Review Article
A Review on the Fabrication of Electrospun Polymer Electrolyte Membrane for Direct Methanol Fuel Cell
Table 1
Overview on electrolyte composite membrane for fuel cell application.
| Matrix Polymer | Fillers | Proton conductivity | Methanol permeability | Filler’s distribution | Type of fuel cell | Ref. |
| SPEEK | Cloisite 15A/TAP | Lower than Nafion 112 | Significantly reduced | Partially exfoliated | DMFC | [11] |
| SPEEK | MMT/silicotungstic acid | Slight enhancement of proton conductivity | Suppressed | — | DMFC | [22] |
| PVOH | Cloisite Na+/phosphotungstic acid | Slight decrease of ionic conductivity | ~88% reduced with respect to neat polymer | Exfoliated | DMFC | [24] |
| SPEEK | Silica sulfuric acid (SSA) | 18.6% higher than pristine SPEEK 8.6% higher than Nafion 117 | — | — | PEMFC | [80] |
| SPEEK | Heteropolyacids (HPA) | Higher than Nafion | — | — | PEMFC | [81] |
| Nafion | Organoclay, montmorillonite (Cloisite1 10A) | Remains similar to Nafion 117 | Slightly decreases compared to the Nafion 117 | Exfoliated | DMFC | [82] |
| Nafion | Montmorillonite (MMT) | Comparable with unmodified Nafion | Significantly decreases compared to unmodified Nafion | Exfoliated | DMFC | [83] |
| Nafion | Laponite | Higher than commercial Nafion membrane | — | — | PEMFC | [84] |
|
|