Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2015, Article ID 736943, 26 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/736943
Research Article

Meshing Highly Regular Structures: The Case of Super Carbon Nanotubes of Arbitrary Order

Emmy Noether Research Group MISMO (Mechanical Instabilities in Self-Similar Molecular Structures of Higher Order), Institute of Structural Analysis, University of Kassel, Mönchebergstraße 7, 34125 Kassel, Germany

Received 16 January 2015; Accepted 12 July 2015

Academic Editor: Xiao-Yu Yang

Copyright © 2015 Christian Schröppel and Jens Wackerfuß. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. J. Frey and P. L. George, Mesh Generation: Application to Finite Elements, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2nd edition, 2008.
  2. S. Iijima, “Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon,” Nature, vol. 354, no. 6348, pp. 56–58, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. de Borst and E. Ramm, Multiscale Methods in Computational Mechanics, Springer, 2011.
  4. W. Hackbusch, Multi-Grid Methods and Applications, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2nd edition, 2003.
  5. T. I. Zohdi and P. Wriggers, An Introduction to Computational Micromechanics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2nd edition, 2008.
  6. V. Gravemeier, S. Lenz, and W. A. Wall, “Towards a taxonomy for multiscale methods in computational mechanics: building blocks of existing methods,” Computational Mechanics, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 279–291, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. W. Ruge and K. Stüben, “Algebraic multigrid,” in Multigrid Methods, S. F. McCormick, Ed., pp. 73–130, SIAM, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  8. A. J. Cleary, R. D. Falgout, H. van Emden, and J. E. Jones, “Coarse-grid selection for parallel Algebraic Multigrid,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Solving Irregularly Structured Problems in Parallel, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Ed., vol. 1457 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 104–115, Springer, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  9. H. de Sterck and U. M. Yang, “Coarsening and interpolation in algebraic multigrid: a balancing act,” in Proceedings of the 12th Copper Mountain Conference on Multigrid Methods, April 2005.
  10. R. E. Bank and C. Wagner, “Multilevel ILU decomposition,” Numerische Mathematik, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 543–576, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. J. Cleary, R. D. Falgout, V. E. Henson et al., “Robustness and scalability of algebraic multigrid,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1886–1908, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  12. V. E. Henson and U. M. Yang, “BoomerAMG: a parallel algebraic multigrid solver and preconditioner,” Applied Numerical Mathematics, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 155–177, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. S. Butler, Improving coarsening and interpolation for algebraic multigrid [M.S. thesis], University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada, 2006.
  14. C. G. Bayreuther, Mehrskalenmodelle in der Festkörpermechanik und Kopplung von Mehrgittermethoden mit Homogenisierungsverfahren [Ph.D. thesis], University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, 2005.
  15. T. J. R. Hughes, G. R. Feijóo, L. Mazzei, and J.-B. Quincy, “The variational multiscale method—a paradigm for computational mechanics,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 166, no. 1-2, pp. 3–24, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. E. Weinan, B. Engquist, X. Li, W. Ren, and E. Vanden-Eijnden, “The heterogeneous multiscale method: a review,” Communications in Computational Physics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 367–450, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  17. C. Miehe and C. G. Bayreuther, “Multilevel FEM for heterogeneous structures: from homogenization to multigrid solvers,” in Multifield Problems in Solid and Fluid Mechanics, R. Helmig, A. Mielke, and B. I. Wohlmuth, Eds., vol. 28 of Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics, pp. 361–397, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  18. A. Brandt, “Algebraic multigrid theory: the symmetric case,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 19, no. 1–4, pp. 23–56, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Stüben, “Algebraic multigrid (AMG): experiences and comparisons,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 13, no. 3-4, pp. 419–451, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. D. Kangwai, S. D. Guest, and S. Pellegrino, “An introduction to the analysis of symmetric structures,” Computers and Structures, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 671–688, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Kaveh and M. Nikbakht, “Block diagonalization of Laplacian matrices of symmetric graphs via group theory,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 908–947, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. Koohestani, “Exploitation of symmetry in graphs with applications to finite and boundary elements analysis,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 152–176, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  23. A. Kaveh and H. Rahami, “An efficient analysis of repetitive structures generated by graph products,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 108–126, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  24. A. Zingoni, “Group-theoretic exploitations of symmetry in computational solid and structural mechanics,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 253–289, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. Suresh and A. Sirpotdar, “Automated symmetry exploitation in engineering analysis,” Engineering with Computers, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 304–311, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. C. Wohlever, “Some computational aspects of a group theoretic finite element approach to the buckling and postbuckling analyses of plates and shells-of-revolution,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 170, no. 3-4, pp. 373–406, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Kaveh and K. Koohestani, “Graph products for configuration processing of space structures,” Computers and Structures, vol. 86, no. 11-12, pp. 1219–1231, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. V. R. Coluci, D. S. Galvao, and A. Jorio, “Geometric and electronic structure of carbon nanotube networks: ‘super’-carbon nanotubes,” Nanotechnology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 617–621, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. Y. Li, X. Qiu, F. Yang, X.-S. Wang, Y. Yin, and Q. Fan, “A comprehensive study on the mechanical properties of super carbon nanotubes,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 41, no. 15, Article ID 155423, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. B. Liu, Y. Huang, H. Jiang, S. Qu, and K.-C. Hwang, “The atomic-scale finite element method,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 193, no. 17–20, pp. 1849–1864, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. J. Wackerfuß, “Molecular mechanics in the context of the finite element method,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 969–997, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Wang, X. Qiu, X. Zhang, and Y. Yin, “Equivalent parameter study of the mechanical properties of super carbon nanotubes,” Nanotechnology, vol. 18, no. 29, Article ID 295708, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. V. Diudea, B. Parv, and E. C. Kirby, “Azulenic tori,” MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry, no. 47, pp. 53–70, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  34. S. M. Ferrer, N. V. Khokhriakov, and S. S. Savinskii, “Geometry of multi-tube carbon clusters and electronic transmission in nanotube contacts,” Molecular Engineering, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 315–344, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. I. László, “Topological description and construction of single wall carbon nanotube junctions,” Croatica Chemica Acta, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 217–221, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. Diestel, Graph Theory, vol. 173 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  37. R. Diestel, Graphentheorie, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 4th edition, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  38. C. Godsil and G. Royle, Algebraic Graph Theory, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  39. U. Knauer, Algebraic Graph Theory: Morphisms, Monoids, and Matrices, De Gruyter, Berlin, Germany, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. J. A. Bondy and U. S. R. Murty, Graph Theory, Springer, London, UK, 2008.
  41. G. Hahn and C. Tardif, “Graph homomorphisms: structure and symmetry,” in Graph Symmetry, G. Hahn and G. Sabidussi, Eds., pp. 107–166, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  42. R. Hammack, W. Imrich, and S. Klavžar, Handbook of Product Graphs, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2nd edition, 2011. View at MathSciNet
  43. D. J. Miller, “The categorical product of graphs,” Canadian Journal of Mathematics, vol. 20, pp. 1511–1521, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. J. A. Bondy and U. S. R. Murty, Graph Theory with Applications, Macmillan, London, UK, 1976.