Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 367341 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/367341

Synthesis of Copper Nanoparticles Using Mixture of Allylamine and Polyallylamine

Academic Editor: Joydeep Dutta
Received04 Feb 2015
Accepted28 Mar 2015
Published06 May 2015

Abstract

Copper nanoparticles (Cu-NPs) with sizes lower than 31 nm were prepared by wet chemical reduction using copper sulfate solution, hydrazine, and mixture of allylamine (AAm) and polyallylamine (PAAm) as stabilizing agents. The use of AAm/PAAm mixture leads to the formation of Cu and CuO nanoparticles. The resulting nanostructures were characterized by XRD, TGA, and TEM. The average particle diameters were determined by the Debye-Scherrer equation. Analysis by TGA, TEM, GS-MS, and 1HNMR reveals that synthesized NPs with AAm presented a coating with similar characteristics to NPs with PAAm, suggesting that AAm underwent polymerization during the synthesis. The synthesis of NPs using AAm could be a good alternative to reduce production costs.

1. Introduction

In recent years, nanoparticles have received much attention in the scientific community and industry due to their unique physicochemical properties attributed to their relatively small size and high surface area-to-volume ratio [1, 2]. In particular, copper nanoparticles (Cu-NPs) are of great interest because of their distinctive catalytic, optical, thermal, magnetic, antimicrobial, electronic, and electrical conducting properties [39]. They present a wide range of potential applications in nanotechnology including catalysts [3], additives for lubricants [10], heat transfer nanofluids [11], manufacture of electronic and optical devices [12], conductive inks [13], materials for solar energy conversion [14], biosensors [15], antibiofouling agents [16], and cancer cell treatments [17]. Moreover, copper nanoparticles can be a promising candidate to replace expensive noble metal nanoparticles such as silver and gold [1820].

The synthesis of high-performance copper nanostructures strongly depends on the method used, where a good control over particle size, shape, and spatial distribution is of critical importance [21]. Thus, the development of new simple and low-cost processes to enhance Cu-NPs properties is required in order to scale-up the production of Cu-NPs at an industrial level.

Among the methods employed for the preparation of nanosized copper particles, the chemical reduction of copper(II) salts in aqueous solution is one of the most versatile routes because of its simplicity, solubility, inexpensive reagents, and short reaction times [18], allowing at the same time the possibility of controlling of Cu-NPs sizes and shapes [2]. However, metallic copper is highly unstable as it can be easily oxidized under atmospheric conditions, generating Cu2O and/or CuO on the surface during and after preparation [19, 20]. Therefore, nanoparticles must be protected adding surface-protecting stabilizing agents such as organic ligands, surfactants, or polymers that can form complexes with copper ions [17].

On the other hand, the formation of copper oxides at nanoscale can also be very useful to diverse areas [22]. Oxides of transition metals, especially cupric oxide (CuO), exhibit characteristic catalytic and photocatalytic properties [23]. According to the literature, Cu(II)O is a p-type semiconductor compound with a monoclinic crystal structure and a narrow band gap of 1.2 eV [24] that offers diverse applications. These include lithium ion batteries [25], magnetic storage media [26], gas sensors [27], supercapacitors [28], nanofluids [29], and antimicrobial agents [30].

The synthesis of Cu-NPs in polymer media has several advantages compared to other agents such as their ease of processing, solubility, less toxicity, and control of nanoparticles growth [31]. Coated Cu(0) [1, 32, 33], CuO, and Cu2O [23, 34, 35] nanoparticles have been obtained using different polymers as capping agents.

Generally, preformed polymeric surface stabilizers are introduced during the preparation of the metal nanoparticles; however some cases have reported the simultaneous formation of metal nanoparticles and in situ polymerization of the organic monomer [36, 37].

Previously in our research group we have studied the synthesis of copper nanoparticles through the wet chemical reduction method in the presence of hydrazine hydrate (N2H4·H2O) as a reducing agent and nitrogen ligands allylamine (AAm), linear polyallylamine (PAAm), and partially cross-linked polyallylamine (PAAmc) as stabilizing agents [33]. The results of this study indicated the exclusive formation of Cu(0) nanoparticles under basic aqueous conditions in an air atmosphere. We observed that the use of small amount of monomer AAm did not affect significantly the composition of the prepared Cu(0)-NPs.

In the present study, we focus on reducing the use of expensive PAAm as a stabilizing agent in the synthesis of copper nanoparticles via chemical reduction in aqueous solution using different ratios of nitrogen ligands in mixture (AAm/PAAm/PAAmc) and with a constant concentration of NaOH and N2H4·H2O. In contrast to our previous work [33], this synthetic route gave as a result Cu(0) mixed with an oxidized phase of CuO nanoparticles.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials and Reagents

Copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate, hydrazine hydrate solution (50–60%), poly(allylamine) solution (PAAm) (Mw ~ 17 000, 20 wt% aqueous solution), allylamine (98%), and sodium hydroxide (98.8%) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and were used without previous purification. PAAmc was obtained by PAAm’s warming at 40°C for two months. The moles of PAAm were calculated by the molecular weight of the repeating unit [CH2-CH(CH2NH2)] of 57 g/mol. Different molar ratios of nitrogen ligands/CuSO4 were used. The reactions with PAAmc used higher H2O/CuSO4 molar ratios due to the lower solubility of the ligand in H2O.

2.2. Synthesis of Copper Nanoparticles

The synthesis of copper nanoparticles was performed using wet chemical reduction. In a flat bottom flask CuSO4·5H2O was added, which was dissolved in distilled water under magnetic stirring for 10 minutes at 60°C. Nitrogen ligands mixture dissolved in distilled water was then added in a dropwise manner and stirred for 10 minutes. Subsequently, a solution of 0.5 M NaOH was added dropwise and allowed to react for 30 minutes followed by the addition of hydrazine. The reaction mixture was maintained at 60°C with constant stirring. The nanoparticles were recovered by centrifugation at 15,000 rpm and 25°C, purification being realized with two washes with distilled water and ethanol, and finally dried at 60°C for 2 hours; the NPs were obtained as black powder. The yields (R1 and R5) were calculated following our previous work [33].

2.3. Characterization Techniques

X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique was employed in order to know the oxidation state and chemical stability of the synthesized copper nanoparticles on a Siemens D-5000 diffractometer with a scanning interval in the 2θ range of 30 to 80° with a scan speed of 0.02°/s, the radiation employed was copper Kα with a wavelength of 1.54056 Å, and values of 25 mA and 35 kV were used for intensity and voltage, respectively. The average particle diameter was determined from the XRD diffractograms of each sample based on the Debye-Scherrer equation, taking the most intense peak for calculation [38, 39]. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used in order to observe the morphology and particle size distribution of the copper samples on a FEI Titan high-resolution electron microscope operating at 300 kV. The surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of copper nanoparticles was characterized using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu MultiSpec-1501) with photodiode array and a quartz cell in absorbance mode with a tungsten lamp at a wavelength of 500–800 nm.

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was employed to analyze the thermal behavior of Cu particles and the thermal stability of coating using a DuPont Instruments 951 analyzer. Operating conditions were a heating rate of 10°C/min and air atmosphere with a gas flow of 50 mL/min. The runs of the samples were carried out from 30°C to 600°C in N2 atmosphere. Once 600°C was reached N2 atmosphere was changed for O2. 1HNMR spectra were recorded on a JEOL-300 NMR spectrophotometer, in deuterated water (D2O) and using residual H2O signs as the internal reference (4.7 ppm). Infrared spectra were obtained with a Nicolet Magna 550 spectrophotometer on KBr crystals. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GS-MS) was used to study the products of thermal degradation of the coatings; the mass spectra were acquired in the GC/MS system (Agilent Technologies 7890A, 240 ion Trap) with Thermal Separation Probe (TSP) Agilent G4381A and capillary column HP-5MS. The temperature was set to from 50°C to 280°C.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Nitrogen Ligands on the Synthesis of Copper Nanoparticles

The synthesis of Cu nanoparticles using AAm, PAAm, and PAAmc ligands with different molar ratios leads to Cu-NPs and CuO-NPs. Table 1 shows the results obtained (R1R5).


SampleMolar ratio of PAAm/CuMolar ratio of AAm/CuMolar ratio of AAm/PAAmChemical composition(d)Average diameter (nm)(d)Ligand
(%)

R1(a)0.097.00.0Cu(e)30.05.6
R2(b)0.7397.0134.0Cu, CuO15.033.6
R3(b)0.7345.062.0Cu, CuO22.024.9
R4(c)0.2385.0374.0Cu, CuO21.012.2
R5(c)0.2343.0186.0Cu(f)21.03.8

(a) AAm ligand; (b) PAAmc ligand; (c) PAAm ligand; (d) determined by XRD; (e) 36% yield; (f) 70% yield.
N2H4/Cu molar ratio of 38.0 and a NaOH/Cu molar ratio of 8.0.

The synthesis of Cu nanoparticles with PAAm and PAAmc ligands mixed with AAm (R2R5) used AAm/PAAm molar ratios between 62 and 374. The purpose of this study was to obtain copper nanoparticles using PAAm at lower concentrations than our previous work [33]. The data of Table 1 suggest that the ligands mixture favors the formation of CuO-NPs and only Cu-NPs are obtained when low concentration of AAm is used. Furthermore, the use of AAm ligand promotes Cu nanoparticles with higher percentage of coating. The average particle diameter is also affected by the use of AAm ligand. In order to explain the effect of AAm ligand, a detailed study was conducted on the synthesis of copper nanoparticles in the presence of this ligand.

The particle diameter () for the indicated samples was determined by the Debye-Scherrer equation [38, 39]:where is the copper wavelength (1.54056 Å), is the Bragg diffraction angle, and is the half-width of the most intense diffraction peak. The average diameter calculated for the synthesized nanoparticles is shown in Table 1. Particles obtained with AAm/PAAm mixture show smaller particle diameters with respect to the nanoparticles obtained with AAm ligand. This suggests that polymeric ligands favor the formation of small particles and are more evident when using PAAmc.

3.2. Synthesis of Copper Nanoparticles Using AAm

In previous results of our research group we studied the synthesis of copper nanoparticles using AAm ligand. The use of this ligand led exclusively to Cu-NPs and the isolation by centrifugation gave 36% yield (Table 1). Here, we report a more detailed study of R1. The new evidence indicates that most of the Cu nanoparticles remained in a wine-red colloidal solution. After a month the solution kept the same color and no precipitation was observed.

The solution containing copper nanoparticles in colloidal form was analyzed by UV-visible spectroscopy (UV-Vis). The analysis was performed in order to determine the type of copper particle in the solution. UV-Vis spectrum in Figure 1 shows an absorption band located at ~566 nm attributed to metallic copper, which agrees with the values reported in the literature in the range of ~560 to 570 nm [40]. Evidence of the formation of spherical copper nanoparticles is sustained in the characteristic Cu0 plasmon peak at 566 nm and the red-wine color solution. It is well known that the position and shape of plasmon absorption of metal nanoparticle are strongly dependent on the particle size, dielectric medium, and surface adsorbed species [41, 42]. According to Mie’s theory [43], single SPR peak was expected for spherical nanoparticles, whereas anisotropic shape particles could give two or more SPR peaks depending on the shape of the particle.

Figure 2 shows the micrograph of particles in colloidal solution, the histogram of particle size distribution, and a vial with a red colloidal solution.

According to the micrographs shown in Figure 2, monodispersed copper particles with spherical morphology can be observed. The presence of PAAm is not that clear, probably because the PAAm formed in this solution has a low molecular weight, which hinders observation; this also helps to explain the colloidal stability of the solution due to the fact that PAAm with low molecular weight is very soluble in water and can stabilize the nanoparticles better, avoiding its precipitation. The histogram behavior is closed or narrowed and exhibited an average particle diameter of 6.1 nm. The particle size distribution of this sample was obtained from the count of ~400 particles.

As previously mentioned, the colloidal solution is stable for about a month, after this time the nanoparticles start to precipitate in the aqueous medium and the solution turns pale yellow. Two drops of this solution were analyzed by proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1HNMR) and the spectrum obtained in D2O presented mainly fine signals of AAm centered at 3.2 ppm, 4.8 ppm, 5.1 ppm, and 5.9 ppm along with other smaller signals between 0.75 and 2.9 ppm.

To observe better the signals of PAAm formed in situ the solution was first evaporated to eliminate AAm and water where a solid was obtained. The 1HNMR spectrum (Figure 3) presented the small signals with greater clarity and the chemical shifts located at 1.0–1.6 ppm and 2.46 ppm are very similar to commercial PAAm. In addition, the bandwidth and the presence of multiple signals in the analyzed spectrum region suggests the presence of oligomers and/or polymers with similar chemical structures to PAAm. Clearly, the transformation of AAm monomer leads to a mixture of products with amino groups that stabilize Cu-NPs in colloidal form.

FTIR analysis of the solid obtained after evaporation also gave evidence of the presence of PAAm. The spectrum obtained in KBr presented between 500 and 1900 cm−1 three very intense bands at 983 cm−1, 1449 cm−1, and 1601 cm−1 (Figure 4). The FTIR spectrum of commercial PAAm also presents three intense bands located at frequencies of 938 cm−1, 1450 cm−1, and 1596 cm−1. The changes in the frequencies are associated with the coordination of Cu nanoparticles with amino groups, and these are more evident in the vibrations of N–H and C–N bonds.

GS-MS technique was also used to analyze PAAm and coating of samples R1R5, mass spectrum of PAAm shows peaks at = 28, 29, 30, 33, 39, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, and 57, and these values reflect the thermal decomposition and formation of allylamine monomer located at 57 [44]. Most of these peaks are detected in the mass spectrum of allylamine monomer and primary amines [45]. The mass spectrum of R1 presented most of these peaks suggesting that during the synthesis of nanoparticles R1 PAAm was formed. The same result was observed in samples R2R5 where PAAm was used for the synthesis of copper nanoparticles.

In summary, the use of different characterization techniques suggest that during the synthesis of Cu nanoparticles the AAm monomer undergoes polymerization reactions, leading to an oligomer and/or polymer with a similar structure to PAAm. The in situ PAAm synthesis may be important from an economic standpoint because it could avoid using polymer PAAm, which is expensive compared to AAm. There are reports in the literature that can help to explain what happens in reaction R1 as it is known that CuSO4/N2H4 system is capable of initiating the polymerization of methyl methacrylate in water in a basic medium [46]. The reaction conditions in R1 are very similar to those used in this report and it is likely that polymerization of AAm proceeded in the same way. Grafting and/or crosslinking reactions may also be explained as follows: once PAAm is formed the amino groups may be oxidized and form radical species on the nitrogen atom; these species are rearranged forming free radicals on the PAAm backbone, which react with AAm monomer. When the concentration of the monomer is low the recombination of the growing chains could form partially cross-linked PAAm. A similar explanation was made in the preparation of grafted copolymers PAAm-g-poly(t-BA) [47]. Figure 5 illustrates a possible mechanism of the polymerization of AAm and other reactions that can be performed in reaction R1.

3.3. Effect of the Content of Mixture of AAm and PAAm on the Synthesis of Copper Nanoparticles

The synthesis of copper nanoparticles was also performed using a mixture of AAm, linear polyallylamine (PAAm), and partially cross-linked polyallylamine (PAAmc). The goal was to obtain a synthesis method that enables the use of the least amount of PAAm and leads to copper nanoparticles. Reactions R2 and R3 that used AAm and PAAmc led to a mixture of Cu(0) and CuO nanoparticles; apparently a combination of these nitrogen ligands favors the oxidation of copper. In the case of reactions R4 and R5 where linear PAAm and a PAAm/Cu constant molar ratio of 0.23 were used led to a mixture of nanoparticles (Cu and CuO) and Cu(0), respectively. Reaction R5 that used AAm/Cu molar ratio of 43 suggests that it is possible to obtain copper nanoparticles without evidence of oxidation when the concentration of AAm in the reaction medium is not very high. Figure 6 shows the XRD diffractograms of nanoparticles synthetized under different AAm/PAAm molar ratios (Table 1), experiments R2-R3 and R4-R5.

The XRD diffractograms of the particles obtained show several reflections that correspond to Cu(0) and CuO NPs. A comparison with the standards shown at the bottom of the graph readily identifies each type of NPs and only the diffractogram obtained in NPs R5 exhibits the three properties of metallic copper reflections [48, 49]. XRD analysis indicated that the reaction conditions used in R5 allowed the preparation of Cu-NPs without the presence of impurities such as CuO, Cu2O, and Cu(OH)2.

The average particle size was calculated by using the Debye-Scherrer equation [38, 39], yielding lower values than 25 nm. The nanoparticles obtained with AAm/PAAmc mixture presented coating weight percentages between 25% and 34%, while nanoparticles obtained with AAm/PAAm, identified as R4 and R5, presented 3.8% and 12.2% of coating, respectively (Table 1); the values are higher than those previously reported in reactions where linear PAAm was used [33]. This data suggests that part of AAm monomer can polymerize and form part of the final coating of the nanoparticle.

Through transmission electron microscopy it was able to observe the morphology and particle size distribution of Cu nanoparticles R2R5. The nanoparticles obtained with PAAmc (R2 and R3) presented spherical morphology with particle diameters between 3 and 22 nm; both micrographs showed nanoparticles with spherical and semispherical form with well dispersed zones and others with strong agglomeration. Figure 7 shows the micrographs of the nanoparticles R2.

The analysis by TEM of nanoparticles obtained with PAAm identified as R4 and R5 indicated that the particle growth was very different. Figure 8 shows the micrograph of NPs R4. The image shows agglomerates of nanoparticles with different geometrical shapes, highlighting hemispherical subparticles with sizes of about 5 to 10 nm and similar structures to the shape of rods with lengths of about 50 nm. All these particles appear to be embedded in the polymer matrix of PAAm. The presence of rod-shaped particles is favored when CuO is formed [50]. Other authors reported the formation of these geometries when a high concentration of PAAm is used in the synthesis [32].

The micrograph of Figure 8 also shows the patterns of selected area electron diffraction (SAED). The SAED pattern shown in the upper right part of the image exhibits mainly the diffraction of CuO-NPs with lattice distance of 0.25, 0.186, and 0.1408 nm corresponding to the (002), (−202), and (−311) planes, respectively. These values were taken from the most notorious and strong diffractions of the diffractogram besides showing other diffractions that correspond to metallic Cu with lattice distances of 0.209 and 0.1808 nm. On the other hand, the SAED diffraction pattern that is found at the bottom of the image on the left side displayed completely the diffractions of CuO with lattice distance of 0.23, 0.1776, and 0.157 nm, corresponding to the (111), (112), and (202) planes, respectively. This is a further evidence of the formation of Cu-NPs mixed with CuO-NPs.

Figure 9 exhibits the TEM micrograph of nanoparticles R5 synthesized with the lowest concentration of AAm. The micrograph shows agglomerates of nanosized hemispherical shapes. The agglomerates are completely covered with PAAm and within them there are subparticles with irregular morphologies (mostly hemispherical). High-resolution micrographs (not shown) presented nanoparticles covered with a PAAm shell of about 9 nm. This polymer shell plays the role of protecting metallic copper nanoparticles against chemical oxidation and prevents agglomeration.

TEM studies in this paper indicated that nanoparticles with higher agglomeration were those synthesized using partially cross-linked PAAm and NPs that presented a high percentage of CuO (R3 and R4).

TGA analysis of nanoparticles synthesized under different AAm/PAAm molar ratios (Table 1) of experiments R1R5 allowed us to determine the thermal behavior of the inorganic material and the polymer coating present on the NPs. Figure 10 shows the TGA thermograms of synthesized particles along with neat PAAm ligand for comparison purposes. In addition, Table 2 shows the percent of coating, solvent, and inorganic material.


SampleAAm/PAAmCu (%)Ligand (%)Solvent (%)Maximum degradation temperature (°C)

PAAm0.00.086.014.0~440.0
R10.0093.25.61.2~354.0
R2134.058.733.67.7~421.5
R362.069.224.95.9~414.2
R4374.083.112.24.7~430.6
R5186.094.63.81.6~430.1

The thermogram of neat PAAm shows three weight-loss events; the first event is located in a temperature range of ~30 to 200°C and is attributed to water evaporation. The second loss is between temperatures of ~200 and 494°C, where a marked fall is observed and is awarded to the decomposition of PAAm with a peak decomposition temperature of 440°C; this value is very close to that reported in the literature [51, 52]. The third and final stage of loss of material is between 600°C and 620°C and is assigned to the degradation of pyrolytic carbon from the polymer ligand due to the entrance of an oxygen source. The formation and thermal degradation of this type of coal have been reported in previous work [53].

The thermal stability of the coating is very similar to that presented by neat PAAm; the loss at low temperatures corresponds to volatiles present in the samples. Between 200°C and 600°C most of the mass of the polymer is lost. At temperatures higher than 600°C samples R2 and R3 are completely degraded and only inorganic residues remain due to the administration of O2. In the case of NPs R4 and R5 a gain in weight is presented after 600°C and it was more evident in NPs of R5, which displayed the lowest percentage of coating. The weight gain is due to the oxidation of Cu-NPs to thermodynamically more stable CuO particles. The TGA analysis performed in this research indicated that the use of partially cross-linked PAAm prevents oxidation of nanoparticles even under drastic oxidation conditions. All those nanoparticles synthesized with linear PAAm and presenting low percentages of coating did not show this thermodynamic stability. The experimental evidence suggests that nanoparticles R1R3 are trapped in the polymer matrix and because the coating percentage is high the pyrolytic carbon residues could protect nanoparticles at temperatures above 600°C.

Higher values of coated nanoparticles were those where partially cross-linked PAAm was used and corresponds to samples R2 and R3 with values of 33.6 and 24.9%, respectively.

4. Conclusions

Synthesis of metallic copper particles was achieved using nitrogen ligands AAm and PAAm individually. The average particle diameters determined by XRD were lower than 31 nm. The synthesis of copper nanoparticles in the presence of both ligands favors the formation of Cu-NPs and CuO-NPs nanoparticles. Pure form of Cu-NPs was obtained only when using AAm/Cu molar ratio of 43. The use of PAAm promotes the synthesis of particles with low percentage of coating and with high yields, while the use of partially cross-linked PAAm favors the preparation of nanoparticles with a high percentage of coating and with moderate yields. In general, the use of AAm monomer in the synthesis of copper nanoparticles does not have a significant effect on the particle size; however, it may affect the yield. Despite this disadvantage, the total or partial replacement of PAAm ligand for AAm ligand in the studied synthetic method may be important from an academic and industrial perspective.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from CONACYT Grant 127151/EU 7th FP Grant 26396, CONACYT Grant 132578, and CuVito Project. R. Sierra-Avila wishes to thank CONACYT for the Scholarship no. 23415. Finally, the authors would like to thank A. Espinoza Muñoz, M. Lozano Estrada, M.L Guillen Cisneros, and G. Mendez Padilla for their valuable technical support.

References

  1. M. Sampath, R. Vijayan, E. Tamilarasu, A. Tamilselvan, and B. Sengottuvelan, “Green synthesis of novel jasmine bud-shaped copper nanoparticles,” Journal of Nanotechnology, vol. 2014, Article ID 626523, 7 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J.-G. Yang, S.-H. Yang, T. Okamoto et al., “Synthesis of copper monolayer and particles at aqueous-organic interface,” Surface Science, vol. 600, no. 24, pp. L318–L320, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. K. Judai, S. Numao, J. Nishijo, and N. Nishi, “In situ preparation and catalytic activation of copper nanoparticles from acetylide molecules,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 347, no. 1-2, pp. 28–33, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. T. M. D. Dang, T. T. T. Le, E. Fribourg-Blanc, and M. C. Dang, “Synthesis and optical properties of copper nanoparticles prepared by a chemical reduction method,” Advances in Natural Sciences: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 2, no. 1, Article ID 015009, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. W. Yu, H. Xie, L. Chen, and Y. Li, “Investigation on the thermal transport properties of ethylene glycol-based nanofluids containing copper nanoparticles,” Powder Technology, vol. 197, no. 3, pp. 218–221, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. Ghasemi, E. Ghasemi, and E. Paimozd, “Influence of copper cations on the magnetic properties of NiCuZn ferrite nanoparticles,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 323, no. 11, pp. 1541–1545, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. R. Betancourt-Galindo, P. Y. Reyes-Rodriguez, B. A. Puente-Urbina et al., “Synthesis of copper nanoparticles by thermal decomposition and their antimicrobial properties,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2014, Article ID 980545, 5 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. G. H. Chan, J. Zhao, E. M. Hicks, G. C. Schatz, and R. P. Van Duyne, “Plasmonic properties of copper nanoparticles fabricated by nanosphere lithography,” Nano Letters, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 1947–1952, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Q.-L. Zhang, Z.-M. Yang, B.-J. Ding, X.-Z. Lan, and Y.-J. Guo, “Preparation of copper nanoparticles by chemical reduction method using potassium borohydride,” Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, vol. 20, pp. s240–s244, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. P. J. Shi, H. L. Yu, H. M. Wang, and B. S. Xu, “Tribological behaviour of surface modified copper nanoparticles as lubricating additives,” Physics Procedia, vol. 50, pp. 461–465, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. Garg, B. Poudel, M. Chiesa et al., “Enhanced thermal conductivity and viscosity of copper nanoparticles in ethylene glycol nanofluid,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 103, no. 7, Article ID 074301, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. L. Pacioni, A. Pardoe, K. L. McGilvray, M. N. Chrétien, and J. C. Scaiano, “Synthesis of copper nanoparticles mediated by photogenerated free radicals: catalytic role of chloride anions,” Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 766–774, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. B. K. Park, D. Kim, S. Jeong, J. Moon, and J. S. Kim, “Direct writing of copper conductive patterns by ink-jet printing,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 515, no. 19, pp. 7706–7711, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. O. Musa, T. Akomolafe, and M. J. Carter, “Production of cuprous oxide, a solar cell material, by thermal oxidation and a study of its physical and electrical properties,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 51, no. 3-4, pp. 305–316, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. A. Kumar, H.-W. Cheng, S.-M. Chen, and S.-F. Wang, “Preparation and characterization of copper nanoparticles/zinc oxide composite modified electrode and its application to glucose sensing,” Materials Science and Engineering C, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 86–91, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. Kumari and P. Majewski, “Adsorption of albumin on silica surfaces modified by silver and copper nanoparticles,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2013, Article ID 839016, 7 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Abdulla-Al-Mamun, Y. Kusumoto, and M. Muruganandham, “Simple new synthesis of copper nanoparticles in water/acetonitrile mixed solvent and their characterization,” Materials Letters, vol. 63, no. 23, pp. 2007–2009, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. P. K. Khanna, S. Gaikwad, P. V. Adhyapak, N. Singh, and R. Marimuthu, “Synthesis and characterization of copper nanoparticles,” Materials Letters, vol. 61, no. 25, pp. 4711–4714, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. N. Luo, K. X. Liu, X. J. Li et al., “Synthesis of graphite-coated copper nanoparticles by the detonation of a copper-doped emulsion explosive,” Mendeleev Communications, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 248–249, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. Y. Seo, H. W. Kang, D. S. Jung, H. M. Lee, and S. B. Park, “One-step synthesis of copper nanoparticles embedded in carbon composites,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1484–1489, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Kumar, A. Saxena, A. De, R. Shankar, and S. Mozumdar, “Facile synthesis of size-tunable copper and copper oxide nanoparticles using reverse microemulsions,” RSC Advances, vol. 3, no. 15, pp. 5015–5021, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. K. Bortoleto-Bugs, T. Mazon, M. Tarozzo Biasoli, A. Pavani Filho, J. Willibrordus Swart, and M. Roque Bugs, “Understanding the formation of the self-assembly of colloidal copper nanoparticles by surfactant: a molecular velcro,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2013, Article ID 802174, 8 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. P. Meshram, P. V. Adhyapak, U. P. Mulik, and D. P. Amalnerkar, “Facile synthesis of CuO nanomorphs and their morphology dependent sunlight driven photocatalytic properties,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 204-205, pp. 158–168, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. Anandan, G.-J. Lee, and J. J. Wu, “Sonochemical synthesis of CuO nanostructures with different morphology,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 682–686, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. X. Liu, Z. Li, Q. Zhang, F. Li, and T. Kong, “Preparation of CuO/C core—shell nanowires and its application in lithium ion batteries,” Materials Letters, vol. 80, pp. 37–39, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. G. Yang, T. Li, B. X. Gu et al., “Ferromagnetism in Mn-doped CuO,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 83, no. 18, pp. 3746–3748, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. P. Rai, S. Jeon, C. Lee, J. Lee, and Y. Yu, “Functionalization of ZnO nanorods by CuO nanospikes for gas sensor applications,” RSC Advances, vol. 4, no. 45, pp. 23604–23609, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. D. P. Dubal, G. S. Gund, R. Holze, and C. D. Lokhande, “Mild chemical strategy to grow micro-roses and micro-woolen like arranged CuO nanosheets for high performance supercapacitors,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 242, pp. 687–698, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. R. Manimaran, K. Palaniradja, N. Alagumurthi, S. Sendhilnathan, and J. Hussain, “Preparation and characterization of copper oxide nanofluid for heat transfer applications,” Applied Nanoscience, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 163–167, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. N. Ekthammathat, T. Thongtem, and S. Thongtem, “Antimicrobial activities of CuO films deposited on Cu foils by solution chemistry,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 277, pp. 211–217, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. S. Usman, N. A. Ibrahim, K. Shameli, N. Zainuddin, and W. M. Z. W. Yunus, “Copper nanoparticles mediated by chitosan: synthesis and characterization via chemical methods,” Molecules, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 14928–14936, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. Y. Wang and T. Asefa, “Poly(allylamine)-stabilized colloidal copper nanoparticles: synthesis, morphology, and their surface-enhanced raman scattering properties,” Langmuir, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 7469–7474, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. R. Sierra-Ávila, M. Pérez-Alvarez, G. Cadenas-Pliego et al., “Synthesis of copper nanoparticles coated with nitrogen ligands,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2014, Article ID 361791, 8 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Suleiman, M. Mousa, A. Hussein, B. Hammouti, T. B. Hadda, and I. Warad, “Copper(II)-oxide nanostructures: synthesis, characterizations and their applications-review,” Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 792–797, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  35. P. Abdulkin, Y. Moglie, B. R. Knappett et al., “New routes to Cu(I)/Cu nanocatalysts for the multicomponent click synthesis of 1,2,3-triazoles,” Nanoscale, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 342–350, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J.-F. Zhu and Y.-J. Zhu, “Microwave-assisted one-step synthesis of polyacrylamide-metal (M = Ag, Pt, Cu) nanocomposites in ethylene glycol,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 17, pp. 8593–8597, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. G. I. Dzhardimalieva, A. D. Pomogailo, N. D. Golubeva et al., “Metal-containing nanoparticles with core-polymer shell structure,” Colloid Journal, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 458–466, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. I. Langford and A. J. Wilson, “Scherrer after sixty years: a survey and some new results in the determination of crystallite size,” Journal of Applied Crystallography, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 102–113, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. Monshi, M. R. Foroughi, and M. R. Monshi, “Modified Scherrer equation to estimate more accurately nano-crystallite size using XRD,” World Journal of Nano Science and Engineering, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 154–160, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. T. M. D. Dang, T. T. T. Le, E. Fribourg-Blanc, and M. C. Dang, “The influence of solvents and surfactants on the preparation of copper nanoparticles by a chemical eduction method,” Advances in Natural Sciences: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 2, no. 2, Article ID 025004, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. U. Kreibig and M. Vollmer, Optical Properties of Metal Clusters, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1995.
  42. P. Mulvaney, “Surface plasmon spectroscopy of nanosized metal particles,” Langmuir, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 788–800, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. G. Mie, “Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metallösungen,” Annals of Physics, vol. 25, pp. 377–445, 1908. View at: Google Scholar
  44. L. Denis, D. Cossement, T. Godfroid et al., “Synthesis of allylamine plasma polymer films: correlation between plasma diagnostic and film characteristics,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 199–208, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. H. Budzikiewicz, C. Djerassi, and H. Dudley, Interpretation of Mass Spectra of Organic Compounds, Holden Day, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1964.
  46. J. Bond and P. Lee, “The cupric sulfate-hydrazine systems as an initiator of vinyl polymerization. The polymerization of methyl methacrylate in aqueous solution in the presence of oxygen,” Journal of Polymer Science, vol. 7, pp. 379–385, 1969. View at: Google Scholar
  47. D. Sarkar, J. M. El Khoury, S. T. Lopina, and J. Hu, “Grafting poly(t-butyl acrylate) to poly(allylamine) by inverse microemulsion radical polymerization: from comb-polymer to amphiphilic shell crosslinked polymer nanocapsule,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 1905–1911, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. O. Mondal, A. Datta, D. Chakravorty, and M. Pal, “Ultrafine narrow dispersed copper nanoparticles synthesized by a facile chemical reduction method,” MRS Communications, vol. 3, no. 02, pp. 91–95, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. V. Saikova, S. A. Vorob’ev, R. B. Nikolaeva, and Y. L. Mikhlin, “Conditions for the formation of copper nanoparticles by reduction of copper(II) ions with hydrazine hydrate solutions,” Russian Journal of General Chemistry, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 1122–1127, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. D. P. Singh, A. K. Ojha, and O. N. Srivastava, “Synthesis of different Cu(OH)2 and CuO (nanowires, rectangles, seed-, belt-, and sheetlike) nanostructures by simple wet chemical route,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 113, no. 9, pp. 3409–3418, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. J. M. El Khoury, D. Caruntu, C. J. O'Connor, K.-U. Jeong, S. Z. D. Cheng, and J. Hu, “Poly(allylamine) stabilized iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 959–964, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. S. J. Kim, S. J. Park, M.-S. Shin, Y. H. Lee, N. G. Kim, and S. I. Kim, “Thermal characteristics of IPNs composed of polyallylamine and chitosan,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 85, no. 9, pp. 1956–1960, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. J. Rodriguez-Mirasol, T. Cordero, L. R. Radovic, and J. J. Rodriguez, “Structural and textural properties of pyrolytic carbon formed within a microporous zeolite template,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 550–558, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Rubén Sierra-Ávila et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

4234 Views | 1803 Downloads | 14 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder