Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2015, Article ID 536801, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/536801
Research Article

Enhanced Hydrophilicity and Protein Adsorption of Titanium Surface by Sodium Bicarbonate Solution

1Department of Implant Dentistry, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing 100081, China
2Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received 27 August 2015; Accepted 21 October 2015

Academic Editor: Daniel S. Oh

Copyright © 2015 Shengnan Jia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. J. Gil, N. Manzanares, A. Badet, C. Aparicio, and M.-P. Ginebra, “Biomimetic treatment on dental implants for short-term bone regeneration,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Y. Förster, C. Rentsch, W. Schneiders et al., “Surface modification of implants in long bone,” Biomatter, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 149–157, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. Rupp, R. A. Gittens, L. Scheideler et al., “A review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces I: theoretical and experimental aspects,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 2894–2906, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. Anselme, M. Bigerelle, B. Nol, A. Iost, and P. Hardouin, “Effect of grooved titanium substratum on human osteoblastic cell growth,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 529–540, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Canabarro, C. G. Paiva, H. T. Ferreira et al., “Short-term response of human osteoblast-like cells on titanium surfaces with micro- and nano-sized features,” Scanning, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 378–386, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. H. Park, C. E. Wasilewski, N. Almodovar et al., “The responses to surface wettability gradients induced by chitosan nanofilms on microtextured titanium mediated by specific integrin receptors,” Biomaterials, vol. 33, no. 30, pp. 7386–7393, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. A. Gittens, R. Olivares-Navarrete, A. Cheng et al., “The roles of titanium surface micro/nanotopography and wettability on the differential response of human osteoblast lineage cells,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 6268–6277, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Buser, N. Broggini, M. Wieland et al., “Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 83, no. 7, pp. 529–533, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Eriksson, H. Nygren, and K. Ohlson, “Implantation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic titanium discs in rat tibia: cellular reactions on the surfaces during the first 3 weeks in bone,” Biomaterials, vol. 25, no. 19, pp. 4759–4766, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. M. Bornstein, P. Valderrama, A. A. Jones, T. G. Wilson, R. Seibl, and D. L. Cochran, “Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 233–241, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. F. Rupp, L. Scheideler, N. Olshanska, M. de Wild, M. Wieland, and J. Geis-Gerstorfer, “Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 323–334, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. H. Aita, N. Hori, M. Takeuchi et al., “The effect of ultraviolet functionalization of titanium on integration with bone,” Biomaterials, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1015–1025, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. Feng, J. Weng, B. C. Yang, S. X. Qu, and X. D. Zhang, “Characterization of surface oxide films on titanium and adhesion of osteoblast,” Biomaterials, vol. 24, no. 25, pp. 4663–4670, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. Duske, I. Koban, E. Kindel et al., “Atmospheric plasma enhances wettability and cell spreading on dental implant metals,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 400–407, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. V. Milleret, S. Tugulu, F. Schlottig, and H. Hall, “Alkali treatment of microrough titanium surfaces affects macrophage/monocyte adhesion, platelet activation and architecture of blood clot formation,” European Cells and Materials, vol. 21, pp. 430–444, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Tugulu, K. Löwe, D. Scharnweber, and F. Schlottig, “Preparation of superhydrophilic microrough titanium implant surfaces by alkali treatment,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 2751–2763, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Hamlet, M. Alfarsi, R. George, and S. Ivanovski, “The effect of hydrophilic titanium surface modification on macrophage inflammatory cytokine gene expression,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 584–590, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Al Mustafa, H. Agis, H. D. Muller, G. Watzek, and R. Gruber, “In vitro adhesion of fibroblastic cells to titanium alloy discs treated with sodium hydroxide,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 15–19, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. J. L. Calvo-Guirado, A. J. Ortiz-Ruiz, B. Negri, L. López-Marí, C. Rodriguez-Barba, and F. Schlottig, “Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of immediate implant placement on a dog model with a new implant surface treatment,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 308–315, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. B. Stadlinger, S. J. Ferguson, U. Eckelt et al., “Biomechanical evaluation of a titanium implant surface conditioned by a hydroxide ion solution,” British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 74–79, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Pratten, J. Wiecek, N. Mordan et al., “Physical disruption of oral biofilms by sodium bicarbonate: an in vitro study,” International Journal of Dental Hygiene, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. T. Ma, X. Ge, S. Jia, X. Jiang, Y. Zhang, and Y. Lin, “The influence of titanium surfaces treated by alkalis on macrophage and osteoblast-like cell adhesion and gene expression in vitro,” RSC Advances, vol. 5, no. 99, pp. 81378–81387, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. E. McCafferty and J. P. Wightman, “Determination of the concentration of surface hydroxyl groups on metal oxide films by a quantitative XPS method,” Surface and Interface Analysis, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 549–564, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. F. Schwarz, M. Wieland, Z. Schwartz et al., “Potential of chemically modified hydrophilic surface characteristics to support tissue integration of titanium dental implants,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 544–557, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Z. Qu, X. Rausch-Fan, M. Wieland, M. Matejka, and A. Schedle, “The initial attachment and subsequent behavior regulation of osteoblasts by dental implant surface modification,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 658–668, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. G. Zhao, Z. Schwartz, M. Wieland et al., “High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 49–58, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Vlacic-Zischke, S. M. Hamlet, T. Friis, M. S. Tonetti, and S. Ivanovski, “The influence of surface microroughness and hydrophilicity of titanium on the up-regulation of TGFβ/BMP signalling in osteoblasts,” Biomaterials, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 665–671, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. Wennerberg and T. Albrektsson, “Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 20, supplement 4, pp. 172–184, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. F. Rupp, L. Scheideler, D. Rehbein, D. Axmann, and J. Geis-Gerstorfer, “Roughness induced dynamic changes of wettability of acid etched titanium implant modifications,” Biomaterials, vol. 25, no. 7-8, pp. 1429–1438, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. Lai, B. Sunderland, J. Xue et al., “Study on hydrophilicity of polymer surfaces improved by plasma treatment,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 252, no. 10, pp. 3375–3379, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Cei, D. Karapetsa, E. Aleo, and F. Graziani, “Protein adsorption on a laser-modified titanium implant surface,” Implant Dentistry, vol. 24, pp. 134–141, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. M. Gorbahn, M. O. Klein, M. Lehnert et al., “Promotion of osteogenic cell response using quasicovalent immobilized fibronectin on titanium surfaces: introduction of a novel biomimetic layer system,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 1827–1834, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. M. Moursi, C. H. Damsky, J. Lull et al., “Fibronectin regulates calvarial osteoblast differentiation,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 109, part 6, pp. 1369–1380, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  34. K. Anselme, “Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials,” Biomaterials, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 667–681, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. Protivínský, M. Appleford, J. Strnad, A. Helebrant, and J. L. Ong, “Effect of chemically modified titanium surfaces on protein adsorption and osteoblast precursor cell behavior,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 542–550, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. N. Hori, T. Ueno, H. Minamikawa et al., “Electrostatic control of protein adsorption on UV-photofunctionalized titanium,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 4175–4180, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. L. Scheideler, F. Rupp, M. Wieland, and J. Geis-Gerstorfer, “Storage conditions of titanium implants influence molecular and cellular interactions,” Scientific Poster, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  38. D. E. MacDonald, B. Markovic, M. Allen, P. Somasundaran, and A. L. Boskey, “Surface analysis of human plasma fibronectin adsorbed to commercially pure titanium materials,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 120–130, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. W. Song and J. F. Mano, “Interactions between cells or proteins and surfaces exhibiting extreme wettabilities,” Soft Matter, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 2985–2999, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. P. Roach, N. J. Shirtcliffe, D. Farrar, and C. C. Perry, “Quantification of surface-bound proteins by fluorometric assay: comparison with quartz crystal microbalance and amido black assay,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 41, pp. 20572–20579, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. Zimmermann, M. Rabe, D. Verdes, and S. Seeger, “Functionalized silicone nanofilaments: a novel material for selective protein enrichment,” Langmuir, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1053–1057, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. Mata, X. Su, A. J. Fleischman et al., “Osteoblast attachment to a textured surface in the absence of exogenous adhesion proteins,” IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 287–294, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. V. Grigoriou, I. M. Shapiro, E. A. Cavalcanti-Adam, R. J. Composto, P. Ducheyne, and C. S. Adams, “Apoptosis and survival of osteoblast-like cells are regulated by surface attachment,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 3, pp. 1733–1739, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. D. M. Rivera-Chacon, M. Alvarado-Velez, C. Y. Acevedo-Morantes et al., “Fibronectin and vitronectin promote human fetal osteoblast cell attachment and proliferation on nanoporous titanium surfaces,” Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1092–1097, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. Strnad, K. Urban, C. Povysil, and Z. Strnad, “Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 502–512, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. U. Held, D. Rohner, and D. Rothamel, “Early loading of hydrophilic titanium implants inserted in low-mineralized (D3 and D4) bone: one year results of a prospective clinical trial,” Head and Face Medicine, vol. 9, article 37, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. L.-E. Monfoulet, P. Becquart, D. Marchat et al., “The pH in the microenvironment of human mesenchymal stem cells is a critical factor for optimal osteogenesis in tissue-engineered constructs,” Tissue Engineering Part A, vol. 20, no. 13-14, pp. 1827–1840, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus