Research Article | Open Access
Jan-Hau Chang, Heh-Nan Lin, "Investigation of the Photocatalytic Activity of ZnO Nanowires: Substrate Effect and Kinetics Analysis", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2014, Article ID 426457, 6 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/426457
Investigation of the Photocatalytic Activity of ZnO Nanowires: Substrate Effect and Kinetics Analysis
The photocatalytic activity of substrate-supported ZnO nanowires is investigated with a focus on the substrate effect and the photodegradation kinetics. The employed NWs are grown on various substrates by thermal evaporation and a 50 μM rhodamine B solution is used as the target solution. It is found that the photocatalytic activity is facilitated by using a conductive substrate and such a result can be reasonably attributed to the improvement of charge separation. The photodegradation is found to follow a zeroth-order kinetics at high concentrations and a first-order kinetics at low concentrations with a transition at around 10 μM. The present observation is opposed to the commonly accepted first-order kinetics. Degradation constants of 0.58 μM·min−1 for the zeroth-order and 0.028 min−1 for the first-order have been achieved. The first-order constant also compares favorably with reported values.
Photodegradation of organic pollutants based on photocatalytic nanomaterials has been receiving growing research interests in recent years due to its application for environmental protection and sustainable development [1–3]. TiO2 and ZnO nanomaterials are most popular and numerous photodegradation results with the use of the two nanomaterials in the suspension form have been reported in the literature [4–8]. The main drawback of the use of nanomaterials in the suspension form is that they need to be separated afterwards for cleanup and/or reuse. On the other hand, substrate-supported nanomaterials can overcome this drawback but at the cost of worse performance due to less surface area. To increase the surface area, it is natural to employ substrate-grown one-dimensional nanostructures. Photocatalytic activities of substrate-supported nanotubes, nanorods, and nanowires (NWs) of TiO2 and ZnO have also been investigated extensively [9–17].
It is known that the photocatalytic efficiency can be enhanced by improving charge separation between the photogenerated charge carriers [3, 15–17]. In principle, charge separation can be facilitated by using a conductive substrate for substrate-supported nanomaterials. However, experimental works on the substrate effect have been absent in the literature to our knowledge. Another concern is the photodegradation kinetics, which is widely accepted as a first-order kinetics [5–7, 10–12]. Nevertheless, the possibility of a combined zeroth- and first-order kinetics has been proposed in a previous report , but no follow-up works have been reported.
The present work aims to provide more experimental results to investigate the photocatalytic activity of ZnO NWs with a focus on the substrate effect and the photodegradation kinetics. The employed NWs are grown on conductive and nonconductive substrates by thermal evaporation without seed layers or catalysts. The photocatalytic activity is evaluated by degrading a 50 μM rhodamine B (RhB) solution [10, 11, 17] under the irradiation of a 254 nm light source. The results reveal that the photocatalytic activity can be enhanced by using a conductive substrate. Also, the photodegradation follows a zeroth-order kinetics at high concentrations and a first-order kinetics at low concentrations with a transition at around 10 μM. Degradation constants of 0.58 μM·min−1 (zeroth-order) and 0.028 min−1 (first-order) have been achieved.
2.1. ZnO NW Growth
The ZnO NWs were grown in a standard double-tube furnace system by high-temperature thermal evaporation based on a surface-roughness-assisted vapor-solid mechanism without the employment of seed layers or catalysts [18–20]. The substrates included sapphire (c-plane), Si (with doping), and fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO), and their resistivities were around 1014, 10−2, and 10−4 Ω·cm, respectively. To increase the substrate surface roughness for the NW growth, the sapphire and the Si (native oxide removed first in a diluted HF solution) substrates were etched prior to the growth process in 1 M NaOH and 1 M KOH solutions for 1 min, respectively. Details of the growth parameters can be found in our previous reports [18–20]. For the FTO and the Si substrates, two batches were prepared and the NW samples are designated as FTO-A, FTO-B, Si-A, and Si-B. The morphology of the NWs was examined by a scanning electron microscope (SEM; JSM 6500F, JEOL) and their photoluminescence (PL) properties were measured by a spectrometer (F-7000, Hitachi) with a 325 nm light source.
2.2. Photodegradation Measurement
The NW photocatalytic activity was evaluated by degrading a 50 μM RhB solution. In each experimental round, a 1.5 × 1.5 cm2 NW sample was placed in a beaker with 7.5 mL RhB. Three 4 W low-pressure Hg lamps at a wavelength of 254 nm were utilized as the irradiation source, and the light intensity on the sample was 3.3 mW·cm−2. A small motor was employed to stir the solution and a 50 μL drop was taken every 30 min during photodegradation. The absorption spectra of the drops were measured with the use of an optical microscope (BX51, Olympus), equipped with a fiber-connected spectrometer (BRC111A, BWTek).
3. Result and Discussion
3.1. ZnO NW Morphology
Figure 1 shows SEM images of ZnO NWs grown on FTO (Figure 1(a) for FTO-A and Figure 1(c) for FTO-B), sapphire (Figure 1(d)), and Si (Figure 1(e) for Si-A and Figure 1(f) for Si-B). Figure 1(b) is a cross-sectional SEM image of the FTO-A sample and it displays that the NWs are straight and grow out of the substrate, which also applies to other samples. The insets in Figure 1 are enlarged images of individual NWs and it can be seen that the NW diameters range between 30 and 90 nm. In addition, all the NWs have a good hexagonal shape and are, therefore, single-crystalline. The single-crystallinity has been well characterized in our previous reports [18–20] and will not be elaborated here.
As the photocatalysis occurs on the nanomaterial surface, the surface area of the nanomaterial is important. A convenient parameter for evaluating this property is called the roughness factor (RF), which is defined as the ratio of the surface area of the nanomaterial to the surface area of the substrate. The NWs in FTO-A have an average diameter of around 80 nm (i.e., a hexagonal edge width of 40 nm) judging from the inset in Figure 1(a) and a length of around 6 μm from Figure 1(b). The number density is roughly 3.4 μm−2 by carefully counting the number of NWs in an enlarged SEM image, and the RF of FTO-A is consequently estimated to be 5. (The RF obtained by the present calculation is a rough estimate and the uncertainty is supposedly around 30%.) A comparison of diameters, area densities, and RFs for all samples is provided in Table 1. (Note that the NW length is around 6 μm for all samples.) It can be seen that the surface areas of the NW samples are in a small range.
3.2. Substrate Effect
The absorption spectra of a 50 μM RhB solution at intervals of 30 min due to the photocatalytic activity of the FTO-A sample are shown in Figure 2(a). The absorption peak appears at 554 nm and its intensity decreases down to around 5% of its original value for only 90 min. With the use of other samples, similar absorption spectra were obtained and the peak intensities were determined. The absorption peak intensity correlates with the RhB concentration, and the ratios of the concentration as a function of time to the initial concentration for all samples as well as the results for using no NWs are plotted in Figure 2(b). As can be seen, UV irradiation alone without the assistance of NWs is ineffective to degrade RhB. On the other hand, the NWs facilitate photodegradation effectively. The FTO-A and the sapphire samples have the best and the worst performances, respectively.
There are several factors that influence the photodegradation performance including the surface area, the structural defect [15, 16], and the substrate conductivity. From the SEM images in Figure 1, the NWs on all substrates possess a hexagonal shape and are similarly distributed. In addition, the surface areas of the NW samples are in a close range with the sapphire sample having the highest value as can be seen in Table 1. It is convincible that the surface area is not the origin for the variation in the observed photodegradation performance.
For the role of structural defect, it is known that structural defects in ZnO NWs correlate with the green emission in a PL spectrum [9, 15, 16, 21]. A lower PL intensity indicates a lower recombination rate of photoinduced electron-hole pairs. A lower level of structural defects is thus advantageous for photocatalysis . The PL spectra are shown in Figure 3 with the peak UV intensities normalized to be equal. By comparing the PL spectra with the photodegradation curves in Figure 2(b), the two results are consistent except for the sapphire sample, which has better crystallinity than FTO-B and Si-B but worse performance. It is quite apparent that the worst performance of the sapphire sample arises from sapphire’s nonconductive characteristic. Consequently, a conductive substrate is beneficial for photodegradation and such a result can be reasonably attributed to better charge separation.
3.3. Photodegradation Kinetics
The ratios of to in Figure 2(b) allow the determination of the photodegradation kinetics. It is commonly accepted that the photodegradation follows a first-order kinetics [1, 5–7, 10–12, 17] and can be expressed as where is the first-order constant. To verify if this is the case, the logarithmic plots of the ratios in Figure 2(b) have been obtained. It is found that the logarithmic plots for the sapphire, Si-B, and FTO-B samples follow the linear relationship but the plots for the Si-A and FTO-A samples deviate (see Figure 4(a)). Therefore, the first-order kinetics does not seem to be suitable.
It has been proposed and explained previously that the degradation reaction is concentration dependent, and the photodegradation follows a zeroth-order kinetics at high concentrations and a first-order kinetics at low concentrations . For the zeroth-order kinetics, can be expressed as where is the zeroth-order constant. The ratio of to is therefore a straight line. As can be seen in Figure 2(b), the ratios are indeed straight lines at high concentrations but deviate at low concentrations for the Si-A and the FTO-A samples.
The logarithmic plots of the Si-A and the FTO-A ratios are shown in Figure 4(a) and they roughly have a linear relationship at low concentrations. For further confirmation, the FTO-A sample was used for another test to degrade a 10 μM RhB solution. The logarithmic plot of the concentration ratios is shown in Figure 4(b), and the good linear relationship ensures the validity of the first-order kinetics at concentrations below 10 μM. Therefore, the present results support the combined kinetics instead of the commonly accepted first-order kinetics. Judging from the Si-A and the FTO-A ratios in Figure 2(b), the transition occurs at approximately 10 μM (i.e., at the ratio of 0.2) and is indicated by a dashed line. Incidentally, this transition concentration of 10 μM has been the initial concentration in several RhB photodegradation reports [10, 11, 17]. It is reasonable that the zeroth-order kinetics has not been observed in these works.
Although the theoretical basis for the combined kinetics has been described in , it is instructive to have a simple explanation. Since the photodegradation occurs on the NW surface, it depends on the molecular surface coverage on the NW. The surface coverage is a result of molecular adsorption and desorption and can be described by the Langmuir equation [15, 22]. At high concentrations, desorption is negligible in comparison with adsorption [15, 22]. The NW surface is thus fully covered with molecules and the (full) coverage is independent of the concentration, which is shown in Figure 5(a). The photodegradation consequently proceeds at a constant rate regardless of the concentration and follows the zeroth-order kinetics in (2). At low concentrations, adsorption and desorption are comparable. The NW surface is thus partially covered with molecules and the coverage depends on the concentration, which is shown in Figure 5(b). The photodegradation consequently proceeds at a rate proportional to the concentration and follows the first-order kinetics in (1). The transition concentration is influenced by adsorption, desorption, and other factors as well.
The calculated zeroth-order constants from the fitted lines in Figure 2(b) are 0.054 (no NW), 0.17 (sapphire), 0.25 (Si-B), 0.26 (FTO-B), 0.34 (Si-A), and 0.58 (FTO-A) μM·min−1. Since no zeroth-order constants for RhB photodegradation are available in the literature, these constants cannot be compared. On the other hand, the first-order constants are roughly 0.036 (Si-A) and 0.032 min−1 (FTO-A) from the fitted lines in Figure 4(a). A more accurate result from the fitted line in Figure 4(b) is 0.028 min−1 for the FTO-A sample. It is noteworthy that this first-order constant of 0.028 min−1 is higher than reported values of around 0.01 min−1 at a similar ratio of solution volume to NW substrate area of around 3 mL·cm−2 [10, 11, 17].
The present work investigates the photocatalytic activity of ZnO NWs with a focus on the substrate effect and the photodegradation kinetics. The employed NWs are grown on nonconductive and conductive substrates by thermal evaporation. The photocatalytic activity is evaluated by degrading a 50 μM RhB solution under the irradiation of a 254 nm light source. The results reveal that the photocatalytic activity can be enhanced by using a conductive substrate due to improved charge separation. The degradation kinetics has been found to follow a zeroth-order kinetics at high concentrations and a first-order one at low concentrations with a transition at around 10 M. Degradation constants of 0.58 μM·min−1 for the zeroth-order and 0.028 min−1 for the first-order have been achieved. The first-order constant also compares favorably with reported values of around 0.01 min−1 in the literature.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
This work was supported by the National Science Council under Grant no. 101-2112-M-007-016.
- M. R. Hoffmann, S. T. Martin, W. Y. Choi, and D. W. Bahnemann, “Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 69–96, 1995.
- U. I. Gaya and A. H. Abdullah, “Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: a review of fundamentals, progress and problems,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2008.
- C. C. Chen, W. H. Ma, and J. C. Zhao, “Semiconductor-mediated photodegradation of pollutants under visible-light irradiation,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 4206–4219, 2010.
- S. Sakthivel, B. Neppolian, M. V. Shankar, B. Arabindoo, M. Palanichamy, and V. Murugesan, “Solar photocatalytic degradation of azo dye: Comparison of photocatalytic efficiency of ZnO and TiO2,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 65–82, 2003.
- M. A. Behnajady, N. Modirshahla, and R. Hamzavi, “Kinetic study on photocatalytic degradation of C.I. Acid Yellow 23 by ZnO photocatalyst,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 133, no. 1–3, pp. 226–232, 2006.
- D. Mijin, M. Savić, P. Snežana et al., “A study of the photocatalytic degradation of metamitron in ZnO water suspensions,” Desalination, vol. 249, no. 1, pp. 286–292, 2009.
- Y. A. Chung, Y. C. Chang, M. Y. Lu, C. Y. Wang, and L. J. Chen, “Synthesis and photocatalytic activity of small-diameter ZnO nanorods,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 156, no. 5, pp. F75–F79, 2009.
- B. X. Li and Y. F. Wang, “Facile synthesis and enhanced photocatalytic performance of flower-like ZnO hierarchical microstructures,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 890–896, 2010.
- M. Y. Guo, M. K. Fung, F. Fang et al., “ZnO and TiO2 1D nanostructures for photocatalytic applications,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 509, no. 4, pp. 1328–1332, 2011.
- T. J. Kuo, C. N. Lin, C. L. Kuo, and M. H. Huang, “Growth of ultralong ZnO nanowires on silicon substrates by vapor transport and their use as recyclable photocatalysts,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 19, no. 21, pp. 5143–5147, 2007.
- G. Wang, D. Chen, H. Zhang, J. Z. Zhang, and J. H. Li, “Tunable photocurrent spectrum in well-oriented zinc oxide nanorod arrays with enhanced photocatalytic activity,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 24, pp. 8850–8855, 2008.
- X. M. Zhao, B. H. Zhang, K. L. Ai et al., “Monitoring catalytic degradation of dye molecules on silver-coated ZnO nanowire arrays by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 31, pp. 5547–5553, 2009.
- C. L. Wu, L. Shen, H. G. Yu, Y. C. Zhang, and Q. L. Huang, “Solvothermal synthesis of Cu-doped ZnO nanowires with visible light-driven photocatalytic activity,” Materials Letters, vol. 74, pp. 236–238, 2012.
- Y. X. Wang, X. Y. Li, G. Lu, X. Quan, and G. H. Chen, “Highly oriented 1-D ZnO nanorod arrays on zinc foil: direct growth from substrate, optical properties and photocatalytic activities,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 19, pp. 7332–7336, 2008.
- Y. Liu, Z. H. Kang, Z. H. Chen et al., “Synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic application of different ZnO nanostructures in array configurations,” Crystal Growth and Design, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 3222–3227, 2009.
- D. W. Chu, Y. Masuda, T. Ohji, and K. Kato, “Formation and photocatalytic application of ZnO nanotubes using aqueous solution,” Langmuir, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2811–2815, 2010.
- J. Bae, J. B. Han, X. M. Zhang et al., “ZnO nanotubes grown at low temperature using ga as catalysts and their enhanced photocatalytic activities,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 113, no. 24, pp. 10379–10383, 2009.
- S. T. Ho, K. C. Chen, H. A. Chen, H. Y. Lin, C. Y. Cheng, and H. N. Lin, “Catalyst-free surface-roughness-assisted growth of large-scale vertically aligned zinc oxide nanowires by thermal evaporation,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 19, no. 16, pp. 4083–4086, 2007.
- S. T. Ho, C. Y. Wang, H. L. Liu, and H. N. Lin, “Catalyst-free selective-area growth of vertically aligned zinc oxide nanowires,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 463, no. 1–3, pp. 141–144, 2008.
- S. T. Ho, C. L. Hsiao, H. Y. Lin, H. A. Chen, C. Y. Wang, and H. N. Lin, “Single-crystalline zinc oxide nanowires as photoanode material for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 6473–6478, 2010.
- M. Kashif, U. Hashim, M. E. Ali et al., “Effect of different seed solutions on the morphology and electrooptical properties of ZnO Nanorods,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2012, Article ID 452407, 6 pages, 2012.
- R. Desikan, S. Armel, H. M. Meyer III, and T. Thundat, “Effect of chain length on nanomechanics of alkanethiol self-assembly,” Nanotechnology, vol. 18, no. 42, Article ID 424028, 2007.
Copyright © 2014 Jan-Hau Chang and Heh-Nan Lin. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.