Research Article  Open Access
JanHau Chang, HehNan Lin, "Investigation of the Photocatalytic Activity of ZnO Nanowires: Substrate Effect and Kinetics Analysis", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2014, Article ID 426457, 6 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/426457
Investigation of the Photocatalytic Activity of ZnO Nanowires: Substrate Effect and Kinetics Analysis
Abstract
The photocatalytic activity of substratesupported ZnO nanowires is investigated with a focus on the substrate effect and the photodegradation kinetics. The employed NWs are grown on various substrates by thermal evaporation and a 50 μM rhodamine B solution is used as the target solution. It is found that the photocatalytic activity is facilitated by using a conductive substrate and such a result can be reasonably attributed to the improvement of charge separation. The photodegradation is found to follow a zerothorder kinetics at high concentrations and a firstorder kinetics at low concentrations with a transition at around 10 μM. The present observation is opposed to the commonly accepted firstorder kinetics. Degradation constants of 0.58 μM·min^{−1} for the zerothorder and 0.028 min^{−1} for the firstorder have been achieved. The firstorder constant also compares favorably with reported values.
1. Introduction
Photodegradation of organic pollutants based on photocatalytic nanomaterials has been receiving growing research interests in recent years due to its application for environmental protection and sustainable development [1–3]. TiO_{2} and ZnO nanomaterials are most popular and numerous photodegradation results with the use of the two nanomaterials in the suspension form have been reported in the literature [4–8]. The main drawback of the use of nanomaterials in the suspension form is that they need to be separated afterwards for cleanup and/or reuse. On the other hand, substratesupported nanomaterials can overcome this drawback but at the cost of worse performance due to less surface area. To increase the surface area, it is natural to employ substrategrown onedimensional nanostructures. Photocatalytic activities of substratesupported nanotubes, nanorods, and nanowires (NWs) of TiO_{2} and ZnO have also been investigated extensively [9–17].
It is known that the photocatalytic efficiency can be enhanced by improving charge separation between the photogenerated charge carriers [3, 15–17]. In principle, charge separation can be facilitated by using a conductive substrate for substratesupported nanomaterials. However, experimental works on the substrate effect have been absent in the literature to our knowledge. Another concern is the photodegradation kinetics, which is widely accepted as a firstorder kinetics [5–7, 10–12]. Nevertheless, the possibility of a combined zeroth and firstorder kinetics has been proposed in a previous report [15], but no followup works have been reported.
The present work aims to provide more experimental results to investigate the photocatalytic activity of ZnO NWs with a focus on the substrate effect and the photodegradation kinetics. The employed NWs are grown on conductive and nonconductive substrates by thermal evaporation without seed layers or catalysts. The photocatalytic activity is evaluated by degrading a 50 μM rhodamine B (RhB) solution [10, 11, 17] under the irradiation of a 254 nm light source. The results reveal that the photocatalytic activity can be enhanced by using a conductive substrate. Also, the photodegradation follows a zerothorder kinetics at high concentrations and a firstorder kinetics at low concentrations with a transition at around 10 μM. Degradation constants of 0.58 μM·min^{−1} (zerothorder) and 0.028 min^{−1} (firstorder) have been achieved.
2. Experimental
2.1. ZnO NW Growth
The ZnO NWs were grown in a standard doubletube furnace system by hightemperature thermal evaporation based on a surfaceroughnessassisted vaporsolid mechanism without the employment of seed layers or catalysts [18–20]. The substrates included sapphire (cplane), Si (with doping), and fluorinedoped tin oxide (FTO), and their resistivities were around 10^{14}, 10^{−2}, and 10^{−4} Ω·cm, respectively. To increase the substrate surface roughness for the NW growth, the sapphire and the Si (native oxide removed first in a diluted HF solution) substrates were etched prior to the growth process in 1 M NaOH and 1 M KOH solutions for 1 min, respectively. Details of the growth parameters can be found in our previous reports [18–20]. For the FTO and the Si substrates, two batches were prepared and the NW samples are designated as FTOA, FTOB, SiA, and SiB. The morphology of the NWs was examined by a scanning electron microscope (SEM; JSM 6500F, JEOL) and their photoluminescence (PL) properties were measured by a spectrometer (F7000, Hitachi) with a 325 nm light source.
2.2. Photodegradation Measurement
The NW photocatalytic activity was evaluated by degrading a 50 μM RhB solution. In each experimental round, a 1.5 × 1.5 cm^{2} NW sample was placed in a beaker with 7.5 mL RhB. Three 4 W lowpressure Hg lamps at a wavelength of 254 nm were utilized as the irradiation source, and the light intensity on the sample was 3.3 mW·cm^{−2}. A small motor was employed to stir the solution and a 50 μL drop was taken every 30 min during photodegradation. The absorption spectra of the drops were measured with the use of an optical microscope (BX51, Olympus), equipped with a fiberconnected spectrometer (BRC111A, BWTek).
3. Result and Discussion
3.1. ZnO NW Morphology
Figure 1 shows SEM images of ZnO NWs grown on FTO (Figure 1(a) for FTOA and Figure 1(c) for FTOB), sapphire (Figure 1(d)), and Si (Figure 1(e) for SiA and Figure 1(f) for SiB). Figure 1(b) is a crosssectional SEM image of the FTOA sample and it displays that the NWs are straight and grow out of the substrate, which also applies to other samples. The insets in Figure 1 are enlarged images of individual NWs and it can be seen that the NW diameters range between 30 and 90 nm. In addition, all the NWs have a good hexagonal shape and are, therefore, singlecrystalline. The singlecrystallinity has been well characterized in our previous reports [18–20] and will not be elaborated here.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
As the photocatalysis occurs on the nanomaterial surface, the surface area of the nanomaterial is important. A convenient parameter for evaluating this property is called the roughness factor (RF), which is defined as the ratio of the surface area of the nanomaterial to the surface area of the substrate. The NWs in FTOA have an average diameter of around 80 nm (i.e., a hexagonal edge width of 40 nm) judging from the inset in Figure 1(a) and a length of around 6 μm from Figure 1(b). The number density is roughly 3.4 μm^{−2} by carefully counting the number of NWs in an enlarged SEM image, and the RF of FTOA is consequently estimated to be 5. (The RF obtained by the present calculation is a rough estimate and the uncertainty is supposedly around 30%.) A comparison of diameters, area densities, and RFs for all samples is provided in Table 1. (Note that the NW length is around 6 μm for all samples.) It can be seen that the surface areas of the NW samples are in a small range.

3.2. Substrate Effect
The absorption spectra of a 50 μM RhB solution at intervals of 30 min due to the photocatalytic activity of the FTOA sample are shown in Figure 2(a). The absorption peak appears at 554 nm and its intensity decreases down to around 5% of its original value for only 90 min. With the use of other samples, similar absorption spectra were obtained and the peak intensities were determined. The absorption peak intensity correlates with the RhB concentration, and the ratios of the concentration as a function of time to the initial concentration for all samples as well as the results for using no NWs are plotted in Figure 2(b). As can be seen, UV irradiation alone without the assistance of NWs is ineffective to degrade RhB. On the other hand, the NWs facilitate photodegradation effectively. The FTOA and the sapphire samples have the best and the worst performances, respectively.
(a)
(b)
There are several factors that influence the photodegradation performance including the surface area, the structural defect [15, 16], and the substrate conductivity. From the SEM images in Figure 1, the NWs on all substrates possess a hexagonal shape and are similarly distributed. In addition, the surface areas of the NW samples are in a close range with the sapphire sample having the highest value as can be seen in Table 1. It is convincible that the surface area is not the origin for the variation in the observed photodegradation performance.
For the role of structural defect, it is known that structural defects in ZnO NWs correlate with the green emission in a PL spectrum [9, 15, 16, 21]. A lower PL intensity indicates a lower recombination rate of photoinduced electronhole pairs. A lower level of structural defects is thus advantageous for photocatalysis [15]. The PL spectra are shown in Figure 3 with the peak UV intensities normalized to be equal. By comparing the PL spectra with the photodegradation curves in Figure 2(b), the two results are consistent except for the sapphire sample, which has better crystallinity than FTOB and SiB but worse performance. It is quite apparent that the worst performance of the sapphire sample arises from sapphire’s nonconductive characteristic. Consequently, a conductive substrate is beneficial for photodegradation and such a result can be reasonably attributed to better charge separation.
3.3. Photodegradation Kinetics
The ratios of to in Figure 2(b) allow the determination of the photodegradation kinetics. It is commonly accepted that the photodegradation follows a firstorder kinetics [1, 5–7, 10–12, 17] and can be expressed as where is the firstorder constant. To verify if this is the case, the logarithmic plots of the ratios in Figure 2(b) have been obtained. It is found that the logarithmic plots for the sapphire, SiB, and FTOB samples follow the linear relationship but the plots for the SiA and FTOA samples deviate (see Figure 4(a)). Therefore, the firstorder kinetics does not seem to be suitable.
(a)
(b)
It has been proposed and explained previously that the degradation reaction is concentration dependent, and the photodegradation follows a zerothorder kinetics at high concentrations and a firstorder kinetics at low concentrations [15]. For the zerothorder kinetics, can be expressed as where is the zerothorder constant. The ratio of to is therefore a straight line. As can be seen in Figure 2(b), the ratios are indeed straight lines at high concentrations but deviate at low concentrations for the SiA and the FTOA samples.
The logarithmic plots of the SiA and the FTOA ratios are shown in Figure 4(a) and they roughly have a linear relationship at low concentrations. For further confirmation, the FTOA sample was used for another test to degrade a 10 μM RhB solution. The logarithmic plot of the concentration ratios is shown in Figure 4(b), and the good linear relationship ensures the validity of the firstorder kinetics at concentrations below 10 μM. Therefore, the present results support the combined kinetics instead of the commonly accepted firstorder kinetics. Judging from the SiA and the FTOA ratios in Figure 2(b), the transition occurs at approximately 10 μM (i.e., at the ratio of 0.2) and is indicated by a dashed line. Incidentally, this transition concentration of 10 μM has been the initial concentration in several RhB photodegradation reports [10, 11, 17]. It is reasonable that the zerothorder kinetics has not been observed in these works.
Although the theoretical basis for the combined kinetics has been described in [15], it is instructive to have a simple explanation. Since the photodegradation occurs on the NW surface, it depends on the molecular surface coverage on the NW. The surface coverage is a result of molecular adsorption and desorption and can be described by the Langmuir equation [15, 22]. At high concentrations, desorption is negligible in comparison with adsorption [15, 22]. The NW surface is thus fully covered with molecules and the (full) coverage is independent of the concentration, which is shown in Figure 5(a). The photodegradation consequently proceeds at a constant rate regardless of the concentration and follows the zerothorder kinetics in (2). At low concentrations, adsorption and desorption are comparable. The NW surface is thus partially covered with molecules and the coverage depends on the concentration, which is shown in Figure 5(b). The photodegradation consequently proceeds at a rate proportional to the concentration and follows the firstorder kinetics in (1). The transition concentration is influenced by adsorption, desorption, and other factors as well.
(a)
(b)
The calculated zerothorder constants from the fitted lines in Figure 2(b) are 0.054 (no NW), 0.17 (sapphire), 0.25 (SiB), 0.26 (FTOB), 0.34 (SiA), and 0.58 (FTOA) μM·min^{−1}. Since no zerothorder constants for RhB photodegradation are available in the literature, these constants cannot be compared. On the other hand, the firstorder constants are roughly 0.036 (SiA) and 0.032 min^{−1} (FTOA) from the fitted lines in Figure 4(a). A more accurate result from the fitted line in Figure 4(b) is 0.028 min^{−1} for the FTOA sample. It is noteworthy that this firstorder constant of 0.028 min^{−1} is higher than reported values of around 0.01 min^{−1} at a similar ratio of solution volume to NW substrate area of around 3 mL·cm^{−2} [10, 11, 17].
4. Conclusions
The present work investigates the photocatalytic activity of ZnO NWs with a focus on the substrate effect and the photodegradation kinetics. The employed NWs are grown on nonconductive and conductive substrates by thermal evaporation. The photocatalytic activity is evaluated by degrading a 50 μM RhB solution under the irradiation of a 254 nm light source. The results reveal that the photocatalytic activity can be enhanced by using a conductive substrate due to improved charge separation. The degradation kinetics has been found to follow a zerothorder kinetics at high concentrations and a firstorder one at low concentrations with a transition at around 10 M. Degradation constants of 0.58 μM·min^{−1} for the zerothorder and 0.028 min^{−1} for the firstorder have been achieved. The firstorder constant also compares favorably with reported values of around 0.01 min^{−1} in the literature.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the National Science Council under Grant no. 1012112M007016.
References
 M. R. Hoffmann, S. T. Martin, W. Y. Choi, and D. W. Bahnemann, “Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 69–96, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 U. I. Gaya and A. H. Abdullah, “Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: a review of fundamentals, progress and problems,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. C. Chen, W. H. Ma, and J. C. Zhao, “Semiconductormediated photodegradation of pollutants under visiblelight irradiation,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 4206–4219, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Sakthivel, B. Neppolian, M. V. Shankar, B. Arabindoo, M. Palanichamy, and V. Murugesan, “Solar photocatalytic degradation of azo dye: Comparison of photocatalytic efficiency of ZnO and TiO_{2},” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 65–82, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. A. Behnajady, N. Modirshahla, and R. Hamzavi, “Kinetic study on photocatalytic degradation of C.I. Acid Yellow 23 by ZnO photocatalyst,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 133, no. 1–3, pp. 226–232, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Mijin, M. Savić, P. Snežana et al., “A study of the photocatalytic degradation of metamitron in ZnO water suspensions,” Desalination, vol. 249, no. 1, pp. 286–292, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. A. Chung, Y. C. Chang, M. Y. Lu, C. Y. Wang, and L. J. Chen, “Synthesis and photocatalytic activity of smalldiameter ZnO nanorods,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 156, no. 5, pp. F75–F79, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. X. Li and Y. F. Wang, “Facile synthesis and enhanced photocatalytic performance of flowerlike ZnO hierarchical microstructures,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 890–896, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Y. Guo, M. K. Fung, F. Fang et al., “ZnO and TiO_{2} 1D nanostructures for photocatalytic applications,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 509, no. 4, pp. 1328–1332, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. J. Kuo, C. N. Lin, C. L. Kuo, and M. H. Huang, “Growth of ultralong ZnO nanowires on silicon substrates by vapor transport and their use as recyclable photocatalysts,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 19, no. 21, pp. 5143–5147, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Wang, D. Chen, H. Zhang, J. Z. Zhang, and J. H. Li, “Tunable photocurrent spectrum in welloriented zinc oxide nanorod arrays with enhanced photocatalytic activity,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 24, pp. 8850–8855, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. M. Zhao, B. H. Zhang, K. L. Ai et al., “Monitoring catalytic degradation of dye molecules on silvercoated ZnO nanowire arrays by surfaceenhanced Raman spectroscopy,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 31, pp. 5547–5553, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. L. Wu, L. Shen, H. G. Yu, Y. C. Zhang, and Q. L. Huang, “Solvothermal synthesis of Cudoped ZnO nanowires with visible lightdriven photocatalytic activity,” Materials Letters, vol. 74, pp. 236–238, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. X. Wang, X. Y. Li, G. Lu, X. Quan, and G. H. Chen, “Highly oriented 1D ZnO nanorod arrays on zinc foil: direct growth from substrate, optical properties and photocatalytic activities,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 19, pp. 7332–7336, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Liu, Z. H. Kang, Z. H. Chen et al., “Synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic application of different ZnO nanostructures in array configurations,” Crystal Growth and Design, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 3222–3227, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. W. Chu, Y. Masuda, T. Ohji, and K. Kato, “Formation and photocatalytic application of ZnO nanotubes using aqueous solution,” Langmuir, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2811–2815, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Bae, J. B. Han, X. M. Zhang et al., “ZnO nanotubes grown at low temperature using ga as catalysts and their enhanced photocatalytic activities,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 113, no. 24, pp. 10379–10383, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. T. Ho, K. C. Chen, H. A. Chen, H. Y. Lin, C. Y. Cheng, and H. N. Lin, “Catalystfree surfaceroughnessassisted growth of largescale vertically aligned zinc oxide nanowires by thermal evaporation,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 19, no. 16, pp. 4083–4086, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. T. Ho, C. Y. Wang, H. L. Liu, and H. N. Lin, “Catalystfree selectivearea growth of vertically aligned zinc oxide nanowires,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 463, no. 1–3, pp. 141–144, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. T. Ho, C. L. Hsiao, H. Y. Lin, H. A. Chen, C. Y. Wang, and H. N. Lin, “Singlecrystalline zinc oxide nanowires as photoanode material for dyesensitized solar cells,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 6473–6478, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Kashif, U. Hashim, M. E. Ali et al., “Effect of different seed solutions on the morphology and electrooptical properties of ZnO Nanorods,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2012, Article ID 452407, 6 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Desikan, S. Armel, H. M. Meyer III, and T. Thundat, “Effect of chain length on nanomechanics of alkanethiol selfassembly,” Nanotechnology, vol. 18, no. 42, Article ID 424028, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 JanHau Chang and HehNan Lin. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.