Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

Nanomaterials for Environmental Applications

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 150150 |

Zhen Wang, Lu Yin, Ziwen Chen, Guowang Zhou, Huixiang Shi, "Photodegradation of Methyl Orange Using Magnetically Recoverable AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 Photocatalyst under Visible Light", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2014, Article ID 150150, 6 pages, 2014.

Photodegradation of Methyl Orange Using Magnetically Recoverable AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 Photocatalyst under Visible Light

Academic Editor: Haiqiang Wang
Received07 Feb 2014
Accepted26 Feb 2014
Published01 Apr 2014


A novel magnetically recoverable AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 hybrid was prepared by a simple deposition-precipitation approach and characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS). The results revealed that the photocatalytic activity and stability of AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 composite toward decomposition of methyl orange (MO) dye were superior to those of pure Ag3PO4 under visible light irradiation. The photocatalytic activity enhancement of AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 is closely related to the efficient separation of electron-hole pairs derived from the matching band potentials between Ag3PO4 and AgBr, as well as the good conductivity of Fe3O4. Moreover, the photocatalyst could be easily separated by applying an external magnetic field due to its magnetic property. The quenching effects of different scavengers proved that active h+ and played the major role for the MO degradation. This work would provide new insight for the construction of visible light responsible photocatalysts with high performance, good stability, and recoverability.

1. Introduction

As a promising way to meet the challenges of environmental pollution, photocatalysis has attracted considerable interest over the past few decades [14]. With the shortage of energy sources becoming severe, significant efforts have now been directed toward the exploitation of highly efficient visible light responsible photocatalysts which can potentially utilize solar energy [58]. Very recently, Ag3PO4 has been put forward as a novel photocatalyst with excellent oxidative capability for the purification of water under visible light irradiation, which thus inspired great enthusiasm [913]. It seems to be a promising material for efficient photodecomposition of organic contaminants. Nevertheless, it should be noted that, in the present Ag3PO4 photocatalytic system, Ag3PO4 is prone to be photochemically decomposed to Ag if no sacrificial reagent is involved [14], which inevitably becomes a main obstacle for Ag3PO4 in practical application.

Recent reports indicated that epitaxial growth of an AgX (X = Br, I) nanoshell on the surface of Ag3PO4 could greatly enhance the chemical stability and activity of Ag3PO4 [1517]. For instance, Bi et al. introduced AgX (X = Cl, Br, I) for the modification of Ag3PO4 by a simple in situ ion-exchange method and revealed the enhanced photocatalytic properties and stability [16]. Cao et al. successfully synthesized AgBr/Ag3PO4 as highly efficient and stable photocatalyst [17]. This is mainly because AgX and Ag3PO4 have matching band potentials, which could promote the transfer and separation of photoexcited carriers through their heterojunctions. Other researchers also confirmed the enhancement in AgBr-based composites [16]. Thus, combining Ag3PO4 with AgX is a more promising and fascinating visible light response photocatalyst than pure Ag3PO4.

For nano- or microsized photocatalysts, another problem that restrains their application is how to effectively separate the used photocatalysts from the mixed system in a simple way [18, 19]. Immobilizing catalysts on magnetic substrates by feasible methods is proven to be an effective approach for removing and recycling particles [2023]. Moreover, Fe3O4 has excellent conductivity. Thus, Fe3O4 could act as an electron-transfer channel and acceptor, which would suppress the photogenerated carrier recombination [24]. Therefore, given the magnetic separation ability and conducting properties of Fe3O4, it can be foreseen that fabrication of AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 heterostructures could combine the advantages of activity of AgBr@Ag3PO4 with the merit of easy separation due to the incorporation of Fe3O4.

Nowadays, toxic organic dyes and their effluents are among the largest groups of water pollutants. The removal of these nonbiodegradable dye molecules from the environment is a crucial ecological problem, for their toxicity and potential carcinogenicity. To solve such pollution, the methyl orange (MO), which is a typical azo dye for textile industry, is chosen as the targeted pollutant in this paper. Herein, we prepared a novel magnetically separable AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 composite via a simple deposition-precipitation approach. The catalysts can be easily recovered by applying an external magnetic field. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this composite favors the separation of electron-hole pairs and exhibits the enhancement of stability and activity in the photocatalytic decomposition of MO under visible light.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

All chemicals were of analytical grade and used as received without purification. Nano Fe3O4 (particle size <50 nm) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

2.2. Sample Preparation

Firstly, the Fe3O4 nanoparticles were dispersed in distilled water (20 mL, 7.5 mM) and then added to the AgNO3 solution (10 mL, 0.1 M). The solution was sonicated for 10 min. Subsequently, Na2HPO4 aqueous solution (5 mL, 0.5 mM) was added dropwise to the above suspension. After sonicating for 10 min, a definite concentration of NaBr solution was added slowly into the above mixture. The theoretical molar percentage of added Br/original P was controlled to be 80%. The reaction was allowed to proceed for 10 min under sonication. Finally, the obtained precipitate was separated by an external magnetic field, washed with deionized water for several times, and then dried in a vacuum oven at 60°C for 12 h. The final sample was labeled as AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4.

For comparison, pure Ag3PO4 particles were prepared by a simple precipitation method according to the previous study [14]. Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 and AgBr@Ag3PO4 were also prepared by the same conditions by replacing the NaBr or Fe3O4 solution with water.

2.3. Characterization

For XRD studies, the samples were recorded on X’Pert Pro PANalytical automatic diffractometer, using Cu-Kα radiation () in the range of 10°–80°. TEM images were taken on a JEM-1200 (JEOL) microscope with an acceleration voltage of 80 kV. The UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra in the range of 230–700 nm were recorded on a Pgeneral TU-1901 PC spectrometer, using BaSO4 as a standard.

2.4. Photocatalytic Tests

The photocatalytic activity of the sample was evaluated by photodegradation of MO at room temperature. Briefly, 60 mg of photocatalyst was added to an aqueous solution of MO (100 mL, 20 mg/L). The suspension was mechanically stirred for 45 min in dark conditions to reach complete adsorption-desorption equilibrium. Then, it was irradiated with a 150 w Xe lamp with a 400 nm light filter. During the illumination, at given time intervals, about 3 mL aliquots were sampled, magnetically separated, and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min to remove the remaining particles. The concentrations of MO were analyzed on a UV-Vis spectrophotometer at 461 nm.

Additionally, the recycling experiments were performed for three consecutive cycles to test the stability and reusability of the as-prepared AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 composite. After each cycle, the photocatalyst was separated by an external magnetic field, washed thoroughly with deionized water, and then dried at 60°C for the next test.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Characterization

XRD was used to investigate the different crystalline structures of the as-prepared photocatalysts. As shown in Figure 1(a), all the characteristic diffraction peaks can be readily indexed as the different crystalline planes of Ag3PO4 (JCPDS, card number 06-0505). From Figure 1(b), the diffraction peaks can be well indexed to magnetite Fe3O4 (JCPDS, card number 19-0629). For the pattern of AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 (Figure 1(c)), besides the peaks of Ag3PO4 and Fe3O4, the diffraction peaks of AgBr at 26.6°, 30.9°, 44.3°, and 64.4° corresponding to the (111), (200), (220), and (400) have also been detected, confirming that AgBr have been formed on the Ag3PO4 surface after reaction with NaBr. The diffraction peaks of Fe3O4 at 35.5°, 43.2°, and 62.8° correspond to the (311), (400), and (440). However, as shown in Figures 1(b) and 1(c), the diffraction peaks from Fe3O4 turn weaker in the as-prepared AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 composite due to the low content of Fe3O4. These observations indicate the successful synthesis of AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 heterostructure.

The morphological and microstructural details of the AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 composite were then examined by TEM measurement. As shown in Figure 2(a), the Fe3O4 exhibits regular spherical shape with diameter of about 20–40 nm. Figure 2(b) reveals that the Ag3PO4 possess an irregularly spherical morphology with diameter of 100–500 nm. Some big particles can be attributed to the agglomeration of small particles. In the case of AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 hybrid, as can be seen from Figures 2(c) and 2(d) in different magnification, it is evident that, alongside the Ag3PO4, the Fe3O4 nanoparticles are firmly anchored. This suggests a good combination between Ag3PO4 and Fe3O4 particles. Unfortunately, we failed to obtain TEM images of the AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 samples, because AgBr nanoshells were easily destroyed by the high-energy electron beam during the measurements, as Wang et al. reported [25].

Figure 3 shows the UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of Ag3PO4, Fe3O4, and the related complex photocatalysts. Pure Ag3PO4 shows a sharp fundamental absorption edge at about 520 nm, in accordance with the previous observation [26]. In contrast to pure Ag3PO4, the absorption of AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 sample toward the visible light region is remarkably enhanced. It could be mainly attributed to the introduction of Fe3O4 nanoparticles, which is a well-performing light harvesting material as we can see in Figure 3.

3.2. Photocatalytic Performance

The photocatalytic activity of the as-prepared AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 was evaluated by the degradation of MO under visible light irradiation. Figure 4 gives the absorption spectra of an aqueous solution of MO exposed to visible irradiation for various time periods. In the reaction process, the color of the MO solution gradually diminished (as the inset shows), and the typical absorption peak at 461 nm disappeared after 15 min, indicating that the chromophoric structure of the dye was completely destroyed assisted by AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4.

For comparison, the photodegradation of MO was also performed with photolysis, pure Ag3PO4, Fe3O4, Ag3PO4/Fe3O4, and AgBr@Ag3PO4.

As can be seen from Figure 5, negligible degradation was detected under photolysis or using Fe3O4 as photocatalyst. Similar to the previous reports, the pure Ag3PO4 sample reveals a nice photodegradation performance under visible light (47.7% in 15 min). For comparison, after epitaxial growth of AgBr nanoshell on the surface of Ag3PO4, the AgBr@Ag3PO4 show much higher photocatalytic activity for the degradation of MO dye (94% in 15 min). This is mainly due to the effective coupling where the conduction band and valence band potentials of AgBr semiconductor are more negative than that of Ag3PO4, which could promote the transfer and separation of photoexcited electron-hole pairs [16]. In addition, the combination of Fe3O4 with Ag3PO4 also achieved good degradation efficiency (87.3% in 15 min). As Xi et al. explained, because of the excellent conductivity, the charge transport is improved after introduction of Fe3O4 into the composite, which would enhance the separation of electron-hole pairs [24]. Furthermore, just as the experimental results confirmed, once integrating the conductivity of Fe3O4 and the structural match of AgBr with Ag3PO4 particles, the AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 exhibits the highest photocatalytic efficiency.

3.3. Stability and Recyclability of AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4

The stability of a photocatalyst is one of the most important parameters for its application. As our previous study demonstrated [27], Ag3PO4 is quite unstable at repeated use. However, as Figure 6(a) presents, the MO solution is quickly bleached after every MO decomposition experiment, and photocatalyst ternary AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 is stable enough during the three repeated experiments without exhibiting any obvious loss of photocatalytic activity. Besides, the magnetic separation ability of the photocatalyst is impressive. As shown in Figure 6(b), the as-prepared AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 can be conveniently collected from the solution by applying an external magnetic field within 3 min. This desirable property is what other conventional powder photocatalysts lack. Therefore, the as-prepared AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 composite can work as an effective photocatalyst for pollutant degradation with good stability and recoverability.

3.4. Involved Active Species in the Photocatalysis

In order to investigate the photocatalytic degradation mechanism of AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4, it is necessary to verify the active species involved in the photocatalysis. Generally, photoinduced active species including , radicals, and are expected to be involved in the photocatalytic process. Herein, i-PrOH was added to the reaction system as an scavenger, EDTA-Na2 was introduced as a scavenger of , and BQ was adopted to quench [28].

Figure 7 shows that, in the presence of EDTA, the photodegradation of MO was drastically inhibited with the degradation efficiency less than 5%. However, the employment of i-PrOH in the same photocatalytic system made a minor change caused in the photocatalytic degradation of MO. Furthermore, when the radical scavenger (BQ) was introduced, an evident decreasing photocatalytic activity of the AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 composite was observed. These results indicate that active species and contribute most to the photocatalytic system, and the presence of radicals is considered to be of less importance to the reaction. Thus, we can anticipate the possible mechanism for the photocatalytic degradation of MO by AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 composites. Under visible light irradiation, Ag3PO4 and AgBr can be simultaneously excited to form electron-hole () pairs. As is known, AgBr and Ag3PO4 have matching band potentials; the photoinduced electrons can transfer from the CB bottom of AgBr to that of Ag3PO4, further migrate to Fe3O4 particles, and react with the adsorbed oxygen molecule to yield . At the same time, the holes also move in the opposite direction from the VB top of Ag3PO4 to that of AgBr. The separated then mainly participate in the degradation of MO by direct oxidation, which would be together with . However, a small number of can still react with water to produce radicals to degrade MO.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we reported an investigation on the preparation and photocatalytic activity of a novel magnetically recoverable AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 hybrid. Because of the magnetism of Fe3O4 and the matching band between AgBr and Ag3PO4, the as-synthesized AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 nanoparticles exhibited efficient photocatalytic activity, good stability, and recyclability toward decomposition of MO under visible light irradiation. In addition, the quenching effects of different scavengers proved that reactive and played the major role for the MO degradation. We expected that this kind of magnetically separable AgBr@Ag3PO4/Fe3O4 composite would provide new insight for the design and fabrication of high performance photocatalysts toward environmental protection.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors genuinely appreciate the financial support of this work from Major Science and Technology Projects Focus on Social Development Projects of Zhejiang Province (2010C03003 and 2012C03004-1).


  1. S. Malato, P. Fernández-Ibáñez, M. I. Maldonado, J. Blanco, and W. Gernjak, “Decontamination and disinfection of water by solar photocatalysis: recent overview and trends,” Catalysis Today, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 1–59, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. N. Chong, B. Jin, C. W. K. Chow, and C. Saint, “Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: a review,” Water Research, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 2997–3027, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Y. Qu and X. Duan, “Progress, challenge and perspective of heterogeneous photocatalysts,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 42, pp. 2568–2580, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  4. H. Tong, S. Ouyang, Y. Bi, N. Umezawa, M. Oshikiri, and J. Ye, “Nano-photocatalytic materials: possibilities and challenges,” Advanced Materials, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 229–251, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. W. Ren, Z. Ai, F. Jia, L. Zhang, X. Fan, and Z. Zou, “Low temperature preparation and visible light photocatalytic activity of mesoporous carbon-doped crystalline TiO2,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 69, no. 3-4, pp. 138–144, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. Lin, J. Cao, B. Luo, B. Xu, and S. Chen, “Synthesis of novel Z-scheme AgI/Ag/AgBr composite with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 21, pp. 91–95, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. Ren, W. Wang, S. Sun, L. Zhang, and J. Chang, “Enhanced photocatalytic activity of Bi2WO6 loaded with Ag nanoparticles under visible light irradiation,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 92, no. 1-2, pp. 50–55, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. X. Zhang, G. Zhou, H. Zhang, C. Wu, and H. Song, “Characterization and activity of visible light-driven TiO2 photocatalysts co-doped with nitrogen and lanthanum,” Transition Metal Chemistry, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 217–222, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Y. Bi, S. Ouyang, N. Umezawa, J. Cao, and J. Ye, “Facet effect of single-crystalline Ag3PO4 sub-microcrystals on photocatalytic properties,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 17, pp. 6490–6492, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y. Bi, H. Hu, S. Ouyang, Z. Jiao, G. Lu, and J. Ye, “Selective growth of Ag3PO4 submicro-cubes on Ag nanowires to fabricate necklace-like heterostructures for photocatalytic applications,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 22, pp. 14847–14850, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  11. H. Wang, Y. Bai, J. Yang, X. Lang, J. Li, and L. Guo, “A facile way to rejuvenate Ag3PO4 as a recyclable highly efficient photocatalyst,” Chemistry—A European Journal, vol. 18, no. 18, pp. 5524–5529, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. S. Xu and W. D. Zhang, “Monodispersed Ag3PO4 nanocrystals loaded on the surface of spherical Bi2MoO6 with enhanced photocatalytic performance,” Dalton Transactions, vol. 42, pp. 1094–1101, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  13. P. Dong, Y. Wang, B. Cao et al., “Ag3PO4/reduced graphite oxide sheets nanocomposites with highly enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity and stability,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 132-133, pp. 45–53, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  14. W. Wang, B. Cheng, J. Yu, G. Liu, and W. Fan, “Visible-light photocatalytic activity and deactivation mechanism of Ag3PO4 spherical particles,” Chemistry—An Asian journal, vol. 7, pp. 1902–1908, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  15. B. Wang, X. Gu, Y. Zhao, and Y. Qiang, “A comparable study on the photocatalytic activities of Ag3PO4, AgBr and AgBr/Ag3PO4 hybrid microstructures,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 283, pp. 396–401, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  16. Y. Bi, S. Ouyang, J. Cao, and J. Ye, “Facile synthesis of rhombic dodecahedral AgX/Ag3PO4 (X = Cl, Br, I) heterocrystals with enhanced photocatalytic properties and stabilities,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 13, no. 21, pp. 10071–10075, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Cao, B. Luo, H. Lin, B. Xu, and S. Chen, “Visible light photocatalytic activity enhancement and mechanism of AgBr/Ag3PO4 hybrids for degradation of methyl orange,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 217-218, pp. 107–115, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Linley, T. Leshuk, and F. X. Gu, “Magnetically separable water treatment technologies and their role in future advanced water treatment: a patent review,” Clean-Soil Air Water, vol. 41, pp. 1152–1156, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  19. V. Polshettiwar, R. Luque, A. Fihri, H. Zhu, M. Bouhrara, and J.-M. Basset, “Magnetically recoverable nanocatalysts,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 3036–3075, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. X. Xu, X. Shen, G. Zhu, L. Jing, X. Liu, and K. Chen, “Magnetically recoverable Bi2WO6-Fe3O4 composite photocatalysts: fabrication and photocatalytic activity,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 200–202, pp. 521–531, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  21. L. Zhang, W. Wang, S. Sun, Y. Sun, E. Gao, and Z. Zhang, “Elimination of BPA endocrine disruptor by magnetic BiOBr@SiO2@Fe3O4 photocatalyst,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 148-149, pp. 164–169, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  22. L. Zhang, W. Wang, L. Zhou, M. Shang, and S. Sun, “Fe3O4 coupled BiOCl: a highly efficient magnetic photocatalyst,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 90, no. 3-4, pp. 458–462, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. H. Liu, Z. Jia, S. Ji, Y. Zheng, M. Li, and H. Yang, “Synthesis of TiO2/SiO2@Fe3O4 magnetic microspheres and their properties of photocatalytic degradation dyestuff,” Catalysis Today, vol. 175, no. 1, pp. 293–298, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. G. Xi, B. Yue, J. Cao, and J. Ye, “Fe3O4/WO3 hierarchical core-shell structure: high-performance and recyclable visible-light photocatalysis,” Chemistry—A European Journal, vol. 17, no. 18, pp. 5145–5154, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. W. S. Wang, H. Du, R. X. Wang, T. Wen, and A. W. Xu, “Heterostructured Ag3PO4/AgBr/Ag plasmonic photocatalyst with enhanced photocatalytic activity and stability under visible light,” Nanoscale, vol. 5, pp. 3315–3321, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  26. G. Chen, M. Sun, Q. Wei, Y. Zhang, B. Zhu, and B. Du, “Ag3PO4/graphene-oxide composite with remarkably enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity toward dyes in water,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 244-245, pp. 86–93, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  27. Z. Wang, L. Yin, M. Zhang et al., “Synthesis and characterization of Ag3PO4/multiwalled carbon nanotube composite photocatalyst with enhanced photocatalytic activity and stability under visible light,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 49, pp. 1585–1593, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  28. M. Ge, N. Zhu, Y. Zhao, J. Li, and L. Liu, “Sunlight-assisted degradation of dye pollutants in Ag3PO4 suspension,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 51, no. 14, pp. 5167–5173, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Zhen Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.