Energy Conversion and Storage: Synthesis, Mechanism, and Applications of NanomaterialsView this Special Issue
Research Article | Open Access
Wonchai Promnopas, Titipun Thongtem, Somchai Thongtem, "ZnTe Semiconductor-Polymer Gel Composited Electrolyte for Conversion of Solar Energy", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2014, Article ID 529629, 6 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/529629
ZnTe Semiconductor-Polymer Gel Composited Electrolyte for Conversion of Solar Energy
Nanostructured cubic p-type ZnTe for dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) was synthesized from 1 : 1 molar ratio of Zn : Te by 600 W and 900 W microwave plasma for 30 min. In this research, their green emissions were detected at the same wavelengths of 563 nm, the energy gap at 2.24 eV, and three Raman shifts at 205, 410, and 620 cm−1. The nanocomposited electrolyte of quasisolid state ZnO-DSSCs was in correlation with the increase in the , , fill factor (ff), and efficiency (η) by increasing the wt% of ZnTe-GPE (gel polymer electrolyte) to an optimum value and decreased afterwards. The optimal ZnO-DSSC performance was achieved for 0.20 wt% ZnTe-GPE with the highest photoelectronic energy conversion efficiency at 174.7% with respect to that of the GPE without doping of p-type ZnTe.
Since the first report on low-cost dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) in 1991 , great efforts have been made to improve their performance [2–4]. In spite of their initial success of approximately 11% solar energy conversion efficiency, much effort to improve cell performance has not been made to major breakthrough since then . DSSCs are very attractive and promising alternative for the development of new generation of photovoltaic devices. Recent research has focused on the use of p-type semiconductors and organic hole-transport materials [6–9] that have better mechanical properties and simple fabrication processes. The main difficulty is to form contacts at p-n junctions and the potential of DSSCs using solid state electrolyte is quite low . Thus, both liquid and solid electrolytes are combined to form quasisolid (gel) electrolytes, including the replacement of liquid electrolytes by solid state hole conductors such as p-type semiconductors , CuI , CuSCN [13, 14], and NiO [15–17] and polymeric electrolytes [18, 19]. In this study, p-type ZnTe as hole collectors in a polymer electrolyte was used to fabricate solid state DSSCs.
2. Experimental Procedures
2.1. p-Type ZnTe
To synthesize ZnTe, Zn and Te powders (analytical grade, Fluka) were used without further purification. Four mixtures of 1 : 1 molar ratio Zn : Te were mixed by rotation for 1 h at room temperature and loaded into 11 mm I.D. × 100 mm long silica boats. Each was placed in a horizontal quartz (HQ) tube at a time. The HQ tube was tightly closed and evacuated to kPa absolute pressure for removal of air and followed by gradual feeding of argon into this HQ tube. The procedure was repeated three times. Finally, argon in the HQ tube was evacuated to kPa constant absolute pressure. Each solid mixture was heated in a manner of 10 min batch run by a 2,450 MHz microwave plasma using 300, 450, 600, and 900 W, left to cool down in vacuum to room temperature, and thoroughly mixed. The process was repeated under the same condition until 30 min run completion. In the end, the products were collected for further characterization and for being selected for fabrication of DSSCs.
2.2. Gel Polymer Electrolyte
Basically, gel polymer electrolyte (GPE) contained 0.10, 0.20, 0.30, 0.40, 0.50, and 0.70 wt% p-type ZnTe in electrolytic solution of 0.5 mM LiI, 0.05 mM I, 0.15 nM PEG20000, and 10 mL acetonitrile (CH3CN). The colloidal liquid was stirred at 60°C for 30 min until clear homogeneous quasisolid state was achieved.
2.3. Fabrication of DSSCs
ZnO films were deposited on two fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass plates by the microwave plasma technique. Each of ZnO photoelectrodes was soaked in the Eosin Y dye (the cheapest dye) solution for 24 h and dried. Concurrently, the FTO electrode was coated by platisol T solution until its sheet resistance was achieved at 10 Ω/cm2. The GPE solution was cast on the dye-absorbed glass plate and the counter electrode over 1 cm2 in area for fabrication of a solar cell. Then, the photoanode was partly placed on top of the counter electrode such that they were extended beyond, with the GPE sandwiched in between them. This solar cell was tightly held together by alligator clips. Each sandwich-type photoelectrochemical solar cell was composed of a dye-absorbed ZnO photoelectrode with 8 mm in thickness, a laminar film, and a counter electrode.
3. Results and Discussion
XRD is an effective method for determining phases and crystallite sizes of the as-synthesized products. XRD patterns (Figure 1) of the products synthesized by different powers of microwave were characterized. All the spectra were compared with the JCPDS database (reference codes: 15-0746 for ZnTe, 01-1238 for Zn, and 01-0714 for Te) . At 300 W (result not shown), the product was composed of ZnTe and some impurities. Upon increasing the heating power from 300 W to 450, 600, and 900 W, the reactions of Zn and Te became more complete with reduction in impurities. At 450 W, Zn and Te impurities were still left in the main product. At 600 and 900 W, only cubic ZnTe was detected with no impurity detection. At these stages, the chemical reaction of Zn and Te was complete. Comparing among different heating powers, the XRD peaks at 900 W were the sharpest, implying that this product was the best crystalline and that its atoms resided in normal lattice. The strongest intensity peak is at 2θ of 25.3 degrees and diffracted from the (111) crystallographic planes of the cubic ZnTe main product.
Generally, reaction rate is controlled by heating power and temperature. Therefore, increasing of the heating power has the influence to increase the driving force of reaction, which promotes the reaction rate to speed up and more product is synthesized. Calculated average crystallite sizes using the Scherrer formula  were 51.729 nm at 600 W and 51.734 nm at 900 W, due to the crystal growth process.
3.2. SEM and SAED
SEM image (Figure 2(a)) shows a number of ZnTe nanoparticles oriented in different directions with 50 nm in diameter at 600 W microwave heating. This product appears as facet nanoparticles in clusters, specified as crystal—in accordance with the above XRD analysis.
SAED pattern (Figure 2(b)) of the ZnTe product appeared as hollow concentric rings of bright spots, showing that this product was composed of a number of nanocrystals with different orientations. These rings were interpreted and found to correspond very well with the (111), (200), (220), (311), (400), and (511) planes of cubic ZnTe .
3.3. Photoluminescence (PL) and UV-Visible Absorption
PL emission of cubic ZnTe (Figure 3(a)) was green emission centered at around 563 nm (2.20 eV), possibly associated with point defects with their energy level above the valence band edge. The emission was in accordance with green emission centered at 560 nm wavelength (2.21 eV) of ZnTe nanowires reported by Meng et al. , and 552 nm wavelength (2.25 eV) of 14 nm nanocrystals reported by Lee et al. . The present emission was slightly red shift comparing to 2.26 eV band gap of ZnTe (bulk)  caused by some defects residing in the product.
UV-visible absorption of ZnTe synthesized by the 600 and 900 W microwave plasma was recorded. The direct energy gap was determined by extrapolation the linear portion of the curves (Figure 3(b)) to zero absorbance, corresponding to 2.24 eV for the threshold optical absorption. In this study, the photoluminescence energy is less than the energy gap due to the existence of defects.
3.4. Raman Spectra
Raman spectra (Figure 4) of ZnTe nanocrystals synthesized by different microwave powers were composed of three longitudinal optical (LO) modes at 205 cm−1 (fundamental), 410 cm−1 (1st overtone), and 620 cm−1 (2nd overtone) and were in good accordance with the available results at 198 cm−1 and 396 cm−1 modes of ZnTe nanowires reported by Meng et al. .
ZnO films were synthesized by the microwave plasma technique for using as photoelectrodes. In general, the operating principle of a DSSC with p-type ZnTe adding in polymer electrolyte is shown in Figure 5. It consisted of a transparent conductive oxide glass (F-doped SnO2 glass, FTO), nanoporous ZnO layer, Eosin Y dye (the cheapest dye) monolayer bonded to ZnO nanoparticles, electrolyte consisting of and redox species, and platinum coated on counter electrode. When the dye sensitizer was excited by solar radiation, electrons were released into conduction band of mesoporous oxide film and further diffused towards the anode and utilized at external loads prior to be collected by the electrolyte at the cathode to complete the cycle. To improve transmittance properties and electrical conductivity, a FTO conducting glass was used as the anode. Zinc oxide thin film deposited on the FTO glass can play the role in the exciton dissertation and the electron diffusion processes. Porosity of the oxide thin film is the important factor that controls the content of absorbed dye molecules and provides surface area of reaction sites on monolayer dye molecules deposited on top. The selection of dye should correspond to the solar energy range, long-term stability, and firm grafting. and couples as well as ZnTe-GPE were used, including a platinum catalyst deposited at the cathode [24–26].
The - characteristic curves of 0–0.70 wt% ZnTe-GPE DSSCs are shown in Figure 6, including their performance parameters in Table 1. The efficiency () was calculated by where , , , and are the short-circuit current density, open-circuit voltage, fill factor, and incident light power density, respectively [24, 27–30]. In this research, the efficiency of the DSSCs increases to the highest value with the increase in wt% ZnTe added to GPE and decreases afterwards. For 0.20 wt% ZnTe-GPE, its efficiency was the highest at 174.7% with respect to that of the GPE without doping of p-type ZnTe. Comparison with other researchers showed that performance of photovoltaic cells was controlled by several parameters according to the following. Premalal et al.  demonstrated the enhancement of conductivity and better pore filing of modified CuSCN inside the TiO2 matrix. The solar cell performance gradually increased to a maximum value beyond which it decreased. For the best results, the conversion efficiency is 3.4% at AM 1.5 with 41.8% enhancement of a solid state DSSC using CuSCN as a hole transport material. It was 14 times higher than that obtained for the solid state DSSC of ordinary CuSCN. Chung et al.  found that the fresh and clean CsSnI3 cell showed very good - characteristics of solid state solar cell: mA/cm2, V, , , mA/cm2, and by doping with 5 mol% fluorine. Further improvement was obtained for 2 mol% SnF2-CsSnI2.95F0.05 which, respectively, provided an increase in 29% and 21% of (15.7 mA/cm2) and (6.81%) comparing to the undoped CsSnI2.95F0.05 with the optimum molar concentration of 5 mol% SnF2. Similarly, the TiO2 nanoporous film of the corresponding cell was pretreated by a fluorine plasma etching process to increase the size of the nanopores and nanochannels, including the possibility to reduce surface states and charged particle recombination. The results were mA/cm2, V, , and . Kim et al.  fabricated a DSSC using titanium deposited with a dye-absorbed TiO2 layer as a working electrode and a platinum deposited with a porous polymer electrolyte membrane as a counter electrode. Overall, the ionic conductivity was improved by increasing the P123 content. The photoelectrochemical characteristics were also controlled by the thickness of the TiO2 layer and the twist pitch length of the counter electrode. The best performance is mA/cm2, V, , and . Kumara et al.  found that the thickness of TiO2 and ZnO layers can play the role in conversion efficiency of the photovoltaic cells. When the thickness and, hence, the sheet resistance of the TiO2 dense layer were increased, the conversion efficiency was gradually increased up to 2.6% at a sheet resistance of 370 Ω (15 μm thick) beyond which it decreased. Upon the use of ZnO dense layer for the replacement of TiO2 dense layer, the similar trend was also detected, and the best conversion efficiency of 3.2% was obtained at a sheet resistance of 2500 Ω (15 μm thick).
Pure cubic ZnTe nanocrystals were successfully synthesized by an inexpensive solid state process using 600 and 900 W microwave plasma for 30 min. Their photoluminescence was the same green emission centered at 563 nm (2.20 eV), possibly associated with point defect level above the valence band edge. The performance of quasisolid state ZnO DSSCs with different wt% ZnTe-GPE composited electrolytes was the highest efficiency for 0.20 wt% ZnTe adding.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
The authors wish to thank the National Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC) and the National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), for providing financial support through the Project P-10-11345, and the Thailand’s Office of the Higher Education Commission for providing financial support through the National Research University (NRU) Project for Chiang Mai University.
- B. O’Regan and M. Grätzel, “A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on sensitized colloidal TiO2 films,” Nature, vol. 353, pp. 737–740, 1991.
- M. Grätzel, “Photoelectrochemical cells,” Nature, vol. 414, pp. 338–344, 2001.
- M. Grätzel, “Dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 145–153, 2003.
- M. Grätzel, “Conversion of sunlight to electric power by nanocrystalline dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A, vol. 164, no. 1–3, pp. 3–14, 2004.
- A. Hagfeldt, G. Boschloo, L. Sun, L. Kloo, and H. Pettersson, “Dye-sensitized solar cells,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 110, no. 11, pp. 6595–6663, 2010.
- B. O'Regan, F. Lenzmann, R. Muis, and J. Wienke, “A solid-state dye-sensitized solar cell fabricated with pressure-treated P25-TiO2 and CuSCN: analysis of pore filling and IV characteristics,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 5023–5029, 2002.
- K. Murakoshi, R. Kogure, Y. Wada, and S. Yanagida, “Fabrication of solid-state dye-sensitized TiO2 solar cells combined with polypyrrole,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 55, no. 1-2, pp. 113–125, 1998.
- J. Hagen, W. Schaffrath, P. Otschik et al., “Novel hybrid solar cells consisting of inorganic nanoparticles and an organic hole transport material,” Synthetic Metals, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 215–220, 1997.
- D. Wei, P. Andrew, and T. Ryhänen, “Electrochemical photovoltaic cells-review of recent developments,” Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, vol. 85, no. 12, pp. 1547–1552, 2010.
- J. Wu, Z. Lan, S. Hao et al., “Progress on the electrolytes for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 80, no. 11, pp. 2241–2258, 2008.
- B. Li, L. Wang, B. Kang, P. Wang, and Y. Qiu, “Review of recent progress in solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 549–573, 2006.
- L. Yang, Z. Zhang, S. Fang, X. Gao, and M. Obata, “Influence of the preparation conditions of TiO2 electrodes on the performance of solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells with CuI as a hole collector,” Solar Energy, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 717–722, 2007.
- E. V. A. Premalal, N. Dematage, G. R. R. A. Kumara et al., “Preparation of structurally modified, conductivity enhanced-p-CuSCN and its application in dye-sensitized solid-state solar cells,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 203, pp. 288–296, 2012.
- Y. Ni, Z. Jin, K. Yu, Y. Fu, T. Liu, and T. Wang, “Electrochemical deposition characteristics of p-CuSCN on n-ZnO rod arrays films,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 53, no. 20, pp. 6048–6054, 2008.
- C.-Y. Hsu, W.-T. Chen, Y.-C. Chen et al., “Charge transporting enhancement of NiO photocathodes for p-type dye-sensitized solar cells,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 66, pp. 210–215, 2012.
- Y.-M. Lee and C.-H. Lai, “Preparation and characterization of solid n-TiO2/p-NiO hetrojunction electrodes for all-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells,” Solid-State Electronics, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 1116–1125, 2009.
- J. H. Rhee, Y. H. Lee, P. Bera, and S. I. Seok, “Cu2S-deposited mesoporous NiO photocathode for a solar cell,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 477, no. 4–6, pp. 345–348, 2009.
- M. Song, J. S. Park, Y. H. Kim et al., “Synthesis and characterization of polymer electrolytes containing phenothiazine-based click polymers for dye-sensitized solar cell applications,” Macromolecular Research, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 654–659, 2011.
- M.-S. Kang, K.-S. Ahn, and J.-W. Lee, “Quasi-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells employing ternary component polymer-gel electrolytes,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 896–901, 2008.
- Powder Diffract. File, JCPDS-ICDD, 12 Campus Boulevard, Newtown Square, PA 19073-3273, USA, 2001.
- T. Suriwong, S. Thongtem, and T. Thongtem, “Solid-state synthesis of cubic ZnTe nanocrystals using a microwave plasma,” Materials Letters, vol. 63, no. 24-25, pp. 2103–2106, 2009.
- Q. Meng, C. Jiang, and S. X. Mao, “Temperature-dependent growth of zinc-blende-structured ZnTe nanostructures,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 310, no. 20, pp. 4481–4486, 2008.
- S. H. Lee, Y. J. Kim, and J. Park, “Shape evolution of ZnTe nanocrystals: nanoflowers, nanodots, and nanorods,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 19, no. 19, pp. 4670–4675, 2007.
- J. Gong, J. Liang, and K. Sumathy, “Review on dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs): fundamental concepts and novel materials,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 16, pp. 5848–5860, 2012.
- J. Chen, T. Peng, K. Fan, R. Li, and J. Xia, “Optimization of plastic crystal ionic liquid electrolyte for solid-state dye-sensitized solar cell,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 94, pp. 1–6, 2013.
- J. E. Benedetti, A. A. Corrêa, M. Carmello, L. C. P. Almeida, A. S. Gonalves, and A. F. Nogueira, “Cross-linked gel polymer electrolyte containing multi-wall carbon nanotubes for application in dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 208, pp. 263–270, 2012.
- I. Chung, B. Lee, J. He, R. P. H. Chang, and M. G. Kanatzidis, “All-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells with high efficiency,” Nature, vol. 485, pp. 486–490, 2012.
- F. Odobel, Y. Pellegrin, E. A. Gibson, A. Hagfeldt, A. L. Smeigh, and L. Hammarström, “Recent advances and future directions to optimize the performances of p-type dye-sensitized solar cells,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 256, pp. 2414–2423, 2012.
- F. Bella and R. Bongiovanni, “Photoinduced polymerization: an innovative, powerful and environmentally friendly technique for the preparation of polymer electrolytes for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C, vol. 16, pp. 1–21, 2013.
- N. Khongchareon, S. Choopun, N. Hongsith, A. Gardchareon, S. Phadungdhitidhada, and D. Wongratanaphisan, “Influence of carbon nanotubes in gel electrolyte on photovoltaic performance of ZnO dye-sensitized solar cells,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 106, pp. 195–200, 2013.
- J. H. Kim, Y. S. Chi, and T. J. Kang, “Optimization of quasi-solid-state dye-sensitized photovoltaic fibers using porous polymer electrolyte membranes,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 229, pp. 84–94, 2013.
- G. R. A. Kumara, J. K. Tiskumara, C. S. K. Ranasinghe et al., “Efficient solid-state dye-sensitized n-ZnO/D-358 dye/p-CuI solar cell,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 94, pp. 34–37, 2013.
Copyright © 2014 Wonchai Promnopas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.