Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 974285, 6 pages
Research Article

3D Hollow Sn@Carbon-Graphene Hybrid Material as Promising Anode for Lithium-Ion Batteries

1School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2Engineering Laboratory for Functionalized Carbon Materials, Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China

Received 13 December 2013; Accepted 23 December 2013; Published 12 January 2014

Academic Editor: Zheng-Hong Huang

Copyright © 2014 Xiaoyu Zheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


A 3D hollow Sn@C-graphene hybrid material (HSCG) with high capacity and excellent cyclic and rate performance is fabricated by a one-pot assembly method. Due to the fast electron and ion transfer as well as the efficient carbon buffer structure, the hybrid material is promising in high-performance lithium-ion battery.

1. Introduction

Metallic Sn has long been considered as a promising anode material for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) due to its high theoretical specific capacity [1, 2]. However, Sn is plagued with a rapid capacity fading because of volume expansion induced pulverization during the lithiation and delithiation reactions, leading to the breakdown of electrical connection of anode particles [3, 4]. Generally, reducing the particle size to nanoscale is an effective way to minimize the volume change [5, 6]. In order to further decrease the volume change of Sn in the electrochemical reactions, hollow Sn nanospheres (NSs), whose tensile stress is ~5 times lower than that of Sn solid NSs with an equal volume, are proven to be a better choice in electrochemical reactions [710].

Besides aforementioned routes, many researches also indicate that dispersing Sn NSs into carbon matrix is another effective approach to improve and stabilize the cyclability, where the carbon matrix restricts the volume expansion of Sn and moreover acts as an electron conductor to increase the conductivity [1114]. A Sn core/carbon shell nanostructure is a typical structure to combine the advantages of carbon and Sn from above consideration, in which the carbon coating layers not only enhance the conductivity of electrode and buffer the volume variation but also help form a stable solid electrolyte interface (SEI) film.

Aggregation, which hinders the fast Li+ transportation, is another problem for nanomaterials in real applications. Many latest results have shown that graphene nanosheets (GNs) are ideal substrates to well disperse NSs, which can also construct a flexible network through a “plane-to-point” mode to bridge the active material particles and form effective ion and electron transfer networks [1518]. Furthermore, it is expected that such soft carbon layer could endure the volume change of the metal NSs and reduce the mechanical stress within the electrode to prevent its disintegration [10, 19, 20].

Herein, we integrate the above concerns into one hybrid structure, and a three-dimensional hollow Sn@carbon-graphene hybrid structure (abbreviated as HSCG) is obtained. In such an HSCG, hollow Sn NS was encapsulated in a carbon shell to form a core-shell sphere structure (hollow Sn@C) and these NSs are uniformly anchored onto the flexible GNs. On one hand, hollow Sn NSs are formed to decrease the intrinsic volume variation, and the carbon shell acts as a buffer layer to restrict the volume changes of Sn NS, which also improves the conductivity and helps the formation of stable SEI film. On the other hand, GNs are used as the substrate to fix and isolate the NSs to avoid the aggregation and the presence of NSs prevents the restacking of GNs, which ensure the open ion transportation channels retention. The interlacing of GNs in the hybrid forms an interconnected conducting network, and the NSs are in a good contact with the GNs, which guarantee the electron transfer between the two components and the fabricated electrode. Furthermore, the GNs endure the volume change of the NSs at some extent. Therefore, the hybrid structure has combined the three above discussed characters, defined as fast ion transfer, interconnected conducting network, and efficient volume variation control in electrochemical performance improvement, and is a promising anode candidate for high performance LIBs [21, 22].

2. Experimental

2.1. Preparation of 3D Hollow Sn@C-Graphene

In a typical preparation process, 20 mL ammonia (26 wt%) was added into 20 vol% ethanol aqueous solution, and 2.4 g hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was then dissolved into the above solution with continuous stirring for 20 min. After that, 10 mL ethanol and 10 mL tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) containing 5 g SnCl2 were dropwise introduced into the above solution under stirring for 48 h and the obtained mixture solution was denoted as Mixture A. Mixture B was obtained by sonicating 1 g glucose and 400 mg graphene oxide (GO) in 400 mL DI water with a probe sonicator (JY92-N, China, 300 W) for 1 h. Mixtures A and B were mixed under continuous stirring for 5 h followed by an overnight storage at room temperature. After dried at 120°C, the obtained mixture was calcined at 800°C for 4 h under N2 and then treated with HF followed by washing with ethanol and DI water. Finally, the HSCG was obtained after dried at 120°C (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Scheme for the assembly process of hollow Sn@C-graphene hybrid nanostructure (HSCG).
2.2. Structure Characterization

XRD measurements were conducted at room temperature using a specular reflection mode (Bruker D-8, Cu Kα radiation,  nm). SEM and TEM observations were performed by using Hitachi S-4800 (Hitachi, Japan) and JEM 2100F (JEOL, Japan), respectively. Nitrogen cryoadsorption was measured by using BEL mini-instrument, and the specific surface area was obtained by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller analyses of the adsorption isotherm. Elemental mapping was performed using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) in conjunction with a TEM. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out using TG 8120 (Thermo Plus) with a heating rate of 10°C/min in a range of 25–900°C under air flow.

2.3. Electrochemical Performance Measurement

First, the as-prepared sample as active material was ground into fine powders. 80 wt% active materials, 10 wt% Super P, and 10 wt% PTFE were well mixed in ethanol solution to make uniform mixture slurry under sonication. Then, the mixture slurry was spread uniformly on nickel foam and dried at 120°C for 12 h under vacuum to obtain a loading density of active material in the range of 2.2–2.5 mg cm−2. Finally, coin cells (CR2032) were assembled in Ar filled glove box and the lithium foils were used as the anode, and 1 M LiPF6 mixture solution (1 : 1 (v/v) of ethylene carbonate (EC) and dimethyl carbonate (DMC)) as the electrolyte.

The coin cells were tested at room temperature using battery tester (Lixing, China) and electrochemistry workstation (Gamry Instrument, USA). Note that the charge and discharge processes were conducted at the same current density with the voltage range of 0.006 V–2.5 V.

3. Results and Discussion

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed to indicate the reduction process from Sn2+ to metallic Sn. As shown in Figure 2(a), the identified diffraction peaks that are located at 30.7°, 32.1°, and 44.9° are attributed to the tetragonal Sn (200), (101), and (211) planes, respectively (JCPDS Card no. 04-0673). Obviously, the initial Sn2+ was reduced into crystalline Sn by carbon at high temperature. According to the energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis, the residual SiO2 weight fraction is lower than 3%, indicating that SiO2 has mostly been etched off (Figure S1, ESI, available online at

Figure 2: (a) XRD patterns of HSCG and crystalline Sn; (b) typical FESEM and (c and d) TEM images of HSCG. Inset of (d) shows eggs with an egg support, which is similar to HSCG nanostructure where a core-shell Sn@C is supported by planar graphene sheets.

The morphologies of the HSCG were examined with field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). Figure 2(b) clearly shows that NSs, which are with a narrow size distribution of 100~200 nm, are uniformly anchored onto the surface of GNs. These NSs acting as the spacers prevent the restacking of GNs and stabilize the individual GNs in single or few layers, inducing the retention of open ion transportation channels. Additionally, the separated NSs guarantee the fast and sufficient contact of electrolyte with the active sites. As revealed in the SEM image, the soft two-dimensional GNs bridge the active NSs through a “plane-to-point” mode, in which a flexible conducting network is essentially constructed in electrochemical reactions. The obtained sample shows a typical IV N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm with a significant hysteresis loop, indicating that HSCG possesses a mesoporous and macroporous structure (Figure S2, ESI). The specific surface area of HSCG is 29.51 m2 g−1 calculated by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller method.

The TEM images (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)) further confirm the formation of aforementioned structure. As revealed in Figure 2(d), the carbon shell with a thickness of ~20 nm fully encapsulates the hollow Sn core to form a core-shell NS with the diameter of about ~200 nm. These NSs are tightly anchored onto the GNs even though a strong sonication treatment is used during the sample preparation for the TEM observations, suggesting a strong interaction between the NSs and GNs. Besides, the carbon shell is tightly attached to the Sn core, which is beneficial for mechanical reinforcement of the carbon buffer to restrict the volume expansion and enhance electronic conduction. Moreover, the void space of the hollow Sn@C is large enough to endure the volume changes during the electrochemical reaction. Such a hybrid structure, where core-shell Sn@C is supported by planar GNs, is similar to the structure of nonyolk eggs with the protection of egg support as shown in Figure 2(d) (inset). In order to determinate the carbon and tin fractions in HSCG, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, Figure S3, ESI) was carried out under air atmosphere, and the result shows that HSCG contains about ~70 wt% tin and ~27 wt% carbon.

To reveal the advantages of HSCG, its lithium insertion/extraction process is characterized with cyclic voltammetry in the range of 0.005 to 2.5 V at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 [23]. The CV behavior shown in Figure 3(a) is consistent with the previous reports [10, 24], indicating a similar electrochemical reaction occurred. It is found that the cathodic current in the first cycle is obviously larger than that of the 2nd cycle, especially from 1.5 to 0 V, which is mainly due to the reduction of electrolyte on the HSCG surface to form a SEI film and the irreversible reduction of the tin oxide (SnO2) impurity. The broad cathodic peaks at 0.3–0.7 V are attributed to the multistep electrochemical reduction reactions (lithiation) of Sn with Li ion to form various Li-Sn alloys. The anodic peaks at 0.4–0.8 V originate from the delithiation process (from the formed Li-Sn alloy phases). Based on the above discussion, it is found that the HSCG electrode shows excellent anodic reversibility.

Figure 3: Electrochemical performance of HSCG. (a) CV profiles of the first and second cycles; (b) galvanostatic profiles at a current density of 50 mA g−1 with a cut-off potential between 5 mV and 2.5 V; (c) cycling profiles; (d) rate performance profile.

Figures 3(b) and 3(c) show the discharge-charge voltage profiles at a current density of 50 mA g−1. The voltage profiles are consistent with that of Sn-based anodes. It is clear that the first discharge/charge capacities of the HSCG are ~1710.2 and 922.7 mAh g−1, respectively. The key point for such high capacity properties is derived from the synergic effect of hollow Sn@C structures with planar graphene sheets. The hollow Sn@C structure accommodates the volume variation and prevents pulverization of Sn and it also acts as the spacer to avoid face-to-face aggregation of GNs. At the same time, the graphene interlinked with each other and with the carbon shell form a continuous conducting network. The initial irreversible loss (787.5 mAh g−1) is mainly attributed to the formation of SEI film due to a relatively large interfacial surface of HSCG. At the second cycle, the HSCG anode still shows a large reversible capacity of about 853.9 mAh g−1, revealing a high capacity retention of 92.6% with a coulombic efficiency of 88.8%. The charge/discharge property at the first two cycles is well consistent with the reactions observed from CV curves shown in Figure 3(a). After 10, 20, and 50 cycles, the reversible capacities are preserved at about 758.2, 710.0, and 659.5 mAh g−1, respectively, indicating a capacity retention of 82.1%, 76.9%, and 71.5%. To the best of our knowledge, the capacities are amongst the highest values reported for Sn/C hybrid structure (see Figure S4) [22, 25, 26]. The enhanced performance of HSCG is derived from its unique infrastructure. Other than preventing the Sn NSs from aggregation, carbon shell and GNs both play the role of buffer in this hybrid to mitigate the large volume change of Sn particles associated with a conversion reaction electrode. The hollow structure of Sn also contributes to a reduction of the intrinsically large volume change.

The HSCG also shows a good rate capability and stability. As shown in Figure 3(d), at higher current densities of 100 mA g−1 and 200 mA g−1, the specific discharge capacities can also reach 759.2 mAh g−1 and 647.4 mAh g−1. When the current density goes back to 50 mA g−1, the discharge capacity returns to 788.7 mAh g−1, which is comparable to the initial capacity at 50 mA g−1, indicating the electrode is stable and has high reversibility. The promotion of the rate capability is attributed to the open channels and formed conductivity network mentioned in the structure discussion. Moreover, the hollow Sn shell with improved surface-to-volume ratio and reduced transport lengths for both mass and transport further improves the rate performance.

4. Conclusion

In summary, a novel 3D hollow Sn@carbon-graphene structure was designed and prepared by a one-pot assembly method. Such a unique hybridized nanostructure, which is similar to non-yolk eggs within a rigid egg support, is proved a highly active hollow metal@carbon structure attached on flexible and high-strength conductive GNs plane. The synergic effects, resulting from the combination of three kinds of selected infrastructures, contribute to a high reversible specific capacity of 922.7 mAh g−1 and excellent cyclic performance, while an outstanding rate capability is also achieved simultaneously due to the fast ion and electron transfer characteristic. This hybrid structure provides us a promising model for the design of high-performance anode material for LIBs.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors appreciate support from NSAF (no. U1330123), National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 51372167 and 51302146), Shenzhen Basic Research Project (nos. JC201104210152A and CYJ20130402145002430), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2012M520012 and 2013T60111).


  1. S. Yang, X. Feng, S. Ivanovici, and K. Müllen, “Fabrication of graphene-encapsulated oxide nanoparticles: towards high-performance anode materials for lithium storage,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 49, no. 45, pp. 8408–8411, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. Luo, B. Wang, X. Li, Y. Jia, M. Liang, and L. Zhi, “Graphene-confined Sn nanosheets with enhanced lithium storage capability,” Advanced Materials, vol. 24, no. 26, pp. 3538–3543, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. C.-M. Park and K.-J. Jeon, “Porous structured SnSb/C nanocomposites for Li-ion battery anodes,” Chemical Communications, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 2122–2124, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H.-C. Shin and M. L. Liu, “Three-dimensional porous copper-tin alloy electrodes for rechargeable lithium batteries,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 582–586, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. W. Lv, Y. Tao, W. Ni et al., “One-pot self-assembly of three-dimensional graphene macroassemblies with porous core and layered shell,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 33, pp. 12352–12357, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Liu, S. Z. Qiao, J. S. Chen, X. W. Lou, X. Xing, and G. Q. Lu, “Yolk/shell nanoparticles: new platforms for nanoreactors, drug delivery and lithium-ion batteries,” Chemical Communications, vol. 47, no. 47, pp. 12578–12591, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Yao, M. T. McDowell, I. Ryu et al., “Interconnected silicon hollow nanospheres for lithium-ion battery anodes with long cycle life,” Nano Letters, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 2949–2954, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. W.-M. Zhang, J.-S. Hu, Y.-G. Guo et al., “Tin-nanoparticles encapsulated in elastic hollow carbon spheres for high-performance anode material in lithium-ion batteries,” Advanced Materials, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1160–1165, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Y.-S. Lin, J.-G. Duh, and M.-H. Hung, “Shell-by-shell synthesis and applications of carbon-coated SnO2 hollow nanospheres in lithium-ion battery,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 114, no. 30, pp. 13136–13141, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Liang, X. Zhu, P. Lian, W. Yang, and H. Wang, “Superior cycle performance of Sn@C/graphene nanocomposite as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 184, no. 6, pp. 1400–1404, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Qiu, K. Yan, and S. Yang, “Ultrafine tin nanocrystallites encapsulated in mesoporous carbon nanowires: scalable synthesis and excellent electrochemical properties for rechargeable lithium ion batteries,” Chemical Communications, vol. 46, no. 44, pp. 8359–8361, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. Deng and J. Y. Lee, “Reversible storage of lithium in a rambutan-like tin-carbon electrode,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 1660–1663, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. W. Lv, F. Sun, D.-M. Tang et al., “A sandwich structure of graphene and nickel oxide with excellent supercapacitive performance,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 25, pp. 9014–9019, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Wang, M. Wu, Z. Jiao, and J. Y. Lee, “Sn@CNT and Sn@C@CNT nanostructures for superior reversible lithium ion storage,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 21, no. 14, pp. 3210–3215, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, “The rise of graphene,” Nature Materials, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 183–191, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. W. Lv, D.-M. Tang, Y.-B. He et al., “Low-temperature exfoliated graphenes: vacuum-promoted exfoliation and electrochemical energy storage,” ACS Nano, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 3730–3736, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. F.-Y. Su, C. You, Y.-B. He et al., “Flexible and planar graphene conductive additives for lithium-ion batteries,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 43, pp. 9644–9650, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F.-Y. Su, Y.-B. He, B. Li et al., “Could graphene construct an effective conducting network in a high-power lithium ion battery?” Nano Energy, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 429–439, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. Zhou, D.-W. Wang, F. Li et al., “Graphene-wrapped Fe3O4 anode material with improved reversible capacity and cyclic stability for lithium ion batteries,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 22, no. 18, pp. 5306–5313, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Chen, P. Chen, M. Wu, D. Pan, and Y. Wang, “Graphene supported Sn-Sb@carbon core-shell particles as a superior anode for lithium ion batteries,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1302–1306, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Z.-S. Wu, W. Ren, L. Wen et al., “Graphene anchored with Co3O4 nanoparticles as anode of lithium ion batteries with enhanced reversible capacity and cyclic performance,” ACS Nano, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 3187–3194, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. Wang, B. Wang, X. Wang et al., “Sn/graphene nanocomposite with 3D architecture for enhanced reversible lithium storage in lithium ion batteries,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 44, pp. 8378–8384, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. I. Stojković, N. Cvjetićanin, M. Mitrić, and S. Mentus, “Electrochemical properties of nanostructured Li1.2V3O8 in aqueous LiNO3 solution,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 56, no. 18, pp. 6469–6473, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. Ji, Z. Tan, T. Kuykendall et al., “Multilayer nanoassembly of Sn-nanopillar arrays sandwiched between graphene layers for high-capacity lithium storage,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 3611–3616, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. X. W. Lou, Y. Wang, C. Yuan, J. Y. Lee, and L. A. Archer, “Template-free synthesis of SnO2 hollow nanostructures with high lithium storage capacity,” Advanced Materials, vol. 18, no. 17, pp. 2325–2329, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. F. Wang, G. Yao, M. Xu, M. Zhao, Z. Sun, and X. Song, “Large-scale synthesis of macroporous SnO2 with/without carbon and their application as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 509, no. 20, pp. 5969–5973, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus