Research Article
Microstructures of Reduced Graphene Oxide/Sulfur Nanocomposites and Their Impacts on Lithium Storage Performances
Table 1
Comparison of a set of reported studies on graphene/sulfur and graphene oxide/sulfur composites with their corresponding electrochemical performances.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
rGO: reduced graphene oxide; TG: thermally exfoliated graphene; pGNS: porous (activated) graphene nanosheets. a-S: amorphous sulfur; c-S: crystalline sulfur. In most literatures, the electrode for electrochemical characterizations contains 80 wt% GO/S, 10 wt% carbon additive, and 10 wt% binder. |