Research Article  Open Access
QingShan Fu, YongQiang Xue, ZiXiang Cui, MingFang Wang, "Study on the SizeDependent Oxidation Reaction Kinetics of Nanosized Zinc Sulfide", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2014, Article ID 856489, 8 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/856489
Study on the SizeDependent Oxidation Reaction Kinetics of Nanosized Zinc Sulfide
Abstract
Numerous oxidation problems of nanoparticles are often involved during the preparation and application of nanomaterials. The oxidation rate of nanomaterials is much faster than bulk materials due to nanoeffect. Nanosized zinc sulfide (nanoZnS) and oxygen were chosen as a reaction system. The influence regularities were discussed and the influence essence was elucidated theoretically. The results indicate that the particle size can remarkably influence the oxidation reaction kinetics. The rate constant and the reaction order increase, while the apparent activation energy and the preexponential factor decrease with the decreasing particle size. Furthermore, the logarithm of rate constant, the apparent activation energy and the logarithm of preexponential factor are linearly related to the reciprocal of particle diameter, respectively. The essence is that the rate constant is influenced by the combined effect of molar surface energy and molar surface entropy, the reaction order by the molar surface area, the apparent activation energy, by the molar surface energy, and the preexponential factor by the molar surface entropy. The influence regularities and essence can provide theoretical guidance to solve the oxidation problems involved in the process of preparation and application of nanomaterials.
1. Introduction
Because of nanoeffect, nanomaterials have great many peculiar physical and chemical properties [1–4]. NanoZnS presents plentiful excellent properties due to its nanostructural effects [5, 6]. At present, nanoZnS has been widely applied in various fields, such as luminescent materials, sensors, photocatalysis, and semiconductors [7–10]. However, nanoZnS is oxidized easily in the process of preparation and application, and the oxidation rate is much faster than that with massive ZnS. In fact, there is the possibility of being oxidized for most nanomaterials, causing the degradation of performance. The influence mainly depends on the rate of being oxidized. Therefore, it is vitally important to study the oxidation reaction kinetics of nanomaterials for their preparation and application.
The research related to oxidation kinetics of nanoZnS has not been reported so far, and there are a few researches in particle size effect on oxidation kinetics of other nanoparticles. The results show that with the decrease of particle diameter, the rate constant increases [11] and the apparent activation energy and the preexponential factor decrease [11–14]. What they have done lays a foundation for the continuing research of the oxidation reaction kinetics of nanoparticles. However, the particle size effect on the reaction order has not been considered and the essence of particle size effect on the oxidation reaction kinetics is unclear as well.
In this paper, by choosing nanoZnS with different particle sizes and oxygen as the reaction system, the kinetic parameters of the oxidation reaction at different temperatures were determined and the regularities of particle size effect on the reaction kinetics were summarized. The essence of particle size effect on the oxidation reaction kinetics was also discussed theoretically.
2. Experimental
2.1. Preparation and Characterization of NanoZnS
A certain amount of sodium hyposulfite (Na_{2}S_{2}O_{3}·5H_{2}O) and zinc acetate ((CH_{3}COO)_{2}Zn·2H_{2}O) were dissolved in distilled water. The solution, whose pH value was adjusted by acetic acid and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate, used as surface active agent, was added into a boiling flask3neck (500 mL) followed by heating and stirring. When the reaction was finished, after sucking filtration, after being washed by distilled water and absolute ethyl alcohol, and after being dried in a vacuum drying box, the nanoZnS particles were obtained. The nanoZnS with different sizes were obtained by changing the reaction temperature, initial pH value, heating method, and the kind of surface active agent which are shown in Table 1.
 
^{*1}SDBS is sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate. ^{*2}CTMAB is hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide. 
The XRD diffraction spectrum of nanoZnS was determined by XRD6000 (Cu Kα, λ = 0.154178 nm). The average particle diameter of nanoZnS was calculated by Scherrer formula through the FWHMs of the diffraction peaks. The average particle diameters of nanoZnS used in this experiment were 17.9, 26.0, 33.3, 49.1, 57.6, and 71.9 nm, respectively. The XRD spectra are shown in Figure 1.
2.2. Reactions of NanoZnS
The reactions were performed in an autoclave (WDF0.25, 250 mL). Excessive nanoZnS particles of a certain size were added into the autoclave and then oxygen was introduced slowly to drain the air out of the reactor, introducing about 0.20 MPa oxygen into the reaction kettle again and then closing the inlet. The reaction equation is shown below: The reaction time and the corresponding pressure (±0.0001 MPa) were recorded when the temperature reached the target value by stirring in high speed.
2.3. Processing of Experimental Data
According to the total pressure, the mole fractions (, ), the partial pressure (, ), and mole numbers (, ) at moment were calculated by the RK equation. Assuming that the reaction has a reaction order, the differential rate equation is expressed as follows: where is the reaction rate, is the reaction time, is the rate constant, and and are the partial reaction orders.
The reaction rate can be calculated approximately as follows:
The logarithm form of (2) is as follows:
According to (4), the partial reaction orders and and the rate constant are calculated through multiple linear regression. If the correlation coefficient is close to 1, the reaction has a reaction order and the total reaction order is .
The Arrhenius equation: where is the preexponential factor, is the apparent activation energy, and is the reaction temperature.
If the reaction follows the Arrhenius equation, the plot of logarithm of rate constant against the reciprocal of temperature should be a line; then can be gotten from the slope and can be gotten from the intercept of this line. If the plot is not a line, the reaction is a nonArrhenius reaction.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Effect of Particle Size on Rate Constant and Reaction Order
The reaction has a reaction order because the correlation coefficient is very close to 1 (). By combining (3) and (4) with and calculated by the RK equation, the , , , and are calculated. The logarithms of rate constants and reaction orders with different particle sizes of nanoZnS at different temperatures are given in Tables 2 and 3.


At different temperatures, the curves of the logarithms of rate constants against the reciprocal of the particle diameters are shown in Figure 2.
It can be seen from Figure 2 that the particle size of nanoZnS has a marked influence on the reaction rate constant; the reaction rate constant increases when the particle size decreases and it is consistent with the reported results of reaction of nanoparticles in solutions [15–17]. At different temperatures, the logarithm of rate constant exhibits a linear relationship with the reciprocal of the particle diameter; the influence regularity is consistent with the result of reaction of nanoparticles in solution [15]. The theoretical relationship between the reaction rate constant and the reciprocal of particle diameter will be discussed below.
At different temperatures, the curves of the reaction orders versus the particle diameters are shown in Figure 3.
As can be seen from Figure 3, there is a great influence of particle size of nanoZnS on the reaction order. At the same temperature, the reaction order increases with the decrease of particle size; the influence regularity is consistent with the result of the reduction reaction of the nanoparticles [18] and is consistent with the result of reaction of nanoparticles in solutions [15–17]. The reaction order increases with the rising of temperature when the particle size remains unchanged. But with the particle size decreasing, the effect of temperature on the reaction order becomes smaller. For multiphase reaction, reducing the size of reactants can increase the specific surface area, thus speeding up the reaction rate; but solid particles in the reaction do not appear in the rate equation and thus the contribution of reducing particle size to accelerate the reaction rate is reflected in the effect of the partial pressure of oxygen on the reaction rate. Therefore, the increase of reaction order can attribute to the increase of molar surface area.
3.2. Effect of Particle Size on Apparent Activation Energy and Preexponential Factor
The curves of versus for nanoZnS with different particle sizes are presented in Figure 4. As shown in Figure 4, is proportional linearly to , which shows that the reaction of nanoZnS with oxygen follows the Arrhenius formula. According to Arrhenius equation, the and for a given particle diameter can be obtained from the slope and intercept of the line, respectively (see Table 4).

From the data in Table 4, the curves of the apparent activation energies versus the reciprocals of the particle diameters are shown in Figure 5.
As shown in Figure 5, the particle size of nanoZnS has a remarkable influence on the apparent activation energy. The apparent activation energy decreases with the decrease of particle size, which is consistent with the results of the reaction of the nanoparticles in solutions [15–17], the thermal decomposition reactions of the nanoparticles [19–22], and the reduction reactions of the nanoparticles [18, 23]. The apparent activation energy is proportional linearly to the reciprocal of particle diameter, which is consistent with the results reported in literatures [15–17, 22]. Based on our previous theoretical analysis [15, 22], the theoretical relationship between the apparent activation energy and the reciprocal of particle diameter will be discussed below.
Assume that there is an energy barrier (i.e., transition state) during the reaction between nanoparticle A and another reactant B (gas) and the intermediate product corresponding to the transition state is the activated complex (denoted by ). The molar energy barrier () can be calculated by the following formula: where , and are the molar energy of reactant A, reactant B, and activated complex , respectively.
Assuming that one molar energy of nanoparticles consists of the energy of one molar bulk phase () and the energy of one molar surface phase (), (the superscript b and s are used to indicate bulk phase and surface phase, resp.)
Assuming that when nanoparticles act as the reactant, the molar energy of the activated complex () is equal to the molar energy of the activated complex () when the same material but bulk particles act as the reactant.
Consider
Using (7) and (8) into (6), the following equation is obtained: where is the apparent activation energy for the corresponding bulk reactant.
Consider
As shown in (10), the apparent activation energy of nanoparticles as the reactant is lower than the same material but bulk particles as the reactant, the reduce of activation energy roots in the molar surface energy of nanoparticles; that is, the essence of the decrease of the activation energy of nanoparticles is that the larger molar surface energy leads to the increase of the average molar energy of reactants, but the molar energy of intermediate activated complex stays unchanged, causing the activation energy decreases.
For the produced nanoZnS are spherical particles, the molar surface energy of the particle can be expressed as follows [16, 17]: where is the surface tension, is the molar volume, and is the diameter of the particles.
Using (11) into (9), the apparent activation energy is given as follows:
It is seen from (12) that the apparent activation energy is related to particle size. Only if the radius of the nanoparticles approaches or reaches the order of m would the effect become significant [24]. The particles used in this experiment are dozens of nanometers, so the influence of particle size on the surface tension is very small and the surface tension can be seen as a constant. Then the apparent activation energy decreases with the decrease of its diameter and the apparent activation energy exhibits a linear relationship with the reciprocal of the particle diameter. The above theory analysis explains well about the experimental regularity of the influence of particle size on the apparent activation energy. In addition, as shown in the (9), the effect of particle size on the apparent activation energy is exerted through the molar surface energy and the larger molar surface energy, the smaller apparent activation energy.
From Table 4, the curve of logarithms of the preexponential factors versus the reciprocal of the particle diameters are shown as follows.
The results presented in Figure 6 show that the particle size of nanoZnS has a notable influence on the preexponential factor. The preexponential factor decreases with the decrease of the particle diameter and the regularity is consistent with the results in literatures [15–17], but is contrary to the literature result [25]. By comparison, there are many differences in the particles of the reactants. They used porous microsized coal particles as reactants, but we used nanosized solid particles. The specific surface area of the micropores is much larger than that of the outer surface of the particles. Furthermore, the radius of curvature of outer surface of particles is positive, while that of inner micropore is negative. Maybe the radius of curvature is one of the important effect factors of regularity. The positive or negative of the radius of curvature might lead to the contradiction among the literatures.
In addition, the logarithm of preexponential factor exhibits a linear relationship with the reciprocal of the particle diameter and the regularity is consistent with the results reported in literature [15].
According to the transition state theory, if a chemical reaction occurs at a certain temperature, the preexponential factor is proportional to [26] and so the equation is derived as follows: where is molar activation entropy for nanoparticles, is the Boltzmann constant, is the Planck constant, and is reaction order.
Consider
Assuming that the particle size has no effect on the entropy of intermediate complex at transition state, that is, no matter what the reactant is, nanoparticle or bulk substance, the molar entropy of the intermediate complex is the same,
Assuming that one molar entropy of nanoparticle () consists of the entropy of one molar bulk phase () and the energy of one molar surface phase (),
From (14), (15), and (16), the following equation is obtained: where is the corresponding molar activation entropy when the reactant is a bulk substance.
Similarly, where is the molar activation Gibbs free energy, is the molar activation Gibbs free energy for bulk phase, and is the molar surface Gibbs function for nanoparticle A.
For the spherical nanoparticle, the molar surface Gibbs function is
Using (19) into (18), the molar activation Gibbs free energy can be expressed as follows:
Ignoring the influence of temperature on the molar volume of nanoparticles, the following equation is obtained:
Comparing (17) and (21), the following equation can be obtained:
Using (17) or (21) into (13), the following equation is obtained:
As shown in (23), for the common materials, the . As the discussion above, in this experiment, the influence of particle size on the surface tension can be ignored. Therefore, the preexponential factor decreases with the decreasing particle size of reactant and exhibits a linear relationship with the reciprocal of the particle diameter. The above theory analysis explains well about the experimental regularity of the influence of particle size on the preexponential factor. Additionally, the effect of particle size on the preexponential factor is through its molar surface entropy and the smaller the nanoparticle size, the larger the molar surface entropy and the smaller the preexponential factor.
The influence regularity of reactant size on the preexponential factor and apparent activation energy can be used to explain the influent regularity of reactant size on its rate constant. By (12), (23), and the Arrhenius equation, the following equations are obtained: where is a certain constant, which is related to temperature only. Namely,
The surface enthalpy is
Often, and as a good approximation, surface enthalpy and surface energy are not distinguished, so (27) can be seen in the form as follows [27]:
Equation (24) can be simplified as follows:
Just as the discussion above, the surface tension can be seen as constant in this experiment. As shown in (29), the rate constant increases with the decrease of nanoparticles and the logarithm of rate constant exhibits a linear relationship with the reciprocal of the particle diameter. The above theory analysis explains well about the experimental regularity of the influence of particle size on the rate constant.
As shown in (24), the logarithm of rate constant of nanoreactant is related to its molar surface energy and molar surface entropy; but molar surface energy and molar surface entropy have the opposite effect on the rate constant, because molar surface energy of nanoreactant makes rate constant larger, while molar surface entropy makes rate constant smaller. Therefore, the particle size effect on the rate constant is the result of the combined action of molar surface energy and molar surface entropy. In the process of the reaction of nanoparticles, the molar surface energy of nanoparticles disappears, which causes the decrease of system energy and makes it easier for the reaction. At the same time, the molar surface entropy of nanoparticles also disappears, which causes the decrease of system entropy and makes it more difficult for the reaction. As for the solid nanoparticles, the molar surface entropy is so small that the effect of molar surface energy on the rate constant is dominant. Therefore, the smaller the particle size, the larger the rate constant.
4. Conclusions
Through experimental study and theoretical analysis, it can be concluded that the particle size of nanoZnS has a significant effect on the kinetic parameters of oxidation reaction. The results show that the particle size of nanoZnS can observably affect the oxidation reaction kinetics. The reaction rate constant and the reaction order increase, while the apparent activation energy and the preexponential factor decrease with the decreasing particle diameter. Moreover, the logarithm of rate constant, the apparent activation energy, and the logarithm of preexponential factor exhibit linear relations with the reciprocal of the particle diameter, respectively. The essence of particle size effect on oxidation reaction kinetics is that the rate constant is influenced by the combined effect of molar surface energy and molar surface entropy, the reaction order by the molar surface area, the apparent activation energy by the molar surface energy, and the preexponential factor by the molar surface entropy. The influence regularities and essence can provide theoretical guidance to solve the oxidation problems involved in the process of preparation and application of nanomaterials.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgment
The authors are so grateful for the support from the National Natural Scientific Fund (no. 21373147).
References
 K. Vasundhara, S. N. Achary, S. K. Deshpande, P. D. Babu, S. S. Meena, and A. K. Tyagi, “Size dependent magnetic and dielectric properties of nano CoFe_{2}O_{4} prepared by a salt assisted gelcombustion method,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 113, no. 19, Article ID 194101, 9 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. V. Molodtsova, I. M. Aristova, S. V. Babenkov, O. V. Vilkov, and V. Yu. Aristov, “Morphology and properties of a hybrid organicinorganic system: Al nanoparticles embedded into CuPc thin film,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 115, Article ID 164310, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
 M. M. Vijatović, B. D. Stojanović, J. D. Bobić, T. Ramoska, and P. Bowen, “Properties of lanthanum doped BaTiO_{3} produced from nanopowders,” Ceramics International, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1817–1824, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. S. Ciobanu, F. Massuyeau, L. V. Constantin, and D. Predoi, “Structural and physical properties of antibacterial Agdoped nanohydroxyapatite synthesized at 100°C,” Nanoscale Research Letters, vol. 6, article 613, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Dehghani, S. Nazerdeylami, E. SaievarIranizad, and M. H. Majles Ara, “Synthesis and investigation of nonlinear optical properties of semiconductor ZnS nanoparticles,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 1008–1010, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. K. Kole and P. Kumbhakar, “Effect of manganese doping on the photoluminescence characteristics of chemically synthesized zinc sulfide nanoparticles,” Applied Nanoscience, vol. 2, pp. 15–23, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 X. F. Wang, H. T. Huang, B. Liang, Z. Liu, D. Chen, and G. Z. Shen, “ZnS nanostructures: synthesis, properties, and applications,” Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 57–90, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Tolia, Z. V. P. Murthy, and M. Chakraborty, “Application of mechanochemically synthesised ZnS nanoaprticles in photocatalytic oxidation of phenol,” Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 223–228, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 D. A. Reddy, G. Murali, A. Divya, R. P. Vijayalakshmi, and B. K. Reddy, “Investigations on ZnS nanoparticles based on synthesis temperature for optoelectronic device applications,” Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 2185–2189, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 K. V. Anand, R. Mohan, R. M. Kumar, M. K. Chinnu, and R. Jayavel, “Structural and optical properties of highpurity cubic phase ZnS nanoparticles prepared by thermal decomposition route for optoelectronic applications,” Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, vol. 79, pp. 395–399, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
 K. Park, D. Lee, A. Rai, D. Mukherjee, and M. R. Zachariah, “Sizeresolved kinetic measurements of aluminum nanoparticle oxidation with single particle mass spectrometry,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 15, pp. 7290–7299, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. X. Phuoc and R. Chen, “Modeling the effect of particle size on the activation energy and ignition temperature of metallic nanoparticles,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 159, no. 1, pp. 416–419, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Zhou, A. Rai, N. Piekiel, X. Ma, and M. R. Zachariah, “Ionmobility spectrometry of nickel nanoparticle oxidation kinetics: application to energetic materials,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 42, pp. 16209–16218, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. J. Higgins, H. Jung, D. B. Kittelson, J. T. Roberts, and M. R. Zachariah, “Sizeselected nanoparticle chemistry: kinetics of soot oxidation,” Journal of Physical Chemistry A, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 96–103, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Xue, X. Wang, and Z. Cui, “The effects of particle size on the kinetic parameters in the reaction of nanoNiO with sodium bisulfate solution,” Progress in Reaction Kinetics and Mechanism, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 329–341, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Xue, J. Du, P. Wang, and Z. Wang, “Effect of particle size on kinetic parameters of the heterogeneous reactions,” Acta Physico—Chimica Sinica, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 758–762, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Q. Xue, H. Zhao, and J. P. Du, “Effect of particle size on kinetic parameters of heterogeneous reactions,” Wuji Huaxue Xuebao, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1952–1956, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 Z. Y. Li, K. Yu, Y. Gao, J. Liu, D. Jin, and Y. C. Zhai, “Effect of particle size on hydrogen reduction reaction kinetics parameters of Cu_{2}O powders,” Materials Science Forum, vol. 694, pp. 769–772, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. M. Criado and A. Ortega, “A study of the influence of particle size on the thermal decomposition of CaCO_{3} by means of constant rate thermal analysis,” Thermochimica Acta, vol. 195, pp. 163–167, 1992. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Hoang, A. Janotti, and C. G. van de Walle, “The particlesize dependence of the activation energy for decomposition of lithium amide,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 50, no. 43, pp. 10170–10173, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. M. Abdul Mujeeb, K. Muraleedharan, M. P. Kannan, and T. Ganga Devi, “The effect of particle size on the thermal decomposition kinetics of potassium bromate,” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 1171–1182, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Cui, Y. Xue, L. Xiao, and T. Wang, “Effect of particle size on activation energy for thermal decomposition of nanoCaCO_{3},” Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 569–572, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Pang, P. Guo, P. Zhao, C. Cao, and D. Zhang, “Influence of size of hematite powder on its reduction kinetics by H2 at low temperature,” Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 07–11, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Q. Xue, X. C. Yang, Z. Cui, and W. P. Lai, “The effect of microdroplet size on the surface tension and tolman length,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 109–112, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Coda and L. Tognotti, “The prediction of char combustion kinetics at high temperature,” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, vol. 21, no. 13, pp. 79–86, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Atkins and J. de Paula, Atkins’ Physical Chemistry, Higher Education Press, 2006.
 A. W. Adamson and A. P. Gast, Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, WileyInterscience, 1997.
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 QingShan Fu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.