during a long period of time (Figure 5), which suggests that (i) the encapsulation efficiency of this membrane is ~95% (no major leakage) and (ii) it is very stable at physiological pH 7.4. At pH 8, a clear release of pyrene was observed which is due to the deprotonation of the pyridinium ion block, which forms the corona shell of the micelle at high pH as we previously reported [8]. The pyridinium molecules shrink and expose the pyrene-loaded PS core to the buffer solution, resulting in a substantial pyrene release (Figure 5). The major difference between the two profiles pH 8 and pH 8′ is that the pyrene release was slower in the presence of CB[7]. This is due to CB[7] threading the pyridinium block which will decrease the deprotonation rate and thus hinders the release of pyrene. To calculate the loading efficiency, the membrane was digested at pH 1 and the amount of released pyrene was measured by UV. Pyrene was loaded into the micellar membrane with a loading efficiency of about 0.02 wt%, which means that every 2 mg of the micellar membrane contains 0.4 μg of pyrene.

4. Conclusion

A supramolecular approach for building a potential controlled drug delivery system is both simple and efficient. CB[7] strongly complexes P4VPH+, making up the corona shell of the micelle, at acidic and neutral pH which affords a closed delivery system with minimal leakage. Under basic conditions, the micelles will shrink and cargo release will be initiated. The presence of CB[7] slows down the release rate and thus provides more control over this system. Designing drug delivery systems that offer prolonged drug release and are only operational under basic pH, such that the pancreatic cancer duct can afford both controlled and targeted release to diseased tissues [28, 29]. Further studies are now underway to incorporate this concept into biocompatible block copolymers for in vivo applications.


The authors thank King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) for the financial support. There is no financial gain from any commercial material used.


  1. R. P. Zhu, Y. M. Wang, and W. D. He, “Multiple morphological micelles formed from the self-assembly of poly(styrene)-b-poly(4-vinylpyridine) containing cobalt dodecyl benzene sulfonate,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 41, pp. 2088–2096, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. T. Zhu, H. Z. Yu, and W. Jiang, “Morphological transition of aggregates from ABA amphiphilic triblock copolymer induced by hydrogen bonding,” Macromolecules, vol. 38, no. 17, pp. 7492–7501, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. Ruokolainen, G. ten Brinke, and O. Ikkala, “Supramolecular polymeric materials with hierarchical structure-within-structure morphologies,” Advanced Materials, vol. 11, pp. 777–780, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  4. O. Ikkala and G. Ten Brinke, “Functional materials based on self-assembly of polymeric supramolecules,” Science, vol. 295, no. 5564, pp. 2407–2409, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. O. Ikkala and G. Ten Brinke, “Hierarchical self-assembly in polymeric complexes: towards functional materials,” Chemical Communications, vol. 19, pp. 2131–2137, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Z. Gao, S. K. Varshney, S. Wong, and A. Eisenberg, “Block copolymer “crew-cut” micelles in water,” Macromolecules, vol. 27, no. 26, pp. 7923–7927, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  7. H. Shen, L. Zhang, and A. Eisenberg, “Multiple pH-induced morphological changes in aggregates of polystyrene-block-poly(4-vinylpyridine) in DMF/H2O mixtures,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 121, pp. 2728–2740, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. X. Yang, B. A. Moosa, L. Deng, L. Zhao, and N. M. Khashab, “PH-triggered micellar membrane for controlled release microchips,” Polymer Chemistry, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 2543–2547, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Zhu, A. Eisenberg, and R. B. Lennox, “Interfacial behavior of block polyelectrolytes. 1. Evidence for novel surface micelle formation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 113, no. 15, pp. 5583–5588, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  10. H.-K. Lee, K. M. Park, Y. J. Jeon et al., “Vesicle formed by amphiphilc cucurbit[6]uril: versatile, noncovalent modification of the vesicle surface, and multivalent binding of sugar-decorated vesicles to lectin,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 14, pp. 5006–5007, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. Kim, I.-S. Jung, S.-Y. Kim et al., “New cucurbituril homologues: syntheses, isolation, characterization, and X-ray crystal structures of cucurbit[n]uril (n = 5, 7, and 8),” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 540–541, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. I. Day, A. P. Arnold, R. J. Blanch, and B. Snushall, “Controlling factors in the synthesis of cucurbituril and its homologues,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 66, no. 24, pp. 8094–8100, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. G. Celtek, M. Artar, O. A. Scherman, and D. Tuncel, “Sequence-specific self-sorting of the binding sites of a ditopic guest by cucurbituril homologues and subsequent formation of a hetero[4]pseudorotaxane,” Chemistry, vol. 15, no. 40, pp. 10360–10363, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. F. W. L. Vögtle, Mock in Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry, vol. 2, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1996.
  15. K. Kim, “Mechanically interlocked molecules incorporating cucurbituril and their supramolecular assemblies,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 31, pp. 96–107, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. Lagona, P. Mukhopadhyay, S. Chakrabarti, and L. Isaacs, “The cucurbit[n]uril family,” Angewandte Chemie (International Edition), vol. 44, no. 31, pp. 4844–4870, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Y. Jon, N. Selvapalam, D. H. Oh et al., “Facile synthesis of cucurbit[n]uril derivatives via direct functionalization: expanding utilization of cucurbit[n]uril,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 125, no. 34, pp. 10186–10187, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Sempere, G. Fernandez, and F. Wurthner, “Self-sorting phenomena in complex supramolecular systems,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 111, pp. 5784–5814, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. B. Rosen, C. Wilson, D. Wilson, M. Peterca, M. Imam, and V. Percec, “Dendron-mediated self-assembly, disassembly, and self-organization of complex systems,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 109, pp. 6275–6540, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. Harada, A. Hashidzume, H. Yamaguchi, and Y. Takashima, “Polymeric rotaxanes,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 109, pp. 5974–6023, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. N. Momčilović, P. Clark, A. Boydston, and R. Grubbs, “One-pot synthesis of polyrotaxanes via acyclic diene metathesis polymerization of supramolecular monomers,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, pp. 19087–19089, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. I. Yoo, B.-H. Sohn, W.-C. Zin, J. C. Jung, and C. Park, “Mixtures of diblock copolymer micelles by different mixing protocols,” Macromolecules, vol. 40, no. 23, pp. 8323–8328, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Jacquin, P. Muller, H. Cottet, and O. Théodoly, “Self-assembly of charged amphiphilic diblock copolymers with insoluble blocks of decreasing hydrophobicity: from kinetically frozen colloids to macrosurfactants,” Langmuir, vol. 26, no. 24, pp. 18681–18693, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B. P. Bastakoti, S. Guragain, Y. Yokoyama, S.-I. Yusa, and K. Nakashima, “Incorporation and release behavior of amitriptylene in core-shell-corona type triblock copolymer micelles,” Colloids and Surfaces B, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 734–740, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. G. Chen and M. Jiang, “Cyclodextrin-based inclusion complexation bridging supramolecular chemistry and macromolecular self-assembly,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 40, pp. 2254–2266, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Y. Ling and A. E. Kaifer, “Complexation of poly(phenylenevinylene) precursors and monomers by cucurbituril hosts,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 18, no. 25, pp. 5944–5949, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Z. Keresztessy, M. Bodnár, E. Ber et al., “Self-assembling chitosan/poly-γ-glutamic acid nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery,” Colloid and Polymer Science, vol. 287, no. 7, pp. 759–765, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. Ishiguro, M. C. Steward, R. W. Wilson, and R. M. Case, “Bicarbonate secretion in interlobular ducts from guinea-pig pancreas,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 495, no. 1, pp. 179–191, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  29. D. Tuveson and D. Hanahan, “Translational medicine: cancer lessons from mice to humans,” Nature, vol. 471, no. 7338, pp. 316–317, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Basem A. Moosa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.